Site Search:
 
Get TEFL Certified & Start Your Adventure Today!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Good News - Moonlighting Is Legal In China After All...
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> China (Job-related Posts Only)
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Wo Dong



Joined: 02 Sep 2014
Posts: 54

PostPosted: Tue Sep 16, 2014 11:33 pm    Post subject: Good News - Moonlighting Is Legal In China After All... Reply with quote

I confirmed with my father-in-law that unless you are employed with an SOE or government agency/entity (like an embassy, Peace Corps, UN, etc) there is no law in China that prevents you from having second or even third jobs tutoring, translating, etc. (For those of you who did not see my other thread, my FIL is a former law professor at Renmin University - the Harvard Law School of Asia).

He further says that educational companies and schools cannot withhold release letters nor charge you money for them, nor can they prohibit you from private tutoring - if the students you tutor are not their CURRENT clients. I think this second part is noteworthy because my colleague was refused a release letter because the employer was pissed that he did nit renew his contract and instead began tutoring in the same neighborhood about 1,000 meters away.

Many of you may laugh about getting laws enforced in China but after you learn about the story of teacher Cole who sued two schools and actually won a $30,000 settlement from a large chain, you will stop laughing. Apparently it is not actually the law the school administrators fear (if they have guan xi) but rather the risk of publicity as Cole was paid the settlement the day after a CCTV reporter tried to get an appointment with the school's FAO. The school he sued was operating for 3 years claiming to be an affiliate of BFSU and they were not. The school even used the BFSU logo on all of there brochures and turned out only to have a license to be an "educational consultant" and not a "school", nor "learning center".

What surprised me the most was that Cole was actually hired by another school and his visa was renewed. So there is more respect for the law today than four years when I arrived.


Last edited by Wo Dong on Wed Sep 17, 2014 2:39 am; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
newmansone



Joined: 07 Sep 2014
Posts: 70

PostPosted: Wed Sep 17, 2014 12:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Talk about spam bait.

Read the SAFEA contract - a legally binding contract according to the Labor Ministry. In addition, read the Immigration Visa law for the Z visa.

It's all there in black and white regarding this subject of "second jobs."

WOW
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Wo Dong



Joined: 02 Sep 2014
Posts: 54

PostPosted: Wed Sep 17, 2014 12:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Go to Renmin Law Library and read the 2012 and 2013 labor law amendments and you will see that new laws give foreigners "equal protection and enforcement of the law" as Chinese employees, and no Chinese employee can be prevented from moonlighting "with other employers not considered to be a competitor" BTW... I think the SAFEA contract template you are speaking about is a 2002 document.

Take a translator with you to Renmin or offer student 100 yuan to find the law for you. It will take less than 30 minutes.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bud Powell



Joined: 11 Jul 2013
Posts: 1736

PostPosted: Wed Sep 17, 2014 1:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sticky: "...This forum is not any one member's personal playground..."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Wo Dong



Joined: 02 Sep 2014
Posts: 54

PostPosted: Wed Sep 17, 2014 2:43 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bud Powell wrote:
Sticky: "...This forum is not any one member's personal playground..."


Once again I agree with you Bud, but by the same token, just because you have been posting here for years does not negate the rights of newbies to disagree with you. I agree with 80% of your posts, but when I disagree, I do not expect to be greeted with insults and hostility. You have to admit that you have given incorrect advice and information in the past (about foreigners having to have Chinese partners to open a business, or having to have a TEFL certificate to teach in China - remember?)

In reading some of your old 2012 and 2013 posts, you yourself chastised people for "attacking the messenger" instead of the message - remember? Please extend that courtesy to me as well Bud. Freedom of speech is something I am not willing to forfeit only because you don't like a certain topic that may adversely affect your personal income.

And although I realize you may have discussed some topics dozens of times, I have not and since the sticky thread on contracts in China have been LOCKED for 8 Years, I am trying to bring others up to speed on new changes in the laws that help them, since I am getting the info directly from a veteran labor lawyer in China who was a law professor for five years at Renmin University - the premier law school of Asia.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
newmansone



Joined: 07 Sep 2014
Posts: 70

PostPosted: Wed Sep 17, 2014 3:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Wo Dong wrote:
Bud Powell wrote:
Sticky: "...This forum is not any one member's personal playground..."


