|
Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
McEFL (English Second, Economics First)
Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 Next
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
KES

Joined: 17 Nov 2004 Posts: 722
|
Posted: Tue Jul 25, 2006 7:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| But then again being a teacher we do have a chance to put a tiny wee spanner in the works - you know start to push the concepts of creativity and active learning |
Are you saying NO EF teachers or schools have creativity and active learning?
Or just that only you and those fired by EF can judge quality?
It's hard to tell since both of you have, no offense meant, really poor writing skills - something one would expect to find in a self styled educational zealot. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
vikdk
Joined: 25 Jun 2003 Posts: 1676
|
Posted: Tue Jul 25, 2006 8:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| It's hard to tell since both of you have, no offense meant, really poor writing skills - something one would expect to find in a self styled educational zealot |
a three line response - of which a third is taken up with some pointless trolling of other posters - should be taken for what it is - McCrap
really kes my poor writing skills should have provoked a more mature response than that - but then again maybe you're one of those creative, free thinking monkeys who has such a frustrating time traped in that McCrap cage - kind of hard for them bosses to take your ideas seriously while you're in there, aint it - WHAT IS YOUR ALTERNATIVE  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
vikdk
Joined: 25 Jun 2003 Posts: 1676
|
Posted: Tue Jul 25, 2006 9:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| Are you saying NO EF teachers or schools have creativity and active learning? |
if creativity flourishes at EF, they're certainly keeping it quiet - I went over their site trying to find something about their educational practice - but only found McCrap testimonials like this -
| Quote: |
China is great.. better than I could have imagined, so very different from the life I was used to but in the same breath, the best choice I ever made.
Xi'an itself has a really good mixture of old and new, it is developing at a rapid rate but in turn keeping the old China alive by incorporating traditional style architecture into the new buildings. People's attitudes are still very traditional and it seems most older people are reluctant to change, however the young people are very excited about their future, for the first times in their lives.
The schools here are amazing, the people here who I work with are all really cool, all of similar age and background, I work with 3 people from Brighton and 1 from Chichester so it's really nice to have something in common. Everyone is or has been in the same boat at one point or another and knowing that makes the first few days after arriving not so daunting.
China is an amazing place with so much going on, life here never stops and every day is a new experience. The students are all so eager to learn, so beautiful and so well mannered. I can honestly say this is the best thing I have ever done and want to continue working for EF for a long time. I have loads of places I want to visit in the world and know that with EF I have the opportunity.
Rachel Marfleet, EF Xi'an 2005 |
this wonderfull prose can be found - http://www.englishfirst.com/trt/testimonial_cn.html
It seems EF is marketed as tool for travel - the business of teaching seems to come second place - and also going through this thread it seems that nobody realy has taken time to praise any inovative and progresive teaching method - just defending EF as an employer - a vehicle for traveling China
So you people who want to travel - McCrap may seem great - But what about us who want to teach - WHAT'S OUR ALTERNATIVE - should I stay at home Kes and leave this "TRADE" to the backpackers:lol:  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cj750

Joined: 27 Apr 2004 Posts: 3081 Location: Beijing
|
Posted: Tue Jul 25, 2006 9:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
vikdk wrote
| Quote: |
if you want to get yourself a crap badly-made copy of a pre WWII BMW then get yourself a Chinese made CJ 750
If your qualification is - white English speaker - and you want to be called a teacher - the get your self a crap imitation of a teaching job in a McCrap.
|
the crude quality of the Chang is what is beautiful and PLA spec'd machines are tough.....but then again..if you can afford the pre war BMWs more power to yu..how many do you have...how many Ks have you logged on Chinese roads.....and to your qualifications...what are they and are they such as to afford you a teaching job in your home country..if so then why even work full time for a McCrap unless you are a dud.
and another offering from the mouth of McBULLSh*t
| Quote: |
| really kes my poor writing skills should have provoked a more mature response than that - but then again maybe you're one of those creative, free thinking monkeys who has such a frustrating time traped in that McCrap cage - kind of hard for them bosses to take your ideas seriously while you're in there |
Could he be more wrong.....by characterizing all EF's as a cage yu show yourself for the same kind of small minded person you accuse the "bosses" off....and I am not saying that EF is a great career goal..but then again i wouldn't feel that any ESL job is a goal of a lifetime..merely a trade that some are able to ply for a while before or after getting serious about working.
