View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
vancouver_syndicate
Joined: 09 Sep 2004 Posts: 46 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Sat Sep 11, 2004 5:40 am Post subject: Aeon requires a deposit? |
|
|
Hello
I was visiting Aeon's website and noticed that they require you to place a deposit after you've signed the contract. And they would then reimburse you when you finish the training.
I don't think they had that before. Why did they implement it now? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
guest of Japan

Joined: 28 Feb 2003 Posts: 1601 Location: Japan
|
Posted: Sat Sep 11, 2004 6:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
That was policy in July of 2000 and AEON doesn't make changes quickly or often. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Hondo 2.0
Joined: 05 Aug 2004 Posts: 69 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Sun Sep 12, 2004 12:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
Wow. How much is the deposit, and what is it for? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
PAULH
Joined: 28 Jan 2003 Posts: 4672 Location: Western Japan
|
Posted: Sun Sep 12, 2004 1:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
I believe the policy is to stop people signing a contract, getting a work visa and then dumping them for someone else or accepting a job with another school before you start working for them. When you pay cold hard cash you think twice about abandoning a signed contract with an employee. No idea how much but i think its about $US200. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
guest of Japan

Joined: 28 Feb 2003 Posts: 1601 Location: Japan
|
Posted: Sun Sep 12, 2004 1:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
Back in 2000 it was $200. I've heard it is $300 now, but I'm not sure and not inspired enough to look it up.
The money is basically meant to inspire the recruits not to bail at the last possible minute and to cover administration costs if they do.
Strangely, my current company uses the same system yet even more so. I have to pay $300 everytime I sign a new contract. I get the money back after my second month of working on the new contract. My boss swears to me that this is a Western custom adopted to deal with Western teachers. Anyone know a Western country that actually does this? I almost didn't take the job the first time because it felt like I was walking into a scam. My boss interviewed me in a coffeeshop, didn't have a business card and wanted a deposit. The job sounded appealing outside of those issues and I was entering desperation time for getting the kind of job I wanted, so I took it. It turned out my boss and the company he worked for were on the level if just a bit quirky. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Hondo 2.0
Joined: 05 Aug 2004 Posts: 69 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Sun Sep 12, 2004 1:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
I don't like the sound of this. When you start a new job, you and the employer are both taking a risk. I really don't like to see contracts and hiring practices that reflect mistrust of new employees. If they don't trust you, then they shouldn't hire you. I'd like to see employer/employee relationships beginning with a gesture of trust. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
guest of Japan

