| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
moonraven
Joined: 24 Mar 2004 Posts: 3094
|
Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2005 6:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| A topic that had more global significance might have been a lot more interesting--and would have created an opportunity for kids not just to parrot their parents' opinions. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guy Courchesne

Joined: 10 Mar 2003 Posts: 9650 Location: Mexico City
|
Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2005 6:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| moonraven wrote: |
| A topic that had more global significance might have been a lot more interesting--and would have created an opportunity for kids not just to parrot their parents' opinions. |
oooh...I'll try not to take that as a rub on my Canadian ego.
You are right. At the time, Canadians were consumed with constitutional debate (has anything changed?) and Free Trade.
What was globablly significant then? Invasion of Grenada? Iran-Iraq war, Palestinian/Israeli conflict... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
moonraven
Joined: 24 Mar 2004 Posts: 3094
|
Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2005 7:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I can think of a couple others:
The War over the Falklands
Israel Invaded Lebanon (several bombing of Jewish businesses in the Marais district in Paris occurred while I was there) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guy Courchesne

Joined: 10 Mar 2003 Posts: 9650 Location: Mexico City
|
Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2005 7:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
True...after I posted, I also recalled the Cold War...there was an incident in 1982 that nearly brought us to the brink, I think.
Iron Maiden has a song...Two Minutes to Midnight. (what the hell did Guy just write?)
At the time, George Michael and the other guy where at the top of the charts with Wham! Jitterbug. haha
Gay bashing was an issue. Acid rain as well.
As we are talking about age 11 students (me in Grade 6), there's probably a limit as to what can be discussed.
EDITED: for a sticky r key
Last edited by Guy Courchesne on Tue Jan 18, 2005 8:28 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
moonraven
Joined: 24 Mar 2004 Posts: 3094
|
Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2005 8:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I think you're probably right. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guy Courchesne

Joined: 10 Mar 2003 Posts: 9650 Location: Mexico City
|
Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2005 8:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It seems that most of us won't have religion as a topic in class, or even fear having it as one. Why is that? Do we fear being seen as missionaries, colonizers, emperialist? do we think that students simply won't react to it well or feel confortable with it?
If we consider our students as people, then take a look at this board where religion does get thrown into the pot on occasion (well, not any more) and see that it does generate a lot of communication, why can't we we bring it to our students? I agree that it wouldn't be appropriate for younger students, but uni age and up should be able to handle it?
Myself, teaching in Mexico...I would be able to puruse topics such as the role of religion in state affairs, or to talk generally about 'spirituality', or a simple comparison of world religions for the sake of simply talking about them. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
leeroy
Joined: 30 Jan 2003 Posts: 777 Location: London UK
|
Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2005 9:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| It seems that most of us won't have religion as a topic in class, or even fear having it as one. Why is that? |
Most people can debate what they had for lunch yesterday with no problems. Some, and thankfully a only precious few, can get a bit tetchy about religion - especially if they percieve their own religious beliefs to be under criticism or attack. I don't see full-on arguments or awkward moments as particularly good language-learning contextst - and would simply rather not risk it.
Consider...
"You had a baked potato for breakfast? That's disgusting!"
vs.
"You're Muslim? I hate your religion, it's full of terrorists!"
I know which I'd prefer in class
Some, of course, might argue that it's part of our role as educators to address such issues in the classroom. But then, I work for a private language institute - it's not my job to teach students how to think  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guy Courchesne

Joined: 10 Mar 2003 Posts: 9650 Location: Mexico City
|
Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2005 9:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
Consider...
"You had a baked potato for breakfast? That's disgusting!"
vs.
"You're Muslim? I hate your religion, it's full of terrorists!" |
How about looking for this?
"You had a baked potato for breakfast? what else did you have? How did you make it?"
You're Muslim? Interesting. Tell me more..." |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
leeroy
Joined: 30 Jan 2003 Posts: 777 Location: London UK
|
Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2005 9:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Yeah - but the examples weren't me asking the questions - they were other students. I'd like to think of myself as pragmatic enough not to say "You're Muslim? I hate your religion, it's full of terrorists!", but, if the truth be told, I'm not so confident about all of my students... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
moonraven
Joined: 24 Mar 2004 Posts: 3094
|
Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2005 9:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Guy, I don't believe religion and spirituality to be synonomous.
Religion implies an institutionalization of some beliefs to the exclusion of others. Too many wars have been fought and are still being fought by standardbearers of religions to insure a harmonious interchange in a classroom--which, after all, is another microcosm--like Dave's. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guy Courchesne

Joined: 10 Mar 2003 Posts: 9650 Location: Mexico City
|
Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2005 9:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I can't say that I haven't had the same lack of confidence in my students. I usually chalk it up to lack of effort on everyone's part and look for opportunities to engage the students further.
In practice modules in our TEFL course, I've noticed a definite tendency on the part of the TEFLers to make classes invloving q & a around Describing your city, what you had for lunch, what movies do you like...it's a challenge to keep it engaging and look for chances to be more in-depth and interesting.
Where do you teach Leeroy? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
leeroy
Joined: 30 Jan 2003 Posts: 777 Location: London UK
|
Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2005 9:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
In London Guy - I've got students from everywhere!
I'm sure 99% of them would approach a topic like religion sensibly, but it still seems like an unnecessary risk - especially when there are so many other topics out there.
I agree, "describing your home city" gets a bit dull - I prefer to add healthy doses of surreal hypotheticality to my lessons... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guy Courchesne

Joined: 10 Mar 2003 Posts: 9650 Location: Mexico City
|
Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2005 9:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| moonraven wrote: |
Guy, I don't believe religion and spirituality to be synonomous.
Religion implies an institutionalization of some beliefs to the exclusion of others. Too many wars have been fought and are still being fought by standardbearers of religions to insure a harmonious interchange in a classroom--which, after all, is another microcosm--like Dave's. |
Perhaps they aren't synonymous. That point alone could be something to discuss in the classroom, without tossing a match into the powderkeg.
Leeroy...if you haven't, go read the Titan Landing thread, which hasn't been zapped yet I believe. Nice creative source material in there to get hypothetical.
I haven't had the benefit of teaching ESL in an English country. I would like the experience one day to compare against EFL work. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
carnac
Joined: 30 Jul 2004 Posts: 310 Location: in my village in Oman ;-)
|
Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2005 10:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I stay farrrr away from religion at all times, but politics is ok when it's the students who initiate the conversation. Not the politics of their own country, but international politics.
I like to ask questions that elicit student responses and discussions outside of the textbook box. Anything that gets them speaking in terms other than the canned textbook phrases. (Headway, don't get me going!)Not long ago we had a discussion in which the students explained to me why the dishdasha is such a reasonable garment for the Middle Eastern climate, being not only loose-fitting and thus well-ventilated, but also being a white color reflective of the harsh summer sun. Reasonable. So I asked why, if white is the best color, which it is, do all the women wear black abbayas?
The silence from the all-male class was deafening. A collective "Hmmm", followed by some great arguments among the students, of course in English.
"Staring (or looking) daggers at..." is/was a phrase in common American English usage c. 1920s-50s.. Might be out of style now, don't know. Believe it came from British English, dagger from French, very old. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
moonraven
Joined: 24 Mar 2004 Posts: 3094
|
Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2005 10:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Carnac,
You have my sympathy. The mere mention of Headway in your post caused a molotov coktail to materialize in my right hand. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|