|
Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
dtomchek
Joined: 07 Jun 2004 Posts: 135
|
Posted: Mon Sep 27, 2004 5:36 am Post subject: A Philisophical Question about Japan... |
|
|
Hello everyone:
I was sitting at a Karaoke place with some friends and we got into a discussion as to whether "Japan is a first world modern country?!" The question itself facinated me and I would like some views from people who live/have lived in Japan!!! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
GambateBingBangBOOM
Joined: 04 Nov 2003 Posts: 2021 Location: Japan
|
Posted: Mon Sep 27, 2004 6:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
You need to define what you mean by "first world country".
It certainly has all the things that are generally thought of as being part of the first world- indoor plumbing (predominantly), high levels of literacy, economy that allows most people a half-decent way of life (compared to developing nations).
It's just that there are aspects of this country that still seem very much pre-Meiji reformation throwbacks, especially in the heirarchy of the culture, and attitudes towards "outsiders".
But guess what! That's what happens when your goal is to immitate without becoming a western country (actually changing people's general opinions is a very slow process, getting people to say that they have changed their opinion when there is a definate benefit for them is much easier, and faster).
So IMHO it's a first world country (non-western toilets aside ) but with attitudes that seem to change very slowly by Western standards. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gordon

Joined: 28 Jan 2003 Posts: 5309 Location: Japan
|
Posted: Mon Sep 27, 2004 10:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
I wouldn't say Japan is first world when it comes to housing: no insulation, cheaply made, corrugated iron siding, cracks down the sides of buildings. People live in buildings that in many first-world nations would be condemned. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Lindsay
Joined: 06 Apr 2004 Posts: 29 Location: kitakyushu, japan
|
Posted: Tue Sep 28, 2004 9:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
I believe the correct terms are: least developed, developing and developed.
Because Japan is a G8 country, I believe it to be a developed country. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
canuck

Joined: 11 May 2003 Posts: 1921 Location: Japan
|
Posted: Tue Sep 28, 2004 11:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
Japan is a developed country. This question is not very deepof philisophical.
A better question might be are people in Canada or the US better off than people in Japan. Many of us that live here have had to adjust to many different things, including many things that are inferior.
I heard an interesting fact, that most people in Canada or the States live paycheque to paycheque and would have a difficult time surviving if they lost their job for more than 2 months. Most people in Japan do not live paycheque to paycheque and are more prepared for the future. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
AgentMulderUK

Joined: 22 Sep 2003 Posts: 360 Location: Concrete jungle (Tokyo)
|
Posted: Tue Sep 28, 2004 11:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
A high proportion of Japanese people are loaded with money, IMO.
There is nothing developing about it. It's already happened.
Just look at the rate they spend spend spend.
In Tokyo, can you walk 100m and not bump into a girl with a designer bag, loaded down with carrier bags from expensive shops....
Take a look at the cars. I have yet to see rust on one of them.
One thing I notice here is that people just love to constantly say how poor they are. Particularly over coffee and a cream cake in an expensive coffee shop or during their PRIVATE lesson.
I couldn't afford the cream cake, let alone the private lesson.... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bshabu