Joined: 28 Feb 2003 Posts: 1601 Location: Japan
|
Posted: Sun Sep 12, 2004 1:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
You must understand that Japanese companies think they are doing you a favor by hiring you. The mindset is different here. This coupled with the fact that foreign teachers do often cut and run gives us contracts based on mistrust. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
PAULH
Joined: 28 Jan 2003 Posts: 4672 Location: Western Japan
|
Posted: Sun Sep 12, 2004 2:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hondo 2.0 wrote: |
I don't like the sound of this. When you start a new job, you and the employer are both taking a risk. I really don't like to see contracts and hiring practices that reflect mistrust of new employees. If they don't trust you, then they shouldn't hire you. I'd like to see employer/employee relationships beginning with a gesture of trust. |
The employer in fact is taking a bigger risk, because once he hires you, it effectively becomes impossible to fire you, unless you thump your boss or get arrested by the police. get rid of a teacher and it usually means months of negotiations with a union or a court case, no matter how incompetent you are.
I might also add that the current NOVA policies on student contact and drug tests came about becuase of misbehavior by teachers. When I was at NOVA there was no drug testing and we could go out after work with students- i even dated a few. its only because some people take the whole yard and push the envelope with employers that the employer treats them like 12 year olds and has all these rules so that people behave themselves. What people do has an effect on what happens to the people following them, but new teachers dont realise this when they apply for a job with one of the big schools. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Hondo 2.0
Joined: 05 Aug 2004 Posts: 69 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Sun Sep 12, 2004 2:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
I recognise that an employer is taking a risk when they hire an employee. However, I don't agree that this risk is greater than that undertaken by the employee. New employees at an eikaiwa usually sign on without seeing their new workplace or accomodations. Often, they don't even know what part of Japan they're going to be working in
I know you've been in Japan for a long time. So, if you worked for a company, and they didn't meet their obligations, you'd be on their ass pretty fast. Or, perhaps you'd just find a new job with your contacts, qualifications, and experience. Wouldn't you agree that this situation is not typical? Most teachers don't have much recourse when their employer decides to treat them like crap.
What I want to see is full and honest disclosure at the time of hiring. I'd like to see recruiters telling their potential employees about the most common complaints from current and outgoing emplyees. I'd like to see employers providing an accurate and complete description of what it is like working for them. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Billy Chaka
Joined: 20 Oct 2003 Posts: 77
|
Posted: Sun Sep 12, 2004 3:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hondo 2.0 wrote: |
What I want to see is full and honest disclosure at the time of hiring. I'd like to see recruiters telling their potential employees about the most common complaints from current and outgoing emplyees. I'd like to see employers providing an accurate and complete description of what it is like working for them. |
I really apologize if my post sounds condescending, but I couldn't help chuckling when I read this. I have no idea what country you're from or how old you are. I'm from the United States, and I've held various jobs (too many to count). Not even once in my entire life has my potential employer told me "the most common complaints from current and outgoing employees" or provided me "an accurate and complete description of what it is like working for them." If a recruiter were to ever provide me with this information, he/she would surely be fired. Really - I'm not kidding. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mike L.
Joined: 28 Feb 2003 Posts: 519
|
Posted: Sun Sep 12, 2004 3:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
Most teachers don't have much recourse when their employer decides to treat them like crap. |
Actually you do have some recourse as Paul mentioned above (General union etc etc... The real problem is that a lot of newbies, straight out of college, will tollerate a lot of nonesense!
I've always been blunt with my employers and have never had a problem! I'm also very picky too.
Another problem is that many "newbies" will work for wages far below the norm. For example 200,000 yen a month for 8:30-4:30, Monday to Friday, at some private high school through a despatch company. By doing so, without realizing it I imagine, they are contributing to deteriorating working conditions!
I'm not sure what these people are thinking but it seems those that get into trouble here with employers, apt's, visas etc etc often haven't done their research and come and leave on whim.
Regardless I also agree other posters that the payment to an employer is proposterous to say the least! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Hondo 2.0
Joined: 05 Aug 2004 Posts: 69 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Sun Sep 12, 2004 3:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
Billy Chaka, my comments regarding disclosure express what I would like to see, not what I expect to see. My first ESL job was with GEOS. I worked for them for two years. My experience with them led me to re-evaluate how much research I think an employee should do before accepting a position.
My current situation certainly influences my comments. I was flown out to Thunder Bay yesterday for a job interview. The school I'd be working in is in a fly-in only community of about 1200 people. I dug up all the information available, but there is only so much. If I take the job, I'm going to have to trust the people who are hiring me. I really don't want to find out after the fact that they have misrepresented themselves.
And if you're curious, I'm 26, from Montreal, and an Aquarius. I enjoy long, bloody, MMA fights, and dark beer. My turn-offs include coprophilia and tardiness.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Billy Chaka
Joined: 20 Oct 2003 Posts: 77
|
Posted: Sun Sep 12, 2004 4:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
[quote="Mike L."]
Quote: |
Regardless I also agree other posters that the payment to an employer is proposterous to say the least! |
If I owned an English school in Japan, and it took me months to process the visa of a new hire, I would absolutely require a deposit for performing the service of processing the visa. Then, when the new hire arrived in Japan, I would absolutely always return the deposit (just like Aeon does). And potential recruits would still flock to my school to try to get hired for the chance to teach English overseas (just like with Aeon).
If I didn't require a deposit, people who weren't really serious would apply on a whim, I'd spend months processing their visas, and then they wouldn't show up. I'd have done all that work for nothing, and then on top of that, I'd have to hustle to try to find replacements for the people who didn't show up. If I didn't require a deposit, it would be a terrible business practice. And if I do require a deposit, I loose nothing (because I still have people flocking to my school), and my new hires loose nothing (because I give them back everything as soon as they arrive). Seems like a no-brainer to me. And I don't even have an MBA!  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Hondo 2.0
Joined: 05 Aug 2004 Posts: 69 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Sun Sep 12, 2004 4:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
I don't imagine many teachers would think to themselves, "This employer wants me to pay a deposit before I start work. That must mean it's a good place to work." On the contrary, I think a lot of good candidates would just pass over such an employer. Limiting your appeal to good candidates is not a good business practice.
To retain employees, it might be more effective to restructre the common Y250000 monthly salary. You could offer Y200000/month, with a guaranteed completion bonus of Y600000. That would certainly motivate people to finish off their contracts. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
guest of Japan

Joined: 28 Feb 2003 Posts: 1601 Location: Japan
|
Posted: Sun Sep 12, 2004 4:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
I would definitely steer clear of a job that advertised that. That tells me that either teachers have a habit of quitting or the employer has a habit of terminating contracts midway. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|