|
Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
McEFL (English Second, Economics First)
Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 Next
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
englishgibson
Joined: 09 Mar 2005 Posts: 4345
|
Posted: Wed Jul 12, 2006 8:51 am Post subject: McEFL (English Second, Economics First) |
|
|
It seems that some of us sleep on our keyboards
Quote: |
yeah EG dem entertaining posts sure do get the customers flocking in for more:lol: |
Now to this one:
Quote: |
You are quick to take Clark Griswold to task for a possible conflict of interest between an unbiased opinion of EF and his website accepting advertising from EF.
Equally, how impartial can a person be who was FIRED from EF be?
|
I ain�t no quick and neither are my fingers, mate
With Clark Gr�.it�s �possible�, isn�t it?
With regards to your �QUESTION� above disregarding your overuse of the word �BE� (no biggy there ), I�d say that you are quite right. A �FIRED� employee could really get �p*ssed off�. However, how much does �a person� like you know about my McEF dismissal to "come out" so nicely?
Quote: |
Shouldn't your rants against EF contain a disclaimer: "BTW: I was fiired from EF"?
Seems full disclosure for the goose is good for the gander, eh?
So how about it? How much credibility can a reader give to a disgruntled ex-employee who was fired?
|
Up there, are you talking about some kinda �rats in EF�? BMW I drove once!
Old trolls like YOU make those wonderful forums soooo colorful, �EH�? So how about it?
How much credibility can a reader give to an old trolling fart like YOU who is little and knows little?
"Flaming" might burn my cooking, so now is the time for my bbqed pork chops. Let me flip�em first before I come back to read more �interesting stuff� here.
Forums are ONE BIG JUNGLE
Cheers and beers to all  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Lobster

Joined: 20 Jun 2006 Posts: 2040 Location: Somewhere under the Sea
|
Posted: Wed Jul 12, 2006 9:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
No matter who the employer is, once a good FT walks into a classroom and starts the lesson, the children will learn no matter what name is printed on the sign outside. I've seen some great teachers at crappy schools and some crappy teachers at great schools. If you want to discuss business ethics, corporate honesty, or depressing wages for FTs, that's fine. You could also discuss enforced curricula and poor resources as secondary arguments. However, saying that teaching quality is always affected by an employer is really grasping at straws.
RED |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
vikdk
Joined: 25 Jun 2003 Posts: 1676
|
Posted: Wed Jul 12, 2006 9:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sure enough KES looks like I should change all my opinions on an organisation that offers so much - after all if a demand exists then of course the market has a duty to satisfy it.
What insight into the wonders of modern Chinese education - I step back in wonder
By the way there is a strong social requirment for pre-school care institutions - but I don't think same applies to language mills, they could be most easily substituted with other more life fullfilling activities that aid the individual in their persuit of personal development. But then again this is a particularly academic argument, because as you have so rightly mentioned - this is China and people here think act in a whole different way. However that's no reason for likes of me to button up over the likes of McCrap - espescially if their product is built on a practice which does not have the best interests of FT or student in mind - but is more focused on economic gain and goals. This could be acceptable if it was just older students that were lured into this grinder - but the inclusion of small kids in their schemes certainly increases the repugnance factor for some of us  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
KES

Joined: 17 Nov 2004 Posts: 722
|
Posted: Wed Jul 12, 2006 11:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
Sure enough KES looks like I should change all my opinions on an organisation that offers so much - after all if a demand exists then of course the market has a duty to satisfy it. |
No reason to change your opinion. However, if a market exists, then there is likelihood that the market will satisfy it. Markets don�t have a duty to do anything. It�s the old �hidden hand� mechanism of basic economic theory. Providers are likely to compete to meet these demands when they surface, but it is all predicated on self interest. Some famous observer wrote words to the effect that it is not due to altruism that our baker, butcher and brewer provide for us, but only in their own self interest.
Quote: |
By the way their is a strong social requirment for pre-school care institutions - but I don't think same applies to language mills, they could be most easily substituted with other more life fullfilling activities that aid the individual in their persuit of personal development. But then again this is a particularly academic argument, because as you have so rightly mentioned - this is China and people here think act in a whole different way. |
I think you have stumbled upon my point. The consumers, the parents, determine what �life fulfilling� activities are best suited for them. There is a dearth of sport and recreational activities, as well as outdoor play areas and such similar to the West.
