|
Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Lister100
Joined: 26 Aug 2004 Posts: 106
|
Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2005 2:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sorry for the Yens,
Thanks for the discussion. As interesting as this is it's turning all Canada/US. I have a tendency to fall into the Canada route, something I have to work on. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
homersimpson
Joined: 14 Feb 2003 Posts: 569 Location: Kagoshima
|
Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2005 12:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
You have a huge Hispanic population and how many Americans speak English and Spanish? How many languages do the anchormen speak on CNN? |
Canada has a sizable Chinese population. How many Candians speak Chinese? Heck, how many Winnipegers speak fluent French for that matter? CNN anchormen/women don't need to speak Spanish; many broadcasts in the U.S. are delivered in both English and Spanish by utilizing one's SAP button on the TV. In addition, many public documents are printed in both English and Spanish. (I'm not talking about basic things like street signs, as the alphabet is basically the same, minus the "k" so the average Spanish-speaker is able to read.)
Regarding the dual citizenship issue:
Quote: |
If you are born here, you are an American, no matter what the nationality of your parents.
If you are born abroad, but at least one of your parents is an American, you'll be considered an American, too (there are some exceptions).
Immigrants who have been granted permanent resident status may become naturalized citizens. Ordinarily, immigrants have to wait five years after receiving their green card to apply for citizenship. Spouses of U.S. citizens only have to wait three years.
The oath that naturalized citizens take requires them to "absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state or sovereignty." Old passports must be turned in. But nothing prevents a new citizen from going back to his or her country of origin and getting another. Americans who acquired multiple citizenship at birth are under no legal obligation to put America first.
The country in which a dual citizen resides is generally considered to have the greater claim on allegiance, but no international treaties govern dual citizenship. Each country decides how to treat dual citizens. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Lister100
Joined: 26 Aug 2004 Posts: 106
|
Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2005 2:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Just remember Homer this started with your boast of being the most multicultural nation in the world.
Homer "As the only truly multicultural nation on the planet..." How many countries have you spent real time in other than Japan?
"Canada has a sizable Chinese population. How many Candians speak Chinese? Heck, how many Winnipegers speak fluent French for that matter? CNN anchormen/women don't need to speak Spanish; many broadcasts in the U.S. are delivered in both English and Spanish by utilizing one's SAP button on the TV. In addition, many public documents are printed in both English and Spanish. (I'm not talking about basic things like street signs, as the alphabet is basically the same, minus the "k" so the average Spanish-speaker is able to read.) "
There are a little over one million Chinese immigrants in Canada. Say 1 for every 30 Canadians of various backgrounds. Thats a little early to start changing the street signs. How many people of Hispanic descent are there in the US? And before you say they don't all speak Spanish the same could be said for Chinese and even French Canadians in Canada. The relationship is different too. French Canadians and Hispanic communities of the South share more in common than Chinese immigrants. What is worth noting is how many Chinese immigrants preserve their language in Canada. That's why Canadians are learning Chinese as a Second language on the West Coast.
Manitoban's were once more French than English and English Canada put through education laws to assimilate them into English. The fear was that Western Canada would be more French than English. This wasn't a great moment in our history, but as things stand if you're a French Metis from the outskirts of Winnipeg and you move into the city you will have your French television(no dubbing or subtitles necessary) can have your PUBLIC schooling in all French and your court cases in French. Our House of Commons speaks in both languages and I can't remember the last prime minister we had that could not speak both languages with some competency.
While French Canadians were practicing their religion and language the US was on the path of Manifest Destiny. The divine right of the Anglo Saxon race to rule over all others. Ever read your history in the Phillipines? Not too pretty! Our last prime minister was French, when was the last Hispanic or Black president?
The melting pot has its advantages and there is no reason to be ashamed of it. For our purposes, it would be a vast improvement to the condition of foreigners in Japan. People raising kids here that speak Japanese wouldn't have worry about them being accepted.
