Site Search:
 
Get TEFL Certified & Start Your Adventure Today!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Do you ever try to take on other vocabulary?
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... , 9, 10, 11  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> General Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Henry_Cowell



Joined: 27 May 2005
Posts: 3352
Location: Berkeley

PostPosted: Sun Apr 16, 2006 5:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Atassi wrote:
The original sentence in question:
Quote:
Aluminum' was the original name given to the element by Humphry Davy, who discovered it.

Here, we have a comma in a place where not many people need to pause. I was attempting to state that this sentence as originally written was correct without the comma.

And you were wrong, as the person who actually wrote that original sentence (and many others) indicated. We all provided syntactical reasons for the comma, not spoken reasons. So why the continuing fuss?

Whose "pauses" are you referring to here? "Normal" speakers? Who the h*ll are they?? What if different speakers have different pauses? A "principle" must be universal, no?

I've asked you several times to supply a written source that actually states your "principle" for punctuation in writing. You haven't because you cannot. Case closed, I think.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Henry_Cowell



Joined: 27 May 2005
Posts: 3352
Location: Berkeley

PostPosted: Sun Apr 16, 2006 5:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Atassi wrote:
Now, Stephen mentioned another sentence:
Quote:
I phoned my brother who lives in Chicago, and then emailed my other brother in Iraq.

Now, I believe we might also write: "I phoned my brother, who lives in Chicago, and then emailed my other brother in Iraq."

Do you understand the difference in meaning between the two sentences as written with and without punctuation? Yes or no? If yes, please explain the difference in terms of types of clauses. This is what we teach our students to recognise.
Atassi wrote:
my God, what is, that, thing?

This is an extreme example I agree, but it is acceptable in some types of writing.

Um, you do know the difference between a comma and an ellipsis? The latter (and sometimes the dash) is used in writing for this purpose: to indicate pauses in speech. Never the comma. Double duh. And don't you yourself "pause" after the phrase "extreme example"?? Why no comma there? Aren't you a "normal" native speaker of English. Who is "normal"? If it's indeed a PRINCIPLE, then we should be able to regularise it. Laughing
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
BearMan
Mod Team
Mod Team


Joined: 20 Nov 2005
Posts: 115

PostPosted: Sun Apr 16, 2006 8:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It seems. this one. has run its course . . . Shocked

Pause, when, and as, you please.

BearMan
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
stillnosheep



Joined: 01 Mar 2004
Posts: 2068
Location: eslcafe

PostPosted: Sun Apr 16, 2006 9:49 pm    Post subject: The pregnant pause... Reply with quote

or The meaning of a comma is its use in the language

Rules governing punctuation are complex.

Far more interesting is the discussion around the primary function of the comma in modern English. What is it really for?

While Henry Cowell argues for the use of ellipses or other punctuation to mark pauses in speech, restricting commas for other uses (which may or may not coincide with pauses), Stephen Jones looks back to the origin of the comma.

But even if commas developed as pause markers in written speech, and even if those pauses often coincide with syntactical boundaries, not all syntactical boundaries coincide with pauses in read speech or in conversation. So upon what principles shall we base our rules?

This is not a question of right and wrong. The answer is not imposed upon the user by the rules of the language. Ultimately the community of English language users will decide the future rules of comma usage by their actions. Different sub-communities may make different decisions.

We are not a congregation waiting to decipher the word of God, neither are we a jury attempting to discover the truth. We are a community of language users deciding collectively how we wish to use commas in the future.


Last edited by stillnosheep on Sun Apr 16, 2006 10:52 pm; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Mr. Kalgukshi
Mod Team
Mod Team


Joined: 18 Jan 2003
Posts: 6613
Location: Need to know basis only.

PostPosted: Sun Apr 16, 2006 10:07 pm    Post subject: Advice Reply with quote

The MODS are not going to lock or delete the thread at this time.

The MODS are going to suggest that all concerned tone things down appreciably and stay on topic and far, far away from personal insults or name-calling.

