View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
naturegirl321

Joined: 04 May 2003 Posts: 9041 Location: home sweet home
|
Posted: Tue Nov 29, 2005 2:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I've got 2 IRAs. one that I pay taxes now and one that I don't . Havne't had a taxable income for about 4 years now. Hopeing to get 5000 by the time I'm 25, I've been told that would set me up when I'm reitred. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Jizzo T. Clown

Joined: 28 Apr 2005 Posts: 668 Location: performing in a classroom near you!
|
Posted: Tue Nov 29, 2005 9:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
naturegirl321 wrote: |
I've got 2 IRAs. one that I pay taxes now and one that I don't. |
How did you set those up? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
naturegirl321

Joined: 04 May 2003 Posts: 9041 Location: home sweet home
|
Posted: Tue Nov 29, 2005 11:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Talk to your financial advisor. I went through my parents advisor. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Joe Gahona
Joined: 24 Apr 2004 Posts: 27 Location: New York City
|
Posted: Wed Nov 30, 2005 4:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
Roth IRAs are tax-free, and in my opinion it should be the first line of retirement savings. You are limited to investing $4K/year, but it goes up to $5K in 2007 (I think). When you're 60, you can pull out every last cent and you won't be taxed at all.
I wasn't trying to stress the lower-income people are worse tenants than high-income people -- I used to do wood floors for my buddy's company, and in general the nicer the house was, the fussier the people were. (We did some places that looked like crack houses in Detroit and the people were usually great.) My point was that real estate has a hassle factor that's not there with regular ol' investing -- which is fine for someone like you who enjoys it and doesn't see it as a hassle. But I know people who've gone into real estate thinking it was strictly an investment and were in for a rude awakening when problems arose. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
tedkarma

Joined: 17 May 2004 Posts: 1598 Location: The World is my Oyster
|
Posted: Wed Nov 30, 2005 6:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
Joe Gahona wrote: |
I wasn't trying to stress the lower-income people are worse tenants than high-income people -- I used to do wood floors for my buddy's company, and in general the nicer the house was, the fussier the people were. (We did some places that looked like crack houses in Detroit and the people were usually great.) My point was that real estate has a hassle factor that's not there with regular ol' investing -- which is fine for someone like you who enjoys it and doesn't see it as a hassle. But I know people who've gone into real estate thinking it was strictly an investment and were in for a rude awakening when problems arose. |
I agree - property management is not for newbies. I use professional companies to manage my properties. But, I DID manage my own properties for about 15 years. It is not easy - but it does help a property owner to know the issues your manager is facing - and helps you know if they are doing a good job - or even if they are cheating you - or not.
It is - or should be - "just an investment" - part of a portfolio. When I say that - what I mean is that people should not get emotionally attached to property - and they often do. And, that they should evaluate property as they would any other investment. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
tedkarma

Joined: 17 May 2004 Posts: 1598 Location: The World is my Oyster
|
Posted: Wed Nov 30, 2005 6:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
An important consideration about real estate is that it adds a stability to your investment portfolio - that other investments generally can't.
Okay, bonds are stable - but don't offer the income protection that depreciation provides - nor the potential appreciation in price that real estate can provide (okay you can get some appreciation in bonds when interest rates go down - but it is a sophisticated game I don't want to play).
Also, the illiquidity of real estate keeps you from being too implusive about your investment plan - you know you could/should hold on to it for 8-10 years or at least through a full economic cycle before selling.
And - don't forget tax advantages when you do unload. I just made a significant gain on the sale of a condo - and my total tax bill for the gain (net minus basis) bill will be less than 5%. Hard to beat! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
moot point
Joined: 22 Feb 2005 Posts: 441
|
Posted: Wed Nov 30, 2005 8:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
On the topic of bonds tedkarma wrote:
Quote: |
but don't offer the income protection that depreciation provides |
Can you explain this further? I don't understand.
BTW, and perhaps I missed it in an earlier posting, but are you only investing in properties in the U.S.? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
tedkarma

Joined: 17 May 2004 Posts: 1598 Location: The World is my Oyster
|
Posted: Wed Nov 30, 2005 10:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
moot point wrote: |
On the topic of bonds tedkarma wrote:
Quote: |
but don't offer the income protection that depreciation provides |
Can you explain this further? I don't understand.
BTW, and perhaps I missed it in an earlier posting, but are you only investing in properties in the U.S.? |
Depreciation is a tax deduction subtracting the value of the aging of the property across the anticipated years of its life. This deduction is taken straight off your income - reducing your taxes on your income.
Example:
$400,000 house, thirty years straight line depreciation, figure the land is 1/4 of the value (land doesn't depreciate) = $10,000 taken off your income - that you don't have to pay taxes on. Of course, the house will last much longer than 30 years - but that's what the gov't allows you to do. There are other tax issues related to the depreciation of course, but this isn't the place to get into them.
I invest only in the US - in the area where I used to live - it is the market I know best. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
moot point
Joined: 22 Feb 2005 Posts: 441
|
Posted: Wed Nov 30, 2005 11:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks. That is clearer now. Originally, I thought you were referring to how bonds work. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
JZer
Joined: 16 Jan 2005 Posts: 3898 Location: Pittsburgh
|
Posted: Thu Dec 01, 2005 12:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
tedkarma,
it is true that cheaper properties tend to produce a better return. I don't know if you remember but we talked about real estate before. I AM currently looking to buy a house in my hometown for $40,000. The rent per month would be $850. The one disadvantage of properties in poor neighborhoods is I don't think they appreciate as much, so they should be looked at soley for their returns from the rent that is being paid.
I am not expert but this is my opinion. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
tedkarma
 |