View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
JimDunlop2

Joined: 31 Jan 2003 Posts: 2286 Location: Japan
|
Posted: Tue Apr 04, 2006 12:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Confucius say, man who shoot off mouth, must expect to lose face.
HA!!! I kill me!
/threadjack |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Captain Onigiri
Joined: 20 Jan 2005 Posts: 103 Location: fly-over land
|
Posted: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Actually, I think most theologians don't consider Confusianism a religion. Confusianism mostly deals with what is good government and the place individuals should have in it. Confusianism has no teachings about the afterlife. In fact, Confusius is quoted as saying he didn't care what happened after death. Confusianism is more of a philosophy than a religion. Anyway, that's what gathered from what I've read in the intro to The Analects. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Khyron
Joined: 10 Mar 2006 Posts: 291 Location: Tokyo Metro City
|
Posted: Wed Apr 05, 2006 2:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
Captain Onigiri wrote: |
Actually, I think most theologians don't consider Confusianism a religion. Confusianism mostly deals with what is good government and the place individuals should have in it. Confusianism has no teachings about the afterlife. In fact, Confusius is quoted as saying he didn't care what happened after death. Confusianism is more of a philosophy than a religion. Anyway, that's what gathered from what I've read in the intro to The Analects. |
I would be considered more of a psuedo-religion, than a pure religion. Many would call it a system of philosophy. However, the inclusion of concepts like qi(chi/ki) seem to put it somewhere in between a religion and a philosophy. Personally, I'd say it's more of a philosophy which resulted in a template for the social structure for much of Asia. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Captain Onigiri
Joined: 20 Jan 2005 Posts: 103 Location: fly-over land
|
Posted: Sat Apr 08, 2006 1:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think you are right. I have to admit that I only read about half of The Analects before I got bored with it and before I knew it, it was time to return it to the library.
They say something similar happened to Greek Philosophy and Christianity in the 1st-3rd century. Both were such strong forces at the time that neither could ignore each other for long and by the 3rd Century neither Greek philosophy or Christianity looked like the did before they met.
The same think might be said about Confusianism and Buddhism or Confusianism and Shinto. A person might be hard pressed to say where one started and the other left off. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Khyron
Joined: 10 Mar 2006 Posts: 291 Location: Tokyo Metro City
|
Posted: Sat Apr 08, 2006 5:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Captain Onigiri wrote: |
I think you are right. I have to admit that I only read about half of The Analects before I got bored with it and before I knew it, it was time to return it to the library.
They say something similar happened to Greek Philosophy and Christianity in the 1st-3rd century. Both were such strong forces at the time that neither could ignore each other for long and by the 3rd Century neither Greek philosophy or Christianity looked like the did before they met. |
Thank you Mr. Constantine...
Quote: |
The same think might be said about Confusianism and Buddhism or Confusianism and Shinto. A person might be hard pressed to say where one started and the other left off. |
Basically. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Captain Onigiri
Joined: 20 Jan 2005 Posts: 103 Location: fly-over land
|
Posted: Sat Apr 08, 2006 6:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sorry. Did I state the obvious? I live in the Po-Dunk Midwest where the most intellectually stimulating conversation is who is about to be voted off American Idol and I'm sure I sometimes make statements that are obvious to people haven't turned off their brains for the rest of their lives. 479 days left before I can get the hell out of here. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Khyron
Joined: 10 Mar 2006 Posts: 291 Location: Tokyo Metro City
|
Posted: Sun Apr 09, 2006 6:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
Captain Onigiri wrote: |
Sorry. Did I state the obvious? I live in the Po-Dunk Midwest where the most intellectually stimulating conversation is who is about to be voted off American Idol and I'm sure I sometimes make statements that are obvious to people haven't turned off their brains for the rest of their lives. 479 days left before I can get the hell out of here. |
No, I'm sorry.
I was referring to Constantine being a bit of an idiot in some ways. I wasn't sarcastically calling you Mr. Constantine! Your post was fine. I doubt many people here have ever really looked at early Christianity. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Captain Onigiri
Joined: 20 Jan 2005 Posts: 103 Location: fly-over land
|
Posted: Sun Apr 09, 2006 8:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ah... Emperor Constatine. Good to hear. I thought it was some Canadian/British/Austrailian cultural reference that I didn't get and I was too embarrassed to ask. I would blame Mr. Augustine more, that woman-hating, sex-hating slug. And he's boring to boot. I resent being made to read his Confessions in college. Even worse is Mr. Aquinus whose greatest contribution to theology is the question, "How many angels can dance on the head of a pin?" I say it depends on whether there is a mash pit or not. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Khyron
Joined: 10 Mar 2006 Posts: 291 Location: Tokyo Metro City
|
Posted: Sun Apr 09, 2006 9:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Captain Onigiri wrote: |
Ah... Emperor Constatine. Good to hear. I thought it was some Canadian/British/Austrailian cultural reference that I didn't get and I was too embarrassed to ask. I would blame Mr. Augustine more, that woman-hating, sex-hating slug. And he's boring to boot. I resent being made to read his Confessions in college. Even worse is Mr. Aquinus whose greatest contribution to theology is the question, "How many angels can dance on the head of a pin?" I say it depends on whether there is a mash pit or not. |
I agree on the Augustine part. I think you're generalizing Sir Aquinas a lot though! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Captain Onigiri
Joined: 20 Jan 2005 Posts: 103 Location: fly-over land
|
Posted: Tue Apr 11, 2006 3:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ack! You're making me try to remember what Aquinus actually said in detail. Too much like being in school!
Er...what was the original topic of this thread? Anyway, I think we're the last two people left that's interested in this thread. If you want to still talk about theology (Christian or otherwise) feel free to PM me. It's a favorite subject of mine. Know anything about Shinto? I've read a couple of books but I still don't think I understand the basics. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
luckyloser700
Joined: 24 Mar 2006 Posts: 308 Location: Japan
|
Posted: Tue Apr 11, 2006 5:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
Khyron wrote: |
I would classify most Japanese as agnostic people who don't give much thought to religion. Very secular actually. |
It's not that they don't think about it; probably most are just unwilling to discuss such topics with people they aren't close to. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
fiveeagles