If not, the MODS will take appropriate action including sanctions against individual members who choose not to follow MOD advice.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Stephen Jones



Joined: 21 Feb 2003
Posts: 4124

PostPosted: Sun Apr 16, 2006 10:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Let's go back to basics. The purpose of a comma is to indicate a boundary. In spoken English we use a pause for the same effect. Now we have other punctuation marks than the comma to indicate a pause - full stops, question marks and exclamation marks are the primary boundary markers (which you use depends on the status), and commas, semi-colons and colons are the secondary ones.

Following the CGEL p.1735, there is a heirarchy full stop --- colon/semi colon --- comma. This refers to the size and type of the chunks that are delimited.

In speech we would use a pause to delimit the boundary, and in general the comma would delimit a shorter pause than the full stop.

Now the point is not that the comma is used to indicate a pause, or vice-versa (that when reading we should pause when we see a comma); the point is that the comma and the pause are ways of determing syntactic or semantic boundaries and thus both are governed by the same principles.

Thus one of Attassi's earlier statements is basically true: Where there is a comma there will be a pause, but all pauses are not indicated by commas.

Even in the phrase Humphrey Davy, who invented it there is a pause, slight though it may be.

The example of Chicago, Illinois said without a pause is merely an example of writing being more conservative than speech. In the unlikely event that we all end up speaking like American sports commentators and the pause that is normally there disappears, it will not be too long before the comma follows it into obscurity.

So the comma separates the dependent units in a sentence structure in the same way that a pause does in spoken English.

What happens when a speaker uses a lot of pauses in non-standard places, or alternatively, like Henry's newsreader, misses them out where they would normally be expected? Interestingly, we can indicate the lack of an obligatory pause by missing out the obligatory comma John help me do the washing up that's sitting in the sink and my God just driving me crazy just as we can even miss out full stops to indicate a continuous flow of verborrheia, but, as HC points out, it is no longer standard to use commas to indicate excessive pauses in places where a comma would not otherwise be discretional.

Let us look at a few cases where the discretional use of a comma depends on the something other than syntactic rules. Let's take the Oxford comma.
Few would punctuate like this:
The British flag is red, white, and blue.
However many would punctuate like this:
His arguments are exquisitely expressed, thoroughly researched, and compellingly logical.
The fact that the chunks are longer makes the use of the Oxford comma more likely.
Look at this example:
Our manager is knowledgeable, dynamic, and useless.
Here the Oxford comma is stressing the disjunct between the last phrase and what comes before. And, as we would do this in spoken English with a pregnant pause, it is also conveying information as to how to read it.

The point about optional commas is that they clearly show that their usage cannot depend on syntax alone. Use of commas has changed in the last hundred years, and there is a tendency for a lighter style (for graphic as well as prosodic reasons). The rules of English grammar and syntax have not changed in that period. The only reason for putting a comma in
After dinner, the men went into the sitting room.
is, as Thurber says, to tell you to pause so the guests have time to push back the chairs and stand up.

The CGEL gives an excellent list of the factors that influence the use of the delimiting comma:
    a) length and complexity of the constituent
    b) whether or not there are punctuation marks nearby
    c) the linear position of the constituent
    d) the semantic category of an adjunct
    e) the possibility of misparsing
    f) prosody

Note that the sixth factor specifically refers to the representation of spoken English, and that the first and second apply to both graphically and acoustically.

To sum up, commas have not become divorced from speech, and certainly their use is not exclusively decided by grammar and syntax.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Stephen Jones



Joined: 21 Feb 2003
Posts: 4124

PostPosted: Sun Apr 16, 2006 10:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
not all syntactical boundaries coincide with pauses in read speech or in conversation.
But where the syntatical boundaries don't coincide with a pause, they don't coincide with a comma.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Sheikh Inal Ovar



Joined: 04 Dec 2005
Posts: 1208
Location: Melo Drama School

PostPosted: Mon Apr 17, 2006 3:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

No I'm not mad, Atassi ... I thought my tone would have indicated that ...

Anyhow your answer to the question below will allow me to depart ...

The original text

'Aluminum' was the original name given to the element by Humphry Davy, who discovered it.

Atassi's treatment of the above text

Atassi-Page 4 to start the contoversy- wrote:
Actually, Mr. Jones was correct. A comma is not supposed to be where you wanted to place it. Change the phrase at the end and it may take a comma, but as it is it would actually be incorrect to place one there.


