| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
7969

Joined: 26 Mar 2003 Posts: 5782 Location: Coastal Guangdong
|
Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2005 10:37 am Post subject: .... |
|
|
i'm not american and i'm not a big bush supporter, but i was a soldier. i saw that movie.... fahrenheit 9/11. and i thought it was a load of rubbish. moore certainly did manipulate much of that movie. on a very basic level, here are my comments:
he must have paid those military recruiters to act like idiots out in that mall parking lot, because i was a military recruiter at one point, and i cant believe what some of those guys were doing and saying to try and get recruits. further, he must have searched out the stupidest soldiers in the entire US army in irak (the fools singing whatever song that was about burning people or whatever) for cameo appearances in his film. some of the s*** those guys were saying sure isnt representative of real soldiers. that part's actually a disgrace and an embarrassment to the US military......
i know i'd never show a film that was so obviously one-sided. dont think chinese students are going to debate anything in this film with you. and i doubt you'll provoke any "interesting" thoughts. it wont happen.
those are just my feelings. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kev7161
Joined: 06 Feb 2004 Posts: 5880 Location: Suzhou, China
|
Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2005 11:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| he must have searched out the stupidest soldiers in the entire US army in irak |
hmmmm |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
7969

Joined: 26 Mar 2003 Posts: 5782 Location: Coastal Guangdong
|
Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2005 1:00 pm Post subject: .... |
|
|
| i like to spell irak with a "k." phonetics and all. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mugato
Joined: 17 Oct 2004 Posts: 120 Location: Here and There
|
Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2005 1:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
big hmmmmmmmmmmmmm from...
Hmmmmmmmmmgato |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ChinaMovieMagic
Joined: 02 Nov 2004 Posts: 2102 Location: YangShuo
|
Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2005 1:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Irak Attak
Big Mak Attak
Amerika...
To kill...or not to kill...
That is the kwestyun...
y'all... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mugato
Joined: 17 Oct 2004 Posts: 120 Location: Here and There
|
Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2005 11:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kool
might this thread have run its course? or is this just the beginning of something big and beautiful?
kreetings from eye-rak
Mooregato |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cj750

