Site Search:
 
Get TEFL Certified & Start Your Adventure Today!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Respect Cultural Diversity, eh?
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> General North America Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Henry_Cowell



Joined: 27 May 2005
Posts: 3352
Location: Berkeley

PostPosted: Thu Aug 03, 2006 6:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

rusmeister wrote:
If they don't share my culture, where is our common ground?

Said by chauvinists and xenophobes for centuries. The actual "common ground" eludes them even when it's right before their eyes and beneath their feet. Instead, they focus on a narrow and inaccurate notion of culture.

As I've already written, if we as English teachers don't know how to define culture as anthropologists do and don't know how to live among people with diverse backgrounds and practices, how can we expect others to learn to do the same? The conclusion that nations can somehow become "too" diverse and then inevitably self-destruct is a convenient scare tactic -- and wrong.

To call diversity "excessive" and "fashionable" is to repeat all the right-wing nativist canards. Is it "fashionable" to proclaim and practice an ancient Eastern European orthodox religion in the 21st century? Is it "excessive" for some people in San Francisco to choose to live in Russian enclaves, shop in Russian stores, speak mostly Russian, and almost never leave the neighborhood?

One person's "excess" is another person's way of being perfectly American. Ooops! I did it again. I said that there's more than one way to be an American. So sorry. Embarassed
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Chancellor



Joined: 31 Oct 2005
Posts: 1337
Location: Ji'an, China - if you're willing to send me cigars, I accept donations :)

PostPosted: Thu Aug 03, 2006 6:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Henry_Cowell wrote:
Note that Chancellor jumped to the rather surprising conclusion that I propose that the U.S. become "a nation divided against itself." It was, of course, he himself who wrote this phrase -- not I. Funny that this is the very Chancellor who constantly complains on these forums about the sorry state of Americans' reading and language skills. Rolling Eyes

And thus did Chancellor go on to provide us with an insight from the Dark Ages:

There is more than a single way to be an "American" = nonsense

From such narrow-minded views spring movements like Aryan Nation, Posse Comitatus, and The Order (and, in other cultures, the Taliban, Al Qaeda, Jean-Marie Le Pen in France, and Pauline Hanson in Australia). Of all people, English teachers who work abroad should be above this sort of medieval xenophobia.
Well, more like "There is more than a single way to be an American" = diversity = nonsense; and, yes, I do consider it to be dividing a nation against itself.

Insisting on a common national identity is certainly not xenophobia inasmuch as it has nothing to do with fear or hatred of strangers and/or things foreign. People are certainly welcome and (considering the famous poem on a plaque beneath the Statue of Liberty) encouraged to emigrate to America. However, it is expected that if they're going to make America their home that they fully assimilate into American society/culture. If you want to consider that to be "narrow-minded," fine. However, it has nothing whatsoever to do with working and living abroad.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Henry_Cowell



Joined: 27 May 2005
Posts: 3352
Location: Berkeley

PostPosted: Thu Aug 03, 2006 7:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Chancellor wrote:
...fully assimilate into American society/culture...

Please define exactly what you mean by listing all your requirements. Should these requirements be added to the constitution as amendments? Should obtaining citizenship depend on fulfilling all of your requirements?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
spiral78



Joined: 05 Apr 2004
Posts: 11534
Location: On a Short Leash

PostPosted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 12:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

To 'fully assimilate' means that you want all the things 'real' Americans want: big house, car (s)


..... and 30 pairs of black trousers in your closet (excerpt from a US ESL textbook on how to slim down your stuff, totally ironic as it's geared for new immigrants, who can't imagine owning 30 pairs of trousers of any description. Ok, of course the American book calls them pants, but I still have a problem saying 'pants' after the heat I took from my British work colleagues)......

This applies to all aspiring 'real' Americans. If you want something different from The American Dream, you aren't assimilating, you bad, bad person! But toe the party line, and you'll be accepted with open arms. Just keep on contributing to our consumer society, speak English, even if broken, and we will accept you into our society. So long as you see it as the epitome of all societies in the world, current and historical.

Hmmmm, it's a bit like a religion, isn't it?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ls650



Joined: 10 May 2003
Posts: 3484
Location: British Columbia

PostPosted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 3:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

This silly argument reminds me of an episode of the Simpsons where Apu has to pretend to be a real 'Murrican: �Let�s take a relaxed attitude towards work and watch baseball!�
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Henry_Cowell



Joined: 27 May 2005
Posts: 3352
Location: Berkeley

PostPosted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 7:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

A "real American":
    ***Is as prejudiced toward his neighbor as the neighbor is toward him
    ***Will eat only the foods that his mother served him during childhood
    ***Believes that the English language is his most important defining quality
    ***Wishes that the younger generation could be more like his own generation in almost all respects
    ***Thinks that the U.S. of the Founders was homogeneous and uniform rather than diverse and varied
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Chancellor



Joined: 31 Oct 2005
Posts: 1337
Location: Ji'an, China - if you're willing to send me cigars, I accept donations :)

PostPosted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 7:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Henry_Cowell wrote:
Chancellor wrote:
...fully assimilate into American society/culture...

