Site Search:
 
Get TEFL Certified & Start Your Adventure Today!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Is it legal to live together if you're not married?
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Taiwan
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Pop Fly



Joined: 15 Feb 2003
Posts: 429

PostPosted: Sun Apr 02, 2006 10:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Aristotle wrote:

Good luck and remember, just because the ROC government is an occupational government they still have the guns and are not afraid of violating your human rights.
A.


And just because Arsistotle has a modem and a keyboard, he still doesn't have a clue, yet isn't afraid of insulting your intelligence.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SanChong



Joined: 22 Nov 2005
Posts: 335

PostPosted: Sun Apr 02, 2006 10:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Adultery is a criminal offense under the laws of the occupational authority on Taiwan known as the Republic of China.
That means you can be put in jail for committing adultery and it routinely happens on the island of Taiwan. Much the same way you can be incarcerated for having traces of illegal drugs in you system


If it routinely happens, I'm sure you can provide us with ONE concrete example, right?


Quote:

Good luck and remember, just because the ROC government is an occupational government they still have the guns and are not afraid of violating your human rights.


Wow. That's one of your most inventive posts. Can you PLEASE even attempt to post credible things, rather than this inflammatory hate language. I'm not really worried, because any regular reader of this forum knows you for what you are. Seriously though, do you have no self respect? What rational basis do you have for any of this?

I'm not even sure if I should respond to your posts of lunacy anymore. It's almost as if by responding, it might provide you with some legitimacy.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
markholmes



Joined: 21 Jun 2004
Posts: 661
Location: Wengehua

PostPosted: Sun Apr 02, 2006 7:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I said;
Quote:
I don't think Steve's being negative about Taiwan. Taiwan still has a level of third worldness about it. That's not negative, it's fact.


SanChong, when I said Third Worldness I wasn't refering to water quality or GDP, I was refering to the fact that many people view the law as 'advisory' rather 'compulsory'. Inadherence to the law is common when the law is viewed as 'getting in the way' or will not accomplish the desired result.

The classic example, and possibly the only example teachers may come across is the bogus contract, the Chinese copy being worded differently to the English copy or the regular breaking of contracts in order to get the job done even if it is to the detriment of the employee concerned. Of course Clark is correct in saying that teachers have recourse in such circumstances, but as schools know most teachers would rather pack up and leave then spend worrying times complaining to the authorities.

Here are a couple of quote from other threads;

Clark wrote:
Quote:
How do companies get away with it even though they are so blatant? I think the answer lies in the attitude mentioned above and the reality of the situation. The reality of the situation is that the very legislators and police officials in charge of enforcing the law also enroll their own children in such programs as they see them as beneficial and not something to be closed down.


Fortigurn wrote:
Quote:
I have wondered how she can register her school as an English preschool, and advertise it as having a foreign English teacher, when she is literally 5 minutes walk down the road from the local police station.

But she says that in the counties (where she is), the laws aren't applied very strictly.


This behaviour is not the behaviour of a fully developed country. These traits have more in common with developing countries like Thailand and Malaysia than Japan (to give an Asian example).

Sanchong wrote:
Quote:
To a certain degree, we need to put aside our Western definition of the word "legal". The word many times has a different meaning here.


No, the law is the law, you are making excuses for the inadequecies of the Taiwanese system. But we also have to consider why people break the law. One reason is because the legislative bodies do not take the right steps to consult with all groups concerned (those that are really affected) before introducing new laws, new laws often being introduced for political brownie points rather than practical reasons. Secondly, as the law is often seen as unfair, people 'bend' the rules for their own gains and protection of their family unit.

Similarly tax avoidance is seen almost as a personal duty. Cash deals to avoid tax are common. Yes, these things sometimes happen in the developed world too, but are far more prevelant in the developing / underdeveloped world. So, when I said Third World, this is what I was refering to.

The next point is;
Sanchong wrote;
Quote:
Taiwan's GDP (Gross Domestic Product) per capita is higher than Spain, South Korea, New Zealand... it's MUCH higher than South Africa.


So before I continue I just want to clarify again that when I was talking about third worldness I was refering to 'adherence to the rule of law'. The original post concerned the law and application thereof, nothing to do with GDP.

You are correct in saying that Taiwan's per capita income is relatively high and frankly it scores well with other indicators too. But whether a country is underdeveloped, developing or developed is not simply a case of measuring GDP. Whilst GDP is a measure of a countries wealth, as a stand alone figure it actually tells us very little and has to be looked in tandem with the following;
PPP www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Purchasing_power_parity
Quality of Life Indicators www.calvert-henderson.com
You also need to consider the spread of wealth in a country.
Rule of law is also a consideration.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Taiwan All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
Page 3 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Teaching Jobs in China
Teaching Jobs in China