Site Search:
 
Get TEFL Certified & Start Your Adventure Today!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Shameful Mali contributions to the California disaster
Goto page Previous  1, 2
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> General Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
denise



Joined: 23 Apr 2003
Posts: 3419
Location: finally home-ish

PostPosted: Thu Jan 13, 2005 1:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Has this thread, too, gone political?!?!?!? Sad

d
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ChinaMovieMagic



Joined: 02 Nov 2004
Posts: 2102
Location: YangShuo

PostPosted: Thu Jan 13, 2005 4:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Has this thread, too, gone political?!?!?!?


If you see "political" as correctly describing this thread,
how do/did you see the thread when it started?
NOT "political"?

Perhaps your "political" definition-in-mind is along the lines of:

*involving or characteristic of politics or parties or politicians; "calling a meeting is a political act in itself"- Daniel Goleman; "political pressure"; "a political machine"; "political office"; "political policy"
www.cogsci.princeton.edu/cgi-bin/webwn

Specifically, people using issues to score points against "the other," bending the truth, doing ad hominem attacks, etc. Yes?
===============================================
For myself, my focus is on the problem-solving aspect...in the spirit of David vs. Goliath, in the spirit of another definition of "political":

*of or relating to your views about social relationships involving authority or power; "political opinions"
www.cogsci.princeton.edu/cgi-bin/webwn

Yes, I believe that the powers-that-be are war criminals and are destroying the national/global economies/ecosystems.
But...I know there are powers greater than the powers-that-be.
People-power
Gaiea-power
Spiritual-power
Extra-terrastrial power

So...for me there's no focus upon "convincing the other" but upon cultivating neo-tribal "social relationships involving authority or power"

People-power
Gaiea-power
Spiritual-power
Extra-terrastrial power


Last edited by ChinaMovieMagic on Thu Jan 13, 2005 7:39 pm; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
john henry



Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 44

PostPosted: Thu Jan 13, 2005 4:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Eeeeeehhhhhhh...he he he......
Hey beavis.....what are you talking about??


If you see "political" as being its current place-in-space/time,
how do/did you see its beginning place-in-space/time?
"Political"?


???
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ChinaMovieMagic



Joined: 02 Nov 2004
Posts: 2102
Location: YangShuo

PostPosted: Thu Jan 13, 2005 7:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

"It"-point taken...and re-written...as "thread"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
once again



Joined: 27 Jan 2003
Posts: 815

PostPosted: Fri Jan 14, 2005 1:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

And here is another one...


Watchdog says US setting bad example

Richard Norton-Taylor, Julian Borger in Washington and Suzanne Goldenberg in Fort Hood
Friday January 14, 2005
The Guardian

America's human rights abuses have provided a rallying cry for terrorists and set a bad example to regimes seeking to justify their own poor rights records, a leading independent watchdog said yesterday.
The torture and degrading treatment of prisoners in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Guant�namo Bay have undermined the credibility of the US as a defender of human rights and opponent of terrorism, the New York-based Human Rights Watch says in its annual report.

"The US government is less and less able to push for justice abroad because it is unwilling to see justice done at home," says Kenneth Roth, the group's executive director.

The report comes as the Bush administration prepares for inauguration next week. The administration has shown little interest in moderating its aggressive approach to its "global war on terror".

Yesterday's scathing report argues that the US has weakened its own moral authority at a time that authority is most needed, "in the midst of a seeming epidemic of suicide bombings, beheadings, and other attacks on civilians and noncombatants."

"When the United States disregards human rights, it undermines that human rights culture and thus sabotages one of the most important tools for dissuading potential terrorists. Instead, US abuses have provided a new rallying cry for terrorist recruiters, and the pictures from Abu Ghraib have become the recruiting posters for Terrorism, Inc."

