|
Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Cshannon
Joined: 10 Dec 2004 Posts: 114
|
Posted: Thu Jan 26, 2006 7:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| The caterwauling about a "hidden agenda" is just so much *beep* IMHO |
Not a very humble opinion, but okay... Anyway, of course we know it exists because they (Conservatives including Harper himself) have stated their real agenda before, but just refrained to address it (which is what we mean when we say "hidden") during this election (focussing instead entirely on how corrupt the Liberals are despite how well, arguably, Canada has been doing). People are awfully forgetful I guess...
| Quote: |
| The 'right wing' of the Conservatives represents a position that is supported by millions of Canadians- hardly an extreme stance |
Millions of recknecks in Alberta you mean. The majority of Canadians do not support the war in Iraq (as Harper does), want missile defense (as Harper does), or want to mess with basic human rights such as abortion, gay-marriage et al (as Harper does). Most Canadians do not want to cozy up to the Bush regime; as Harper clearly does. He made his views very clear in the past, but has conveniently avoided the issues this time around. Basically, the Conservatives led a terrific campaign -- just hammer the Libs on corruption and play it safe. It was very blatant, but worked like a charm.
| Quote: |
| What really gripes me is that a group of traitors like the Bloc Quebecois are allowed to pollute the political landscape. Where else would a political party whose mission is to destroy the country be allowed to exist on the national scene? Unbelievable. It says much (too much) about Canadian tolerance that they can breathe the same air as the rest of us |
It's called democracy. It's a legal party that collected votes from real Canadians -- you condemn so fully what you perhaps don't fully understand? Quebec is a unique province with unique issues. Many people there want to be independant which is unfortunate, but we still have to deal with it in a democratic way. It's not so simple as just outlawing/crushing separatism, as you seem to be advocating. Surely there's much, much more to it than that. If you really want to live in an empire, try moving to the States. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nagoyaguy
Joined: 15 May 2003 Posts: 425 Location: Aichi, Japan
|
Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2006 4:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hi Shannon;
Thank you for injecting the United States into the discussion. Totally irrelevant, but not surprising.
As to the extreme or hidden agenda, you are wrong in saying that only
| Quote: |
| Millions of recknecks in Alberta |
support these issues. Millions of other Canadians in other provinces do as well. Your disparaging remarks about Alberta are very telling, though.
"Real Canadians" have many views on things like abortion or same sex marriage. To them, they are not basic human rights. Hell, even Paul Martin was against gay marriage. So was the Librano justice minister up to a few short years ago, declaring in Parliament that :
"I support the motion for maintaining the clear legal definition of marriage in Canada as the union of one man and one woman to the exclusion of all others."
Tell me how Harper is "cozying up" to the Bush regime. He just used his first public address to WARN the US that Canada plans to vigorously enforce sovereignty in the Arctic. SOme cozying...
I don't want to outlaw or crush separatism. Frankly, I would feel overjoyed if Quebec were to actually separate from Canada. Quebec has been an anchor holding the country back for decades. Hell, I would cut them loose in a minute if I had the opportunity. To be honest, the next referendum shouldn't be about whether Quebec wants to stay in Canada, but whether the rest of Canada wants to continue extending to Quebec the privilege of belonging to our great nation.
Don't you find it odd that, in a NATIONAL parliament, a party that is seeking to divide the nation is allowed to exist? Isn't that just a bit of a contradiction? Voting for the Bloc is voting to cancel your Canadian citizenship, plain and simple.
Yes, Quebec is a unique province with unique issues. So is Alberta. so is British Columbia. So is Ontario. What's your point? Quebec would founder and perish within a few short years of declaring independence. Maybe not a bad thing, that.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guy Courchesne

Joined: 10 Mar 2003 Posts: 9650 Location: Mexico City
|
Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2006 4:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| Tell me how Harper is "cozying up" to the Bush regime. He just used his first public address to WARN the US that Canada plans to vigorously enforce sovereignty in the Arctic. SOme cozying... |
Simple shell game. Watch where that one goes over the next months, and make sure to look behind the curtain.