Once again I agree with you Bud, but by the same token, just because you have been posting here for years does not negate the rights of newbies to disagree with you. I agree with 80% of your posts, but when I disagree, I do not expect to be greeted with insults and hostility. You have to admit that you have given incorrect advice and information in the past (about foreigners having to have Chinese partners to open a business, or having to have a TEFL certificate to teach in China - remember?)

In reading some of your old 2012 and 2013 posts, you yourself chastised people for "attacking the messenger" instead of the message - remember? Please extend that courtesy to me as well Bud. Freedom of speech is something I am not willing to forfeit only because you don't like a certain topic that may adversely affect your personal income.

And although I realize you may have discussed some topics dozens of times, I have not and since the sticky thread on contracts in China have been LOCKED for 8 Years, I am trying to bring others up to speed on new changes in the laws that help them, since I am getting the info directly from a veteran labor lawyer in China who was a law professor for five years at Renmin University - the premier law school of Asia.


NONE of this has any standing with me. The contract is as of 2014 AND remains valid today. Read it. If you sign it, you agree to it. You are welcome to sign away your rights anyway.

That being said, Chinese visa regulations prohibit anyone from working for another employer in a job, paid or unpaid. Read that law as well. Visa violations are no different than contract violations except that one will get you more easily deported.

And get a grip on your holier-than-thou "freedom of speech" ... hardly all countries or cultures provide such a right, nor does the forum here.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Voyeur



Joined: 03 Jul 2012
Posts: 431

PostPosted: Wed Sep 17, 2014 4:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I always thought that the real problem was the immigration rules, not your contract.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mike w



Joined: 26 May 2004
Posts: 1071
Location: Beijing building site

PostPosted: Wed Sep 17, 2014 4:43 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

WD - you are rapidly becoming very boring. Law about this, and law about that.

Wake up man - it doesn't matter 2 hoots what the law says.

What does matter is the person/officials you are having problems with, and how they interpret and enforce the said law.

That's the way it has always been, and it isn't going to change. You can go to your local PSB and ask them something, and then go to another PSB two blocks away and get a totally different answer to the same question. There is no point in arguing with them, or quoting law - effectually, in that situation they are the law. What the person you are dealing with says at that time is the law.

Time you joined the real world and stopped fantasising about something that just usn't going to happen.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Wo Dong



Joined: 02 Sep 2014
Posts: 54

PostPosted: Wed Sep 17, 2014 5:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

newmansone wrote:
Wo Dong wrote:
Bud Powell wrote:
Sticky: "...This forum is not any one member's personal playground..."


Once again I agree with you Bud, but by the same token, just because you have been posting here for years does not negate the rights of newbies to disagree with you. I agree with 80% of your posts, but when I disagree, I do not expect to be greeted with insults and hostility. You have to admit that you have given incorrect advice and information in the past (about foreigners having to have Chinese partners to open a business, or having to have a TEFL certificate to teach in China - remember?)

In reading some of your old 2012 and 2013 posts, you yourself chastised people for "attacking the messenger" instead of the message - remember? Please extend that courtesy to me as well Bud. Freedom of speech is something I am not willing to forfeit only because you don't like a certain topic that may adversely affect your personal income.

And although I realize you may have discussed some topics dozens of times, I have not and since the sticky thread on contracts in China have been LOCKED for 8 Years, I am trying to bring others up to speed on new changes in the laws that help them, since I am getting the info directly from a veteran labor lawyer in China who was a law professor for five years at Renmin University - the premier law school of Asia.


NONE of this has any standing with me. The contract is as of 2014 AND remains valid today. Read it. If you sign it, you agree to it. You are welcome to sign away your rights anyway.

That being said, Chinese visa regulations prohibit anyone from working for another employer in a job, paid or unpaid. Read that law as well. Visa violations are no different than contract violations except that one will get you more easily deported.

And get a grip on your holier-than-thou "freedom of speech" ... hardly all countries or cultures provide such a right, nor does the forum here.