The report says that America's disregard of human rights has encouraged other countries to follow suit:

Advertiser links
Health - Weight Watchers
Discover the biggest change at Weight Watchers in years....

weightwatchers.co.uk

Health 4U - Vitamins and Minerals Online
Health4U - tax-free vitamins, minerals and supplements...

health4u.je

Ocado - Devoted to Your Shopping
Online supermarket and health food shop in partnership with...

ocado.com
� Egypt has defended a decision to renew "emergency" laws by referring to US anti-terror legislation

� Malaysia justifies detention without trial by invoking Guant�namo

� Russia cites Abu Ghraib to blame abuse in Chechnya solely on low-ranking soldiers.

But there are few signs in Washington of a change of approach. The White House secretly persuaded Congress to overturn legislation passed last month by a 96-2 Senate vote that would have imposed restrictions on extreme interrogation methods, the New York Times reported yesterday.

Condoleezza Rice, the national security adviser nominated to be secretary of state, opposed the measure because "it provides legal protections to foreign prisoners to which they are not now entitled".

The US military is proceeding with trials of supposed Abu Ghraib torturers, arguing that abuse was the work of a small band of rogue soldiers.

Last night, the trial of the alleged ringleader, Specialist Charles Graner, culminated in Fort Hood, Texas. A verdict is expected today.

Official inquiries have largely spared the military top brass and the administration itself, which first approved the loosening of guidelines on interrogation in 2002.

Alberto Gonzales, the White House lawyer who approved the guidelines, and who told the president the Geneva conventions were "obsolete" in the face of the terrorist threat, has been nominated attorney-general.

Human Rights Watch said senior US officials had tried to pin the blame on young soldiers. It said the US should appoint a special prosecutor to investigate abuse and bring to justice all those responsible. But the Pentagon said it was "factually incorrect" to say that senior officials were responsible.

The erosion of human rights has also reached the EU, Human Rights Watch warns. It points out that the British government refuses to rule out using information extracted from torture in court proceedings.

Basic principles of international law were being chipped away in Britain, Steve Crawshaw, the London director of Human Rights Watch, said yesterday. "It was dismaying that it needed a law lords' judgment to rule that detention without trial was not acceptable in a democracy," he told the Guardian. "It is even more dismaying that the British government seems reluctant to concede this."

Human Rights Watch also points to shortcomings in security laws in Iraq proposed by the US. In the vast majority of trials it had observed there, defendants were detained without judicial warrants, and had no prior access to a lawyer.

It points to another kind of abuse - "massive ethnic cleansing" in Darfur, western Sudan. "Continued inaction risks undermining a fundamental principle: that the nations of the world will never let sovereignty stand in the way of their responsibility to protect people from mass atrocities."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
once again



Joined: 27 Jan 2003
Posts: 815

PostPosted: Fri Jan 14, 2005 1:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

And for those that just want the important info


Alberto Gonzales, the White House lawyer ..., and who told the president the Geneva conventions were "obsolete" in the face of the terrorist threat, has been nominated attorney-general.

Pasted from <http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1390207,00.html>
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ChinaMovieMagic



Joined: 02 Nov 2004
Posts: 2102
Location: YangShuo

PostPosted: Fri Jan 14, 2005 1:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

LOWERING THE BAR of IDEALS/ACHIEVEMENTS

Yes...the ideals of the US inspired many throughout the world
Public perception of US as promoting progress throughout the world

Kennedy's speech at American U., (featured in Stone's JFK movie), emphasized US support for international peace but "not to be pursued by a Pax Americana, enforced by US military power..."

"Pax Romana"...famed Roman military combined w/famed Roman roads crushed insurrections and tortured insurgents. See the classic Kubrick movie SPARTACUS, especially w/the DVD 9 w/commentary/critique by the screenwriter, Dalton Trumbo, the progressive who was blacklisted in the 1950s and sent to jail for refusing to name names.

Perhaps the US powers-that-be "empire" will not last 1000 years.
Perhaps the US citizens will suffer from the decisions of their powers-that-be.
Perhaps the world's low-grade leaders will justify their actions:
"The US did it to us. Why can't we do it to them?"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> General Discussion All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Teaching Jobs in China
Teaching Jobs in China