View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
casism
Joined: 06 Jan 2006 Posts: 6
|
Posted: Tue Sep 05, 2006 9:13 pm Post subject: Biaggi Law and Contracts |
|
|
Hi di ho again.
Just 2 questions about contracts.
Firstly, how prevalent are 'working for a project' (I presume temporary) contracts, and are they recommended?
Secondly, has anyone heard of the Biaggi law, and what it entails?
Cheers,
C. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Teacher in Rome
Joined: 09 Jul 2003 Posts: 1286
|
Posted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 5:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
"Contratto di progetto" contracts are very prevalent. Unless you have a partita iva and can invoice the school directly, this is the most likely contract you will get. The contract stipulates how long it lasts (anything from 2 weeks to 2 years, but in the case of English schools I imagine it would last around 9 months).
As I understand it, the Biaggi law was introduced to remove the practice of employers empoying people on the old co.co.co contract for longer than temporary periods of time. Under the old contract, you would have to be taken on (on a permanent basis) after 2 years. In practice, employers just carried on with a new co.co.co. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
casism
Joined: 06 Jan 2006 Posts: 6
|
Posted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 4:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
What if it a contract states that the school must give only 15 days notice to a teacher if they want to break the contract, but the teacher must give 150 days (surely close to 5 months)?
Is this clause usually adhered to? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Teacher in Rome
Joined: 09 Jul 2003 Posts: 1286
|
Posted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 8:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sounds unusual to me to ask a teacher to give 150 days notice. Generally, the notice period is stated, and I'd reckon on 30 days for both parties. Personally, I wouldn't sign a contract that gave the employer 15 days but required 150 days from me. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|