Joined: 27 Apr 2004 Posts: 3081 Location: Beijing
|
Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2005 1:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
To show this film in the sprit of what it is ...a mockumentery....would be productive to a media class trying to understand "slant", "spin" and "journelism for entertainment"..
there is not much to get upset about here...it is just entertainment... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mugato
Joined: 17 Oct 2004 Posts: 120 Location: Here and There
|
Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2005 2:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
yeah, it's all edutainment what we do here and i just wanted to get some feedback from those who have watched moore-movies in the classroom before.
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Norman Bethune
Joined: 19 Apr 2004 Posts: 731
|
Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2005 8:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
Michael Moore has made more Films than just Farenheit 9/11.
If you do plan to use his movies in class, I'd advise using "The Big One," or "Roger and Me".
Both present sides of America that Chinese students who Clamour to emigrate there never really consider...unemployment and poverty caused by the relocation of America's manufacturing base and service industries to nations such as....CHINA.
In the Big one, I think there is a scene where good old boy Mike slams China for using Prisoners to make shoes for GASP.....no pay.
What would a Chinese student have to say about that in English? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rickinbeijing
Joined: 22 Jan 2005 Posts: 252 Location: Beijing, China
|
Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2005 4:27 am Post subject: To Preach or to Teach? That is the Question |
|
|
I'm alarmed that you would even contemplate such a move without at least an alternative perspective. Even Moore himself admitted in an interview last year that much of what he records in his film is speculation and contrivance. It is the New Historicism run amok. Moore is above all else a self-promoter, or as we say on the American street, a hustler. Whether you believe his tale or not is immaterial, however. You're there to teach, not to preach. Save the soap box for Hyde Park. And please remember that these students have endured many years of indoctrination in their history and politics classes (that's why they despise these subjects).
I once taught a course in American Culture at the Foreign Affairs College, run by the Foreign Ministry. I tried to offer a balance of viewpoints and let the students decide for themselves. Anything less would have been paternalistic. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ChinaMovieMagic
Joined: 02 Nov 2004 Posts: 2102 Location: YangShuo
|
Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2005 2:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
R.I.B. wrote:
| Quote: |
| I once taught a course in American Culture at the Foreign Affairs College, run by the Foreign Ministry. I tried to offer a balance of viewpoints and let the students decide for themselves. |
FAC is a very prestigious school, preparing many of China's diplomats. I visited there when I was teaching at U. of Int. Relations. I'm interested to learn more:
*what were the issues/viewpoints you presented...and the students' reponses?
*what was your impression of the students?
*did your experiences w/them give you hope for China's international relations, or otherwise? (For myself, as a USAmerican, the recent Bush-ist appointee as UN Ambassador is not hope-inspiring.
http://www.wsws.org/articles/2005/mar2005/bolt-m09.shtml
"Bolton�s views on the United Nations are well known. In 1994, while biding his time in right-wing think tanks between the administrations of Bush senior and Bush junior, he spoke on a panel organized by the World Federalist Association, declaring, �There is no such thing as the United Nations.� He added, �If the UN Secretariat building in New York lost 10 stories, it wouldn�t make a bit of difference.� During the same period, he advocated a complete cutoff of US dues owed to the UN.
On January 1, 2000�more than year before George W. Bush took office�Bolton wrote an article in the right-wing Weekly Standard vilifying UN Secretary General Kofi Annan and affirming the policy of unprovoked militarism that would become the administration�s hallmark."
*did you know a chap...w/name something like Uhlrich?
*REGARDING---Both Sides of Issues...
I recommend
Issues Forums: Discussion guides
Each year, the National Issues Forums Institute (NIFI) identifies several public issues of national concern. Nonpartisan issue discussion ... www.nifi.org/discussion_guides/index.aspx - 17k - 10 Mar 2005 - Cached - Similar pages
[ More results from www.nifi.org ]
*RE: "much of what he records in his film is speculation and contrivance"
Moore had a rigorous fact-checking team, with an immediate response mode, to respond to charges from the loyal opposition. I'm curious, did you actually see the movie?
*RE: Fahrenheit 9/11...great-soul Ray Bradbury, author of prophetic SciFi book Fahrenheit 411, written 40 years ago, politely mentioned that Moore didn't have professional courtesy to ask for his consent to morph the title of his book... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ChinaMovieMagic
Joined: 02 Nov 2004 Posts: 2102 Location: YangShuo
|
Posted: Mon Mar 14, 2005 1:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
http://www.wsws.org/articles/2005/mar2005/holl-m14.shtml
Military interference in American film production
Operation Hollywood: How the Pentagon shapes and censors the movies by David L. Robb
Operation Hollywood: How the Pentagon shapes and censors the movies by David L. Robb, a former journalist for Daily Variety and the Hollywood Reporter, is a timely work. Published in 2004, a year after the US-led occupation of Iraq, it exposes one of the dark secrets of American movies�military interference in film production and Hollywood�s acquiescence to it.....
....While collaboration between the US military and Hollywood, of course, is not a new phenomenon, few moviegoers realise how much control the Pentagon has over the American film industry. Citing letters, internal memos and interviews with producers, writers and directors, Robb�s book contains valuable information about its insidious and destructive influence on American cinema.....
...Today a handful of giant companies, Disney, AOL-Time Warner, Sony, General Electric, Murdoch�s News Corporation and Seagram, dominate all aspects of the American film, television and entertainment industry. While their multi-billion dollar interests are not identical to those of the Pentagon, there is a clear recognition that their profits are bound up with Washington�s attempts to seize control of strategic resources in the Middle East and elsewhere. As Rupert Murdoch declared in the lead up to the invasion of Iraq in 2003, a successful American occupation would lower oil prices and benefit the world economy. �This would be bigger than any tax cut in any country,� he said....
...Operation Hollywood ignores these issues and fails to even mention the highly publicised meeting between Karl Rove, President Bush�s chief political advisor, and the film and television chiefs and the industry�s union bosses straight after the September 11 terrorist attack on the US. Rove called on those assembled to assist in Washington�s so-called �war on terror�. Predictably the entertainment industry chiefs promised to do all they could to help....
...The omission of these and countless other examples of the deepening collaboration between the entertainment and media corporations is bound up with Robb�s underlying political perspective�that military meddling and censorship of the movie industry can be overcome with a bit of pressure and a few minor reforms. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|