|
Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
fluffyhamster
Joined: 13 Mar 2005
Posts: 3292
Location: UK > China > Japan > UK again
|
 Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2006 6:14 am Post subject: |
 |
|
| Maybe the BOEs do shadier deals than before because they aren't being given the funds, especially nowadays, to do everything by the book like Monbugakusho would like. (Just a theory of mine LOL). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SirZephyr
Joined: 06 Nov 2004
Posts: 8
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 01, 2006 3:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
Mr. Glenski.
Did you accept the job offer from Korakuen?
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
yamanote senbei
Joined: 28 Jun 2005
Posts: 435
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 27, 2006 8:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Big John Stud wrote: |
| I am in the same boat! I also wonder if so illegal why does most BOE use out seourcing companies! |
It's easier for them, even though it's more expensive. For schools outside of Tokyo and Osaka it's really difficult to find local foreign teachers anyway. The school administration may not even know that it's illegal to outsource teachers, and so they see it as a convenient solution. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
fluffyhamster
Joined: 13 Mar 2005
Posts: 3292
Location: UK > China > Japan > UK again
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 27, 2006 9:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
| yamanote senbei wrote: |
| Big John Stud wrote: |
| I am in the same boat! I also wonder if so illegal why does most BOE use out seourcing companies! |
It's easier for them, even though it's more expensive. For schools outside of Tokyo and Osaka it's really difficult to find local foreign teachers anyway. The school administration may not even know that it's illegal to outsource teachers, and so they see it as a convenient solution. |
Surely the school/local government admin would know very well what was strictly legal or not (I haven't met many of these types who do ANYTHING unless they are absolutely sure their ass is covered)...which leads me to ask, what exactly would the legal ramification of/penalty for this "illegal" outsourcing be? I'm beginning to suspect that it is more a difference of opinion between the guy in Monbugakushou (an idealist) and the "realists" entrenched against him rather than anything that is clearly actionable. I'm also still a bit surprised that using agencies works out more expensive than direct hires would (the latter with full pay and benefits for each and every ALT).
Hmm, dispatchers providing a service in rural areas? I bet even one-cow towns have umpteen potential AETs lolloping around dreaming of that direct hire... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
wangtesol
Joined: 24 May 2005
Posts: 280
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 27, 2006 9:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
[sarcasm]Ya, that's right. It was a single idealist from Monbusho who decided to issue the advisement highlighting the illegal use of gyomu itaku contracts. Right there at the Dec. 5 2004 union press conference at the Diet, he lept from his chair and shouted, "I must right his wrong. To hell with my bosses! Foreignes rights are being abused!"[/sarcasm]
Fluffy, have you ever hear of political will to do something? Just maybe the forces of outsourcing are stronger than the forces of seeing the rule of law applied to protect foreigners.
You might see that one of leaders in publishing ESL teaching materials (Dennis Stevenson of Pearson Corporation) is also on the board of directors of the largest outsourcing corporation in the world, Manpower Corporation. He also has had very close government and business ties with Japan ever since he negotiated a deal between UK Prime Minister Heath and Japan Prime Minister Tanaka.
see...
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Dennis_Stevenson |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
wangtesol
Joined: 24 May 2005
Posts: 280
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 27, 2006 10:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sorry, I have to add, that if anything, labour voices on this forum are too conservative. Saying that Boards of Education may not be aware that they are violating laws is very generous. I would rather explain why Boards of Education do not follow the law when it comes to foreigners is largely due to nihonjin rombun (or kokutai) sociological racism theory that is given serious intellectual study in Japan.
I mean, the Saitama Board of Education hired onto its board, in December 2004, one of the chairmen of the revisionist publisher that denies historical atrocities during WWII.
Here's the article from the Japan Times...
| Quote: |
SAITAMA (Kyodo) The Saitama Prefectural Government will nominate to its board of education one of the authors of a controversial history textbook criticized for having a nationalist bias, it was learned Monday.
Shiro Takahashi, a Meisei University professor and former deputy chairman of the Japanese Society for History Textbook Reform, has agreed to take up the post at the request of Saitama Gov. Kiyoshi Ueda.
The governor will make the recommendation to the prefectural assembly Dec. 20.
Takahashi would be the first senior member of the group that penned the contentious textbook to sit on a prefectural education panel, according to group members.
Ueda and Takahashi are acquaintances, and the governor asked the professor to join the panel in October, according to the scholar, who added that he replied that he was willing to accept.
Takahashi was a founding member of the textbook group and was its deputy chairman from 1999 to last month, when he quit because he "would be required to be neutral as a member of an education board," he said.
But Takahashi added that he does not intend to leave the group.
In September, Ueda praised the group's history textbook, calling it a "new exercise that stimulates the education community as a whole."
The textbook, published by Fuso Publishing Co., has been criticized for lacking a reference to "comfort women," and for portraying World War II in the Pacific theater as a war "aimed at liberating other Asian countries."
During the war, Japan used a large number of women, mostly from Korea, as sex slaves for its soldiers.
The textbook passed the education ministry screening in April 2001, adding fuel to a fierce domestic debate on how Japan's history should be portrayed in school texts.
The Japan Times: Tuesday, Dec. 7, 2004
(C) All rights reserved
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
fluffyhamster
Joined: 13 Mar 2005
Posts: 3292
Location: UK > China > Japan > UK again
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 27, 2006 10:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Don't get me wrong, wang - I'm not in favour of dispatching (who would be?). I'm just wondering what more can be done besides waving pieces of paper from one bureaucrat in the faces of the others (and this tactic seems useful more for those fighting to keep their direct-hire status than those being hired for the first time by a BOE). Do you have any hardcore advice you can give us? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
wangtesol
Joined: 24 May 2005
Posts: 280
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 27, 2006 10:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Okay. Sure. Nothing gets done by a single person. You gotta organize with others. Already there exists organized labour in the form on the National Union of General Workers, who fought to raise the gyomu itaku issue in the first place.
maybe join them...
http://www.nugw.org |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
womblingfree
Joined: 04 Mar 2006
Posts: 826
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 28, 2006 1:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
| fluffyhamster wrote: |
| Maybe the BOEs do shadier deals than before because they aren't being given the funds, especially nowadays, to do everything by the book like Monbugakusho would like. (Just a theory of mine LOL). |
Not only the BOE's, universities are more and more hiring unqualified teachers through dispatch companies. This is all very much hushed up.
Berlitz was sending teachers to several universities that I know of. They pay a fraction of what you would normally receive. | | |
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