I guess what brothers me is that slags towards EF comes usually by those who are not successful in their work experience.... but after you last post it is clear that you have a grudge against China...proven by equating the quality of a military made motorcycle with that of a franchise neither born in China nor of Chinese design.
Hey I never thought Future School was worth a darn, but the guys who work there seem to like it and often did there jobs with enthusiasm..and as an employer, I would rather that attitude prevailed in my workers that one of no-nothing pretend teachers, who having an unsuccessful career with my company making judgements as to a section of the industry that serves a Chnese Mkt.
I would never recommend to someone to take a job at Aston, Future, Raffles, EF, or any other after school training center...unless they were only interested in picking up some extra money while traveling or interested in living in china and they need a way to finance their stay.
If someone had real teaching ability, then I would say that working for the public school system or an University may serve them better and the money is better also, as long as you are qualified with education under you r belt before you come to China... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
vikdk
Joined: 25 Jun 2003 Posts: 1676
|
Posted: Tue Jul 25, 2006 9:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
duhhhhhhhhhhhh - CJ750 - hasn't it ever occured to you that these arguments and discussions might have something to do with the topic of raising standard rather that trying to shed pent-up feelings of inadequacy - your last paragraph reflects how many of us define the McCrapness of EF and other chains - so why use all that psuedoshrink shiite to finaly get it of your chest
By the way I've been the proud owner of BJ2020 for almost 2 years now (and I love her so much) - so I know all about the charm of ex-PLA crap - just glad the spares for our type of rubbish are so cheap and they can always be repaired with crudest of tools - shame you can't say the same about the kids - the kind of damage the chinese education machine hands out to then is much harder to fix  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
no_exit
Joined: 12 Oct 2004 Posts: 565 Location: Kunming
|
Posted: Tue Jul 25, 2006 4:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You know, I bowed out of this thread a long time ago, and restrained myself from posting, and I'm probably making a big mistake by even getting involved again ... but seriously. A vehicle for travelling China? In my entire three years in China I can count the number of actual trips I've taken on one hand (visa runs don't count!). You hardly get enough time off to backpack around, not matter where you teach, except at a university, where you get an whole entire summer vacation! The backpackers generally work illegally for schools that they can ditch at a moment's notice without repercussions anyhow, and they rarely have the stamina to stick out a contract with a training center. The people who work at these places, in my experience, tend to be people new to teaching who want to gain training and experience, or people who really need to make money and don't care how hard they have to work to get it. Neither of these characteristics make them bad teachers.
The sweeping generalizations make you sound mentally imbalanced vik. No teachers are creative at EF proven by one girl's write-up from one center? Using this thread itself as an argument against EF teachers, saying no one stood up for the teaching methods of EF (because the thread was never about teaching methods in the first place, it was always about EF as a place of work)? Anyone who has any experience with training centers knows that the school is only as good as its teachers, there is no standard "EF methodology," there are good teachers and bad teachers at all schools.
I've seen far more dodgy teachers working at universities, where there is often practically no supervision or monitoring of teaching quality, than I have at training centers, where the DOS will observe your class, hold staff meetings, give you training, and provide you with resources you could never dream of having at a uni. By your logic, I could say "only crap teachers work at unis because they get a long holiday and no one bugs them about their teaching," but that would be completely untrue, a sweeping generalization of the kind that you are fond of making. Just stop it, would you? You don't like EF, any EF under the sun, they are all pure evil in your book, we all get the point. Got it ages ago. But you're sh*tting on an entire category of school and a whole bunch of teachers who simply don't deserve it, and you're only making yourself look like a crazed fanatic in the process.