How are you Nagoyaguy? Been awhile...hope the New Year is treating you well.
Real Canadians, real Quebeckers, real people all have a variety of views.
| Quote: |
| Voting for the Bloc is voting to cancel your Canadian citizenship, plain and simple. |
is yours. Voting Bloc if you are Quebecois means a variety of things too. Having a voice that will represent your interests in a national parliament being the first, I suspect. I wouldn't be calling Albertans traitors for sending an all-Alberta party to parliament, seeking to wreak havoc on what I call Canada. Hell, I wouldn't even try to ban the communists from running. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Cshannon
Joined: 10 Dec 2004 Posts: 114
|
Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2006 6:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| Thank you for injecting the United States into the discussion. Totally irrelevant, but not surprising |
Is this supposed to be your coy little way of saying "I don't really know the issues"? It's fine; you can just say it...
And yes, of course it's relevant for so many reasons.
| Quote: |
| Millions of other Canadians in other provinces do as well. Your disparaging remarks about Alberta are very telling, though |
The country is split on it, but while 56% of Canadians polled think Bill C-38 (the one which legalised gay-marriage) shoud stay, the prairies are the only region where more people would vote against than for.
Abortion is the same, except there is an even higher percentage nation wide who are in favor (the prairies having the highest percentage against).
Support for both is much higher in younger people too, so it's only going to increase with time.
And believe me, I have lived in Alberta before, plenty of decent folk around (don't get me wrong), but unfortunately also way more close-minded, intolerant rednecks than anywhere else I've been in Canada. Just my opinion, take it however you want.
| Quote: |
| I don't want to outlaw or crush separatism. Frankly, I would feel overjoyed if Quebec were to actually separate from Canada. Quebec has been an anchor holding the country back for decades. Hell, I would cut them loose in a minute if I had the opportunity. To be honest, the next referendum shouldn't be about whether Quebec wants to stay in Canada, but whether the rest of Canada wants to continue extending to Quebec the privilege of belonging to our great nation |
I don't think you know anything about it... your comments are ridiculous. Have you ever spent time in Quebec? Do you even realise that it composes a quarter of the population? That its post-industrial economy makes up over 25% of the GDP of Canada (over $60 billion CAN) with a positive trade surplus, strong potential for growth and contains vast resources? Did you realise that? Losing Quebec would be a huge blow to Canada. Saying Quebec is an anchor pulling Canada down really makes you sound like an uniformed bigot.
Not to mention Quebec doesn't want to separate. So you're out of luck (I'm happy to say).
| Quote: |
| Voting for the Bloc is voting to cancel your Canadian citizenship, plain and simple. |
Totally untrue by law, and otherwise merely your opinion. Also, more people vote non-bloc than pro-bloc. Again it's called democracy, so I don't see the contradiction.
| Quote: |
| Yes, Quebec is a unique province with unique issues. So is Alberta. so is British Columbia. So is Ontario. What's your point? Quebec would founder and perish within a few short years of declaring independence. Maybe not a bad thing, that.... |
Quebec is the oldest province in Canada (having been conquered by the British way back) and they speak French. Isn't that enough? Again, it only your whimsical speculation that Quebec would die out if they separated. You have shown no evidence of this and it is debatable (and Quebec is not stupid). They trade about 80% with the States anyway so it's not like they "need" Canada to survive. It's more a question of values -- does Quebec want to remain in Canada? Apparently so, at least for now.
| Quote: |
| Tell me how Harper is "cozying up" to the Bush regime. He just used his first public address to WARN the US that Canada plans to vigorously enforce sovereignty in the Arctic. SOme cozying... |
Oh man... are you joking?
