Site Search:
 
Get TEFL Certified & Start Your Adventure Today!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

2004 Presidential poll and vote.
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> General Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
ChinaEFLteacher



Joined: 08 Sep 2004
Posts: 104
Location: China

PostPosted: Sun Oct 17, 2004 2:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

can't argue with you extor. not with somebody who obviously knows more than me and has the verbosity of a howler monkey. accosted you online, yep, can't stand you chimps with a "fire in the belly" hooting and hollering from yer tree, defecating on the rest of us below.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
extoere



Joined: 23 Feb 2004
Posts: 543

PostPosted: Sun Oct 17, 2004 2:58 am    Post subject: 2004 Presidential Election Reply with quote

Kev: I'm an Independent ---- loathe both parties, Democratic and Republican ---- and, although the Democrats alternately bore me and piss me off, as much as I vow never to vote for them again, I always end up casting votes for certain Democrats. (Kennedy, Johnson, Humphrey, Carter, Clinton) Even after swearing I'd NEVER vote for another Democrat, I voted for Gray Davis for California governor. I wish I could declare unequivocably to you that I will NEVER vote for another Democrat ---- or even that I PROBABLY will never vote for another Democrat. But .... I probably will .....

I indeed flip flopped.
You busted my chops.
I'm duly chagrinned.
But I'll do it again!

Accordingly, I hereby withdraw my candidacy for President of the United States.

Excessively remorseful, Extoere
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
poro



Joined: 04 Oct 2004
Posts: 274

PostPosted: Sun Oct 17, 2004 3:36 am    Post subject: Re: 2004 Presidential Elections Reply with quote

extoere wrote:
Poro: I know lots or rich rappers. Lots of rich car dealers. Lots of rich merchants (newly arrived, just doors away). Lots of fairly rich professionals, some in adjoining offices.

But not a single rich economist. Oh, I'm certain there are some. Somewhere. Must be. But they probably got rich by investing the same way as others. Or writing textbooks in deals with publishers that sell them to their captive audiences: students in economics classes. Not by prognostication.

Do you know any?


I don't know what you're asking, or even why you're asking it, extoere. Are you saying that rappers rule? - that economics consists of prognostication alone? - that you can't get rich from prognostication, therefore no one should practise it? - or that writing textbooks is not a part of mainstream economics? I'll be pleased to address, if you'll clarify.

Quote:
Naaah, I'm not terribly worried about the economic future; we show an amazing tendency to deal with our problems, when forced to, and come out still leading the world in most indicators. Amazing machine, our economy.


Indeed it is. But faith in eventual outcomes based on the resources of your economy is not a strong argument for supporting those who would borrow on those resources and pass the burden of repayment to future generations.

My point is that Bush's tax cuts and increased spending at the same time result in a federal deficit of around $500 billion per year, and that does not include the amount plundered from the trust funds.

All I advocate is responsible management of the country's finances, and not yeehaaa tax-cuts to appease the lobbies (and uninstructed public sentiment).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
extoere



Joined: 23 Feb 2004
Posts: 543

PostPosted: Sun Oct 17, 2004 3:57 am    Post subject: 2004 Presidential Reply with quote

Poro: Couldn't agree with you more. But the Hour Is Late, the Wolf Is At The Door and, like I said, I'm not worried too much about the economy. I'm far more worried about several of those missing "backpack" nuclear devices from the Russian arsenal, along with whatever the terrorists have put together with Pakistani and North Korean assistance, that have very possibly already been planted in the U.S. I first learned of these devices and tactics used in their deployment ---- through unusually reliable and intimately involved sources ---- some years ago and was quite astonished. Recent developments are truly chilling. Three of the prime targets are New York and Los Angeles, of course, and Las Vegas, where a hit on Hoover Dam would result in the same catastrophic effect, knocking out power to a vast area and flooding the basin below, probably killing at least 100,000 people immediately. I live in LA. For now.

cheers,
ex
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
distiller



Joined: 31 May 2004
Posts: 249

PostPosted: Sun Oct 17, 2004 6:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
None of that matters to me nearly as much as the successful prosecution of war on Radical Islam, wherever it is. Not just Afghanistan, not just Iraq. Wherever it raises its head. Wherever. Whatever ... is .. necessary.