Peace, I'm gonna try and not get baited into involving myself in this stupid argument again. I just don't like seeing myself and people I worked with and respected get slagged off over and over again, to be honest it really ticks me off. Grow up, and while you're at it, learn to put together a real argument, preferably something other than "OMG EF is like, McDonalds, they're corporate and bad and they make everyone into robots and the Chinese kids are all like OMG I hate EF because my mom and dad make me go there and its so unfair because they shouldn't be learning things they should be playing outside and they only have shite teaching and you're a shite teacher and this girl at EF Xian liked to travel so EF only hires backpackers and you drive a Chinese POS motorcycle and couldn't afford a BMW and you worked at EF so I win! " |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
vikdk
Joined: 25 Jun 2003 Posts: 1676
|
Posted: Tue Jul 25, 2006 5:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| The sweeping generalizations make you sound mentally imbalanced vik. No teachers are creative at EF proven by one girl's write-up from one center |
well after 3 years of working for EF you could surely have given a first-hand account of how your creative talents were put to excellent use - I looked and looked for a hint of your support for EF as an innovative and progesive teaching outfit - but all I got out of it was an personal attack on me - or maybe thats just my mental imballance playing up again
You really do need to learn to be more objective with your posts, since this thread is not about you or me - its about EF  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
KES

Joined: 17 Nov 2004 Posts: 722
|
Posted: Wed Jul 26, 2006 12:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| since this thread is not about you or me - its about EF Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing |
Not true.
This thread has always been about you. Your prejudices, your monomaniacal obsession with chain schools and your cyberstalking EF.
Do you realize what picture you are painting of yourself? An embittered, disgruntled EF castoff who now devotes his life to trashing a school that has long forgotten him. Even if inaccurate, that's the picture you are painting. Really. Go look at your own posts and see for yourself.
EF bashing has just become a straw man agrument. No one, even yourself I'm sure, takes it seriously.
But when you write in the fashion you do, surely you see no one can believe your posts are a rally for quality or action based learning or whatever. Simply because your posts are so far removed from the very professionalism you claim to endorse. You see that don't you?
How can you decry EF staffers when you write the way you do?
Maybe, for your own sake, it's time to move on and let the healing begin.
Good luck.
Last edited by KES on Wed Jul 26, 2006 2:02 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
vikdk
Joined: 25 Jun 2003 Posts: 1676
|
Posted: Wed Jul 26, 2006 1:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
KES - well from that last post we at least start to get an idea of your posting agenda - but instead of attacking me why not move on to an ALTERNATIVE subject - you know EF as a progressive educational force that encourages and nutures pedagogical quality, rather than a company which seems to direct so much of its effort on profit orientated excercises - ya know like luring that cheap white labour on a promise of travel and leisure.
http://www.englishfirst.com/trt/testimonial_cn.html
'fraid no-exits accounts of work, work and more work, kinda mess that image up - KES maybe that's the kind of stuff you could write about - or are you going into your posting swansong in this thread  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
KES

Joined: 17 Nov 2004 Posts: 722
|
Posted: Wed Jul 26, 2006 2:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| but instead of attacking me why not move on to an ALTERNATIVE subject - you know EF as a progressive educational force that encourages and nutures pedagogical quality, |
Given your posting history on this thread, why would anyone suspect you have a notion about a "a progressive educational force that encourages and nutures pedagogical quality"?
And how does your relentless attacks on EF foster this, if, as you now seem to indicate, that is the tack you want to take?
So all of your previous posts were a warmup to actually fostering a civil and rational discussion about improving EF's curricula? Who would have imagined.
Okay, if you can remain civil, I'll be happy to learn what your "ALTERNATIVES" are.
Please expound. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
vikdk
Joined: 25 Jun 2003 Posts: 1676
|
Posted: Wed Jul 26, 2006 2:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
well KES since my speciallity is pre-school and EF have classes for this age group - so Id be perticularly interested in this kind of stuff -
. lessons which are based on encouraging the child's creative talents - with English as a pathway of instruction.
