Site Search:
 
Get TEFL Certified & Start Your Adventure Today!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Jobs in Tibet?
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> China (Job-related Posts Only)
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
mendications



Joined: 02 Oct 2005
Posts: 4

PostPosted: Mon Oct 03, 2005 9:21 pm    Post subject: Jobs in Tibet? Reply with quote

Has anyone ever heard of any jobs available in Tibet? How about volunteer positions? Presumably people want to learn English there but I have never seen a posting for the area.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jeffinflorida



Joined: 22 Dec 2004
Posts: 2024
Location: "I'm too proud to beg and too lazy to work" Uncle Fester, The Addams Family season two

PostPosted: Tue Oct 04, 2005 12:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I just returned from Tibet and did not see any ads lookng for teachers and didn't see any promos or anything for English schools.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
YearOfTheDog



Joined: 22 Jan 2005
Posts: 159
Location: Peterborough, ON, Canada

PostPosted: Tue Oct 04, 2005 5:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I am not going to post them, But if you search on Yahoo! or Google...ESL TIBET....stuff comes up.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Roger



Joined: 19 Jan 2003
Posts: 9138

PostPosted: Tue Oct 04, 2005 9:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Officially,. there are a couple of public institutions that hire FTs, but that is relatively new. I suppose they have collaborative relationships with some overseas-based universities that accept the onus to make sure no one goes to Tibet with the "wrong" political or religious agenda. You can bet on being thoroughly vetted.

Volunteer services operate in the border regions between TIbet and China, i.e. Sichuan, QInghai and Yunnan; one of them is known by the name of "khamaid" (I think), which points to a former Tibetan province the CHinese incorporated into Sichuan. In Qinghai some Aussie guy is independently doing some work in the field of education, but I can't give you his current particulars.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
ChinaMovieMagic



Joined: 02 Nov 2004
Posts: 2102
Location: YangShuo

PostPosted: Tue Oct 04, 2005 3:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's my friends at www.khamaid.org

Re: Roger's use of "Tibet and China"
I hope newbies don't attempt to copy Roger, as he's a veteran entitled to "poetic license" (I guess)

For a USAmerican it would seem strange to hear someone write:
"Florida and America."

"Taiwan and China"
"Tibet and China"...
...it can be a provocative statement...
...either consciously...or unconsciously...

Like US southern good ole' boys proudly/provocatively
...hanging the Confederate Flag...

How would we put it:
�Tibet and the rest of China"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
Henry_Cowell



Joined: 27 May 2005
Posts: 3352
Location: Berkeley

PostPosted: Tue Oct 04, 2005 9:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ChinaMovieMagic wrote:
Like US southern good ole' boys proudly/provocatively
...hanging the Confederate Flag..."

Actually, those good ol' boys (note the proper use of an apostrophe) seceded from the U.S. government. To my knowledge, Tibet never seceded from the PRC -- because it was never a part of the PRC. Its population also never voted to become part of the PRC.

Communist political correctness is like any other kind of political correctness: obtuse, unyielding, adamant and delusional. Just like its purveyors and lackeys.

ChinaMovieMagic wrote:
How would we put it:
Tibet and the rest of China"

We??? "We" would put it exactly as Roger put it: Tibet and China. Simple and accurate, no?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Roger



Joined: 19 Jan 2003
Posts: 9138

PostPosted: Wed Oct 05, 2005 2:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

My first, and probably only, theological difference with CMM. I stick by my guns. Chinese are foreigners in Tibet, invaders, colonisers, imperialists. Ditto in Taiwan. Not necessarily so in Tuerkestan/"Xinjiang".
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
KarenB



Joined: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 227
Location: Hainan

PostPosted: Thu Oct 06, 2005 1:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Americans are generally not permitted to work in Tibet.

English speakers from most other nationalities are permitted.

I know about a dozen Canadians working there as English language teachers in some of the universities.

Tibet seems to hire most of their English language teachers through reputable organizations such as ELIC, rather than hiring "independents". They also usually ask for a 2 year commitment, so there's probably not much available for the casual backpacker passing through.

From what I hear from my friends living there -- the high altitude is quite difficult on the body. A lot of the foreigners there get ill a lot.


Last edited by KarenB on Mon Oct 17, 2005 2:53 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sandinista445



Joined: 30 Oct 2004
Posts: 136
Location: 世界

PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2005 5:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

"Tibet and China" would be more along the lines of saying "Puerto Rico and the USA," than saying Texas (or any other southern state) and the USA.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Henry_Cowell



Joined: 27 May 2005
Posts: 3352
Location: Berkeley

PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2005 4:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

sandinista445 wrote:
"Tibet and China" would be more along the lines of saying "Puerto Rico and the USA," than saying Texas (or any other southern state) and the USA.

No, "Tibet and China" is equivalent to saying "Germany and Denmark."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ChinaMovieMagic



Joined: 02 Nov 2004
Posts: 2102
Location: YangShuo

PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2005 5:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

How about New Mexico and USA?
Hawaii and Mainland USA?
New England and England?
New Orleans and Orleans?