Quotes abound:
"I don't know all the facts on Iraq, but I think we should work closely with the Americans" - Harper
"Thank you for saying to our friends in the United States of America, you are our ally, our neighbour, and our best friend in the whole wide world. And when your brave men and women give their lives for freedom and democracy we are not neutral. We do not stand on the sidelines; we're for the disarmament of Saddam and the liberation of the people of Iraq." - Harper, Friends of America Rally, April 4, 2003
"In my judgment Canada will eventually join with the allied coalition if war on Iraq comes to pass." - Harper
"The world is now unipolar and contains only one superpower. Canada shares a continent with that superpower" - Harper
"We should have been there shoulder to shoulder with our allies. Our concern is the instability of our government as an ally. We are playing again with national and global security matters" - Harper
"This government's only explanation for not standing behind our allies is that they couldn't get the approval of the Security Council at the United Nations - a body [on] which Canada doesn't even have a seat." - Harper
""The time has come to recognize that the U.S. will continue to exercise unprecedented power in a world where international rules are still unreliable and where security and advancing of the free democratic order still depend significantly on the possession and use of military might." - Harper, May, 2003, speech to the Institute for Research on Public Policy
"'Continental economic and security integration' with the U.S. as well as a 'continental energy strategy' that should be broadened 'to a range of other natural resources.' - Harper
Don't forget this is the same guy who called Bush to apologise for Canada not participating in the Iraq war. Said he was embarrased as I recall. Convinced yet? For better or worse, Harper is very pro-America. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nagoyaguy
Joined: 15 May 2003 Posts: 425 Location: Aichi, Japan
|
Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2006 6:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
Being pro American and "cozying up" are totally different kettles of fish. You are implying that Harper will somehow subvert Canada into an underpopulated version of Jesusland North. That is not the case. Harper is nakedly patriotic and very much in favour of Canadian sovereignty. We can play cut-and-paste the quote all you want, it won't prove more than who has the better Google skills.
In any case, Canada is better off with a good relationship with the USA. All Martin's posturing and fake bluster was embarrassing. For better or worse, we depend on the US for our economy, security, and protection.
As for Quebec separating, yes it is my dream that they do so. WIthout federal support, they are fucked. I used to live in Ottawa, so I have spent a fair amount of time in and around La Belle Province. Tey are playing a very clever game with the rest of Canada. Making threats and waiting for TROC to react and throw them another fish. It has worked so far, too. Look at how equalization payments work, how much federal money is poured in.
Personally, I think Quebec should separate if they want to. Like a bad marriage, it is better to end it quickly instead of dragging along for years and years. I guess, in the final analysis, though, they dont have the stones to do it. Quebec is more than welcome to stay in Canada as an equal partner to the other provinces. But as soon as one group starts getting special treatment, others will want the same thing. It is a dangerous precedent in the long run, and bad for the health of the country.
If an Alberta Separatist Party were to grow and get representation in Parliament, my opinion of them would be the same as that of the Bloc. A bunch of scum. I wouldn't ban them, but I wouldn't kiss their collective ass either. The whole sponsorship thing was an embarrassment from so many angles. The idea that the federal government has to buy support is insane. The benefits of being part of Canada are many and obvious.
Thank you for retracting your slur against Albertans, Shannon. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guy Courchesne

Joined: 10 Mar 2003 Posts: 9650 Location: Mexico City
|
Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2006 2:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Speaking of Alberta, with so many steer, one can smell the bs as far as NFLD...
http://www.cbc.ca/story/canada/national/2006/01/27/alberta-health060127.html
| Quote: |
Alberta Premier Ralph Klein says his government is ready to move forward with health-care changes that may violate the Canada Health Act.
...
Klein called it a coincidence that he's making the announcement as a Conservative government is about to take power federally for the first time since 1993.
"I would describe more as coincidental the fact that a Conservative government was elected as we're moving through these health-care reforms," he said. "But we would have moved through those reforms with or without a Conservative government." |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nagoyaguy
Joined: 15 May 2003 Posts: 425 Location: Aichi, Japan
|
Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2006 3:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hey Guy;
Sorry I didn't return your greeting earlier. Too busy firing off the old vitriol cannon. Old Ralph is a cagey one, that's for sure. He's been drifting more and more left the past few years, though. I think he is trying to cement his legacy out west as one of the Great Premiers.