. aknowledgement of the difficulties a small child has in learning an L2 - rather than just jumping on the tired old bandwagon of promoting 4-10 as the golden years of learning where your kid can more easily learn an L2
. using teaching method where teachers are trained to use chinese language to support English learning - scaffolding principles
. how that old-chesnut - the audiolingual method - is used in EF classrooms - you know getting the student to repeat and ultimately memorise language - often with no understanding of it.
. the developmental aspects of teaching small children - how bad and inapproriate teaching at this stage can actually become the root for an individual to dislike something at a latter date - you know a nasty english experience a 5 can produce an older student who has an instant distaste for anything to do with learning English - how are the teachers of EF given special training to make sure this doesn't happen.
. the point of giving extra classes to these small kids - appart from generating extra cash????
shizer I aint writ about all sorts of stuff - like social education, child initiated learning environments, the value of edutainment, teacher qualification etc etc - but I reckon if this is getting a tired old thread then a discussion on some of the above points - and how the big market leaders in this game - like EF - are encouraging progressive teaching practice - could be just what likes of KES is looking for  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
KES

Joined: 17 Nov 2004 Posts: 722
|
Posted: Wed Jul 26, 2006 4:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| but I reckon if this is getting a tired old thread then a discussion on some of the above points - and how the big market leaders in this game - like EF - are encouraging progressive teaching practice - could be just what likes of KES is looking for |
Thanks.
I think sharing your perspective of what schools, not just chain schools in general, or EF in particular, might do to enhance their curricula would be better than simply criticizing their methods - as I wrote before, light a candle, don't just curse the darkness.
One of your leitmotifs is a disagreement with children receiving "extra" English instruction outside of normal school hours. Since a public school class of fifty-five students taught by Chinese teachers in no way comparable to a training school class of twenty-five students taught by an able and motivated FT, it cannot be considered "extra". It is no more "extra" than participating a football game is "extra" football after having watched a game on TV.
You object to the children attending primarily for, it seems, two reasons; their age and your opinion that children should be else while occupied.
There does seem a general consensus, and it reflects my own, (albeit non empirical) experience and observation that most people do acquire a second language more readily at an earlier age. I believe this to be particularly true regarding pronunciation. I don�t see a groundswell of fact or opinion reflecting a change to this view.
As for whether children�s time ought be better spent in other pursuits, I see that as a parent�s choice. I certainly don�t see the picture of bleak task-oriented drudgery you seem to paint. You can go to some training centers and see kids leaving class obviously excited and happy with their lessons and having much better English than their public school counterparts.
At the end of the day, your average public school with too large class sizes and no exposure to authentic spoken English cannot compete with the results of a training center with small, fun, high energy and educationally sound teaching methods by a motivated and capable foreign teacher. And that is why the market exists.
One may quibble about the methods, but the results are hard to ignore. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
vikdk
Joined: 25 Jun 2003 Posts: 1676
|
Posted: Wed Jul 26, 2006 5:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| At the end of the day, your average public school with too large class sizes and no exposure to authentic spoken English cannot compete with the results of a training center with small, fun, high energy and educationally sound teaching methods by a motivated and capable foreign teacher. And that is why the market exists. |
that's a very sweeping statement - and your empirical evidence for this - of course based on the McCrap classrooms where the teacher is often unqualified and the captive students have had to endure so many hours of forced English that brain stimulation is starting to reach overload point (learning the names of fruit for the 57th time) - is
looks likes its my heresay against yours isn't it - so lets follow a far more profitable path of discussion -
I invite anybody with EF teaching experience - or indeed anybody, like our good friend KES, who has an interest in this subject - to prove me wrong on the subject of employment of "progressive child development friendly" teaching methods - a nice discussion on pedagogical practice in relation to McCrap in this way doesn't need non-existant surveys to proove the differing camps right or wrong - just a little passion, interest, knowledge and conviction for this job will do very nicely
But then again if you believe the product of English speekers is a goal to be achieved regardless of the personal pain inflicted on the poor student - you know the market is our master type post - then your views would also be equally interesting  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
vikdk
Joined: 25 Jun 2003 Posts: 1676
|
Posted: Wed Jul 26, 2006 6:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
as a follow on to my last post - here could be a kickoff point for a discussion -
KES writes
| Quote: |
| There does seem a general consensus, and it reflects my own, (albeit non empirical) experience and observation that most people do acquire a second language more readily at an earlier age. I believe this to be particularly true regarding pronunciation. I don�t see a groundswell of fact or opinion reflecting a change to this view. |
but the results of surveys on the subject say -
| Quote: |
S. Krashen, R. Scarcella, & M. Long (eds.), Child-Adult Differences in Second Language Acquisition, Newbury House
1. Adults proceed through the earlier stages of syntactic and morphological development faster than children (where age and exposure are held constant)
2. Older children acquire faster than younger Children (again, the early stages of syntactic and morphological development re time and exposure are held constant.