Joined: 03 Apr 2003 Posts: 200 Location: Kumagaya
|
Posted: Tue Sep 28, 2004 11:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
Japan has the most developed train system in the world.
Second largest economy in the world.
To expand on canuck's point of living paycheck to paycheck.
"Disposable income". How many people in America or Canada are walking down the street with $2000 designer bags? Heated toilets that wash you.
Japan has a higher rate of early adopters than any other country that I know. They are eager to take in and buy new tech. most impression I get when going back to the USA, is �It�s too expensive.� Just look at mobiles, Car navigation systems in Japan and the USA. All were introduced in the USA at the same time or before Japan. Yet Japan is far ahead of the USA in all respects to these. Example a car-navi in the USA in boasting that it is the only one with a remote, yet another says it is the only one that is tied into the police broadcast to warn of traffic and accidents. I just laughed at this. Remotes are almost standard and police tuners are almost included all the time.
Lastly, no insulation. Yes ,that is true but that�s the last thing you want in summer. There are a lot of bad apartments in Japan. In the USA as well. The best apartment that I have ever lived in is here in Japan, the one I am at now.
What basis makes one think it anything other than Developed? I would like to know some examples that were discussed or more input from others.
bshabu |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
dtomchek
Joined: 07 Jun 2004 Posts: 135
|
Posted: Wed Sep 29, 2004 1:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
Konnichiwa:
Well, this was basically the jist of our conversation as well. Based on the available evidence to date, it sort of boils down to this..
By any tangible definition of the term "Developed Country", then Japan would qualify. Good transportation system, good education system resulting in a high literacy rate, Yen is widely accepted round the world for exchange, advanced technology is used, people have a high standard of living, etc. etc.
If we are talking about more intangilbles, then people think Japan still has a LONG way to go. Racism and Xenephobia not only exists but is widely tolerated and even encouraged by the authorities (Mayor of Tokyo is a good example), official gender inequalities exist as a matter of law (such as in case of divorce where the man can remarry that day but a woman has to wait 6 months), rights of the accused are hardly respected (Police can hold you with no evidence for 20 days and you have no rights to anything in that time including so much as a phone call to your family saying you will not be home and anything you say or don't say can/will be used against you) etc. etc.
That all being said, people who have been here a while do say things are improving all the way around... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
canuck

Joined: 11 May 2003 Posts: 1921 Location: Japan
|
Posted: Wed Sep 29, 2004 2:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think it works many ways. Look in North America for example...would you say there isn't racism? In addition, there are numerous studies showing that women in general still make 67% of what a man makes.
Yes, there are instances where it seems like conditions are harsh, but look what happened with the United States and all the terror suspects...they changed the rules somewhat and called them enemy combatants, held them in Cuba for over 3 years years without charging them of a crime.
You're right, some things that are said and done in Japan just make you shake your head. But it's that way everywhere.
Interesting, healthy discussion. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
dtomchek
Joined: 07 Jun 2004 Posts: 135
|
Posted: Thu Sep 30, 2004 1:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hello:
Well, I'm not sure we are talking about the same things though. The last study I read was that a college educated woman who remains childless makes 98% of what a man in a similar position makes (plus/minus 3% makes it a statistical dead heat). I think here its motherhood that eventually holds women back rather than anything else. As long as the divorce rate remains as 50% or better and women almost in all cases get physical custody of the kids, then the salary difference will always be there. Face it, when you are a single parent with a career, you are just stretched in too many different directions.
Yes, I do agree that Racism exists in every society but I do not think it is as tolerated or accepted in other socities as in Japan. Face it, I don't hear politicians blaming foreigners for every problem America has and seeing police post signs that say, "Beware of Foreigners" does not exactly inspire.
The problem with Guantanamo is something of an abberition. I personally hate holding them there without charges for some indefinite period of time but to let them go with possible catastrophic consequences also is not exactly appealing either.
You are correct though, a healthy discussion indeed... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
GambateBingBangBOOM
Joined: 04 Nov 2003 Posts: 2021 Location: Japan
|
Posted: Fri Oct 01, 2004 2:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
bshabu wrote: |
, no insulation. Yes ,that is true but that�s the last thing you want in summer. |
Why? I like to be cool in the summer. Insulation blocks the outdoor heat. Like a thermos, it keeps warm stuff warm when you want and cool stuff cool, when you want.
Quote: |
I heard an interesting fact, that most people in Canada or the States live paycheque to paycheque and would have a difficult time surviving if they lost their job for more than 2 months. Most people in Japan do not live paycheque to paycheque and are more prepared for the future. |
Most people in Canada or the States also don't live with their parents forever, (including even after they are married). The ridiculousness that is the cost of housing in many places in North America is one reason why so many have no savings. And rent looming over your head is a massive reason for not being able to survive from more than two months.
(There are other reasons of course, like there is the entire job for life thing. If your job is not stable, then the employee knows that the employer can and will replace you if you try to get a liveable wage, because the choice comes down to this: What's better for the employee- having a contract/part-time job or having no job at all? What's better for the employer- paying for full time staff benefits or not? So people work part-time/contract or both jobs with no stability and no benefits). |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gordon

