|
Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
jessicah632
Joined: 12 Jun 2005 Posts: 36 Location: Texas, USA
|
Posted: Wed Dec 14, 2005 5:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The "Eurasian" label seems to fix the problem. I seem to recall that in Russia they do teach that 6-continent model, thereby putting Russia with both Europe and Asia. Which, naturally, makes more sense, because while the bulk of its landmass is on Asia, over 80 percent of its people live on the "Europe" side. So I think most Russians would then prefer the "Eurasian" label. (BTW I think the division b/w "Europe" and "Asia" for Russia is the Ural Mountains, but my geography could be totally wack.)
I was thinking about it, and probably some of the reason I was taught what I was (that Russia is geographically "Asian"), is that politically at that time it was considered so separate and closed off (along with the eastern European/Soviet bloc) from Europe that it was strange to associate Russia (and indeed modern-day Poland, Ukraine, etc.) with Europe. That's the best reason I can give for the education I received regarding Russia. *shrug* Though, I bet, ask me again in ten years, and I'll definitely refer to Russia as a "European" language. Right now it's just weird for me.
I think the EU is an interesting notion. While, naturally, it would be foolish to assume the EU is the ONLY definition of "European" -- Justin pointed out Switzerland, and what about Norway? They haven't joined yet either, and they're clearly European -- I do wonder what will become of the EU as it expands, and whether those nations will eventually join it. I'm especially interested in whether or not Russia will join the EU -- as we know, the EU recently has added a lot of ex-Soviet nations. It seems to be growing in power, but I'm no expert.
Oh, and the reason I assumed most of us on here weren't American was because when I was travelling down in Latin America, it was 1 North American for every 9 Brits and 7 Aussies. No offense to anyone for my assumptions
--Jessicah |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Justin Trullinger

Joined: 28 Jan 2005 Posts: 3110 Location: Seoul, South Korea and Myanmar for a bit
|
Posted: Wed Dec 14, 2005 8:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
Oh, and the reason I assumed most of us on here weren't American was because when I was travelling down in Latin America, it was 1 North American for every 9 Brits and 7 Aussies. No offense to anyone for my assumptions
|
Not a bit. Just was a little confused. Quito, where I am, is fairly crawling with us Yanks. I wonder if dollarization makes it a bigger destination for US travellers, tourists, and teachers. Or maybe it's just luck of the draw. How about it? Just to get this thread completely off topic, what are the most common native English nationalities where you all are?
| Quote: |
| huh, wasn't North and South America seperated by man!!! |
Well, there was a land bridge between them. But they sure look like separate land masses to me. At least, they're nothing like as connected as Europe and Asia. Separating New Jersey with a canal would certainly NOT make a new continent. But it's still probably a good idea.
Justin |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Cdaniels
Joined: 21 Mar 2005 Posts: 663 Location: Dunwich, Massachusetts
|
Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2005 3:05 pm Post subject: Dollarization |
|
|
| Justin Trullinger wrote: |
| Just to get this thread completely off topic, what are the most common native English nationalities where you all are? |
There is a certain thrill in hijacking a thread! Not only dollarization, but the rise of the Euro and weakening of the US Dollar gloablly, certainly makes L.America more appealing for tourists. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guy Courchesne

Joined: 10 Mar 2003 Posts: 9650 Location: Mexico City
|
Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2005 3:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Just wait until the expected deluge of Chinese tourists arrives. A country has to be on a PRC's approved list for visitors to go...Brazil was recently listed. China wields a powerful incentive with that list, when discussing trade and investment.
Ni hao, my friends. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gregor

Joined: 06 Jan 2005 Posts: 842 Location: Jakarta, Indonesia
|
Posted: Fri Dec 16, 2005 2:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| (BTW I think the division b/w "Europe" and "Asia" for Russia is the Ural Mountains, but my geography could be totally wack.) |
That was always my impression, too, but that turns out to just be a convenient border - The Ural Mountains do not happen to be where plates meet or anything like that. There is no geological separation between Europe and Asia. It's just that it's unfairly large, taken as one, with relation to the other continents!
I DO take exception to saying that the Americas are actually one continent. It seems quite clear to me that they are two separate land masses.
By the way, though, in much the same way that the South Pacific islands (New Zealand, Micronesia, the Cook Islands, Fiji, etc.) are clumped together with Australia (giving us "Oceania"), Central America always seemed to be clumped together with North America when I was a kid in school. I have no idea why - culturally (well, linguistically, anyway) speaking, it's SOUTH America. But then again, maybe the Panama Canal being so far south may have something to do with that distinction. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
khmerhit
Joined: 31 May 2003 Posts: 1874 Location: Reverse Culture Shock Unit
|
Posted: Fri Dec 16, 2005 7:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Mastery is a tall order, naturegirl! I used to think my French was a bit weak, now i have a job where i use it five hours a day and it looks like i have nearly mastered it -- but i know i havent really. Point being i guess, that if you have some basics in a language and you get a chance to use it all the time, you can have whipped it good but pronto. The chinese HIGH SCHOOL students i help teach DO not practicE their English as much as they could, and they are residents of an english-speaking country----but if they get the basics while they are teenagers, then they will be ready to practice and will be prepared to speak it every day---when they get tossed out onto the job market, in a few years..
SORRY FOR CAPS |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Cdaniels
Joined: 21 Mar 2005 Posts: 663 Location: Dunwich, Massachusetts
|
Posted: Fri Dec 16, 2005 8:29 pm Post subject: Je Je? |
|
|
| Luna Chica wrote: |
| We had to agree to disagree because neither one of us could accept the other was right. BTW I know I really was je je. |
What the heck is "je-je?!?!?!"
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guy Courchesne

