Site Search:
 
Get TEFL Certified & Start Your Adventure Today!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

skin colour
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
 
Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> General Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
High Plains Drifter



Joined: 27 Jul 2004
Posts: 127
Location: Way Out There

PostPosted: Sat Apr 23, 2005 9:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

�such as yourself� This isn�t an emphatic pronoun anyway. An emphatic pronoun would be �such as you, yourself�. What you wrote is an example of an extremely common but nonstandard use of reflexive pronouns.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Stephen Jones



Joined: 21 Feb 2003
Posts: 4124

PostPosted: Sat Apr 23, 2005 9:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

'Such as yourself' is given as an example of correct use in the CGEL, and there is no suggestion it is sub-standard.

"A University Grammar of English" by Quirk and Greenbaum, section 4.85, states "In variation with personal pronouns, reflexives often occur after ,as, like, but, except and in co-ordinated phrases. Again the examples do not suggest non-standard usage.


The American Heritage Dictionary tends to support the idea that the construction is best avoided:" The �self pronouns, such as myself, yourselves, and herself, are sometimes used as emphatic substitutes for personal pronouns, as in "Like yourself, I have no apologies to make". ..... Although these usages have been common in the writing of reputable authors for several centuries, they may sound overwrought". A significant majority of the usage panel disapproves of the usage, though that still leaves a sizeable minority which sees nothing wrong.

Combining the three sources given, I suspect this is another case where the construction is more acceptable in British English than in American English. I certainly have no objection to being in the same boat as "reputable authors for several centuries" and the two leading academic grammars of English - though if I were in the same boat as them I suspect they'd all put me down to bail out the water Smile


Last edited by Stephen Jones on Sat Apr 23, 2005 10:26 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Stephen Jones



Joined: 21 Feb 2003
Posts: 4124

PostPosted: Sat Apr 23, 2005 10:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
I do not have the virtue of charity where you are concerned.

It does not matter. I will lurk on the outskirts and bask in the radiance of your colossal humility.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
moonraven



Joined: 24 Mar 2004
Posts: 3094

PostPosted: Sun Apr 24, 2005 4:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

While you're lurking, try learning to write.

Maybe that would allow you to communicate, instead of launching your snide gobbledegook from the sidelines.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Zero Hero



Joined: 20 Mar 2005
Posts: 944

PostPosted: Sun Apr 24, 2005 5:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

moonraven wrote:
While you're lurking, try learning to write.

Maybe that would allow you to communicate

This is certainly rich coming from someone who at:

http://www.eslcafe.com/forums/job/viewtopic.php?p=233637&highlight=#233637

writes that they "have dedicated almost 40 years of [their] life to education � not indoctrination � and to empowering students, not indoctrinating them."

The repetition in this litany, part of speech change not withstanding (which is but a disguise of derivational morphology), reminds me of Walter in the Big Lebowski: "We know that this is your homework. We know that you stole a car ... and the f***ing money. And, we know that this is your homework."

I wonder if 'Moonraver' is about to behave as Walter did after making this statement?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
moonraven



Joined: 24 Mar 2004
Posts: 3094

PostPosted: Sun Apr 24, 2005 5:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

xxx

Last edited by moonraven on Sun Apr 24, 2005 6:00 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
moonraven



Joined: 24 Mar 2004
Posts: 3094

PostPosted: Sun Apr 24, 2005 5:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Moonraven is not a THEY, so could not have dedicated THEIR life to education. She is singular.

Twinkle, twinkle illiterate troll--and while you are at it, look up the difference between singular and plural personal pronouns and adjectives.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Zero Hero



Joined: 20 Mar 2005
Posts: 944

PostPosted: Sun Apr 24, 2005 6:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Actually, as all other posters will fully know, I employed "their" as I do not know your gender. It is a gender-neutral pronoun.

Besides, I do not necessarily believe you are female anymore than I necessarily believe you are a published polyglot Native American 60s-survivor dissident PhD.


Last edited by Zero Hero on Sun Apr 24, 2005 6:34 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website