| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Non Sequitur
Joined: 23 May 2010 Posts: 4724 Location: China
|
Posted: Tue Apr 26, 2016 4:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
You're almost forced back to rote learning in such a circumstance.
Rote is OK for some things and we probably all learned the times tables that way.
Singing is also rote and I use it mostly as a warmup at the beginning of class and as a reward at the end. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
donkeydonkey
Joined: 01 Aug 2015 Posts: 73
|
Posted: Tue Apr 26, 2016 12:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| OhBudPowellWhereArtThou wrote: |
dd,
I admire your enthusiasm for the huge classes. If one is teaching oral English to a class of 42+ students, it comes close to a waste of time to both the student and the teacher. This has been discussed recently, and many have suggested ways to manage huge classes. Many of them are effective.
I wonder just how long you have been teaching 60 students per class. That's a brain burner for me. I couldn't manage five classes that size per day. Grading and attendance taking and end-of-term paperwork would be incredibly arduous.
I've given lectures to large classes, and I've been Mr. Bojangles for auditoriums full of thirteen year-olds. Certainly, it is more gratifying to get a rise out of a large group than a small group.
But to manage a class of 60 + students on a daily basis? No can do. |
Hey Bud,
I didn't mean to imply that all of my classes are 60+. Usually i will get 2 or 3 50 or 60 + classes and a couple of smaller ones each semester. I don't know that it is a waste for the students as I have seen some students improve quite a bit in a semester, but it is certainly not ideal. Honestly, student motivation and interest were always more telling to me for student improvement than class size. My best class this semester is 51 people and my worst is 22 people. Today the class with 22 people had 6 people show up in it. I went to one of their other classes later in the day and asked the teacher if I could speak with them about their attendance. I basically went in and threatened to fail them if they didn't improve their attendance. Lack of attendance, lack of interest, lack of effort, and pulling teeth to get people to talk are not exclusive to the big classes.
I am in my 4th year and it has always been a mix of some big classes and some small ones. I agree that 60+ all day everyday would be exhausting and I would drown in paper work. The smaller classes with little interest can be pretty draining too though. One of the things that I hate most is talking to a class and not getting anything back from them. You burn through material and feel like you are not reaching anyone. Those are the most tiring classes that I have taught. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
donkeydonkey
Joined: 01 Aug 2015 Posts: 73
|
Posted: Tue Apr 26, 2016 1:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| At my University, the classes aren't streamed for oral English. The classes stay together. So for example, Freshman Accounting class 1 stays together all day and moves from English class to accounting class to math class. Freshman Accounting class 2 stays together all day and moves together and so on. They are categorized by year, major, and ranking. So 14 Accounting class 1 are Sophomores in accounting who were ranked higher than class 2 upon initial intake. The class stays together for all of their classes from freshman year to senior year. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Non Sequitur
Joined: 23 May 2010 Posts: 4724 Location: China
|
Posted: Wed Apr 27, 2016 8:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Presumably the rankings were Gao Kao scores which has no oral English component.
After allowing for the likelihood that better students will achieve across all subjects it seems your students' oral skills will be pretty random.
As to the variation in class size, the main effect is that smaller classes motor through the material at a faster rate. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JeremyDay
Joined: 11 Apr 2016 Posts: 58
|
Posted: Wed Apr 27, 2016 8:41 pm Post subject: Setup for Failure |
|
|
I'd have to say that a university is setting the teacher and students up for failure with numbers like that. I work in Colombia at the moment as an ESL professor. There are two things that create the biggest impedance to language learning: class size and total classes. Both make the professor in question ineffectual. Both threaten to burn out a professor or make them apathetic.
Whoever it was talking about the energy involved in 60 student classes... you're pretty amazing. I can't do it. I'm even a trained performer. I can't consistently command the attention of classes that size.
I had 24 teacher hours and about 30 to 35 or so students per class last semester. This semester, I have 25 teaching hours and 15 students per class on average. I am 10 times more effective. Hands down. If I found out that a university had more than 30 students per class... I'd go on to the next interview. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rioux
Joined: 26 Apr 2012 Posts: 880
|
Posted: Wed Apr 27, 2016 10:28 pm Post subject: Re: Setup for Failure |
|
|
| JeremyDay wrote: |
| I had 24 teacher hours and about 30 to 35 or so students per class last semester. This semester, I have 25 teaching hours and 15 students per class on average. I am 10 times more effective. Hands down. If I found out that a university had more than 30 students per class... I'd go on to the next interview. |
English majors and the like should be no more than 10 a class while other majors should be no more than 15 a class.
The above is what I think but there is no way I would even suggest that to the powers that be here. At the school I am at now there should be no more than 50 students a class. The first week I showed up I had two classes of almost 80! Since they were in violation of the contract I suggested that they either pay me overtime or reduce the number of my classes the next term. They chose to reduce the classes.
But of course they were pissed off at me for it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
donkeydonkey
Joined: 01 Aug 2015 Posts: 73
|
Posted: Mon May 02, 2016 3:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Non Sequitur wrote: |
Presumably the rankings were Gao Kao scores which has no oral English component.
After allowing for the likelihood that better students will achieve across all subjects it seems your students' oral skills will be pretty random.
As to the variation in class size, the main effect is that smaller classes motor through the material at a faster rate. |
Dead on with each point.
Although, I think there are other effects due to the variance in class size. You get a lot more random answers and responses from a large group. Smaller classes have more of a herd mentality, imo. For example, I did dialogues with my classes on Thursday. The theme was music. The small class dialogues talked about similar topics. Listening to music on their cell phones, Taylor Swift, Justin Beiber etc. In my larger class, The topics were all over the place. Along with same stuff as the small class, I also heard about Prince's death, Beijing Opera, Kpop, Chinese pop, traditional Chinese instruments. The smaller group allows the students to hear too much of what the other groups are doing and so you get more copying, less originality, and less effort. The tendency is for them to hit the same couple of topics and be done with it. They can't do this as much in a large group because of the space so they have to come up with different topics and ideas. This also gives me ideas for what to say in the groups when I go in to monitor them. I would have never brought up Prince because I would think that they didn't know who he was. Surprisingly, a decent number of them did, though certainly not all. That discussion led to us listening to this "When Doves cry" and giving them some vocabulary such as:
1. Dove
2. Bass
3. Drum machine
etc.
I find this kind of vocabulary is effective because it comes organically out of the discussion and isn't a forced lesson. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Non Sequitur
Joined: 23 May 2010 Posts: 4724 Location: China
|
Posted: Mon May 02, 2016 5:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Not sure of the real world usefulness of 'Dove' as a song title and 'bass machine' either for that matter.
I think generic discussion topics rather than the latest Twitter storm are better. Although I have never had much success with group work, which unless you are actually listening to, generally revert to Chinese. The most able kid is the reporter. He/she gets better and the others stay the same.
12 groups of five to cover a 60-student class. Brrr |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
OhBudPowellWhereArtThou

