| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Deconstructor

Joined: 30 Dec 2003 Posts: 775 Location: Montreal
|
Posted: Sun Mar 20, 2005 2:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| fluffyhamster wrote: |
Darn, and there I was, about to put on me anorak and go spot some lucious locomotives (I'd made sarnies, a thermos of tea, crammed my Biber et all into my satchel as well, everything!). Now it looks like I'm gonna have to stick around and "face the mucis", have the last dance with this SJ after all. Thanks a lot, Deconstructor!!!  |
Hey fluffy allow me to say this first: WHAT THE HELL ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT?
But look, if you want to hijack this locomotive, let me know, OK. Got my holster and my saddle. I've been using the former for the TV remote and been doing nothing but polishing the latter.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
fluffyhamster
Joined: 13 Mar 2005 Posts: 3292 Location: UK > China > Japan > UK again
|
Posted: Sun Mar 20, 2005 2:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Actually there aren't any locomotives to hijack where I am at this time of night (the last train left at 11:16, and it's now about 11:30 here in Japan). I was making up all that stuff about going out to trainspot (not that I'm not a trainspotter! Wonderful hobby, the perfect complement to complements!) just so I wouldn't end up dancing at the Grammar Groove with anybody too hideous n' bilious. But I would like to hijack something with you at some point, D, and hope we can plan something big, and plan it better, soon! 
Last edited by fluffyhamster on Sun Mar 20, 2005 2:25 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Deconstructor

Joined: 30 Dec 2003 Posts: 775 Location: Montreal
|
Posted: Sun Mar 20, 2005 2:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| If you've read my posts, you know that I'm game. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
fluffyhamster
Joined: 13 Mar 2005 Posts: 3292 Location: UK > China > Japan > UK again
|
Posted: Sun Mar 20, 2005 2:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| (A worrying silence, then a paranoia, descends on the thread as the would-be hijackers start sending all manner of silly private messages to each other) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Deconstructor

Joined: 30 Dec 2003 Posts: 775 Location: Montreal
|
Posted: Sun Mar 20, 2005 2:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| fluffyhamster wrote: |
| (A worrying silence, then a paranoia, descends on the thread as the would-be hijackers start sending all manner of silly private messages to each other) |
Humm... Maybe we should cloak our messages in reported speech. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
fluffyhamster
Joined: 13 Mar 2005 Posts: 3292 Location: UK > China > Japan > UK again
|
Posted: Sun Mar 20, 2005 3:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Indeed. However, the question then is, which do I say:
You say you are going to hijack a train...
You said you are going to hijack a train...
You said you were going to hijack a train...
Lordy lordy, what's a student to make of all this?!
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
fluffyhamster
Joined: 13 Mar 2005 Posts: 3292 Location: UK > China > Japan > UK again
|
Posted: Sun Mar 20, 2005 3:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
"At the end of the day", reported speech is really just about referring to what somebody said. I need to do a lot more than worry about the exact tenses I'm using in the reporting if I want to make clear what it is exactly that I believe you meant by saying what you did. Explaining "myself" with the addition of something after any one of the above "stems" would seem the most effective way to me of resolving this "dilemma".  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Deconstructor

Joined: 30 Dec 2003 Posts: 775 Location: Montreal
|
Posted: Sun Mar 20, 2005 3:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| fluffyhamster wrote: |
Indeed. However, the question then is, which do I say:
You say you are going to hijack a train...
You said you are going to hijack a train...
You said you were going to hijack a train...
Lordy lordy, what's a student to make of all this?! |
The student usually makes nothing of this. On the way out she complains that she will never understand the reported speech while adding to a fellow student that upon asking how she could learn the reported speech: "The teacher told me to go F myself". |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dyak