Joined: 14 Apr 2005 Posts: 51 Location: Jeonju, South Korea
|
Posted: Tue Apr 11, 2006 6:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I know someone who started a church 20 years ago in Fukuoka. It is now about 150 members and they have their own church building. Big for Japanese standards. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
stillnosheep

Joined: 01 Mar 2004 Posts: 2068 Location: eslcafe
|
Posted: Wed Apr 12, 2006 4:17 am Post subject: Why are people so hostile to christianity here? |
|
|
Why are people so hostile to christianity here?
Because they hate the nasty, small-minded, guilt inducing religion.
Next! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
JimDunlop2

Joined: 31 Jan 2003 Posts: 2286 Location: Japan
|
Posted: Wed Apr 12, 2006 3:00 pm Post subject: Re: Why are people so hostile to christianity here? |
|
|
stillnosheep wrote: |
Why are people so hostile to christianity here?
Because they hate the nasty, small-minded, guilt inducing religion.
Next! |
Highly offensive and closed-minded of you. Why do you feel it necessary to slam Christians here? I'd appreciate it if you would retract that comment. As a Christian I take personal offense to what you've said. It was unkind, unprovoked and certainly uncalled for.
You have the right to believe or disbelieve whatever you wish, but please keep your hatred and rhetoric to yourself. Dave's is a forum for ESL teaching, NOT religion-bashing.
Thanks. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
abufletcher
Joined: 14 Sep 2005 Posts: 779 Location: Shikoku Japan (for now)
|
Posted: Wed Apr 12, 2006 3:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I like the quote in one of the Faulkner books describing the idea that people (in the southern US in particular) are born into a cruciform box and as they grow they come to take on the shape of the box so even after the box is removed they still hold the same shape. I think that's a pretty apt description of "culture" in general and why it is so hard to "break out of the box" (because you literally BECOME THE BOX).
People who are openly agressive to a particular religion (or even all religions in general) are generally people who have spent a good deal of their lives trying to GET RID OF THE BOX - and are still struggling. I feel like I went through many years of this in my teens and 20's. But nowadays 20 something years later, I'm very comfortable with my scientific atheism and don't feel the need to constantly be attacking the box I was born in. If fact, I really like listening to the Christian radio talk shows. They're great fun. My wife on the other hand, having not entirely escaped from her Mexican Catholic box, can't stand these shows and makes me turn them off immediately! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|