Another thing, which I admitted to already, is that I have my biases. Having lived in the multicultural hub of Canada (Toronto) where you can ride the subway and hear 5 different languages being spoken at the same time and none of them are English, I have a tainted perspective. I hear a lot of stories from my friend in Raleigh where the whites openly refer to blacks as *beep*(you know what), news about Arab mosques being burned down in the wake of September 11 and vigilanty squads hunting illegal Mexican immigrants. This might be backwater USA but backwater Canada rarely performs the stunts to get that publicity(maybe because its smaller). It makes you forget about the big cosmopolitan centres like New York (I remember some incredible person in that city saying after losing family members in sept. 11 that they didn't want the government to pursue any path that would do the same to Arab families). It doesn't help that backwater is running your country now. But I would like to know what part of the United States your from that is so progressive?
Here's one more old example to defend my point. You ask a 3rd or 4th generation white person in the US what nationality they are and I'll bet they say American. Do the same in Canada and I'll bet you'll get some giberish about quarter Ukrainian, 10%Irish, quarter French with a cherry on top. Mark pointed out that our Canadian culture lacks the filling to make people drop their roots, maybe thats what it comes down to? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
guest of Japan

Joined: 28 Feb 2003 Posts: 1601 Location: Japan
|
Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2005 10:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
Here's one more old example to defend my point. You ask a 3rd or 4th generation white person in the US what nationality they are and I'll bet they say American. Do the same in Canada and I'll bet you'll get some giberish about quarter Ukrainian, 10%Irish, quarter French with a cherry on top. Mark pointed out that our Canadian culture lacks the filling to make people drop their roots, maybe thats what it comes down to? |
The same holds true for 3rd and 4th generation immigrants in America.
I'm afraid that I think neither the US nor Canada is very multicultural as nations. Both have pockets which are very multi-cultural, but both have large swaths of areas that are not. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
JimDunlop2

Joined: 31 Jan 2003 Posts: 2286 Location: Japan
|
Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2005 11:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Here's a nice, broad, sweeping stereotype for you...
Why does it seem, that almost EVERY nth generation American/Canadian that I speak to always seems to claim that they are "part Cherokee" or "part Navajo" or part-some Native North American.... And they are ALWAYS proud to point out that "he was a tribal chief?"
/just sayin'
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mark
Joined: 23 Jan 2003 Posts: 500 Location: Tokyo, Japan
|
Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2005 10:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
guest of Japan wrote: |
Quote: |
Here's one more old example to defend my point. You ask a 3rd or 4th generation white person in the US what nationality they are and I'll bet they say American. Do the same in Canada and I'll bet you'll get some giberish about quarter Ukrainian, 10%Irish, quarter French with a cherry on top. Mark pointed out that our Canadian culture lacks the filling to make people drop their roots, maybe thats what it comes down to? |
The same holds true for 3rd and 4th generation immigrants in America.
I'm afraid that I think neither the US nor Canada is very multicultural as nations. Both have pockets which are very multi-cultural, but both have large swaths of areas that are not. |
This, I think, is exactly it. Toronto is not the same as the rest of the country. The city's population is, I believe, roughly 50 percent immigrants, and that is not duplicated in many places. There are people from everywhere and they're pretty integrated and things are generally peaceful. But, you get outside the city and things are quite different. My hometown is not a shining example of multiculturalism.
Most recently I lived in Vancouver, which also has a large immigrant population, but it's largely from China/Hong Kong and the Indian subcontinent (largely the Punjab area). Just two areas There are suburbs that are largely Chinese and parts that are largely Indo-Canadian. While everything's peaceful (it's Vancouver, after all), many people don't really mix all that much. In some suburbs, there's definitely problems with ethnic tension and ethnic gangs and whatnot. However, living in the urban centre, you wouldn't experience that very much.
Lister, to be honest, I think you're describing Toronto rather than Canada. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mark
Joined: 23 Jan 2003 Posts: 500 Location: Tokyo, Japan
|
Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2005 10:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
Anyhoo, we've drifted a bit off topic. What were we talking about? Oh yes, whether or not Japan is a racist society.
On that note, look at the recent flare-up between Japan, China and S Korea.
Japanese people (at least in Tokyo) always claim that they're shy, intimidated by foreigners, and embarrassed that they can't speak English. This is used to excuse virtually any behaviour that people might do. Japanese people aren't rude, they're just afraid of foreigners. Being consistently ignored when asking for help or directions, people looking for anyone to sit next to other than the foreigner, J-folks just laugh and say it's because people are afraid. But no-one questions the attitudes that cause people to be so afraid or whether fear justifies actions that would normally be considered rude if done to a Japanese person.