In any case, at least he has put Alberta in an enviable position. No debt, no deficit, no sales tax, and a 16 Billion dollar trust fund for future generations. At the same time, funding for education and social programs is rising by 5% to 10% a year.
I personally have no problem with Canada adopting a freer, more inclusive health care system. Kind of like in Sweden, where private clinics operate alongside the national system.
As for Quebec, the whole thing is a sham. It became obvious when "separatists" suddenly morphed into "sovereignists". Christ, do you want your own country or not? If you do, then get off your collective asses and MAKE one. The last 10 plus years have seen an explosion of small nations. Places from Slovenia to Slovakia to Lithuania are all making a go of it. WHy not Quebec? They are too used to suckling away at the teat of Big Momma Ottawa to wean themselves. All that is left is the THREAT of separation.
L8R |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
seanmcginty
Joined: 27 Sep 2005 Posts: 203
|
Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2006 8:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
My father is from Quebec and my mother is from Alberta, so I guess you could say I'm a child of both extremes. I'm from Ottawa myself.
Given that a lot of my family lives in rural Quebec I'm generally not sympathetic to bigoted rhetoric made against Quebecers, but at the same time I can't stand the seperatists. They really are playing the rest of Canada like a fiddle, and I have to agree that Quebec would be totally screwed if it tried to break away from Canada. MIND YOU the rest of Canada would also be royally screwed if that were to happen, so I think it would be in the best interests of everyone to just accept that Quebec is always going to be "special" and just work towards trying to keep the country together with that in mind. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guy Courchesne

Joined: 10 Mar 2003 Posts: 9650 Location: Mexico City
|
Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2006 8:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Alberta can thank the high price of oil for their economic glories...if NFLD ever gets control of theirs, maybe they'll be calling the shots, eh?
Nice to see another Bytown Boy posting in here...McGinty. Surely not misspelled from McGuinty?
A divorce in the family helps no one. I think that if you haven't been to Quebec or aren't a French Canadian, it's hard to understand what the fuss is all about. The idea of separation or being separate is far from new...Montcalm and Wolfe fought one of the first battles and it won't ever end. Quebeckers themselves are divided on the issue(s), but, if you look closely, the most hardcore separatists are from the backwoods...just like the most hardcore intolerance on the Great Plains tends to be rural.
The Liberals spent a few hundred million dollars on key people to keep the whole thing quiet. The benefit? 10 years of one the best-performing economies in the world and stability on the Quebec front. Imagine if Cretch and Martin had ignored Quebec in 95 or worse, taken a hardline. What would have been the economic cost of not just a breakup, but of the decade or more of turmoil? Far more than the pocket change they spent.
Funny...no one complains if we hand millions to the Palestinians, or to Afghanistan to keep a lid on things, but hey, give some coin to a half-brother and all hell breaks lose. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lupin71
Joined: 22 Apr 2004 Posts: 13 Location: Vancouver
|
Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2006 9:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Just so nobody misunderstands what I'm about to say I want to point out I am from Vancouver, and NO I did not vote for the conservatives.
As dangerous as it is I will assume most of the Liberal supporters who bought into the scare tactics used by Martin and co., and have posted their disdain for harper and the conservatives before the party has even been sworn in, are from the centre of the universe.
I am happy the conservatives won a minority decision. Change is good. To have voted the Liberals back in would have applauded their disgusting waste of taxpayer money and forgiven the Gomery scandal, income trust scandal, the useless and overpriced gun registry, and lets not forget the HRDC Billion dollar boondoggle. Plus countless other examples auditor General Sheila Fraser alluded to.
For those who believe Harper would have sent troops to Iraq, I agree with you. But it's a moot point. We're not going. If the cons. tried, they wouldn't get the support, which is why a minority government is good in this situation. But for those who believe Chretien didn't send troops to Iraq because he believed it was the right decision... GIVE YOUR HEAD A SHAKE! He didn't send them for two reasons. The military probably told him they didn't have the resources, and to send them would only further highlight the disasterous condition our troops are in with lack of equipment and funding. Yes we have the liberals to thank for this. And secondly, had Clinton been in the white house Chretien would have sent our troops to Iraq. Since when is following someone blindly just because you're smitten with them a characteristic of a leader?