Please define exactly what you mean by listing all your requirements. Should these requirements be added to the constitution as amendments? Should obtaining citizenship depend on fulfilling all of your requirements?
It means exactly what I said, regardless of how you might be inclined (rightly or wrongly) to define American society/culture. America was founded on specific concepts and values (embodied in various founding documents that include the Constitution and the Bill of Rights) that have become the foundation of our culture (despite leftist attempts to overcome them through their socialist policies and all this diversity nonsense, Republicans behaving like Democrats [big government perpetuating the nanny state], and Christian nationalists trying to establish a Christian theocracy). As I said in an earlier post...

American culture, to the extent that it exists, is the collective practice of those values on which the nation was founded - such values as liberty, hard work, self-reliance, and limited government.

If one is going to come to America and become a citizen, then adopting these founding values should be a necessity (along with speaking English).


Last edited by Chancellor on Fri Aug 04, 2006 7:21 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Chancellor



Joined: 31 Oct 2005
Posts: 1337
Location: Ji'an, China - if you're willing to send me cigars, I accept donations :)

PostPosted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 7:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ls650 wrote:
This silly argument reminds me of an episode of the Simpsons where Apu has to pretend to be a real 'Murrican: �Let�s take a relaxed attitude towards work and watch baseball!�
The reason why that was funny was because there is a certain amount of truth to it - that many Americans today (especially since the 1960s) are like that. The so-called "Protestant work ethic" for which America was once known went out with the civics classes and the teaching of grammar in public schools.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
guest of Japan



Joined: 28 Feb 2003
Posts: 1601
Location: Japan

PostPosted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 8:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sorry if I'm hopping into this late, but I couldn't resist anymore.

Chancellor, your stated version of American culture actually represents immigrants more than actual born and bred Americans with the exception of the speaking English part. I don't know anyone as self-reliant and hardworking as the fruit pickers in the southwest or the kitchen staff in nearly every restaurant in the northeast. These people get so much less from the government than everyone else. They work countless hours for minimal pay and they do it so they can give their families a better life.

Why don't you just come out and say what you think, American culture is white upper middle class culture. If you read a good history book and not one that just focuses on dead Presidents you will quickly see that American culture has never been this idealized culture that you say. American culture has always been a culture of clashing. There have always been groups pushed to the bottom who had to fight their way to diginity. They are oppressed by the weak element of the dominant groups who fear for their livelihoods, and they are exploited by the economically powerful to support and elevate their livelihoods. I'm sure the pawns would happily act the parts of knights and bishops if they got to do the same moves.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Henry_Cowell



Joined: 27 May 2005
Posts: 3352
Location: Berkeley

PostPosted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 8:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Chancellor wrote:
American culture, to the extent that it exists, is the collective practice of those values on which the nation was founded - such values as liberty, hard work, self-reliance, and limited government.

If one is going to come to America and become a citizen, then adopting these founding values should be a necessity (along with speaking English).

Ah, so it has very little to do with the Constitution as it is currently written. And it has nothing to do with an absence of "excessive diversity."

By your definition, illegal Mexican immigrants seem to be some of the most "American" people here in California. Glad to see that you're coming 'round to the right point of view!! Wink
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Henry_Cowell



Joined: 27 May 2005
Posts: 3352
Location: Berkeley

PostPosted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 8:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

guest of Japan wrote:
American culture has always been a culture of clashing. There have always been groups pushed to the bottom who had to fight their way to diginity.

Exactly. Folks like "Chancellor" refuse to acknowledge the truths of American history. For example, what would he have to say about the proliferation of German-language newspapers and German-medium public schools in previous centuries? Un-American? Or quintessentially American?

Thus, as I've said before: There have always been numerous ways of being "American."

Two qualities that Chancellor omitted from his definition of "American culture" are tolerance and celebration of diversity. But those wouldn't conform to his PC right-wing notions.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Chancellor



Joined: 31 Oct 2005
Posts: 1337
Location: Ji'an, China - if you're willing to send me cigars, I accept donations :)

PostPosted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 9:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

guest of Japan wrote:
Sorry if I'm hopping into this late, but I couldn't resist anymore.

Chancellor, your stated version of American culture actually represents immigrants more than actual born and bred Americans with the exception of the speaking English part. I don't know anyone as self-reliant and hardworking as the fruit pickers in the southwest or the kitchen staff in nearly every restaurant in the northeast. These people get so much less from the government than everyone else. They work countless hours for minimal pay and they do it so they can give their families a better life.
It still doesn't change what I said, even if (in large part thanks to liberalism) we've moved so far away from the values on which we were founded (and, contrary to the beliefs of Christian nationalists, I don't mean Christianity).