Now I think we are getting somewhere with extoere. First of all we need to realize that no one act or issue should dominate the political spectrum. More people died from drowning in the US in 2001 that in the WTC but there's no Department of Homeland Water Rescue being given unlimited powers to sneak into people's back yards and make sure they are practicing pool safety. Islamic extremism is an important issue no doubt. But the first thing that needs to be understood about the current situation is that Saddam Hussein was not an Islamic extremist! His government was secular! That's why Al Quida never worked with him. So Iraq had no extremism or at least was able to control it. And now? Now Islamic extremism is everywhere in Iraq! So Bush has actually manufactured Islamic extremism were there was none and worse yet, as Kerry has pointed out, he has put 10 times as many troops to deal with this problem he created in Iraq than in Afghanistan where there really was and still is Islamic extremism. Hence, if you are really so concerned about this issue you must vote against Bush.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
poro



Joined: 04 Oct 2004
Posts: 274

PostPosted: Sun Oct 17, 2004 10:12 am    Post subject: Re: 2004 Presidential Reply with quote

extoere wrote:
I'm far more worried about several of those missing "backpack" nuclear devices from the Russian arsenal, along with whatever the terrorists have put together with Pakistani and North Korean assistance


Russian nuclear backpacks? Terrorists getting Pakistani and North Korean assistance?

extoere, one of the least credible claims in the WMD scenario is that a state would put them in the hands of terrorists - people they don't control. And the more extreme, undemocratic and unloved a regime is, the more likely it is to have enemies, which in turn makes it less likely to give succour to unknown entities, let alone the means to wipe out cities - they might even become targets themselves! The whole argument reeks of humbug.

Quote:
that have very possibly already been planted in the U.S. I first learned of these devices and tactics used in their deployment ---- through unusually reliable and intimately involved sources ---- some years ago and was quite astonished.


You'd better tell the president about this, because he has proven himself to have NO reliable or even reasonable sources whatsoever.

Quote:
a hit on Hoover Dam would result in the same catastrophic effect, knocking out power to a vast area and flooding the basin below


The biggest threat to your area is drought, not flooding. The natural state of most of the American West is desert, nothing else, and only water management makes it otherwise. In your position, I'd be praying for rain, and I'm serious.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Talkdoc



Joined: 03 Mar 2004
Posts: 696

PostPosted: Sun Oct 17, 2004 10:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

...

Last edited by Talkdoc on Fri Aug 15, 2008 2:11 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
poro



Joined: 04 Oct 2004
Posts: 274

PostPosted: Sun Oct 17, 2004 11:18 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Talkdoc wrote:

As a mental health professional, I have first-hand knowledge of and experience with the disastrous results of poorly designed social welfare policies championed and promulgated by Democrats, ones that psychologically cripple the people they are intended to help by fostering intergenerational dependency.


Well Doc, if you don't like intergenerational dependency, perhaps you could encourage the president to fund his excessive spending from taxes, instead of cutting taxes now and passing the burden on to .... the next generation!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Talkdoc



Joined: 03 Mar 2004
Posts: 696

PostPosted: Sun Oct 17, 2004 11:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

...

Last edited by Talkdoc on Fri Aug 15, 2008 2:08 pm; edited 3 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Manasketa



Joined: 25 Jun 2004
Posts: 35

PostPosted: Sun Oct 17, 2004 11:52 am    Post subject: if I may... Reply with quote

"...Epictetus asks still more strongly: "Why are we not angry if we are told that we have a headache, and why are we angry if we are told that we reason badly, or choose wrongly"? The reason is that we are quite certain that we have not a headache, or are not lame, but we are not so sure that we make a true choice. So, having assurance only because we see with our whole sight, it puts us into suspense and surprise when another with his whole sight sees the opposite, and still more so when a thousand others deride our choice. ..." -Blaise Pascal

-----

Both sides of any real question have equally valid points. The real issue is choosing what valid point you cherish most, or in other words, the end to your means. What do you value: temporal human life, or the immortal institution that houses it (or oppresses it)?

