Site Search:
 
Get TEFL Certified & Start Your Adventure Today!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Being compensated extra for "hardships"
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> General Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
nomad soul



Joined: 31 Jan 2010
Posts: 11454
Location: The real world

PostPosted: Thu Jun 18, 2015 1:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mr. Leafy wrote:
Hardship pay is offered (usually) to entice people to a less desirable location when they have a choice.

So true. Apparently, some China-based foreign companies are doing just that...

Panasonic First Multinational Company To Pay Air Pollution Hardship For Overseas Workers In China
by Ari Phillips, ThinkProgress | March 13, 2014
http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2014/03/13/3400621/panasonic-china-air-pollution-hardship/

Hardship pay has taken on new meaning for foreign workers in China. On Thursday, Japanese-based Panasonic became the first international company to openly state that it will pay employees in China a wage premium to compensate the hazardous air pollution levels there.

The move came during Japan’s annual labor talks, which otherwise focused on preventing an economic slowdown and boosting workers’ wages. A Panasonic document from the labor talks reads “as for the premium for expatriates to compensate for a different living environment, the company will have a special review for those sent to Chinese cities.”

Throughout the winter, Chinese cities like Beijing and Shanghai have been suffering severe pollution bouts unheard of in most other cities — causing flight delays, school closings and widespread public concern. The government has been making large strides to try and assuage the worries of both Chinese citizens and foreign workers — including top executives and other senior staff — that they are doing all they can to clear the air and make the atmosphere more inviting.

“We will declare war on pollution and fight it with the same determination we battled poverty,” China’s premier Li Keqiang said at the opening of China’s Parliament last week in an occasion similar to the annual State of the Union speech in the U.S.

Even before China declared a war on pollution, Panasonic generally paid employees posted in China a premium for working in a “hardship posting,” which was not uncommon for other companies to do as well. However, announcing remuneration specifically for polluted air sets a new precedent for multinational companies operating in China.

“This puts huge pressure on other multinationals to follow suit,” Professor Kamel Mellahi from the Warwick Business School in the U.K. told the International Business Times. “Given the high status of Panasonic in China, one expects other multinationals to start introducing something similar.”

With pollution monitors in Beijing hitting PM 2.5 readings 10 to 15 times the maximum recommended allowance by the World Health Organization, apprehension over working in China is not surprising. PM 2.5 particles are particulate matter that is 2.5 micrometers in diameter or smaller, and they can penetrate the lungs and cause premature death. PM 2.5 particles come from vehicle emissions and other operations that involve burning fossil fuels, such as coal-fired power plants and heavy industry that ring many large Chinese cities as they’ve rapidly industrialized.

“That’s the first time I’ve heard any company be quite so brazen about it,” Robert Parkinson, head of Beijing-based recruiter RMG Selection, told the Financial Times. “It’s a bit like saying we know we are exposing you to something that could be life-threatening. We’re going to admit it and compensate you for it.”

(End of article)

And...

Coke paying employees more to work in China due to pollution
By Carla Caldwell, Bizjournals | July 10, 2014
http://www.bizjournals.com/atlanta/morning_call/2014/07/report-coke-paying-employees-more-to-work-in-china.html

The Coca-Cola Co. is offering a hefty “environmental hardship allowance” to China-based expatriate employees as many foreign companies struggle to staff facilities there due to concerns about chronic pollution, reports Australian Financial Review.

The allowance was introduced recently and is believed to be 15 percent on top of an employee’s base ­salary, AFR reported. The publication says Atlanta-based Coke ­(NYSE: KO) confirmed the introduction of a wage premium , but declined to comment on the amount. “Our competitive mobility package includes an environmental allowance for postings to China,” a Coca-Cola spokeswoman said in an emailed statement. Coke would not disclose how many employees stood to benefit from the extra pay, AFR said

China’s hazardous air pollution has become the key issue for foreign companies looking to post workers to cities such as Beijing or Shanghai, AFR added. Many companies offer better medical insurance benefits, more paid trips home and subsidies for air filters to the roughly half a million foreigners working in China, AFR said.

(End of article)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
santi84



Joined: 14 Mar 2008
Posts: 1317
Location: under da sea

PostPosted: Thu Jun 18, 2015 2:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

We call them "northern allowances" up here. I get three months of sunshine per year, and the rest is -10 to -50C or below with the sun setting at 3pm. It's not so much a hardship but just a reflection of overall cost of living. I can get a half-rotten pepper for about $4.99/kg.