Joined: 10 Mar 2003 Posts: 9650 Location: Mexico City
|
Posted: Fri Dec 16, 2005 8:37 pm Post subject: Re: Je Je? |
|
|
| Cdaniels wrote: |
| Luna Chica wrote: |
| We had to agree to disagree because neither one of us could accept the other was right. BTW I know I really was je je. |
What the heck is "je-je?!?!?!"
 |
It's what Santa says when he's all done jo-jo-jo-ing |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Luna Chica
Joined: 04 Sep 2005 Posts: 177 Location: Trujillo, Peru
|
Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2005 4:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
SEE MY POST ON ABSORBING THE LANGUAGE FOR A DEFINITION OF JE JE. SORRY THOUGH SHOULD HAVE PUT A FULL STOP IN BEFORE MY JE JE.
MERRRRRRY CHRISTMAS WITH A DOUBLE-R GUY JO JO JO |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Cdaniels
Joined: 21 Mar 2005 Posts: 663 Location: Dunwich, Massachusetts
|
Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2005 3:05 pm Post subject: je je je |
|
|
| I thought I had become pretty savvy at looking up Spanish words on the internet, but googling "je je" turns up everything from Dutch sites in the Netherlands to sites for meeting marriage-minded Filipina women. It just goes to show how much there is to learn about a language/culture. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
matttheboy

Joined: 01 Jul 2003 Posts: 854 Location: Valparaiso, Chile
|
Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2005 4:01 pm Post subject: Re: Je Je? |
|
|
| Guy Courchesne wrote: |
| Cdaniels wrote: |
| Luna Chica wrote: |
| We had to agree to disagree because neither one of us could accept the other was right. BTW I know I really was je je. |
What the heck is "je-je?!?!?!"
 |
It's what Santa says when he's all done jo-jo-jo-ing |
ja ja |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cartago
Joined: 19 Oct 2005 Posts: 283 Location: Iraq
|
Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2005 5:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
Turkish is actually not an Indo-European language. I think the reason why Turkey is considered part of Europe, besides part of it being in Europe, is that it wants to associate itself with Europe seeing that as a way to progress. I think most people would agree it's sort of part of both Europe and the Middle East. Being a non-Arabic country does sort of set it apart.
I don't think Russia will ever join the EU. There are too many human rights abuses, not that Turkey hasn't had that problem too. But at least Turkey seems to be making progress in that direction and Russia is not. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Justin Trullinger

Joined: 28 Jan 2005 Posts: 3110 Location: Seoul, South Korea and Myanmar for a bit
|
Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2005 6:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
While it's true that Turkish is linguistically not "European," I believe, and it doesn't really look like part of Europe geographically, and they do have some problems where laws and human rights, or the lack thereof, are concerned, I think the reasons they've had problems in their attempts to join the EU have more to do with...Cyprus. (And this one is pretty complicated.)
Regards,
Justin |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Cdaniels
Joined: 21 Mar 2005 Posts: 663 Location: Dunwich, Massachusetts
|
Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2005 12:55 am Post subject: European or not European |
|
|
"Turkish" is apparently not an Indo-European language. It is an official language of Bulgaria, though.
Its also spoken in Kosovo and Macedonia. It has been classified as an Altaic language, with some controversy. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turkish_%28language%29
Cyprus may be the #1 complication for EU membership, but there are additional issues. Turkey has not officially acknowledged the Armenian Genocide. (Armenian and Kurdish happen to be Indo-European languages) BTW Russia will probably never be an EU country, but it sounds naive to say this is because of human rights abuses. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cartago
Joined: 19 Oct 2005 Posts: 283 Location: Iraq
|
Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2005 1:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
Turkey also doesn't allow conscientious objection and has threatened journalists over certain issues as well as the writer Orhan Pamuk for some remarks about the Armenian genocide.
I know there must be many other reasons why it's unlikely Russia would never be part of the EU, the human rights issue is the only obvious one to me right offhand though. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling. Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|