Atassi-Page 9 wrote:
In this case my dear friend, the comma causes one to pause. Quite frankly, the pause is optional (but I thought you'd be able to figure that one out).


Firstly, when we are speaking I wasn't aware that we saw commas which then caused us to pause ... it could have dangerous consequences when driving for a start ... but more importantly, according to the rule of thumb if the pause is optional then is not the comma also optional????

And did you not say in your first post on page 4 (above) that a comma would be incorrect there ????
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Henry_Cowell



Joined: 27 May 2005
Posts: 3352
Location: Berkeley

PostPosted: Mon Apr 17, 2006 4:19 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Atassi originally wrote:
The principle is that a comma is placed where a native speaker would normally pause...

That's still untrue -- no matter how you might want to interpret its ramifications and underlyling interpretation. The amount of backpedalling that took place after it was written attests to that.

And no amount of erudite lyricism from Stephen Jones about "prosody" will change the comma guidelines used by the writers and editors on my team. We get along quite nicely without worrying about rhythm and pauses because we -- and our readers -- represent many varieties of global English. Who can possibly know (and standardise for a global team of writers) the types of rhythm and pauses that a reader might expect? It just ain't possible.

In the field of technical writing, consistency in everything (vocabulary, spelling, treatment of words, typography, and punctuation) is valued. So we determine comma usage in our materials not by consulting the vagaries of individual speech but by inspecting the rather much more standardised (and universal) grammar and syntax of formal written English.

On the other hand, when we transcribe speech for instructional and documentation purposes, we use other marks to indicate pauses and intonation. But, as I mentioned earlier on this thread, those marks do not always coincide with comma usage in written materials.

[When rereading the previous sentence, I didn't pause at the first comma at all. On our team, however, we always insert that comma in writing to separate the dependent clause from the main clause. Everyone will write and edit it the same way, thereby lending consistency to our set of written materials. If each of our writers applied individual "prosodic" guidelines, our document set would never be consistent. That's why style guides exist.]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Henry_Cowell



Joined: 27 May 2005
Posts: 3352
Location: Berkeley

PostPosted: Mon Apr 17, 2006 5:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Stephen Jones wrote:
But where the syntatical boundaries don't coincide with a pause, they don't coincide with a comma.

What about the standard use of the comma to separate greetings such as hello, hey, good morning, and the like?

Hello, John.
Good morning, Stephen.
Hey, Atassi!

There are not many native speakers who would pause at the commas in these comma-separated phrases.

And we have again my somewhat related example of "Chicago, Illinois" or "Boston, Massachusetts" or "Hamburg, Germany."

There are no pauses there in my speech, but I always use the comma to separate city from either state or country. That's what ALL my style guides and writing handbooks say I should do, and the authors of those guides are Americans who nevertheless know that Americans never pause at the comma. Funny, but I rarely hear BBC announcers pause there either.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Stephen Jones



Joined: 21 Feb 2003
Posts: 4124

PostPosted: Mon Apr 17, 2006 8:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
And we have again my somewhat related example of "Chicago, Illinois" or "Boston, Massachusetts" or "Hamburg, Germany."

There are no pauses there in my speech, but I always use the comma to separate city from either state or country.
I always suspected you probably sound like a Japanese coke vending machine :)

Quote:
Funny, but I rarely hear BBC announcers pause there either.
So you've got a duff ear as well! Ever heard a liason between 'n' and 'E' in 'London, England'? like you get the liason between the 'n' of 'San' and 'A' of 'Antonio' in San Antonio, where the 'n' is the beginning of the next syllable. I doubt it, and the reason there is no liason is that there is a semantic boundary, and thus a pause, brief though it may be. Same goes for Hey, Atassi!. No way is the 'y; pronounced as the beginning of Atassi's name. (And wouldn't it be more correct to say that the comma(s) separate the vocative than that they separate the greeting?)

Quote:
but by inspecting the rather much more standardised (and universal) grammar and syntax of formal written English
Really; which version? Which authority?

