Site Search:
 
Get TEFL Certified & Start Your Adventure Today!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Retirement Options (Are we all screwed?)
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> General Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
naturegirl321



Joined: 04 May 2003
Posts: 9041
Location: home sweet home

PostPosted: Tue Nov 29, 2005 2:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I've got 2 IRAs. one that I pay taxes now and one that I don't . Havne't had a taxable income for about 4 years now. Hopeing to get 5000 by the time I'm 25, I've been told that would set me up when I'm reitred.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Jizzo T. Clown



Joined: 28 Apr 2005
Posts: 668
Location: performing in a classroom near you!

PostPosted: Tue Nov 29, 2005 9:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

naturegirl321 wrote:
I've got 2 IRAs. one that I pay taxes now and one that I don't.


How did you set those up?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
naturegirl321



Joined: 04 May 2003
Posts: 9041
Location: home sweet home

PostPosted: Tue Nov 29, 2005 11:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Talk to your financial advisor. I went through my parents advisor.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Joe Gahona



Joined: 24 Apr 2004
Posts: 27
Location: New York City

PostPosted: Wed Nov 30, 2005 4:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Roth IRAs are tax-free, and in my opinion it should be the first line of retirement savings. You are limited to investing $4K/year, but it goes up to $5K in 2007 (I think). When you're 60, you can pull out every last cent and you won't be taxed at all.

I wasn't trying to stress the lower-income people are worse tenants than high-income people -- I used to do wood floors for my buddy's company, and in general the nicer the house was, the fussier the people were. (We did some places that looked like crack houses in Detroit and the people were usually great.) My point was that real estate has a hassle factor that's not there with regular ol' investing -- which is fine for someone like you who enjoys it and doesn't see it as a hassle. But I know people who've gone into real estate thinking it was strictly an investment and were in for a rude awakening when problems arose.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tedkarma



Joined: 17 May 2004
Posts: 1598
Location: The World is my Oyster

PostPosted: Wed Nov 30, 2005 6:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Joe Gahona wrote:

I wasn't trying to stress the lower-income people are worse tenants than high-income people -- I used to do wood floors for my buddy's company, and in general the nicer the house was, the fussier the people were. (We did some places that looked like crack houses in Detroit and the people were usually great.) My point was that real estate has a hassle factor that's not there with regular ol' investing -- which is fine for someone like you who enjoys it and doesn't see it as a hassle. But I know people who've gone into real estate thinking it was strictly an investment and were in for a rude awakening when problems arose.


I agree - property management is not for newbies. I use professional companies to manage my properties. But, I DID manage my own properties for about 15 years. It is not easy - but it does help a property owner to know the issues your manager is facing - and helps you know if they are doing a good job - or even if they are cheating you - or not.

It is - or should be - "just an investment" - part of a portfolio. When I say that - what I mean is that people should not get emotionally attached to property - and they often do. And, that they should evaluate property as they would any other investment.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
tedkarma



Joined: 17 May 2004
Posts: 1598
Location: The World is my Oyster

PostPosted: Wed Nov 30, 2005 6:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

An important consideration about real estate is that it adds a stability to your investment portfolio - that other investments generally can't.

Okay, bonds are stable - but don't offer the income protection that depreciation provides - nor the potential appreciation in price that real estate can provide (okay you can get some appreciation in bonds when interest rates go down - but it is a sophisticated game I don't want to play).

Also, the illiquidity of real estate keeps you from being too implusive about your investment plan - you know you could/should hold on to it for 8-10 years or at least through a full economic cycle before selling.

And - don't forget tax advantages when you do unload. I just made a significant gain on the sale of a condo - and my total tax bill for the gain (net minus basis) bill will be less than 5%. Hard to beat!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
moot point



Joined: 22 Feb 2005
Posts: 441

PostPosted: Wed Nov 30, 2005 8:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

On the topic of bonds tedkarma wrote:
Quote:
but don't offer the income protection that depreciation provides


Can you explain this further? I don't understand.

BTW, and perhaps I missed it in an earlier posting, but are you only investing in properties in the U.S.?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tedkarma



Joined: 17 May 2004
Posts: 1598
Location: The World is my Oyster

PostPosted: Wed Nov 30, 2005 10:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

moot point wrote:
On the topic of bonds tedkarma wrote:
Quote:
but don't offer the income protection that depreciation provides


Can you explain this further? I don't understand.

BTW, and perhaps I missed it in an earlier posting, but are you only investing in properties in the U.S.?


Depreciation is a tax deduction subtracting the value of the aging of the property across the anticipated years of its life. This deduction is taken straight off your income - reducing your taxes on your income.

Example:
$400,000 house, thirty years straight line depreciation, figure the land is 1/4 of the value (land doesn't depreciate) = $10,000 taken off your income - that you don't have to pay taxes on. Of course, the house will last much longer than 30 years - but that's what the gov't allows you to do. There are other tax issues related to the depreciation of course, but this isn't the place to get into them.

I invest only in the US - in the area where I used to live - it is the market I know best.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
moot point



Joined: 22 Feb 2005
Posts: 441

PostPosted: Wed Nov 30, 2005 11:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks. That is clearer now. Originally, I thought you were referring to how bonds work.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
JZer



Joined: 16 Jan 2005
Posts: 3898
Location: Pittsburgh

PostPosted: Thu Dec 01, 2005 12:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

tedkarma,

it is true that cheaper properties tend to produce a better return. I don't know if you remember but we talked about real estate before. I AM currently looking to buy a house in my hometown for $40,000. The rent per month would be $850. The one disadvantage of properties in poor neighborhoods is I don't think they appreciate as much, so they should be looked at soley for their returns from the rent that is being paid.

I am not expert but this is my opinion.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tedkarma