3. Acquirers who begin natural exposure to second languages during childhood generally achieve higher second language proficiency than those beginning as adults.
V.J. Cook (ed.) (1986), Experimental Approaches to Second Language Learning, Chapter 2
1. Older children are better than younger children at learning a second language.
2. Adults are better than children at learning a second language
3. Immigrants who start learning a second language younger end up better speakers than those who start older |
indeed there seems to be an indication that we have the chance to promote better pronunciation at an earlier age - a skill that will be apparent in latter years - but the actual work of learning to speak an L2 (dont confuse this with L1 development) seems to be a very difficult process for the young learner - something seemingly very removed from the joy of running about in a free open space and going through the process of playing football - well that is unless were already subjected to a very tough sports training regime at a very early age (ohhh the joys of East Germany ).
EF workers - mill workers - any FT's, do your companies explain the difficulties of young learners - what is their spin with parents - do they convince them that an early age is a time when L2 learning is easy - do you have to force feed sentences and songs so it seems that kids are learning when they regurgitate language back home - isn't it this type of manipulation of education for the persual of profit the very essence of McCrap  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
KES

Joined: 17 Nov 2004 Posts: 722
|
Posted: Wed Jul 26, 2006 7:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| but the actual work of learning to speak an L2 (dont confuse this with L1 development) seems to be a very difficult process for the young learner - something seemingly very removed from the joy of running about in a free open space and going through the process of playing football |
Wouldn't you agree "the actual work of learning" pretty much anything, will likely be pretty far removed from running about in free and open space and playing football?
Lack of free and open space aside, Chinese children's extracurricular time is spent with math tutors, calligraphy, piano, Chinese harp, dance or art instructors. To Chinese parents, this is a productive use of time.
In contrast, Chinese parents will often comment on how seemingly lazy and unproductive western students are in comparison to Chinese students. Western students are thought to squander precious time that could be used for learning.
Clearly, this is a cultural bias and neither side will likely soon change views.
Yes, learning a new language is work, no doubt about it. But it is neither a novel, unproven nor, for the most part, a consistently "very difficult" process for most learners.
I believe your own data supports the notion that earlier learner, while they might not initially learn as quickly as older, or adult learners, will typically go on to have better pronunciation and ultimately become better speakers.
| Quote: |
| do you have to force feed sentences and songs so it seems that kids are learning when they regurgitate language back home |
I believe that such methods are used to teach more than English.
However, your points, that children are force fed, and suffer pain upon learning English, are not ones I think universally shared.
I would submit that compulsory education, of any shape and substance, could be characterized as being force fed, if one were so inclined to characterize it as such. Much has been written on this by Freire and Illich; but that is probably beyond the scope of this discussion.
My point is that it is possible to have quality instruction in nearly any environment; even a chain school. I don't think it fair to, in your words, make "a sweeping statement" ("McCrap") that pejoratively dismisses all of them; especially when the unevenness of services is well known.
However, I am led to believe that you would object to any English instruction, regardless of methodology employed, if it is done during the child's extracurricular time. Please correct me if I am wrong but I have this distinct impression from your previous posts.
While we may not agree on every issue, I welcome a discussion that sheds more light than heat upon the subject. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling. Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|