Mind you, my air is super crisp and clean!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
scot47



Joined: 10 Jan 2003
Posts: 15343

PostPosted: Thu Jun 18, 2015 3:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Saudis coming here should be compensated for the horrors of being surrounded by people eating dead pigs and drinking alcohol, not to mention having semi-naked women flaunting themselves everywhere !

This is a nonsense. You know what is on offer. Take or it go and teach on one of the "Disney Schools" in China !
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
MotherF



Joined: 07 Jun 2010
Posts: 1450
Location: 17�48'N 97�46'W

PostPosted: Thu Jun 18, 2015 4:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mr. Leafy wrote:
MotherF wrote:
I work in a university system with a dozen locations. I moved from one of the most desirable to the least desirable due to my husband's job (he is not an English teacher). I tried to explain the concept of hardship pay to my new boss and he feigned ignorance.


Hardship pay wouldn't be relevant here. Hardship pay is offered (usually) to entice people to a less desirable location when they have a choice. You went there for reasons of your own, so , from their point of view, no need to offer anything special.

(And yes, I know there are careers that post you no-choice to places and give hardship pay, but in general.)


Ah yes, I left out the part about this being embedded in a conversation about his recruitment problems. And problems with people breaking contracts. I would have left after the first month if I did not have another reason to be there, so when hiring the school is in direct competition with the other more desirable locations. In his mind the job was the same in any location, so the pay should be too.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nomad soul



Joined: 31 Jan 2010
Posts: 11454
Location: The real world

PostPosted: Thu Jun 18, 2015 6:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Is hardship pay worth the health of an adult or child?

In China, Breathing Becomes a Childhood Risk
By Edward Wong, The New York Times | April 22, 2013
Source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/23/world/asia/pollution-is-radically-changing-childhood-in-chinas-cities.html?_r=0

BEIJING — The boy’s chronic cough and stuffy nose began last year at the age of 3. His symptoms worsened this winter, when smog across northern China surged to record levels. Now he needs his sinuses cleared every night with saltwater piped through a machine’s tubes. The boy’s mother, Zhang Zixuan, said she almost never lets him go outside, and when she does she usually makes him wear a face mask. The difference between Britain, where she once studied, and China is “heaven and hell,” she said.

Levels of deadly pollutants up to 40 times the recommended exposure limit in Beijing and other cities have struck fear into parents and led them to take steps that are radically altering the nature of urban life for their children. Parents are confining sons and daughters to their homes, even if it means keeping them away from friends. Schools are canceling outdoor activities and field trips. Parents with means are choosing schools based on air-filtration systems, and some international schools have built gigantic, futuristic-looking domes over sports fields to ensure healthy breathing. “I hope in the future we’ll move to a foreign country,” Ms. Zhang, a lawyer, said as her ailing son, Wu Xiaotian, played on a mat in their apartment, near a new air purifier. “Otherwise we’ll choke to death.”

She is not alone in looking to leave. Some middle- and upper-class Chinese parents and expatriates have already begun leaving China, a trend that executives say could result in a huge loss of talent and experience. Foreign parents are also turning down prestigious jobs or negotiating for hardship pay from their employers, citing the pollution.

There are no statistics for the flight, and many people are still eager to come work in Beijing, but talk of leaving is gaining urgency around the capital and on Chinese microblogs and parenting forums. Chinese are also discussing holidays to what they call the “clean-air destinations” of Tibet, Hainan and Fujian.

“I’ve been here for six years and I’ve never seen anxiety levels the way they are now,” said Dr. Richard Saint Cyr, a new father and a family health doctor at Beijing United Family Hospital, whose patients are half Chinese and half foreigners. “Even for me, I’ve never been as anxious as I am now. It has been extraordinarily bad.” He added: “Many mothers, especially, have been second-guessing their living in Beijing. I think many mothers are fed up with keeping their children inside.”

Few developments have eroded trust in the Communist Party as quickly as the realization that the leaders have failed to rein in threats to children’s health and safety. There was national outrage in 2008 after more than 5,000 children were killed when their schools collapsed in an earthquake, and hundreds of thousands were sickened and six infants died in a tainted-formula scandal. Officials tried to suppress angry parents, sometimes by force or with payoffs.

But the fury over air pollution is much more widespread and is just beginning to gain momentum. “I don’t trust the pollution measurements of the Beijing government,” said Ms. Zhang’s father, Zhang Xiaochuan, a retired newspaper administrator.

