Site Search:
 
Get TEFL Certified & Start Your Adventure Today!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

The US attitude toward the tsunami
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> General Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Nagoyaguy



Joined: 15 May 2003
Posts: 425
Location: Aichi, Japan

PostPosted: Sun Jan 09, 2005 2:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Any evidence of torture in the relief effort? No. Just help.

Your preference that thousands should have died is fascinating. And chilling. The 'goons' are performing a service to the world.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Guy Courchesne



Joined: 10 Mar 2003
Posts: 9650
Location: Mexico City

PostPosted: Sun Jan 09, 2005 2:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think that sometimes, the largest machine in the world created to sow death and destruction (when required to) can actually be used for good, as we are (hopefully) seeing now in having US ships in the Tsunami region giving assistance.

Again, I'm not one to support the US military or the current administration, but on the surface, it seems that the fastest way to get help out to those who need it comes from the ubiquitous US army and navy presence around the world.

I really HATE having to swallow this bitter pill but there it is. I just hope they don't take advantage of this tragedy.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Josh Lyman



Joined: 12 Oct 2004
Posts: 98

PostPosted: Sun Jan 09, 2005 7:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Private organisations can't get to a lot of the affected areas. Many people are getting aid from helicopters. Where do the helicopters come from?

A: The US Military.

Leeroy: On MSN they show a video of some crazy Muslim cleric on Al Aribiya, saying that the earthquake was the infidels� punishment from Allah for their debauchery. Laughing

Surely Allah would have better aim.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
moonraven



Joined: 24 Mar 2004
Posts: 3094

PostPosted: Sun Jan 09, 2005 7:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Guy--if there were no advantage to be taken, you can bet that they wouldn't be there.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
merlin



Joined: 10 May 2004
Posts: 582
Location: Somewhere between Camelot and NeverNeverLand

PostPosted: Mon Jan 10, 2005 6:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Or would you rather that the USS Abraham Lincoln and accompanying ships have stayed in port?

I would, yes.
You don't need a freakin warship to haul rice. Do you think in the 1980's the Soviets allowed our grain-carrying warships into Port Lenningrad?

The whole idea that a nuclear submarine can give any sort of humanitarian assistance whatsoever is ludicrous. Bush may be dumb, but anyone who swallowed the "warships on a humanitarian mission" line is just a few points lower on the IQ scale than Bush. I'm not trying to insult anyone in particular - that's just how I see it and let the chips fall where they may.

The United States has a huge merchant marine fleet, by the way - it's the 5th "Service" and very competent in what they do. Why the hell were'nt they assigned this mission?
http://www.usmma.edu/
http://www.usmm.org/ww2.html
http://www.marad.dot.gov/welcome/index.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Cardinal Synn



Joined: 01 Nov 2004
Posts: 586

PostPosted: Mon Jan 10, 2005 1:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
The United States has a huge merchant marine fleet, by the way - it's the 5th "Service" and very competent in what they do. Why the hell were'nt they assigned this mission?


Probably because they are all used on scheduled supply routes and are harder to divert from those duties than warships on patrol in the general area of the relief effort. I noticed that the rice the American wariors were supplying in Sumatra had Produce of Indonesia stamped on them so it's not as if the American ships had to travel back home to pick up supplies for the relief effort. They could pick up rice in Indonesia and deliver it quickly. Had they diverted merchant ships, the operation would have taken much longer (they'd have had to unload their cargoes, load up with relief supplies and travel to the tsunami area). Also, warships carry helicopters and do not require harbours to get supplies to affected areas, plus they carry larger crews than merchant ships. All these things would point to warships being a good choice for the job of getting relief in quickly.
Just a thought.


Last edited by Cardinal Synn on Mon Jan 10, 2005 1:22 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
homersimpson



Joined: 14 Feb 2003
Posts: 569
Location: Kagoshima

PostPosted: Mon Jan 10, 2005 1:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
The whole idea that a nuclear submarine can give any sort of humanitarian assistance whatsoever is ludicrous.


What nuclear sub has been sent to SE Asia?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Nagoyaguy



Joined: 15 May 2003
Posts: 425
Location: Aichi, Japan

PostPosted: Mon Jan 10, 2005 1:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Merlin;

In a time of crisis, ANY SHIP available will do to "carry rice". It is really simple. If the US Navy had stayed in port, thousands of people would have died. Perhaps tens of thousands. However, they did not. They went to help. For that, they deserve praise.

I am not aware of any submarines being used in the relief effort. Mostly it is one aircraft carrier, the USS Abraham Lincoln, and a variety of smaller ships. Plus the Marines are using some helicopter carriers, since helicopters are often the only vehicle that can carry supplies to remote areas. Australian, Indian, and Singaporean ships also did great work and helped thousands too.

As to merchant ships, do you realize the time it would take to sail from, say, the west coast of the US to the Indian Ocean? Plus time to load cargo, offload, it would take weeks. Again, thousands would die. The navy ships started the relief effort by using their own supplies on board and distributing them. Plus using their facilities to desalinize water and deliver it. On board, the crews voluntarily went on water rations, cut back on water use, etc. so that more water could be delivered to the victims of the tsunami.