However, if the Chinese parents wanted Cinemax theaters, Scouting Troops, hiking and other activities for their children, I have little doubt the market would arise to service the demand. But, as you pointed out, that�s academic [at best]. At worst, such criticism simply imposes your, or another�s, value judgment on their society.
Quote: |
However that's no reason for like of me to button up over the likes of McCrap - espescially if their product is built on a practice which does not have the best interests of FT or student in mind - but is more focused on economic gain and goals. |
No reason to button up. However, there are those who have experience with EF that can claim, with equal vehemence, that at least some students and some FTs do perceive a benefit. Nor should they button up, or be shouted down. I have never worked for EF, however, I am at least willing to hear both sides when presented in a sober, coherent and civil manner.
EF is a for profit entity. I have no problem with that. If they really do in fact place increasing profit above increasing value, then nothing will stop another school to come along and take away their customers.
The alternative to EF is not, as one poster suggested, do away with EF, but rather for better managed schools to open that give better service to their internal as well as external customers. That will lead to improved product and employee satisfaction. Simply denying the market goods and services for which there is a demand is typical of the old Politburo, central managed economy that only ensured poor quality of goods and services everywhere � the Lada was necessary to meet demand, but still a crap auto. Competition might have led to continuous improvement.
In Chinese parent�s thinking, learning English will give their children an advantage in the increasingly global market. With the Internet, self-assembled International remote work teams and who can imagine what the interconnected future will bring, their thinking is not unreasonable.
There is no reason why students cannot benefit from English instruction, and schools can compete to provide that service.
If EF is the market leader, and really so bad, then FTs should rejoice at the opportunity to put their money where their mouths are and give them some healthy competition.
Why simply curse the darkness rather than light a candle?
One poster�s immature personal attacks on this board do point out a problem with EF; they never should have hired him, and they fired him far too late. What kind of emotionally stunted employee, let alone manager, would engage in such bitter, jejune drivel?
[/quote] |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
englishgibson
Joined: 09 Mar 2005 Posts: 4345
|
Posted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 5:21 am Post subject: McEFL (English Second, Economics First) |
|
|
And this one is back
Quote: |
think you have stumbled upon my point. |
And your point is?
Quote: |
Cinemax theaters, Scouting Troops, hiking and other activities for their children |
Ohhh, I see your point.
Quote: |
No reason to button up. However, there are those who have experience with EF that can claim, with equal vehemence, that at least some students and some FTs do perceive a benefit. Nor should they button up, or be shouted down. I have never worked for EF, however, I am at least willing to hear both sides when presented in a sober, coherent and civil manner. |
No reason, except when having a cold one. Yes, some have experience with EF and they share it on and some don�t but they keep on coming back here to share their �opinions�. Nothing wrong with that, eh? Willing to hear both sides is one thing, but getting in between those sides on forums is another one, isn�t it? A sober, coherent and civil manner it often comes on with, although after the forums �JUNGLE� gets in, questions the unfortunate side that shares his/her experience and tries to discredit him/her on forums��you yourself have shown above your �equal vehemence� and tried to discredit my McEF experience, even though you know little about little if it comes to McEF.
Quote: |
EF is a for profit entity. I have no problem with that. If they really do in fact place increasing profit above increasing value, then nothing will stop another school to come along and take away their customers. |
I am not sure I get that one very well, but I am going to try to understand it here. Yes, McEF is for profitand profit comes first. It surely comes before the quality of its education. If nothing stops another McEF center to come along, hire more FTs (to bull them), take more confused customers in (giving promises), rip the McEF franchisers off further and that all to take its leading roll in private education of English language in China.. the Chinese way. Ohh, I forgot to mention that more McEF franchisees mean more McEF clones around China, but I guess YOU know �little about little� if it comes to McEF discussion.
