| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Aramas
Joined: 13 Feb 2004 Posts: 874 Location: Slightly left of Centre
|
Posted: Sat Aug 28, 2004 3:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jungian psychology is rather fascinating, but I tend to think of it as a quasi-mystical modernist cult that has more in common with scientology than with science.
Introversion/extaversion are Jungian concepts that have been absorbed into the language with simplified and erroneous meanings.
From the Carl Jung web page at Shipton http://www.ship.edu/~cgboeree/jung.html/, courtesy of Dr. C. George Boeree;
| Quote: |
Introversion and Extroversion
Jung developed a personality typology that has become so popular that some people don't realize he did anything else! It begins with the distinction between introversion and extroversion. Introverts are people who prefer their internal world of thoughts, feelings, fantasies, dreams, and so on, while extroverts prefer the external world of things and people and activities.
The words have become confused with ideas like shyness and sociability, partially because introverts tend to be shy and extroverts tend to be sociable. But Jung intended for them to refer more to whether you ("ego") more often faced toward the persona and outer reality, or toward the collective unconscious and its archetypes. In that sense, the introvert is somewhat more mature than the extrovert. Our culture, of course, values the extrovert much more. And Jung warned that we all tend to value our own type most! |
I'm an INTP, as was Socrates, Descartes, Pascal, Newton, Einstein, and of course, Carl Jung
(Excuse the typos - I had an accident at work on tuesday that severed all of the tendons in the back of my right hand, and my left hand isn't the sharpest tool in the shed.) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
laodeng
Joined: 07 Feb 2004 Posts: 481
|
Posted: Sat Aug 28, 2004 8:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Spot on! I don't think anyone in mainstream psychology takes Jungian typology seriously these days. Not only is is Myers-Briggs based on this typology, it is simplistic in the extreme (my opinion). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Will.
Joined: 02 May 2003 Posts: 783 Location: London Uk
|
Posted: Sat Aug 28, 2004 9:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well it proves a couple of things this test.
I am insecure enough to take it.
I am stupid enough not to understand the results yet. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jojo_rock
Joined: 04 Jun 2004 Posts: 9
|
Posted: Sat Aug 28, 2004 4:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
This is me. It's interesting, but mostly just confirmed what I know about myself already. It also said I'd make a good teacher so WOO! confidence for me! I'm in the right job!
ESFJ
slightly expressed extrovert
moderately expressed sensing personality
moderately expressed feeling personality
slightly expressed judging personality
In response to what Ben said "My results are above. I agree that I'm definitely an introvert socially, but I don't see myself as an introvert as a teacher in the classroom.
Can our personalities change (without being schizo) depending on the particular situations we're in?"
I personally find that my personality changes in the classroom. I tell people what to do, I perform, I am centre of attention. Normally I hate doing those things |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
moonraven
Joined: 24 Mar 2004 Posts: 3094
|
Posted: Sat Aug 28, 2004 5:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
A couple of thoughts--for the person who said that mainstream psychology doesn't take Jungian concepts seriously: what are you calling mainstream psychology? Psychology encompasses everything from experimentally based learning research--what we called running the rats in the 60 and 70s--to depth psychology, psychometrics, and so on. Jungian psychology is still very influential--second only to Freudian in its influence--as the number of Jung Societies around the world indicate. If more people did a bit of reading about Archetypes, for example, perhaps the world would not be in the state of unconscious chaos in which we find it. If more of us understaood what the Shadow is--individually, nationally, culturally, we would not have to project it onto others 24/7, but could integrate it and live and let live.
I take exception to the idea of changing personalities in the classroom. Especially in regard to "being the center of attention". It is not the job of a teacher to be the center of attention, but to create--through a dialog--conscious students (and in the process become conscious as well.) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JosephP
Joined: 13 May 2003 Posts: 445
|
Posted: Sat Aug 28, 2004 5:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
INTP, for what's worth.
My home is quite tidy and orderly, but my desk is a mess. My classes start off with the best of intentions, but then one thing leads to another and zoom...off on a tangent. Are these really attributes of INTP types? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Deborann

Joined: 20 Oct 2003 Posts: 314 Location: Middle of the Middle Kingdom
|
Posted: Sat Aug 28, 2004 7:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You still need to be aware that type changes according to situations and time. What you see yourself today in a particular situation is not what you are in different situation.
The shadow side is very important - and given very little exposure!!
If you read Jungs works there is a lot more than a simplistic four letter definition of a personality. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Aramas
Joined: 13 Feb 2004 Posts: 874 Location: Slightly left of Centre
|
Posted: Sun Aug 29, 2004 12:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
There is extraordinary depth to Jung's stuff, but the symbolism is rather overwhelming. Personally I'm not in the habit of wandering around in my grey matter looking for a young girl guarding a pond, or a heavily armed dwarf. Still, it takes all sorts.
Whatever can be said about the weirder bits, Jung's typology is surprisingly accurate. The description of INTP's at intp.org http://www.intp.org/intprofile.html is so accurate it's scary. The descriptions at http://www.typelogic.com/ are also good, if somewhat brief. If nothing else, Jungian typology supercedes the zodiac
As for the crux of the Jungian biscuit, it provides the most elegant vehicle for comparitive mythology that I've encountered.
Oh, and Deb - What happened to you? Have you discovered a decaf that doesn't taste like Yarra water? I happen to enjoy the caffeine rush of several Lavazza espressos, but then I'm not inclined to explosive verbal diarroea Mine just kind of dribbles out chock full of chunky bits of unwholesome goodness  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
double agent