This whole east-west divide in Canada does unfortunately exist. The newspaper headlines here in the west were "the west is in". I believe that thinking is detrimental to the country. Yes we have regional differences to contend with. But for someone living in the east to feel just because we have a prime minister from the west means they're going to get screwed isn't a fair assessment. If anything this political situation Canada finds itself in is a perfect opportunity for Harper to bridge the gap. For all Canadians sake let's hope he recognizes it and acts on it.
I have lived in many other parts of the country. I believe regionalizing yourself is silly. No matter where you live in this great nation we are canadians and it's important to recognize that and to watch our leaders closely. To take part in the political process whether through forums or voting or running for office is what's important. I congratulate everyone on here for discussing the election and for inspiring me to become involved, even at the expense of insulting some and alienating others. Now who wants to buy some AMWAY!!!
Just for fun and my own opinion...
The three worst politicians in Canadian History.
1. Brian Mulroney - g.s.t., free trade -- any doubters read On The Take by Stevie Cameron. The secret Mulroney tapes offer some interesting insight into the man as well.
2. Jean Chretien -- lied to Canadians about getting rid of the g.s.t., most of the liberal scandals happened under his watch, couldn�t lead himself out of a paper bag on a rainy day, mean spirited and lead out of spite.
3. Glen Clark (ex-B.C. Premier) because he's an idiot. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
chirp
Joined: 03 Dec 2005 Posts: 148
|
Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2006 9:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
lupin71,
Where is the centre of the universe? I might go there on my next holiday. Please don't give the usual answer... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lupin71
Joined: 22 Apr 2004 Posts: 13 Location: Vancouver
|
Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2006 9:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| chirp wrote: |
lupin71,
Where is the centre of the universe? I might go there on my next holiday. Please don't give the usual answer... |
If you're a canadian you know where of I speak
Lupin71
A fan of every canadian hockey team, yes that includes the leafs.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
chirp
Joined: 03 Dec 2005 Posts: 148
|
Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2006 9:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
lupin71,
~sigh~
That is where I thought you were referring to... I am not from there but I have never met anyone from there that considers their town to be the centre of the universe. I did once read though a 1/3 of Canada's population lives within 80km of "the centre of the universe" - maybe they got the title based on sheer numbers?
BTW, I am also pleased with the minority Conservative government (see my earlier post). I think we have different reasons for that though.
Chirp |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lupin71
Joined: 22 Apr 2004 Posts: 13 Location: Vancouver
|
Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2006 10:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| chirp wrote: |
lupin71,
~sigh~
I have never met anyone from there that considers their town to be the centre of the universe. I did once read though a 1/3 of Canada's population lives within 80km of "the centre of the universe" - maybe they got the title based on sheer numbers?
Chirp |
you're obviously not from vancouver either. And I'd wager more than half of Canadians live that close to the border. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
some waygug-in
Joined: 07 Feb 2003 Posts: 339
|
Posted: Sun Jan 29, 2006 1:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
The three worst politicians in Canadian History.
1. Brian Mulroney - g.s.t., free trade -- any doubters read On The Take by Stevie Cameron. The secret Mulroney tapes offer some interesting insight into the man as well.
2. Jean Chretien -- lied to Canadians about getting rid of the g.s.t., most of the liberal scandals happened under his watch, couldn�t lead himself out of a paper bag on a rainy day, mean spirited and lead out of spite.
3. Glen Clark (ex-B.C. Premier) because he's an idiot.
***************
You missed one:
Grant Devine --- Mulrooney's little hatchet man back in Scratcherbush.
Ran the province broke, sold off everything of value, gave mountains of cash to his friends and left the province with such a debt it will take 60 years to pay it off. Then as he was turfed out of office, he had the audacity to say "we made a difference".  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling. Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|