Quote: |
The alternative to EF is not, as one poster suggested, do away with EF, but rather for better managed schools to open that give better service to their internal as well as external customers. That will lead to improved product and employee satisfaction. Simply denying the market goods and services for which there is a demand is typical of the old Politburo, central managed economy that only ensured poor quality of goods and services everywhere � the Lada was necessary to meet demand, but still a crap auto. Competition might have led to continuous improvement. |
Politicizing and bringing in commies to this thread?
Nice going and "to go with your flow" for a bit, some of those commies have got in McEF, own a few and are running them. Nothing wrong with that, but they�ve �ADJUSTED� the McEF system as well as cloned it for their own. But then, what would you know about it? You are just reading those forums.
Quote: |
If EF is the market leader, and really so bad, then FTs should rejoice at the opportunity to put their money where their mouths are and give them some healthy competition. |
You really have �little� idea what you are talking about. In China, McEF has got strong roots that lead to the government and that created some connections with public sector. Some McEF owners are military officers, some commies or government (former government) workers etc. Would you like to kiss their rear end or compete with them? Neither might really work....but your rat a*s attitude does kiss the "brake-lights", doesn't it?
Mate, check what this McEF thread is about, before you go on whacking your old trolling tail here.
And now back to my bbqed pork chops...time to flip'em again.
I also have a cold one waiting.
I WILL BE BACK!
Cheers and beers
_____________________________________________________________
Foreign teachers of English are assests in China, aren't they? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Malsol
Joined: 06 Mar 2006 Posts: 1976 Location: Lanzhou
|
Posted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 7:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
KES wrote: |
Quote: |
There has to be a better business model but complaining about EF is not going to change anything. |
NOW you tell us! Where was this pearl of wisdom six pages of pseudo-Chinglish ago?
After all the smoke and fire, looks like nobody is able to offer a better alternative to EF.
Amazing; all the vilification and rants and not even ONE alternative is offered.
That says a lot.
I guess what the posters here are really saying is, "Kids, there IS no alternative to EF; or your kindly folks here, ever willing to help a newbie, would have put up even ONE name."
Well, thanks for trying. |
KES this is just a repeat of the OP! Where were you six pages ago? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
KES

Joined: 17 Nov 2004 Posts: 722
|
Posted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 8:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
Englishgibson,
You're incoherent.
Just because you were fired from EF doesn't give you the only opinion on EF, does it? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
englishgibson
Joined: 09 Mar 2005 Posts: 4345
|
Posted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 8:57 am Post subject: McEFL (English Second, Economics First) |
|
|
KES, where have you been past few years?
"In/Coherent"?
You've provided "little" about "little" on the topic of McEF and more than that you've been flaming like an old trolling fart.
Further more, you know "little" about me and my dismissal with McEF as well as you know "little" about other McEF dismissals that've occured in past 4 years in China.....you could read about it on forums
But then having read those grave, unfortunate posts, it makes one wonder why such an old trolling fart like you would keep on coming back disregarding previous threads.....I smell a rat
Cheers and beers to all of us even to the rats  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
KES

Joined: 17 Nov 2004 Posts: 722
|
Posted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 11:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
Why the name calling?
If you can't even follow these forum rules, why would anyone suspect you could follow the rules at EF?
Is it any wonder you were fired?
Look at your posts. Incoherent juvinile name calling.
Hey, just because you couldn't hack it at EF doesn't mean the end of the world. You don't have to go around all bitter. You'll just end up like Roger. Do you want that?
With a proper education, intensive training, some therapy, and a huge dose of emotional maturity, you could probably lead a normal, perhaps even useful life.
Cheers and pink slips  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
TEAM_PAPUA

Joined: 24 May 2004 Posts: 1679 Location: HOLE
|
Posted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 1:21 am Post subject: * |
|
|
Love it or hate it, EF is here to stay. I really don't understand why you all put so much effort into talking about the organisation - they don't know who you are, and even if they did they wouldn't give a shit about you.
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
englishgibson
Joined: 09 Mar 2005 Posts: 4345
|
Posted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 10:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yes, you are right in a way, although many read on and form their opinion about schools. Some of the jokes on here participate with their opinions without having a clue about the school/organization. With all due respect to the ones that have come here with their McEF experiences, I am sure the readers shall appreciate that, but the rest that's been misleading it all....
Now, back to this joke below
Quote: |
Why the name calling?