Most people refrain from citisizing Japan, because it's assumed that Japanese people are too insecure to handle the criticism. I had a student say to me that until she saw Lost In Translation she thought that all foreigners loved everything about Japan. However, in my opinion at least, deep down Japanese people don't give a damn what anyone thinks of Japan and are going to do what they're going to do regardless of any criticism. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Brooks
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Posts: 1369 Location: Sagamihara
|
Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2005 12:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
xenophobic is what I would say.
Before I worked in Japan I thought Tokyo would be somewhat progressive.
Nah, it isn`t.
I think some Japanese are sensitive to criticism and some could care less.
There have been times when foreign criticism led to changes. Often without the foreign criticism there would be no changes. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mark
Joined: 23 Jan 2003 Posts: 500 Location: Tokyo, Japan
|
Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2005 7:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
xenophobic is what I would say.
Before I worked in Japan I thought Tokyo would be somewhat progressive.
Nah, it isn`t.
|
That's how I would describe it, too. I don't think most Japanese folks see it that way, though. Most people I know say that they're embarassed that they can't speak English well, making it sound like more of an inferiority complex.
Again, I only really know the greater Tokyo area, so I shouldn't try and generalize for Japan. But, as for Tokyo, I've noticed that although folks in Tokyo say that they have no special affity for Tokyo, I believe that may most people here actually look down on much of the rest of Japan and take great pride in being Tokyoites.
I once mentioned that I was thinking of moving to a more outlying city like Mito or Utsunomiya for a different experience and people looked at me like I'd gone mad. Frankly, I've given up asking people about other areas of Japan because nobody knows anything. If they take a trip to another city, they can comment on only three possible things: quality of nature, quality of food and quality of onsens. That's it.
Some Guy: I went to Sapporo.
Me: Oh yeah? How was it?
Some Guy: Hokkaido has great nature and the seafood is very good.
Me: Okay, well, how was the city? What were the people like? How was the atmosphere?
Some Guy: Eeeeee, I don't know.
In my experience, people here think that Tohoku is good for onsens and nothing else, it's too countryside. Most people admit that they don't like Kansai very much, although Kyoto is good for temples. Nobody ever talks about Nagoya. Nagano is good for skiing. Shikoku is too countryside to even think about, and plus they speak like Kansai people. Far western Honshu and Kyushu never come up, perhaps they're too far to think about. Hokkaido is like the end of the world although it's good for skiing, and Okinawa is beautiful and good for vacations. Even living in most parts of western Tokyo is decidedly uncool.
Here's a recent conversation:
Japanese Teacher: Tokyo is made up of people from all over Japan. True Tokyoites are people whose family has been here for at least three generations. I don't know anyone like that.
Me: Actually, I know a few people like that.
Japanese Teacher: Who?
Me: Well, I know someone whose family has always lived in western Tokyo.
Japanese Teacher: (dismissive snort) But they were all farmers.
Perhaps people here feel the need to be better than other Japanese and therefore are more affected by their lack of English ability than people in other parts of Japan.
Also, people from other parts of Japan tell me that they tend to be friendly mainly when they meet someone else who comes from their home area. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Brooks
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Posts: 1369 Location: Sagamihara
|
Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2005 8:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
people from all over Japan come to Tokyo to make money.
People in Kyoto are stuck up too. As my Japanese boss says, people in Kyoto think that they still live in Japan`s capital.
People from Osaka are the only people in Japan who will speak their dialect in Tokyo. They are proud of where they are from.
I read a dialect study and people from Osaka to Kagoshima seem to have a positive reaction to their dialects. People in Kanto prefer to hear someone from Niigata speak Japanese than someone from Ehime.
I find Japanese people can`t always get along with each other. Japan is very regional, like England is.
Yup. the furusato has a strong pull in Japan. My wife is a university instructor in Kanagawa, and she seems to get along well with her students from Shikoku and Hyogo since she speaks Osaka ben to them. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
cafebleu
Joined: 10 Feb 2003 Posts: 404
|
Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2005 1:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
It was interesting to read about North America but ................. let`s get back to the topic!