Quote:
consistency in everything (vocabulary, spelling, treatment of words, typography, and punctuation) is valued
But the whole point of this discussion is that there is not consistencyin the use of commas. You can make a list of arbitrary rules for your fiefdom, as can the chief copy editors of other fiefdoms, and it is possible in certain cases there is some justification for doing so, though in most cases it is an example of corporate control freakery gone mad - the publishing equivalent of fast food waiters' uniforms (why should there be one spelling of e-mail for the Washington Post and another of email for the Wall Street Journal?).

Your particular method may well be appropriate for the particular circumstances - a technical publisher where many of the individual titles are produced in collaboration. You should certainly not attempt to generalize.

And your syntax-based list of guidelines can often come unstuck. Can you easily explain to me why most would place a comma in
Of course, in technical writing consistency is all important.
but the comma would definitely be wrong in
Is consistency all important in technical writing? Of course it is.
There is a syntactical explanation somewhere, but I can use my ear until I work it out.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Stephen Jones



Joined: 21 Feb 2003
Posts: 4124

PostPosted: Mon Apr 17, 2006 3:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
On our team, however, we always insert that comma in writing to separate the dependent clause from the main clause.
But there is no need to. You do need the comma at the end of the dependent clause but there is no need to also have a comma at the left boundary, which is much weaker.

In effect you are saying that you do not delimit the beginning of the subordinate clause in speech from the preceding word, but that out of inertia, or because of a desire for consistency, you do so in writing even though that is unnecessary.

The problem with having a set rule for whether you have a comma at the starting boundary is that you lose in expressiveness. If you always punctuate heavily, then you miss the distinction in emphasis and intonation between
But as I mentioned earlier on this thread, these ...........
and
But, as I mentioned earlier on this thread, these.......
Probably not too important in a technical manual, mind you.


Last edited by Stephen Jones on Tue Apr 18, 2006 7:02 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Stephen Jones



Joined: 21 Feb 2003
Posts: 4124

PostPosted: Mon Apr 17, 2006 3:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

And seeing we are dealing with style books, let's quote Bill Walsh, the Copy Desk Chief at the Business Desk at the Washington Post, who in his appropriately entitled second book on English style "Lapsing into a comma", states:
Commas don't seem to inspire shouting matches the way hyphens do, but opinions on their proper use probably vary even more widely. Because the comma often serves to symbolize a pause in speech, its use is subject to the vagaries of the human ear. There are hard-and-fast rules about commas, of course, but within those rules there is plenty of room for nuance and interpretation.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Henry_Cowell



Joined: 27 May 2005
Posts: 3352
Location: Berkeley

PostPosted: Mon Apr 17, 2006 6:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bill Walsh, "National Copy Desk Chief" of the Washington Post, wrote:
Because the comma often serves to symbolize a pause in speech, its use is subject to the vagaries of the human ear.

"Vagaries of the human ear" are, by definition, not regular and thus cannot be easily formalised in writing. So you would have some writers (or editors) inserting a comma in a sentence, and you would have others not inserting the same comma in the same sentence. This isn't permissible in the type of writing I manage -- nor is it permissible in the type of writing that Bill Walsh manages professionally on the job.
As a result, we do indeed develop guidelines and rules for placement of commas that don't depend on "vagaries of the human ear." So do the publishers of newspapers, journals, nonfiction books and well-edited Web sites. Despite what he says in his popular little book about writing, Bill Walsh himself obeys such rules all the time when he prepares Washington Post articles for publication. That's what publishing style guides are all about, and that's why there is a position called "National Copy Desk Chief." Wink

By the way, Stephen, your ability to hear either pauses or elisions in my speech is truly astounding -- all the way from the Middle East. Or are you in Sri Lanka right now?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Henry_Cowell



Joined: 27 May 2005
Posts: 3352
Location: Berkeley

PostPosted: Mon Apr 17, 2006 7:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Stephen Jones wrote:
But as I mentioned earlier on this thread, these ...........

Zounds. A coordinating conjunction and a subordinating conjunction as part of the same dependent clause. Of what possible "expressive" value is that? Please explain the nuance as you would explain it to your student writers.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> General Discussion All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... , 9, 10, 11  Next
Page 10 of 11

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Teaching Jobs in China
Teaching Jobs in China