|
Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Stephen Jones
Joined: 21 Feb 2003 Posts: 4124
|
Posted: Fri Sep 24, 2004 10:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
As the references that Asia traveller gives in the main refer to HTML, and the earliest example given is
| Quote: |
And�among other places�it appears in an Internet standards document (Request for Comments 1158 of May 1990):
In order to better prepare implementors for future changes ... a new term �deprecated� may be used when describing an object. A deprecated object ... is one which must be supported, but one which will most likely be removed from the next version ... |
which is an internet standards document, perhaps waxwing could say why he felt I was so off the mark in my initial comment. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
AsiaTraveller
Joined: 24 May 2004 Posts: 908 Location: Singapore, Mumbai, Penang, Denpasar, Berkeley
|
Posted: Fri Sep 24, 2004 10:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Because he couldn't admit you knew something that he didn't know? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Stephen Jones
Joined: 21 Feb 2003 Posts: 4124
|
Posted: Fri Sep 24, 2004 11:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I don't think so> Perhaps he felt I was being patronizing explaining the term, but it seemed clear that Kimo didn't, which is why I did it..
Perhaps he'll post back to explain? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kimo
Joined: 16 Feb 2003 Posts: 668
|
Posted: Sat Sep 25, 2004 5:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
Without a doubt I have accomplished what I attempted to do, albeit, not exactly as I had planned. Kitegirl, from my posts and your critiques of them, will have learned something useful from her query beyond the generalities of teach them to write reports, etc.
Maybe not explicitly enough for some of you poor readers though, I have already admitted that I made a mistake. See my comments on the Subject Matter Expert above. The passage was probably not a good example for that which I wanted to bring to Kitegirl's attention. I apologize to her.
Next, where did I say conform rigidly to any rule? Please read what I wrote. See also what I quickly posted as references to back up my assertions. They are a good starting point for Kitegirl to dig into technical writing and make her writing classes, should she have them, more useful for her students. She needed a basic starting point. Her students will (clearly in the future) need some guidelines. As intelligent, professional engineers they will be able to decide when they are applicable and not.
As for the point on Technical English as a whole, AsiaTraveller and a few others addressed the salient points and I did not feel the need to add further comments. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
waxwing
Joined: 29 Jun 2003 Posts: 719 Location: China
|
Posted: Sat Sep 25, 2004 6:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Stephen Jones wrote: |
| Quote: |
| No it isn't, and you don't need to try to explain it to me. |
Possiubly it is used elsewhere |
Yes, it is general usage in all kinds of software development. That was my point. Sorry for my curtness, it was impolite. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
AsiaTraveller
Joined: 24 May 2004 Posts: 908 Location: Singapore, Mumbai, Penang, Denpasar, Berkeley
|
Posted: Sat Sep 25, 2004 6:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
| kimo wrote: |
| The passage was probably not a good example for that which I wanted to bring to Kitegirl's attention. I apologize to her. |
The very idea of giving her a two-sentence 'quiz' was as misguided as it was arrogant. I hope that you're apologizing for that as well.
kitegirl had asked about teaching mechanical and electrical engineers, but you found an obscure example written for software developers. And you then posted it without evidently knowing much about it, its content, or its audience -- nor about the basic principles of technical writing. You even contradicted your own guidelines in subsequent posts.
I doubt that you gave her much of anything except a well-founded mistrust of 'standards' that are promoted by a nonspecialist. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
AsiaTraveller
Joined: 24 May 2004 Posts: 908 Location: Singapore, Mumbai, Penang, Denpasar, Berkeley
|
Posted: Sat Sep 25, 2004 7:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
kitegirl,
I know we've communicated via PM. But I just wanted to urge you to get in touch with the European chapters of the Society for Technical Communication. The Netherlands chapter appears to be a bit dormant, but there is an active chapter in Belgium:
www.stc-europe.org/belgium
There might even be some students who are members, and they can tell you the state of technical communication education in local universities (as will your teaching colleagues).
Many additional resources are available at the main U.S. site:
www.stc.org
Be aware, however, that all STC chapters (and the organization as a whole) are primarily devoted to the field of computer software and hardware documentation. Nevertheless, there are significant numbers of medical writers, science writers, and instructional designers among the membership. The specific needs of engineers are only infrequently addressed. But you know this already! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kitegirl
Joined: 02 Jan 2004 Posts: 101 Location: Lugdunum Batavorum
|
Posted: Sat Sep 25, 2004 11:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
Wow. Great discussion.
I know I'm a good teacher, but more with respect to motivating students, picking up on their needs and creating a good learning atmosphere. Technically, compared to you all, I'm still using training wheels, but I hope to get there.
I really appreciate the effort you've all put into this thread - I've not really visited the Cafe since June, it's nice to be back in the community.
Cheers, K |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Susan K
Joined: 22 Jul 2004 Posts: 19 Location: (East Germany)
|
Posted: Sat Sep 25, 2004 5:55 pm Post subject: Nodding in |
|
|
Must get on with what I should be doing (it involved looking up who Coulomb was - enough to make us all humble!) but I can't resist sharing the big grin that spread over my face as I read this - oh so public - mini soap opera!
Also, I have to make a more stuffy observation. Was it stereotyping or prior knowledge that caused a writer to affix the title "Herr" to Ludwig, after he/she had expressed him/herself in the way that provoked the equally unprofessional response? I think it behoves those of us who aspire to professionalism to keep an eye on ourselves. Forums like this are indeed public and even though I have to admit to the base instincts that got me enthralled rather as one might be in a theatre, I think on the whole I'd have preferred to have been spared the knockabout and left with the feeling that the teaching of English is in the hands of the thoughtful who will guard against national or gender stereotyping.
P.S. All the best with the new job to the starter of the thread! Biographies of great inventors or discoverers can be a great way to get into a technical English conversation, if you're still looking for tips! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
AsiaTraveller
Joined: 24 May 2004 Posts: 908 Location: Singapore, Mumbai, Penang, Denpasar, Berkeley
|
Posted: Sun Sep 26, 2004 5:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Prior knowledge |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling. Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|