Joined: 02 Jun 2015 Posts: 1168 Location: Since 2003
|
Posted: Tue May 03, 2016 11:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
Even in my classes in the states, I found group work to be generally useless. Others point out that one or two students do the work while the rest sit on their hands.
In the states, group assignments primarily fulfill the objective of relieving the teacher of taking the load off the teachers and placing it on the backs of the smarter kids (hopefully) to teach the slower kids the concepts and skills. Except in the case of high achievers, it fails miserably, Strangely, the practice persists from the primary level to the tertiary level.
I can't see how it would work for Chinese students whose English language skills are deficient. The drones may learn something from the work of other, more competent students, but not much. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
D. Amokachi
Joined: 15 Oct 2014 Posts: 60
|
Posted: Tue May 03, 2016 12:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I agree that group work is far from perfect and often leads to students talking in L1, unless the teacher is in earshot. I'm just not sure what else you're supposed to do in this situation? How else are you going to conduct a speaking class with 60 students? Get them to take turns talking to you for a minute at a time? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Non Sequitur
Joined: 23 May 2010 Posts: 4724 Location: China
|
Posted: Tue May 03, 2016 5:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
There is the other factor, which is the awarding of marks.
So, at some stage you are going to need to listen to the student as an individual.
If you have a book of dialogues you will be expected to use it.
(DON'T criticise the book as that will be reported back to the honcho.)
The dialogues are for pairs of students or occasionally trios. I've found no other methodology than listening to the pairs grind through the dialogue.
Keep class attention by randomly selecting the next pair or trio. This keeps a certain tension and also causes some hilarity if a BF/GF pairing comes up.
The important thing is only to do dialogues in the first 45 mins and make sure the students know there will be something much more enjoyable in the 2nd 45. Learning a new class song, or a pairing game or cocktail party activity are useful. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
OhBudPowellWhereArtThou

Joined: 02 Jun 2015 Posts: 1168 Location: Since 2003
|
Posted: Tue May 03, 2016 11:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I've posted my method before, but I'll give a condensed version:
The speakers work in groups, forming their own dialogs according to my prompt.
Students who are not performing comment on the performers' work in writing (in English) anonymously. That way, everyone stays engaged. (So it seems, anyway).
I have been fairly lucky in that I have worked (mostly) with either English majors or foreign trade students who possess decent English skills.
Where there's low-to-no ability, it's quite rough.
Small classes of under 20 are usually especially good because the low achievers can't hide. When the low achievers see that they are graded upon their improvement, they usually rise to the occasion. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Non Sequitur
Joined: 23 May 2010 Posts: 4724 Location: China
|
Posted: Wed May 04, 2016 2:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
My approach is similar to Bud's for mid and end of semester assessments.
Much as I would have loved to have been able to ditch the book it wasn't possible. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
OhBudPowellWhereArtThou

Joined: 02 Jun 2015 Posts: 1168 Location: Since 2003
|
Posted: Wed May 04, 2016 2:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
Keep class attention by randomly selecting the next pair or trio. This keeps a certain tension and also causes some hilarity if a BF/GF pairing comes up.
That has worked for me in American class rooms. In China, mmmm... it depends upon how engaged they are. I've had a few classes in which half of the students didn't give a ship.
If they're English majors, that'll usually keep them engaged because there seems to be a fair amount of competition among those students.
If you've got 60 students, Class Control and Motivation is usually Priority One. If you can achieve that, probably anything that is at least a little challenging will make them care.
The most dastardly thing I've ever done was to withhold grades from a writing class because they kept giving me trash even though they were excellent speakers. Six weeks into the semester I was asked why I hadn't graded anything. I told them that I wasn't assigning grades until EVERYONE began producing work worthy of an A. Interestingly, their written responses to MY prompts improved drastically in a very short time. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|