Scientific studies justify fears of long-term damage to children and fetuses. A study published by The New England Journal of Medicine showed that children exposed to high levels of air pollution can suffer permanent lung damage. The research was done in the 1990s in Los Angeles, where levels of pollution were much lower than those in Chinese cities today.

A study by California researchers published last month suggested a link between autism in children and the exposure of pregnant women to traffic-related air pollution. Columbia University researchers, in a study done in New York, found that prenatal exposure to air pollutants could result in children with anxiety, depression and attention-span problems. Some of the same researchers found in an earlier study that children in Chongqing, China, who had prenatal exposure to high levels of air pollutants from a coal-fired plant were born with smaller head circumferences, showed slower growth and performed less well on cognitive development tests at age 2. The shutdown of the plant resulted in children born with fewer difficulties.

Analyses show little relief ahead if China does not change growth policies and strengthen environmental regulation. A Deutsche Bank report released in February said the current trends of coal use and automobile emissions meant air pollution was expected to worsen by an additional 70 percent by 2025.

Some children’s hospitals in northern China reported a large number of patients with respiratory illnesses this winter, when the air pollution soared. During one bad week in January, Beijing Children’s Hospital admitted up to 9,000 patients a day for emergency visits, half of them for respiratory problems, according to a report by Xinhua, the state news agency.

Parents have scrambled to buy air purifiers. IQAir, a Swiss company, makes purifiers that cost up to $3,000 here and are displayed in shiny showrooms. Mike Murphy, the chief executive of IQAir China, said sales had tripled in the first three months of 2013 over the same period last year. Face masks are now part of the urban dress code. Ms. Zhang laid out half a dozen masks on her dining room table and held up one with a picture of a teddy bear that fits Xiaotian. Schools are adopting emergency measures. Xiaotian’s private kindergarten used to take the children on a field trip once a week, but it has canceled most of those this year.

At the prestigious Beijing No. 4 High School, which has long trained Chinese leaders and their children, outdoor physical education classes are now canceled when the pollution index is high. “The days with blue sky and seemingly clean air are treasured, and I usually go out and do exercise,” said Dong Yifu, a senior there who was just accepted to Yale University.

Elite schools are investing in infrastructure to keep children active. Among them are Dulwich College Beijing and the International School of Beijing, which in January completed two large white sports domes of synthetic fabric that cover athletic fields and tennis courts. The construction of the domes and an accompanying building began a year ago, to give the 1,900 students a place to exercise in both bad weather and high pollution, said Jeff Johanson, director of student activities. The project cost $5.7 million and includes hospital-grade air-filtration systems.

Teachers check the hourly air ratings from the United States Embassy to determine whether children should play outside or beneath the domes. “The elementary schoolchildren don’t miss recess anymore,” Mr. Johanson said.

One American mother, Tara Duffy, said she had chosen a prekindergarten school for her daughter in part because the school had air filters in the classrooms. The school, called the 3e International School, also brings in doctors to talk about pollution and bars the children from playing outdoors during increases in smog levels. “In the past six months, there have been a lot more ‘red flag’ days, and they keep the kids inside,” said Ms. Duffy, a writer and former foundation consultant. Ms. Duffy said she also checked the daily air quality index to decide whether to take her daughter to an outdoor picnic or an indoor play space. Now, after nine years here, Ms. Duffy is leaving China, and she cites the pollution and traffic as major factors.

That calculus is playing out with expatriates across Beijing, and even with foreigners outside China. One American couple with a young child discussed the pollution when considering a prestigious foundation job in Beijing, and it was among the reasons they turned down the offer.

James McGregor, a senior counselor in the Beijing office of APCO Worldwide, a consulting company, said he had heard of an American diplomat with young children who had turned down a posting here. That was despite the fact that the State Department provides a 15 percent salary bonus for Beijing that exists partly because of the pollution. The hardship bonus for other Chinese cities, which also suffer from awful air, ranges from 20 percent to 30 percent, except for Shanghai, where it is 10 percent.

(End of article)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
scot47



Joined: 10 Jan 2003
Posts: 15343

PostPosted: Thu Jun 18, 2015 7:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thank God I did not take up that offer to go and help construct the Chinese Road to Capitalism !
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Deats



Joined: 02 Jan 2015
Posts: 503

PostPosted: Thu Jun 18, 2015 7:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Anyone who takes a family to live in Beijing or Shanghai or any of the other super polluted cities in China should be done for child abuse. They are knowingly taking their kid/s to a place where their long term health will be seriously affected. No amount of money is worth it.