Anyway, back to the OP before we're locked... Cool
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
Henry_Cowell



Joined: 27 May 2005
Posts: 3352
Location: Berkeley

PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2005 7:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Can anyone supply the date on which the Tibetan people (excluding the Han Chinese) willingly decided to "join" the PRC?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
hengyangdave



Joined: 08 Oct 2005
Posts: 211
Location: HengYang, Hunan, China

PostPosted: Sun Oct 09, 2005 10:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

guys.....having discussed this with Chinese nationals in China.....


"Tibet is as much China as Australia is for the White people....you went to Australia, invaded it, control it....now why dont YOU give it back to the Aboriginals?"

any arguments that can defeat this?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Roger



Joined: 19 Jan 2003
Posts: 9138

PostPosted: Sun Oct 09, 2005 1:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I would wager no Europan is pretending that the white man has always honourably discharged his duty towards the yellow, red, brown and black peoples in the world. It is therefore almost insincere to juxtapose white countries' expansions to the expansion that China has performed over the last few hundred years.
I will keep referring to Tibet as an invaded, formerly sovereign country so long as the Chinese are ruling over it.
The Chinese have been pitying themselves and accusing former European powers of having invaded China before; they ought to be the first to own up to the fact that their presence in TIbet is an anomaly due to their own imperialist expansionism.
The Chinese are guilty of some of the most heinous crimes against humanity to the same extent as the U.S.A. against Red Indians ('native Americans'), European and Arab colonisers in Africa, and the Japanese in Asia. The only difference is: the crimes of the white man have been meticulously listed, researched and described in detail in history books; the Chinese crimes have been kept under wraps in China.
BUt the Chinese territorial claims to Tibet are no more tenable than the Russian claims to Kirgistan and Kasakhstan - to name but 2 of those -stans - were when Russian imperialism masqueraded as the Soviet empire.
The Chinese advance that one of the daughters of an ancient emperor married a Tibetan king; ancient flesh trade as modern-day justification for foreign rule over a small people? This is so ridiculous, considering that the current Chinese rulers pretend to loathe feudalism...

There had never been Chinese settlers in Tibet; occasionally the emperor had an 'amban' resident in Lhasa; the last time the amban made headlines was when the British invaded Tibetn in 1904. The British massacred a good many TIbetans - but no Chinese soldiers! How can the Chinese claim they were the sovereigns over TIbet since they didn't even deploy troops to defend Tibet?
They had been asked in the 18th century to come to the help of the TIbetans who had come under attack from Nepalese raiders. Since that time, Tibet had been a sort of protectorate.

When the Chinese toppled their last (foreign: a Manchu!) emperor in 1911, TIbet declared de jure independence.

The Chinese came as a marauding occupation army, murdering 1.5 million natives and destroying their indigenous culture in the turbulent years from '66 to '76.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
KarenB



Joined: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 227
Location: Hainan

PostPosted: Mon Oct 17, 2005 2:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sorry this is long, but here's a little background on Tibet:

Tibet emerged as a unified state with a centralized monarchy in the 7th Century A.D. (during the Tang Dynasty in China). At this time, Indian missionaries introduced Lamaistic Buddhism, developed an alphabet for the Tibetan language, and translated Buddhist sacred texts. The Indian Buddhists also endeavored to suppress the indigenous Bon religion (Shamaism) of Tibet.

Under Song-tsen Gampo, who ruled from A.D. 620-649, Tibet began sending tribute to China. Tibet grew in power in the late 7th century, however, and began to threaten China, with forces even encroaching as close as 200 miles from Chang'an (Xi'an) in 696, during the reign of Empress Wu.

The Chinese Tang Emperor Xuanzong (712-756) emerged victorious in the conflict with Tibet, and signed a peace treaty in which Tibet acknowledged Chinese suzerainty. (A suzerain is a state that controls the international affairs of another state, but generally allows local autonomous rule).

While China was preoccupied with the rebellion of An Lushan, Tibet took the opportunity to briefly capture Chang'an in 763, but retreated almost immediately. Between 780-87, the Tang Emperor Dezong attempted to negotiate a settlement with Tibet, which Tibet refused. Dezong then allied himself with the Uighur (marrying his daughter to a Uighur leader) to subjugate Tibet.

The Mongol conqueror Genghis Khan incorporated Tibet into the Mongolian empire in 1206. In the 15th century, the Yuan (Mongol) Empire appointed the Dalai Lama and gave him political power of Tibet.

During the Ming Dynasty, Tibet was once again subjected to China in 1379.

In the Qing Dynasty, the Dzungar people invaded Tibet in 1717. The Qing Emperor Kangxi intervened and established a Chinese presence in Lhasa. In 1750, his grandson, Qianlong, instated the Dalai Lama as temporal ruler of a state with internal autonomy, but with China as the "protectorate." Emperor Qianlong decreed that the future Dalai Lama should be chosen by lot, and sent a golden urn to Lhasa for that purpose.

Nepal attempted an unsuccessful invasion of Tibet at the turn of the 18th century, and in 1904, British forces from India invaded Tibet, attempting to establish a foothold. In 1906, Britain and China established the Anglo-Chinese Agreement in which Britain recognized the Chinese Empire as Tibet's Suzerain. China paid a large indemnity to Britain, who then withdrew her troops. In 1907, Britain and Russia finalized an agreement pledging non-interference in Tibetan affairs, and acknowledging Chinese suzerainty.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> China (Job-related Posts Only) All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Teaching Jobs in China
Teaching Jobs in China