View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
basiltherat
Joined: 04 Oct 2003 Posts: 952
|
Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2005 6:45 am Post subject: Question for users of Headway |
|
|
How many contact hours do you feel comfortable with in covering a unit of study in the New Headway series. I realize that there are several variables such as class size, trainee ability, nationality of trainees and the such. Also it will clearly depend on the particular book (Foundation needing fewer contact hours, I find, while the Upper Intermediate seems to need more).
Do you think the following sounds reasonable:
Class size: 15-20
Class ability : appropriate for the level
Average Contact hours per unit: Foundation/Elementary = 8 to 10 hours
Pre-Int/Intermediate = 10-12 hours
Upper-Intermediate = 12
These hours would include any additional material supplied where required and WB but not video stuff.
I think the authors' predictions are a little unfair.
Any views ?
Thnx
Basil |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Stephen Jones
Joined: 21 Feb 2003 Posts: 4124
|
Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2005 7:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
If you're teaching Arab students add at least 50% on to the hours you would use to teach Spanish, Italian or French students.
I would reckon around 200 hours a book. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Deconstructor

Joined: 30 Dec 2003 Posts: 775 Location: Montreal
|
Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2005 1:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I suggest avoiding that retarded text at any cost. Though I think this is true for most ESL/EFL texts.
I create my own material: Great reading and listening stuff. I sometimes even record my own voice reading Poe's short strories and others. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
carnac
Joined: 30 Jul 2004 Posts: 310 Location: in my village in Oman ;-)
|
Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2005 8:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Teaching adult Arab students, we allow about 5 hours a day, five days a week per Headway unit in a normal schedule, which permits thorough coverage of the unit plus time for teacher-produced extra materials. Then one week review before three-day exam for every five units. (cumulative)The rationale is that it is necessary to allow TIME for lessons to be assimilated. Not just wham, bam, present perfect.
Recently was forced into a two-units per week accelerated schedule for one particular class of older students, which produced a fifty-percent failure rate. Am having on-going "discussions" (read: kicking and screaming) with administration, point being that producing English speakers is not the same as producing Toyotas. Sigh. And that student personal prestige or family connections is not predictive of language ability.
(Decon, I agree, but there are NO good EFL texts I have seen -all the most readily available are ESL oriented. I have written about this elsewhere.)
Headway is far, far, far from ideal but gives a framework upon which to build. Or in the vernacular, it's "better'n nuthin!" |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Deconstructor

Joined: 30 Dec 2003 Posts: 775 Location: Montreal
|
Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2005 9:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
carnac wrote: |
(Decon, I agree, but there are NO good EFL texts I have seen -all the most readily available are ESL oriented. I have written about this elsewhere.)
Headway is far, far, far from ideal but gives a framework upon which to build. Or in the vernacular, it's "better'n nuthin!" |
I agree with you too. There is very little out there. This is why I like building my own curriculum whenever I'm allowed, which is not often. I believe that a good class must consist of interesting reading, audio and visual materials, having almost nothing to do with grammar.
This is what I did in my last class (Advanced I): I divided the class in half. Each had to read a different article about light pollution and answer 15 to 20 questions. Once done, I paired them with a student from another group as they had to retell the articles to each other. The methodology is much more complicated than this though. There is great deal of pre, while and post activities that have to be done. But you get the gist of it.
Wadya think? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
dyak

Joined: 25 Jun 2003 Posts: 630
|
Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2005 9:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
carnac wrote: |
Recently was forced into a two-units per week accelerated schedule for one particular class of older students, which produced a fifty-percent failure rate. Am having on-going "discussions" (read: kicking and screaming) with administration, point being that producing English speakers is not the same as producing Toyotas. |
I've had to do two units per week of quite a few coursebooks, and it really doesn't work. In fact, the higher the level, the greater the failure rate. It's a shame that 'book politics' often come before student welfare.
Decon wrote: |
This is what I did in my last class (Advanced I): I divided the class in half. Each had to read a different article about light pollution and answer 15 to 20 questions. Once done, I paired them with a student from another group as they had to retell the articles to each other. The methodology is much more complicated than this though. There is great deal of pre, while and post activities that have to be done. But you get the gist of it. |
I love this type of class too. Stimulated students producing 90% of the English in the classroom. No grammar with vague contexts. No white-boards drenched in multi-coloured code. Just real English with correction and explanation when needed.
Amen. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Deconstructor