Somebody pointed out that we don`t have to keep coddling the Japanese and accepting the very skewed view that:
They are Japanese therefore they are unique and everybody else in the world are `gaijin` therefore the Japanese do not need to engage in any kind of self-criticism about their racism, have to be sheltered from debates that other countries with claims to being industrialised democracies have to engage in etc, etc.
My husband is Chinese and readily admits the racism among Chinese but as he explained to me in a conversation that is too lengthy and complicated to reproduce here, the racism of the Chinese is different from that of the Japanese and according to him less dangerous. And less childish. I agree having heard his arguments.
However, the Japanese are hurting themselves the most. The world has changed but they haven`t changed with it. As Alex Kerr (whose Dogs and Demons has its faults but also some devastating insights and critiques into the dysyfunctional aspects of Japanese society and mores) points out, Japan has a history of opening up to the wider world only to resist changing some essential aspects of its society that need changing.
Japan could get away with being the closed country while superficially opening up or opening up to suck up the best of western technology etc, until relatively recently. However the world of 2005 is a world where industrial societies such as Japan will HAVE to change to survive and support the unproductive, ageing population.
My own country of the UK is unrecognisable in any number of ways from what it was in my parents` time. Yes, there are tensions with multiculturalism and there always will be. However, I love my country with its increasingly racially mixed population and English people generally accept that immigration has more economic benefits than not. Immigrants put the birthrate up - something that racist Japan will never allow.
My advice to everybody here - get out within 5 years` time. Japan will still resist belonging to the world community, will refuse immigrants although they will have the children that Japan needs to counter its stagnating, ageing population, will withdraw more into its racism and start scapegoating the tiny population of foreigners it has, and could very well lurch into a semi fascist society.
Already there is an ominous scapegoating of foreigners
yet Japan`s foreign population are by and large people with respectable jobs such as teaching and technology as well as those South Americans doing the vital `dirty` work in factories. I really dread to think of the mindset of the Japanese if there is a 5 percent foreign population - already the number is too much for many of them. Throw in a passive acceptance of what is fed to them, and the anti democratic nature of institutions here, and you have a recipe for disaster waiting to happen in Japan.
Yet the Japanese only have themselves to blame. Their racism is closing Japan off from the real world again and it runs so deep that they cannot handle the number of foreigners in Japan now, if we are honest. Japanese society will pay the economic price and social price for its racism and it will really start to happen about 5 years from now. Get out while things are not so bad is my advice. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
PAULH
Joined: 28 Jan 2003 Posts: 4672 Location: Western Japan
|
Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2005 1:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
Dont know if you saw it in this mornings JT but Japan's High Court turned down Debito Arudo's appeal, basically saying that alhough discrimination against foreigners in Japan was unconstitutional there was no need for Japan's local governments to pass special laws making racial discrimination illegal, which means that local bath houses, shop owners, landlords, universities, the local government can discriminate against you and your family and there is squat you can do about it, as there are no laws in Japan making racial discrimination illegal.
http://www.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/getarticle.pl5?nn20050408a4.htm |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mike L.
Joined: 28 Feb 2003 Posts: 519
|
Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2005 2:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
You're right Paul, but you can sue and often win!  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
blue jay

Joined: 03 Aug 2004 Posts: 119 Location: Vancouver, formerly Osaka, Japan
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
homersimpson
Joined: 14 Feb 2003 Posts: 569 Location: Kagoshima
|
Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2005 1:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
Just remember Homer this started with your boast of being the most multicultural nation in the world.
Homer "As the only truly multicultural nation on the planet..." How many countries have you spent real time in other than Japan? |
First of all, I never claimed to be a "multicultural nation." I said America was. If one doesn't accept the fact that America is by far the only truly multicultural country on the planet, then the debate ends. What other naton has immigrants from England, Ireland, Cambodia, Vietnam, Russia, Japan, Korea, Senegal, Mexico, Panama, The Dominican Republic, Cuba, Chile, et. al? Instead of taking the p*ss, answer that question. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling. Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|