Opinions are like noses - we all have one. My opinion and that of my Labor Lawyer FIL is that a 2012 and 2013 Central government law in China supersedes any municipal, provincial, and central law from 2002. I am not holier than anyone. I just did my homework on this subject and am confident in what I learned and what my FIL confirmed. I don't think many recruiters have a JD in labor law nor were law professors at Renmin U. so I will keep trusting my FIL for accurate and truthful information about Chinese labor laws.

Also I think you guys missed the case of the Cole ruling in Haidian District Court - evidence that we can also now benefit from the law. The corruption is slowly but surely getting weeded out at the basement levels of government and the courts.

"Many of you may laugh about getting laws enforced in China but after you learn about the story of teacher Cole who sued two schools and actually won a $30,000 settlement from a large chain, you will stop laughing. Apparently it is not actually the law the school administrators fear (if they have guan xi) but rather the risk of publicity as Cole was paid the settlement the day after a CCTV reporter tried to get an appointment with the school's FAO. The school he sued was operating for 3 years claiming to be an affiliate of BFSU and they were not. The school even used the BFSU logo on all of there brochures and turned out only to have a license to be an "educational consultant" and not a "school", nor "learning center".

One thing is certain... If we don't assert our rights in China as employees, nobody is going to give them to you, and the only thing you will get is fuc*ed over. Not many school principals or owners want to lose face & $30,000 and legal and court costs because of a foreigner. At least because of Cole we now know we have a fighting chance to win in the courts on labor issues.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
newmansone



Joined: 07 Sep 2014
Posts: 70

PostPosted: Wed Sep 17, 2014 10:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Wo Dong wrote:
newmansone wrote:
Wo Dong wrote:
Bud Powell wrote:
Sticky: "...This forum is not any one member's personal playground..."


Once again I agree with you Bud, but by the same token, just because you have been posting here for years does not negate the rights of newbies to disagree with you. I agree with 80% of your posts, but when I disagree, I do not expect to be greeted with insults and hostility. You have to admit that you have given incorrect advice and information in the past (about foreigners having to have Chinese partners to open a business, or having to have a TEFL certificate to teach in China - remember?)

In reading some of your old 2012 and 2013 posts, you yourself chastised people for "attacking the messenger" instead of the message - remember? Please extend that courtesy to me as well Bud. Freedom of speech is something I am not willing to forfeit only because you don't like a certain topic that may adversely affect your personal income.

And although I realize you may have discussed some topics dozens of times, I have not and since the sticky thread on contracts in China have been LOCKED for 8 Years, I am trying to bring others up to speed on new changes in the laws that help them, since I am getting the info directly from a veteran labor lawyer in China who was a law professor for five years at Renmin University - the premier law school of Asia.


NONE of this has any standing with me. The contract is as of 2014 AND remains valid today. Read it. If you sign it, you agree to it. You are welcome to sign away your rights anyway.

That being said, Chinese visa regulations prohibit anyone from working for another employer in a job, paid or unpaid. Read that law as well. Visa violations are no different than contract violations except that one will get you more easily deported.

And get a grip on your holier-than-thou "freedom of speech" ... hardly all countries or cultures provide such a right, nor does the forum here.


Opinions are like noses - we all have one. My opinion and that of my Labor Lawyer FIL is that a 2012 and 2013 Central government law in China supersedes any municipal, provincial, and central law from 2002. I am not holier than anyone. I just did my homework on this subject and am confident in what I learned and what my FIL confirmed. I don't think many recruiters have a JD in labor law nor were law professors at Renmin U. so I will keep trusting my FIL for accurate and truthful information about Chinese labor laws.

Also I think you guys missed the case of the Cole ruling in Haidian District Court - evidence that we can also now benefit from the law. The corruption is slowly but surely getting weeded out at the basement levels of government and the courts.

"Many of you may laugh about getting laws enforced in China but after you learn about the story of teacher Cole who sued two schools and actually won a $30,000 settlement from a large chain, you will stop laughing. Apparently it is not actually the law the school administrators fear (if they have guan xi) but rather the risk of publicity as Cole was paid the settlement the day after a CCTV reporter tried to get an appointment with the school's FAO. The school he sued was operating for 3 years claiming to be an affiliate of BFSU and they were not. The school even used the BFSU logo on all of there brochures and turned out only to have a license to be an "educational consultant" and not a "school", nor "learning center".