In the case of a real election, there should be a choice between tough or weak foreign relations -and at the same time a choice between war and a path towards peace in the Middle East. But since there is no choice with regards to the war issue since both Kerry and Bush are trumpeting the war horn with whatever breath they can muster, its my opinion that there is no question at all who should win the election. Of course, that's if people use their head. Bush has nothing going for him but his kill-the-terrorists, i'll-be-your-jesus persona, which I feel has no real value at all, especially since his only viable competitor is apeing his terrorism policies move for move.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
extoere



Joined: 23 Feb 2004
Posts: 543

PostPosted: Sun Oct 17, 2004 2:54 pm    Post subject: 2004 Presidential Elections Reply with quote

Poro: Nuclear "backpacks" have existed at least since the 1980s in progressively more sophisticated forms. Initially, there were four specific "packs" involved, each of which were carried by individuals using portable oxygen supplies to enable insertion from high altitude over pre-selected target areas. These "HALO" (and alternate "HAHO") insertions were aided by personal navigation systems, allowing accurate insertion within a few miles of each other into metropolitan areas, where special groups of rear-guard commandos had been surreptitously deployed to projected response routes from local police/military units. Using their navigational systems, the four individuals bearing the "packs" assembled at the target site, where the leader of the quartet --- "first violin," we shall say --- bearing the trigger/timer mechanism, directed the assembly and subsequent withdrawal. Escape window was based on variable timing.
And both Russia and the US practiced this exercise to exacting standards.

This, of course, is merely one scenario for the placement of a portable nuclear device, one whose technique has been perfected over years of practice. There have been more sophisticated forms of these "backpacks" developed during the intervening years. And some are missing from Russia's arsenals. One estimate is ... more than 70. Now consider that inspection of all incoming cargo in the US is something like 8-10 percent on everything from air freight to oceangoing ccargo containers.

No state? Try Pakistan, where a renegade scientist has enriched himself and, doubtless, many top generals, by selling plans for nuclear devices to North Korea ----- and a yet-undetermined-number of others. And Korea is led by a manaical leader whose utter disregard of his own people has resulted in the starvation of hundreds of thousands, and whose million-man army consists mainly of an entire generation of conscripts noted for their diminutive size from malnourishment. Oh, but one can be certain of his concern for what Kofi's international community thinks!

One last thing, Porous, LA doesn't have to worry excessively about its continuing lack of water resources. We have regular infusions from the same sources as the revenues paying for our bloated medical programs for illegal immigrants: Other People.

cheers,
ex
P.S. Check the weather on your international charts for Los Angeles today. I think you'll find that it's raining as I type.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
extoere



Joined: 23 Feb 2004
Posts: 543

PostPosted: Sun Oct 17, 2004 3:14 pm    Post subject: 2004 Presidential Elections Reply with quote

TalkDoc: Funny you should single out Foster Care programs. A few short years ago, I was working in the LA program; specifically, the one charged with providing medical care. Both in California and Florida, these programs have been under increased scrutiny by various agencies as a result of the horror stories still emerging ---- misappropriation, embezzlement, fraud, murder, rape, etc, most of which I'm sure you're generically aware. Not more than seven months ago, my ex-boss, the Director of Nurses for our particular program, quietly checked into a motel and injected herself with a lethal dose of barbiturates.

I make it a point to randomly query others in the department, "Whatever happened to Cheryl?"

You might or might not be alternately surpised and depressed to know just how many say "Not sure" or "Cheryl who?"

cheers,
ex
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
extoere



Joined: 23 Feb 2004
Posts: 543

PostPosted: Sun Oct 17, 2004 3:58 pm    Post subject: 2004 Presidential Election Reply with quote

Distiller: Forget my previous suggestion re: "Everything .. from MTV." You might consider "Wisdom Accumulated Through Hardened Classroom Experience. And Over-Priced Textbooks."

You ever consider Civil Service?
I suspect you'd be a natural.

Oh! And don't worry about such trivialities as qualifications. The noble advocates of Affirmative Action successfully lobbied for the elimination of the federal entrance exam once given to prospective college graduates. I know, first hand, of at least eight ex-felons with records longer than your putz currently running federal/city block grant social programs. So even without Walking the Yard, you'd seem a natural fit!