Quote:
Why don't you just come out and say what you think, American culture is white upper middle class culture.
Because I don't think that!

Quote:
If you read a good history book and not one that just focuses on dead Presidents you will quickly see that American culture has never been this idealized culture that you say.
I don't agree either that American culture has never been what I'm suggesting or that it is idealized.

Quote:
American culture has always been a culture of clashing. There have always been groups pushed to the bottom who had to fight their way to diginity.
Is it really a clash of culture or is it the behavior of individuals who resent foreigners?
Quote:
They are oppressed by the weak element of the dominant groups who fear for their livelihoods, and they are exploited by the economically powerful to support and elevate their livelihoods.
Yes, there has been a history of that but it has not been the history of the culture as a whole.
Quote:
I'm sure the pawns would happily act the parts of knights and bishops if they got to do the same moves.
Does "equal protection under the laws" mean anything to you?

Last edited by Chancellor on Fri Aug 04, 2006 9:55 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Chancellor



Joined: 31 Oct 2005
Posts: 1337
Location: Ji'an, China - if you're willing to send me cigars, I accept donations :)

PostPosted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 9:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Henry_Cowell wrote:
Chancellor wrote:
American culture, to the extent that it exists, is the collective practice of those values on which the nation was founded - such values as liberty, hard work, self-reliance, and limited government.

If one is going to come to America and become a citizen, then adopting these founding values should be a necessity (along with speaking English).

Quote:
Ah, so it has very little to do with the Constitution as it is currently written. And it has nothing to do with an absence of "excessive diversity."
Other than various amendments that don't really change the founding values, the Constitution is the same one that was first ratified near the end of the 18th century.

By your definition, illegal Mexican immigrants seem to be some of the most "American" people here in California.
Other than the fact that they're here illegally, yes. What does that say about the other Californians (or for a great many other Americans)?

Quote:
Glad to see that you're coming 'round to the right point of view!! Wink
You mean the view that values as liberty, hard work, self-reliance, and limited government are the values that we Americans should be espousing? Absolutely!

Last edited by Chancellor on Fri Aug 04, 2006 9:54 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Chancellor



Joined: 31 Oct 2005
Posts: 1337
Location: Ji'an, China - if you're willing to send me cigars, I accept donations :)

PostPosted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 9:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Henry_Cowell wrote:
guest of Japan wrote:
American culture has always been a culture of clashing. There have always been groups pushed to the bottom who had to fight their way to diginity.

Exactly. Folks like "Chancellor" refuse to acknowledge the truths of American history. For example, what would he have to say about the proliferation of German-language newspapers and German-medium public schools in previous centuries? Un-American? Or quintessentially American?
Are you sure those schools were public schools?

Quote:
Thus, as I've said before: There have always been numerous ways of being "American."
Not!

Quote:
Two qualities that Chancellor omitted from his definition of "American culture" are tolerance and celebration of diversity. But those wouldn't conform to his PC right-wing notions.
Two things which are utterly contrary to American culture because they deny Americans an exclusively American identity. Tolerance (meaning to tolerate or merely put up with someone) is something that no self-respecting person should ever accept. I'm sure that those who are so loudly crying for tolerance don't really want people to merely tolerate or put up with them.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Henry_Cowell



Joined: 27 May 2005
Posts: 3352
Location: Berkeley

PostPosted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 11:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Chancellor wrote:
Are you sure those schools were public schools?
Yep. You don't want to believe it, do you? The fact that there were German-language public schools in the U.S. for many decades would throw your whole narrow-minded notion of "English-Only" exclusivity off target.

...Some states mandated English as the exclusive language of instruction in the public schools, while Pennsylvania and Ohio in 1839 were first in allowing German as an official alternative, even requiring it on parental demand. Some public and many private parochial schools taught exclusively in German throughout many decades, mostly in rural areas. But only in a few large cities, such as Baltimore, Cleveland, and Cincinnati, was it ever feasible to operate bilingual public schools, while German-Americans in Buffalo fought for it in vain in the 1860s....

...During the century preceding the First World War, a pluralistic German-language culture existed in America; as late as 1910 an estimated nine million people in the United States still spoke German as their mother tongue....


Chancellor wrote:
... an exclusively American identity...
You still haven't really defined this. The original Constitution (as well as the current Constitution) defines no such identity. You and the rest of the wacko right-wingers have dreamt it up.

You're grasping at straws now, bub. Your descendants will eventually celebrate diversity just as others do now. And they will still be "Americans."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> General North America Forum All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 3 of 4

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Teaching Jobs in China
Teaching Jobs in China