Joined: 30 Dec 2003 Posts: 775 Location: Montreal
|
Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2005 3:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
dyak wrote: |
Decon wrote: |
This is what I did in my last class (Advanced I): I divided the class in half. Each had to read a different article about light pollution and answer 15 to 20 questions. Once done, I paired them with a student from another group as they had to retell the articles to each other. The methodology is much more complicated than this though. There is great deal of pre, while and post activities that have to be done. But you get the gist of it. |
I love this type of class too. Stimulated students producing 90% of the English in the classroom. No grammar with vague contexts. No white-boards drenched in multi-coloured code. Just real English with correction and explanation when needed.
Amen. |
Thanks for the vote of confidence. Usually I get a wave of attacks from grammar lovers.
What usually disappoints me though is that students often feel that they are learning something only if there is grammar involved. Only that which is learned objectively is considered knowledge and grammar is passed on as objective knowledge. Being born in a capitalist world we often want something objective for our money's worth. Today I learned the present perfect. I must be learning language. Thus, students sit in a language class sometimes for years stuck in intermediate 1 wasting time, money and energy without ever questioning why.
I really hate to say this but, no client is dumber and blinder than a language student. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
basiltherat
Joined: 04 Oct 2003 Posts: 952
|
Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2005 5:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
Decon
I can really appreciate wat you say about coursebooks and creating one's own material for your lessons. The problem in many cases is the restrictions placed upon us by our employers who demand that we use a particular coursebook and cover most if not all of the stuff included in it.
Out of choice, i think most of us would prefer to do as you do. Such lessons are especially possible if one is conducting either high level groups or 'conversation' or 'discussion' groups. However, to ignore grammatical points at lower levels, i feel, would be doing trainees a great diservice. I mean, how would they be able to use correct grammar if they dont even know (or cant suss out that) it exists and how/when it is used. I am curious to know how you deal with lower level e.g. foundation level groups. Do you also create your own stuff and base it 90% on trainee talk/work ?
Also, how are your students/trainees tested ? Are there grammar based tasks to complete, for example ?
regards
basil
ps btw, I am no grammar buff. In fact i probably despise dealing with it more than you do  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Stephen Jones
Joined: 21 Feb 2003 Posts: 4124
|
Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2005 7:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
If we're talking post First Certificate level Decon's method is fine. The closer you get to Profiiciency the more you should approximate to first language teaching methods. In all fairness to textbook writers if you are looking for genuine though provoking texts the advanced versions of "Headway" "Streamline" and many other books do a pretty good job of providing them.
Lower down wriiting your own textbook is fraught with problems. If it was that easy then Decon, or Moonraven or the others who claim never to use EFL textbooks could simply publish theirs and live in luxury. You will certainly be facing reasonable opposition from management who will need to have an integrated set of materials from beginner to intermediate, including video and audio material. When your class goes up to the next level there will need to be material that builds on the material you have already brought in. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
basiltherat
Joined: 04 Oct 2003 Posts: 952
|
Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2005 9:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
an integrated set of materials from beginner to intermediate, including video and audio material. When your class goes up to the next level there will need to be material that builds on the material you have already brought in. |
absolutely !
basil |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Deconstructor

Joined: 30 Dec 2003 Posts: 775 Location: Montreal
|
Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2005 1:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
First of all, I could publish my own material if I weren't so damn lazy.
Secondly, the method I described can be adjusted for every level. I am presently teaching a level 1 class. They have very little language. I have this book called amazing Stories where each one is about 50 to 100 words with simple language.
Methodology:
1. The class is divided in half. Ss in a group of 3 or 4 read only the questions; underline important words, and understand the questions.
2.Ss predict some of the questions.
All this gives them a background to work with the text.
3. Each group is given one story. In each group S1 reads Q1 and everyone looks for the answers. The student who finds the answer, tells everyone else. If they agree, they write the answer down and go to Q2.
4. Once the questions are answered, Ss are paired and using their questions and answers only tell back the story to each other.
5.Once they are fluent enough, they're paired with a student from the other group as they tell their stories to each other.
6.Homework: Ss use their notes to write the story using the vocab from the text as well as their own.
Thus, I can keep students talking 95% of the time. They're constantly nagotiating, talking, participating in authentic language.
This methodology can be done with listening as well as video materials.
NOTE:Grammar is not forgotten. At the end of the activity, Ss can read again and discuss (for example) the simple past and how it's used. There are other ways also, but I can't go into it now because my class is about to start. I'll elaborate later.
Pardon the spelling errors if any. I had to do this really fast. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
basiltherat
Joined: 04 Oct 2003 Posts: 952
|
Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2005 6:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Decon
You asppear to be a shining path for us all - assuming you've had endless success stories with your style - maybe one day we'll all be able to do our own thing without restrictions from employers.
good luck
basil |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Deconstructor

Joined: 30 Dec 2003 Posts: 775 Location: Montreal
|
Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2005 9:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
basiltherat wrote: |
Decon
You asppear to be a shining path for us all - assuming you've had endless success stories with your style - maybe one day we'll all be able to do our own thing without restrictions from employers.
good luck
basil |
I gotta tell ya basil, it hasn't been easy. Basically, I operate stealthily. No employer of mine has ever found out what's really been going on in my classes. I usually create the impression in my employer�s and students' minds that I am using Headway or whatever the text may be. I trick students as well because they've spent money on the text so they want their money's worth. I understand that. I might do a page or two, hype it up then move on. I do give lots of homework from the primary text spending around 20% of my class time on it while everyone else gets the impression that it's at least 60 to 70%.
This is the only way I can get any real work done. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
31
Joined: 21 Jan 2005 Posts: 1797
|
Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2005 10:17 pm Post subject: jic |
|
|
SSS
Last edited by 31 on Sat Mar 12, 2005 11:42 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Deconstructor

Joined: 30 Dec 2003 Posts: 775 Location: Montreal
|
Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2005 11:45 pm Post subject: Re: jic |
|
|
MOD EDIT
My experience with Arab students has been mostly positive. They are an oral culture and pick up English extremely fast, at least the ones I've dealt with. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|