If you can't even follow these forum rules, why would anyone suspect you could follow the rules at EF? |
Yes, I shouldn't've called you KES.
Trolling and flaming is your specialty, isn't it Then, at your hot keyboard the rules come to your finger tips
Ur a helluva fella ...and a rether amusing too.
I am just sorry for the readers interested in McEF more than in your pitty.
Keep on coming fella! There's a light on the end of your tunnel
And now's the time to flip my bbqed pork chops again.
Cheers and beers to all  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
OGFT
Joined: 24 Jun 2006 Posts: 432
|
Posted: Mon Jul 24, 2006 4:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
English Gibson wrote:
Quote: |
No reason, except when having a cold one. |
too many of those, eh, is that why they fired you,
sounds like you BBQ'd your own chops
KES wrote:
Quote: |
If you can't even follow these forum rules, why would anyone suspect you could follow the rules at EF?
|
Good point and having worked at EF before, I didn't find it too difficult and those fired had to be fairly sorry.
English Gibson wrote:
Quote: |
tries to discredit him/her on forums��you yourself have shown above your �equal vehemence� and tried to discredit my McEF experience, even though you know little about little if it comes to McEF.
|
You need no help.
You do an excellent job of discrediting yourself.. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Malsol
Joined: 06 Mar 2006 Posts: 1976 Location: Lanzhou
|
Posted: Tue Jul 25, 2006 3:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
Gentlemen - please?
Let's stick to the issues and stop all the personal attacks. They discredit all of us FTs in China. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
cj750

Joined: 27 Apr 2004 Posts: 3081 Location: Beijing
|
Posted: Tue Jul 25, 2006 4:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
I have also worked at EF, although in a part time slot, and I found the EF to be no better or wore than most schools of any configuration, whether it be franchised, public or private. The one I worked for stuck to the guidelines of the franchise and treated it's workers with due process and respect. Many of the workers were not professionals but received training and guidelines that allowed them to go to other institutions with more experience and able to demand a higher paycheck.
I find that some of those speaking out against the EF chain are likely just duds with poor abilities or attitude problems that lead them to think that they are experts in this field and know better than most of the franchisers or parents..after all they are teachers....not. This "I know more than you because I worked there" will not fly as many have made a success out of a term or two contract with EF and in many places you find it hard to get on with EF..and I have met with the Shanghai recruiter and have been offered a job at EF but refused it because with a teaching certificate, I can demand more money.
In Dalian , I knew several EF teachers and tho not my kind of folks, they seem'd very dedicated and often used free time to plan classes and schedule meeting with students...dedicated bunch in all and it would be unfair to belittle a place that gave these untrained folks a chance to learn an EFL trade, cause that is all it is, A TRADE....if you want to hand out teacher like opinions, first you need to be train as a teacher. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
vikdk
Joined: 25 Jun 2003 Posts: 1676
|
Posted: Tue Jul 25, 2006 6:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
if you want to get yourself a crap badly-made copy of a pre WWII BMW then get yourself a chinese made CJ 750
If your qualification is - white English speaker - and you want to be called a teacher - the get your self a crap imitation of a teaching job in a McCrap.
the views of certain posters here don't have much to do with the comparison of Chinese teaching organistions - or the poor monkeys traped in the McCrap cage trying to do a good job. No they're more to do with defining the educational crap that is found out here - you know profit orientated organisations that overcharge customers and undepay employees all in the name of the mighty god of profit who is well-known for his scorn of innovative pedagogical principle. you know the definition of McCrap and how these big companies set standards of crap which others try to copy - and that's the problem folks this this is the land of the crap copy - shizer you just have to look at your CJ 750"s and EF to realise that. But then again being a teacher we do have a chance to put a tiny wee spanner in the works - you know start to push the concepts of creativity and active learning - so why not scream out a little about McCraps - at least it gives a place for those who think discusing this problem is worthwhile - or is a passive acceptence of the market managed Chinese education status-quo - of course in relation to that burning issue, the more jobs for FT's the better - suppossed to be part of the "TRADE" out here
darn all this post is missing is the chorus line - 1,2,3 - BUT WHAT'S THE ALTERNATIVE  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling. Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|