One thing is certain... If we don't assert our rights in China as employees, nobody is going to give them to you, and the only thing you will get is fuc*ed over. Not many school principals or owners want to lose face & $30,000 and legal and court costs because of a foreigner. At least because of Cole we now know we have a fighting chance to win in the courts on labor issues.


So much of that makes no sense and assumptions on identity.

This whole thing is nearly, if not more, as funny and ridiculous as the so-called China Foreign Teachers Union or whatever its name is.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
newmansone



Joined: 07 Sep 2014
Posts: 70

PostPosted: Wed Sep 17, 2014 10:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Wo Dong wrote:
Opinions are like noses - we all have one.


Please speak with knowledge:

Congenital absence of the nasal and related tissues is a rare but well documented disorder. There is even an ICD-9-CM code for it.

And hardly everyone has an opinion - opinions. Trust me.

Let's not speak out of frustration of realizing you are wrong, using what otherwise sounds like some cool metaphor...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
vikeologist



Joined: 07 Sep 2009
Posts: 600

PostPosted: Wed Sep 17, 2014 12:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

OP- You're talking nonsense, and dangerous nonsense at that.
If it really is coming from your father in law, stop listening to the ignorant buffoon.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
water rat



Joined: 30 Aug 2014
Posts: 1098
Location: North Antarctica

PostPosted: Wed Sep 17, 2014 2:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thank you for you time and effort Wo Dong. You stick to your guns. Of course you're FIL would know more about this topic than some random ESL teacher on Dave's Forum.

Some people will do anything rather than admit they are wrong. That one fellow is so ridiculous he actually attacks your nose expression. Talk about grasping at straws. Then he confuses the words 'opinion' and 'opinions' entirely missing that there is no real difference unless one is nitpicking.

But while we are nose-picking, erm, I meant nitpicking, saying that opinions are like noses is a simile, not a metaphor.

To be fair though, emoticons lack noses Sad however they're very opinionated, ... and there is actually an episode of SpongeBob in which Patrick the starfish covets a nose.

Small point: you refer to some of Mr Powell's 2012 posts, but he did not become a member until July 2013, as you can read beneath his name. Wink
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
wangdaning



Joined: 22 Jan 2008
Posts: 3154

PostPosted: Thu Sep 18, 2014 12:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Chinese and foreigners under the same labor code implies one thing. Chinese are free to work wherever, but foreigners must come to the country under contract with one place. To say that we can go down to the local KFC to find a job might sound okay under the code, but actually you would be in breach of immigration policies. We are expats, not Chinese. How many Chinese must apply for an FEC or register with the police? Rhetorical I know, but you are conflating things. The labor department makes rules on labor, might be nice if you have a disagreement, but they do not make rules on immigration or foreign workers position.

PS I would not hire him as representation
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Wo Dong



Joined: 02 Sep 2014
Posts: 54

PostPosted: Thu Sep 18, 2014 1:17 am    Post subject: Ignorance is convenient but not helpful when posting here Reply with quote

Ignornace may be convenient to make an argument here but it fools nobody but yourself. Until you make a trip to a law library (Renmin University has the best one in China) you will be talking out of your ass.

I stand by my FIL and the law books anyone can read by visiting the above law library. So if you want to sort fact from fiction - make the trip or remain ignorant. Your choice. Here is the bottom line...

A 2012 and 2013 Central government law in China supersedes any municipal, provincial, and central law from 2002. I am not holier than anyone. I just did my homework on this subject and am confident in what I learned and what my FIL confirmed. I don't think many recruiters have a JD in labor law nor were law professors at Renmin U. so I will keep trusting my FIL for accurate and truthful information about Chinese labor laws. It is now LEGALLY okay to moonlight with a second job so long as you are not "competing" with your first employer (probably influenced by their harmony doctrines)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> China (Job-related Posts Only) All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Page 1 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Teaching Jobs in China
Teaching Jobs in China