What some people must realise though, is not all of China is the same. For some people, who probably have never even worked in China, they must realise China is actually quite big.

What is refreshing about China is it's the biggest producer of clean energy in the world. It's a shame some in the West rely so heavily on fossil fuels and have no intention of moving away from it if at all possible... and whose gvnts (controlled by major businesses) brainwash the people into letting this happen. It's quite good that China acknowledges it has a problem, whilst westerners like to believe they live in a utopia and bury their heads in the sand.

What's quite scary is the fact China will probably have the last laugh...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gamajorba



Joined: 03 May 2015
Posts: 357

PostPosted: Fri Jun 19, 2015 7:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

How about hardship pay for driving life endangering roads in KSA? Where everyday is a battle to stay alive by avoiding the terrible Saudi drivers. Especially when you drive for many hours a day like I endured (5 a day between Al Kharj and Riyadh)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
scot47



Joined: 10 Jan 2003
Posts: 15343

PostPosted: Fri Jun 19, 2015 9:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hardship pay for having lunatics as colleagues ? That would include those who have chosen to work in a place where they need to drive for 5 hours daily !
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gamajorba



Joined: 03 May 2015
Posts: 357

PostPosted: Fri Jun 19, 2015 9:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

scot47 wrote:
Hardship pay for having lunatics as colleagues ? That would include those who have chosen to work in a place where they need to drive for 5 hours daily !


To respond to the trolling or not...that is the question...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nomad soul



Joined: 31 Jan 2010
Posts: 11454
Location: The real world

PostPosted: Fri Jun 19, 2015 1:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Gamajorba wrote:
How about hardship pay for driving life endangering roads in KSA? Where everyday is a battle to stay alive by avoiding the terrible Saudi drivers. Especially when you drive for many hours a day like I endured (5 a day between Al Kharj and Riyadh)

It doesn't justify a hardship allowance. This was your personal choice to work at two separate facilities a long distance from each other in order to double your salary. You had the option to say no to your employer --- it wasn't forced on you. And frankly, I wouldn't drive that many hours each day in the US.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gamajorba



Joined: 03 May 2015
Posts: 357

PostPosted: Fri Jun 19, 2015 1:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

nomad soul wrote:
Gamajorba wrote:
How about hardship pay for driving life endangering roads in KSA? Where everyday is a battle to stay alive by avoiding the terrible Saudi drivers. Especially when you drive for many hours a day like I endured (5 a day between Al Kharj and Riyadh)

It doesn't justify a hardship allowance. This was your personal choice to work at two separate facilities a long distance from each other in order to double your salary. You had the option to say no to your employer --- it wasn't forced on you. And frankly, I wouldn't drive that many hours each day in the US.


You should not take everything so seriously. Chill out a bit. Others made reference to insane colleagues as hardship, so why not dangerous driving being equally tongue in cheek?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Sashadroogie



Joined: 17 Apr 2007
Posts: 11061
Location: Moskva, The Workers' Paradise

PostPosted: Fri Jun 19, 2015 1:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm considering asking the site owners for hardship payment for the cruel and torturous syntax I have to endure when reading posts. Also being considered, an alchohol allowance, for all the vodka I consume while composing my magnificant contributions to various threads that benefit from a good old dose of dialectical materialism.

Hic!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gamajorba



Joined: 03 May 2015
Posts: 357

PostPosted: Fri Jun 19, 2015 1:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sashadroogie wrote:
I'm considering asking the site owners for hardship payment for the cruel and torturous syntax I have to endure when reading posts. Also being considered, an alchohol allowance, for all the vodka I consume while composing my magnificant contributions to various threads that benefit from a good old dose of dialectical materialism.

Hic!


Please keep 'em comin'! Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nomad soul



Joined: 31 Jan 2010
Posts: 11454
Location: The real world

PostPosted: Fri Jun 19, 2015 2:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sashadroogie wrote:
I'm considering asking the site owners for hardship payment for the cruel and torturous syntax I have to endure when reading posts. Also being considered, an alchohol allowance, for all the vodka I consume while composing my magnificant contributions to various threads that benefit from a good old dose of dialectical materialism.

Hic!

Sasha, the vodka should be making the syntax of those posts appear less cruel and torturous. Razz
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> General Discussion All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Page 2 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Teaching Jobs in China
Teaching Jobs in China