Damn! How I love such terms as "real issue" and "what you must understand." Or Peter Jennings' immortalized "To Put This Into Perspective For Us .." Makes me nostalgic for musty old Poli Sci lectures. Or the .... Evening News!

cheers,
ex
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
poro



Joined: 04 Oct 2004
Posts: 274

PostPosted: Sun Oct 17, 2004 8:15 pm    Post subject: Re: 2004 Presidential Elections Reply with quote

extoere wrote:
Poro: Nuclear "backpacks" have existed at least since the 1980s in progressively more sophisticated forms.


extoere, I know that tanks exist, because I've driven them. I know how artillery works, because I've fired it. I know atom bombs exist, because they've been used. But I am sceptical about nuclear backpacks, because it reads like fiction.

Governments tell you what they want you to believe, if it serves their purpose well enough, and they think they can get away with it. During Gulf War 1, Hussein threatened Saudi Arabia and Israel with Scud missiles, actually fired a few, and some more or less hit a target. Hoping to avert hysteria, and to keep Israel out of the war, the Americans loudly publicised the Patriot missile, claiming it could destroy Scuds in mid-flight - all it took was a few convincing words and a few hundred metres of fake "footage", and everyone believed them.

But the Patriot did not destroy a single Scud, and in fact never even hit one.

Governments - and especially the Americans - are incredibly skilled at creating and maintaining myth, and the "nuclear backpack" is an ideal subject for this kind of game, because practically no one in the world can contradict them. Hence my scepticism.

Quote:
No state? Try Pakistan, where a renegade scientist has enriched himself and, doubtless, many top generals, by selling plans for nuclear devices to North Korea


You don't know that though, do you? You've only been told. In the same way you were told that Hussein had WMD - which of course was backed by irrefutable evidence.

Quote:
One last thing, Porous, LA doesn't have to worry excessively about its continuing lack of water resources.


It doesn't? Well, one certainly hopes not. But it isn't as simple as you think. It was reported last week that the level of Lake Powell (Az, the second largest reservoir in the USA) was falling by over 50 cm per week, and only needs to go down a few more metres until it is no longer safe to operate the two power stations it sustains. Check out California's dependency, and you will get a clearer picture.

Quote:
P.S. Check the weather on your international charts for Los Angeles today. I think you'll find that it's raining as I type.


Excellent - you need it! Let's pray you get enough.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
extoere



Joined: 23 Feb 2004
Posts: 543

PostPosted: Sun Oct 17, 2004 8:58 pm    Post subject: 2004 Presidential Elections Reply with quote

Poro: Excellent points and well taken. I completely agree. Except for your denial of "backpacks." They do exist in reasonably manageable sizes, but large enough to require four carriers. Lately, I don't know. But I've seen sufficient the miniaturization of technology ---- "cameras" small enough to enter my own heart and display an occluded Left Anterior Descending artery above me on a television monitor, as I lay close to death on a hospital gurney --- to have confidence in the science of nanoscience. And this isn't even nanotechnology we're discussing.

You've driven a tank? A considerable expertise, factoring in tactics! Artilliary too? Done that. Gimme a manual typewriter anytime!

Re: government propaganda, of course, I agree. But Pakistan has long been the worry for nuclear proliferation, over 20 years now. And the reports come not only from the U.S. and Britain, but from UN investigations. I think there's evidence aplenty that Pakistani scientists and generals have indeed aided proliferation. And within the last week, the UN's own inspectors have issued a report detailing their discovery of missing nuclear development devices previously known to be in Iraq.

I hope you're right. I hope it's a myth. But I don't think so. The son of whom I sometimes speak was, at different times, both a Ranger and a member of a Special Forces group. He's also a qualified Jumpmaster and Pathfinder. If you're truly an Army veteran, I think you'll know the significance of these qualifications without going into them, right?

Ironically, he just called me from Texas where he's involved in desert training, prior to deployment to Iraq. Although he's rarin' to go, his descriptions of our remaining personnel resources leave me with a growing sense of urgency about the ability of an all-volunteer Army to sustain its mission --- at least in its present use. I think we can certainly expect some major shifts immediately following the election.

And on that point, I'm giving less and less of a damn WHO wins, because either candidate will be faced with the same grim realities.

cheers,
extoere
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> General Discussion All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
Page 6 of 8

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Teaching Jobs in China
Teaching Jobs in China