Seems you are eager to slam the US without waiting to think.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Guy Courchesne



Joined: 10 Mar 2003
Posts: 9650
Location: Mexico City

PostPosted: Mon Jan 10, 2005 1:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Cardinal Synn wrote:
Quote:
The United States has a huge merchant marine fleet, by the way - it's the 5th "Service" and very competent in what they do. Why the hell were'nt they assigned this mission?


Probably because they are all used on scheduled supply routes and are harder to divert from those duties than warships on patrol in the general area of the relief effort. I noticed that the rice the American wariors were supplying in Sumatra had Produce of Indonesia stamped on them so it's not as if the American ships had to travel back home to pick up supplies for the relief effort. They could pick up rice in Indonesia and deliver it quickly. Had they diverted merchant ships, the operation would have taken much longer (they'd have had to unload their cargoes, load up with relief supplies and travel to the tsunami area). Also, warships carry helicopters and do not require harbours to get supplies to affected areas, plus they carry larger crews than merchant ships. All these things would point to warships being a good choice for the job of getting relief in quickly.
Just a thought.


Good eye. Nicely put Cardinal
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
homersimpson



Joined: 14 Feb 2003
Posts: 569
Location: Kagoshima

PostPosted: Mon Jan 10, 2005 1:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
The whole idea that a nuclear submarine can give any sort of humanitarian assistance whatsoever is ludicrous. Bush may be dumb, but anyone who swallowed the "warships on a humanitarian mission" line is just a few points lower on the IQ scale than Bush. I'm not trying to insult anyone in particular - that's just how I see it and let the chips fall where they may.


What nuclear sub has been deployed?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Josh Lyman



Joined: 12 Oct 2004
Posts: 98

PostPosted: Mon Jan 10, 2005 7:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Cardinal Synn wrote:
Quote:
The United States has a huge merchant marine fleet, by the way - it's the 5th "Service" and very competent in what they do. Why the hell were'nt they assigned this mission?


Probably because they are all used on scheduled supply routes and are harder to divert from those duties than warships on patrol in the general area of the relief effort. I noticed that the rice the American wariors were supplying in Sumatra had Produce of Indonesia stamped on them so it's not as if the American ships had to travel back home to pick up supplies for the relief effort. They could pick up rice in Indonesia and deliver it quickly. Had they diverted merchant ships, the operation would have taken much longer (they'd have had to unload their cargoes, load up with relief supplies and travel to the tsunami area). Also, warships carry helicopters and do not require harbours to get supplies to affected areas, plus they carry larger crews than merchant ships. All these things would point to warships being a good choice for the job of getting relief in quickly.
Just a thought.


Good eye. Nicely put Cardinal


Agreed.

Actually, the US military are using the flood-like conditions to practice the invasion and occupation of a tsunami affected area. Now that they have perfected high yield, nuclear, sea-floor seismic events (HSE's), they are training to capitalise on this new found preventative capability.

Rolling Eyes
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
moonraven



Joined: 24 Mar 2004
Posts: 3094

PostPosted: Mon Jan 10, 2005 9:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Raven: �We birds at the beggars� banquet have been accused of callousness before. What can I say? Hey, the planet acting up like this is like a cough from the wings in the middle of the last act to remind SOME of us to say our lines right. And I have a feeling that the species for whom the cougher coughed wasn�t mine.�

Nor for whom that bell is tolling, either.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Nagoyaguy



Joined: 15 May 2003
Posts: 425
Location: Aichi, Japan

PostPosted: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

An alternate theory on the tsunami, brought to you by Sarcastics Anonymous....


Yes, the tsunami can be added to the growing list of tragedies that conspiracy theorists can attribute to the big bad old USA. First, they do secret underwater nuclear tests. Right beside the world's largest muslim nation, of course. Then, they create a disaster designed to scare and frighten the world. The fact that 150,000 or so brown people died was just a lucky side effect. The Americans that died, well, can't make an omelet without breaking eggs, right? The Eurotrash were also a bonus. Less socialists to pollute the world with their foul rhetoric.

Of course, the US Navy just HAPPENS to have ships standing by in the area. Coincidence? I think not. All part of the grand master plan of Bush the Younger to conquer the world. Once the locals are addicted to American food (of course laced with chemicals designed to control their minds and turn them into materialistic Chevrolet-worshipping zombies), they will do anything, ANYTHING to keep the supply.

Bingo bango, Walmart in Bandar Aceh by Christmas 2005, right beside the Marine Base and the KFC.

For a drooling moron, that Bush guy is pretty clever sometimes.....
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
moonraven



Joined: 24 Mar 2004
Posts: 3094

PostPosted: Tue Jan 11, 2005 1:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I wouldn't be surprised at anything done by the Bush Gang--he is NOT clever, but his handlers are.

Apparently my comment about the human species being the target of the cough from the wings--rather than other species--just flew right by your closed mind.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Nagoyaguy



Joined: 15 May 2003
Posts: 425
Location: Aichi, Japan

PostPosted: Tue Jan 11, 2005 1:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

It didnt go by my closed mind, it went under my butt. Dimestore philosophy usually does. I think you need a larger sombrero, seniorita.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> General Discussion All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next
Page 5 of 9

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Teaching Jobs in China
Teaching Jobs in China