Joined: 28 Jan 2003 Posts: 5309 Location: Japan
|
Posted: Fri Oct 01, 2004 3:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'd also like to add that double pane windows also keep the heat out in the summer. You don't have to put up ugly tatami shutters on the outside of your window to block the sun.
No to flog a dead horse, but is there even a building code or do they intentionally try to make things ugly. Whatever happened to the beautiful architecture Japan was once known for? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Dr.J

Joined: 09 May 2003 Posts: 304 Location: usually Japan
|
Posted: Fri Oct 01, 2004 6:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
I guess a lot of it disappeared when it was bombed, and people decided to make lots of houses quickly that wouldn't burn so easily.
All countries go through the "concrete is great!" phase, but I have to admit I've never seen it applied to rivers before. Then again, there is a lot of rain. Then again, concrete doesn't really absorb water like real earth does. Then again, if you channel it right down to the sea, you are OK. But it's still ugly.
Japan is first world, sure, but first world just means top of the heap. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Sweetsee

Joined: 11 Jun 2004 Posts: 2302 Location: ) is everything
|
Posted: Fri Oct 01, 2004 8:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
It is and they aren't.
I think MacCarthur said it all. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
canuck

Joined: 11 May 2003 Posts: 1921 Location: Japan
|
Posted: Fri Oct 01, 2004 10:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
GambateBingBangBOOM wrote: |
Most people in Canada or the States also don't live with their parents forever, (including even after they are married). The ridiculousness that is the cost of housing in many places in North America is one reason why so many have no savings. And rent looming over your head is a massive reason for not being able to survive from more than two months.
(There are other reasons of course, like there is the entire job for life thing. If your job is not stable, then the employee knows that the employer can and will replace you if you try to get a liveable wage, because the choice comes down to this: What's better for the employee- having a contract/part-time job or having no job at all? What's better for the employer- paying for full time staff benefits or not? So people work part-time/contract or both jobs with no stability and no benefits). |
These seem more like excuses to a problem which exists in what we consider a developed country, using Canada or the USA for examples.
It could be argued that Japan has the better system, living with your parents to save money and start off with a nest egg for the future when you do get married. (This is mostly a female thing in Japan) However, there are many 20 something to late 20 something people living with their parents in North America.
The people that choose to move out often have a tougher go of it, especially if they have to hold down a job and go to school. Most Japanese are blessed with the tradition that the parents pay for their educations, which leaves young people without a debt starting off. How many North Americans, especially Canadians take ages to pay off a healthy chunk of their income after university for many years. Having a student loan in Canada for many students is like making a healthy down payment on a house, without the house.
In North America, no one forces people to buy houses. Actually, buying a house as in investment is good, however renting and saving the difference is also another alternative. Buying a house in Japan is risky, because houses aren't investments. Resale values on houses are horrible, and that is why when people buy houses here, they plan on dying there.
A large percentage of North Americans are also riddled with credit card debt. I read somewhere that more than 50% of Americans carry a balance on their credit. That same statistic isn't true in Japan. North Americans are "huge spenders", while the Japanese are "savers".
Ok, now to my point. It could be argued that the Japanese have a much better system of thinking of the future than our North America counterparts. That doesn't even take into account the much better infrastructure there is in Japan, such as the train systems and the high technology. (this is in reference to being a developed country.
So looking from a Japanese point of view, they see people without a lot of disposible income, living paycheque to paycheque, riddled with debt, not as advanced in technology, and in Canada's case, a very poor transit system among other things. It could be argued that the Japanese may wonder if North America is a first world nation according to what dtomchek implied or what I meant by saying which country is better off.
There are so many ways to spin it. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling. Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|