Joined: 25 Jun 2003 Posts: 630
|
Posted: Sun Mar 20, 2005 4:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well, if you two are going to hijack a train, don't for god's sake leave a 'How to Drive a Train' manual and a copy of your favourite religious text in an abandoned car! Countries have been known to start wars based on evidence like that!
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
fluffyhamster
Joined: 13 Mar 2005 Posts: 3292 Location: UK > China > Japan > UK again
|
Posted: Sun Mar 20, 2005 5:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You may have noticed that my examples are a trio, just like SJ's.
In SJ's case, the missing example was: He says he was starving. Are we to assume by its exclusion that it is meant to be so very different from He said he was starving? The only important thing is that the report reflect what the person said (and who just says 'I WAS starving'? > 'I was starving until the relief workers came'); the choice of tense in the reporting verb seems irrelevant (the variation is more a native speaker thing), and any supposed choice in conveying "remoteness" in terms other than "tense" in the reported statement is also nothing that a student should be concerned (burdened?) with.*
The missing example in my case was: You say you were going to hijack a train.... I was being a bit silly...all four examples are directed BACK at Deconstructor and are therefore prompts to continue with the planning/planned actions, rather than reports to a third party of what D said. Or is this fourth example actually an odd one out after all?
*If what was said used a present form, then it is logical and also obvious too that the reported statement mirror it (as past mirrored past, above): I want to sell my car > He said he wants to sell his car.
I used only 'said' there to 'simplify things for the student', BTW, regardless of whether he just said it on the 'phone ('says') or said it a day or a week ago (more advanced students should maybe be studying 'He was saying...' if anything, rather than fretting over 'says' versus 'said' - at least the progressive signals tentativeness, hedging, and therefore has some sensible function to play, a new form for a new function, not another form for the same function).
This then puts the student in the sensible position of just echoing what was said:
London is nice > He said London is nice.
London was nice > He said London was nice.
A student does not need to worry about 'London was a nice city' being 'interesting' or absolutely true in any way until such a time as it somehow gets totally destroyed, in which case, the student's knowledge of the world, that thing known as context, will save the teacher needing to explain anything not already painfully obvious.
Why is it that teachers need to explain so much when it really isn't necessary? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Deconstructor

Joined: 30 Dec 2003 Posts: 775 Location: Montreal
|
Posted: Sun Mar 20, 2005 5:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| fluffyhamster wrote: |
You may have noticed that my examples are a trio, just like SJ's.
In SJ's case, the missing example was: He says he was starving. Are we to assume by its exclusion that it is meant to be so very different from He said he was starving? The only important thing is that the report reflect what the person said (and who just says 'I WAS starving'? > 'I was starving until the relief workers came'); the choice of tense in the reporting verb seems irrelevant (the variation is more a native speaker thing), and any supposed choice in conveying "remoteness" in terms other than "tense" in the reported statement is also nothing that a student should be concerned (burdened?) with.*
The missing example in my case was: You say you were going to hijack a train.... I was being a bit silly...all four examples are directed BACK at Deconstructor and are therefore prompts to continue with the planning/planned actions, rather than reports to a third party of what D said. Or is this fourth example actually an odd one out after all?
*If what was said used a present form, then it is logical and also obvious too that the reported statement mirror it (as past mirrored past, above): I want to sell my car > He said he wants to sell his car.
I used only 'said' there to 'simplify things for the student', BTW, regardless of whether he just said it on the 'phone ('says') or said it a day or a week ago (more advanced students should maybe be studying 'He was saying...' if anything, rather than fretting over 'says' versus 'said' - at least the progressive signals tentativeness, hedging, and therefore has some sensible function to play, a new form for a new function, not another form for the same function).
This then puts the student in the sensible position of just echoing what was said:
London is nice > He said London is nice.
London was nice > He said London was nice.
A student does not need to worry about 'London was a nice city' being 'interesting' or absolutely true in any way until such a time as it somehow gets totally destroyed, in which case, the student's knowledge of the world, that thing known as context, will save the teacher needing to explain anything not already painfully obvious.
Why is it that teachers need to explain so much when it really isn't necessary? |
Yes. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Deconstructor

Joined: 30 Dec 2003 Posts: 775 Location: Montreal
|
Posted: Sun Mar 20, 2005 5:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Reported speech: One reports someone else's speech because one thinks it is important to be repeated or one is not original enough to report one's one speech.
Besides, most of the time we misreport others' speeches. This is why we're always at war.
She is beautiful.
He told me that you are butt ugly.

Last edited by Deconstructor on Sun Mar 20, 2005 10:36 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
fluffyhamster
Joined: 13 Mar 2005 Posts: 3292 Location: UK > China > Japan > UK again
|
Posted: Sun Mar 20, 2005 5:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| D, you are like the magical sitar that can only speak the truth! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
fluffyhamster
Joined: 13 Mar 2005 Posts: 3292 Location: UK > China > Japan > UK again
|
Posted: Mon Mar 21, 2005 8:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| fluffyhamster wrote: |
This then puts the student in the sensible position of just echoing what was said:
London is nice > He said London is nice.
London was nice > He said London was nice. |
BTW, I'm not saying there that students should ever have to echo the exact form used when it isn't important to do so. In this instance, a student could obviously say either 'He said London is nice' or 'He said London was nice' after hearing 'London was nice' (although maybe they should get a bonus point or a pat on the head if they do report that sort of statement using 'is' rather than 'was'). All that's important is that past be used when things actually are past or no longer true (I sold my car > He said he('s) sold his car; I was going to buy the new Swan but decided I could make do with the 2nd edition > He said he was going to...but...). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|