Joined: 18 Jun 2003 Posts: 152 Location: In the wild wild west
|
Posted: Sun Aug 29, 2004 1:14 am Post subject: i took it |
|
|
i took it and it was long and spread over
several daYS
oh ya and my academic comfort level is PHd which I would have to agree. The fact that I can not bare to be around unread people is something I struggle with.
The meek shall inherit the earth.... mmmm...i doubt it.
I think it was several different IQ tests it was years ago...so I can't recall,
mmmmmmm....
Summary in layman terms.
Intelligent foker who doesn't like annoying gits.
In other words, I m the one in the bar getting wrecked and sputtering
orders. Ya thats right. I am your TESL teacher roaming country to country starting my own tesl student cult.

Last edited by double agent on Tue Aug 31, 2004 8:58 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Snoopy
Joined: 13 Jul 2003 Posts: 185
|
Posted: Sun Aug 29, 2004 7:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Moonraven wrote "I never enter a classroom without a written plan". Has Moonraven, in many years of experience, never had to do "doorhandle preparation"? Sometimes you have to take a class at a moment's notice, or else you know exactly what you are doing to follow on from the previous lesson and are not suffering from senile dementia. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bet
Joined: 14 May 2004 Posts: 354
|
Posted: Sun Aug 29, 2004 9:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
INFP. Did this years ago with a roomful of TESL colleagues ... very interesting to see a group in this light. It can help to think this way when there's conflict in the workplace. People can accept the behaviour of others more easily by saying, "Oh, well, that's because they're a such-and-such type." Also helps in putting teams together.
I believe it's an accurate description of me, or is that just me as I see myself ?
I have a feeling (or intuition ?! ) that most TESOL teachers would be introverted, though the sample in China might not be representative.
For classroom and some other practical purposes I'd like to be more judge than perceiver but 'tis not how I am made... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
moonraven
Joined: 24 Mar 2004 Posts: 3094
|
Posted: Sun Aug 29, 2004 5:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Uh--Snoopy, not only do I not suffer from senile dementia (I have almost unlimited contempt for jokers like you who know absolutely squat but insist that wisdom comes with youth and not from experience), but I do not accept taking classes at a moment's notice--and if I did find myself in that position--which would be highly doubtful--I have been teaching and PREPARING CLASSES for enough years to have an appropriate class planned out on one of my lesson plan cards--the larger size index cards are great for that. (When I was teaching and directing a Harmon Hall language school here in Mexico--where our books frequently fell apart--one of my students restitched my books, and even incorporated my lesson plan cards in the binding process!)
Not only is it a slap in the face to students to have them put up with an unprepared teacher trying to improvise a class, it is downright foolish on the part of the teacher. Of course there are arrogant improvisers out there who think that all they have to do is speak English in the classroom and they have given a class. I have not had any qualms of conscience about firing those ESL parasites. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jpvanderwerf2001
Joined: 02 Oct 2003 Posts: 1117 Location: New York
|
Posted: Mon Aug 30, 2004 5:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| Of course there are arrogant improvisers out there who think that all they have to do is speak English in the classroom and they have given a class. I have not had any qualms of conscience about firing those ESL parasites. |
moonraven,
Arrogant? Pot, meet kettle. Kettle, pot.
I would be remiss if I did not stand at awe in the wake of your obvious superior intellectual capacities, impeccable teaching abilities and extraordinary test-taking abilities (re: the infamous perfect SAT score).
Geez, are you this pompous while instructing your students? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
moonraven
Joined: 24 Mar 2004 Posts: 3094
|
Posted: Mon Aug 30, 2004 2:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Green continues to be NOT your color.
My students receive no pomposity from me--they are respectful, work their butts off in my classes, have a great time learning, and know a good thing when they see it. In short, they are smart. I reserve pomposity for folks who are not so smart....and who deserve to receive it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jpvanderwerf2001
Joined: 02 Oct 2003 Posts: 1117 Location: New York
|
Posted: Mon Aug 30, 2004 3:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
Green continues to be NOT your color.
In short, they are smart. I reserve pomposity for folks who are not so smart....and who deserve to receive it. |
moonraven,
You either mistakenly (and inexplicably) think I'm envious (of you?!) or have me confused with a muppet.
Please be careful you don't throw out your shoulder while patting your own back.
Oh, and I would be curious as to how you decide if someone is "smart" or not. Are you the judge? If so, by what mandate? Will you ever answer one of my questions? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|