|
Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
007

Joined: 30 Oct 2006 Posts: 2684 Location: UK/Veteran of the Magic Kingdom
|
Posted: Wed Nov 08, 2006 7:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Queen of Sheba wrote: |
........ I just wonder when, if ever, Orientalism will die out and turn into pure hatred, lies and more and more deceitful books and media propaganda. Do you think that this is a turning point in Orientalism? Could the recent more ignorant 'Orientalism' be a reaction to the long-time, and arguably justified Muslim scholars' criticism of US foreign policies?
By the way, it seems to be working out for you this time around... |
It is a difficult question to answer, because there is no universal definition for the term �Orientalism�, and, I think, it needs a lot of research. Also, I think, it is not a turning point of Orientalism, but there is a birth of what is know by �Modern Orientalist� and �State Oreintalist�, which are different from the old �Classical Orientalist�, and as one writer put it:
�from Classic Orientalist
to Modern Orientalist
to:
1. Independent Orientalist
Human Interests
Thoroughly analytical in line with Human Rights
Peace
and:
2. State Orientalist
Political Interests
Propagandistic and dominant
War�
It is unfair to accuse all modern Muslim scholars of inattention to resistance to the new imperial problem; rather they offer practical and highly intellectual ways of resistance to the new shape of imperialism. But, this should not be confused with the �clash of civilisation�, because this is another issue which is complicated and debatable. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Queen of Sheba
Joined: 07 May 2006 Posts: 397
|
Posted: Wed Nov 08, 2006 8:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| This is good material. I prefer you this way 007. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Cleopatra

Joined: 28 Jun 2003 Posts: 3657 Location: Tuamago Archipelago
|
Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2006 1:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I wonder if we're not perhaps overusing the term "Orientalist"? If by the word we are referring to white folks who view the Muslim world from the vantage point of their own imagined superiority, and whose 'works' are replete with unexamined cliches about the pervasity of religion, 'honour codes' and female submissiveness in the Arab/Islamic world, then certainly the likes of Sasson and Seirstad fit the bill. However, the classic Orientalists of the 19th century were highly erudite and had excellent language skills. They also knew how to write. None of these things can be said for a WSJ hack like Brookes, a hospital administrator like Sasson, or a compound wife like McKay. Bernard Lewis might pass for an Orientalist in the classic mould, but the others are all merely opportunists with an eye for a quick buck. If it became lucrative and fashionable to, for example, write 'first-hand accounts' of the suffering of Palestians under Israeli occupation, you can be sure that all of them would be in Gaza quicker than you could say 'belly dance'.
| Quote: |
| I just wonder when, if ever, Orientalism will die out and turn into pure hatred, lies and more and more deceitful books and media propaganda. |
You mean to say you don't think this has already happened? I have three (OK four) words to say to you: Weapons of Mass Destruction. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Queen of Sheba
Joined: 07 May 2006 Posts: 397
|
Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2006 6:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I agree at least the old-time Orientalists had some style and class, even if they were working for the enemy, which has consequently taken over as a result of those initial explorations into the Middle East. It�s been formulated into hatred and the WOMD you mentioned, and it must have been the grand plan all along.
1. Such simple natives.
2. How quaint that they admire my watch and car!
3. The ignorant bedouin are interesting to look at, like animals in the zoo, only better.
4. Let's see what we can take from them that would be of value.
5. If they won't give it up readily, we will take it by any means possible. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Cleopatra

Joined: 28 Jun 2003 Posts: 3657 Location: Tuamago Archipelago
|
Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2006 7:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You forgot perhaps the most dangerous "Orientalism" of them all. And I don't mean 'dangerous' in an abstract sense either. We're talking about the type of dehumanising stereotype that can - nay did - provide one of many bogus justifications for a war which killed, and continues to kill, thousands of innocent people. And that Orientalism is:
"Arabs only understand the language of force".
I'll leave you to figure out who the esteemed expert' in question was, adding only that a far wiser person recently pointed out that it appears increasingly obvious that the only language Arabs are incapable of understanding is that of force. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
007

Joined: 30 Oct 2006 Posts: 2684 Location: UK/Veteran of the Magic Kingdom
|
Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2006 8:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Cleopatra wrote: |
You forgot perhaps the most dangerous "Orientalism" of them all. And I don't mean 'dangerous' in an abstract sense either. We're talking about the type of dehumanising stereotype that can - nay did - provide one of many bogus justifications for a war which killed, and continues to kill, thousands of innocent people. And that Orientalism is:
"Arabs only understand the language of force".
I'll leave you to figure out who the esteemed expert' in question was, adding only that a far wiser person recently pointed out that it appears increasingly obvious that the only language Arabs are incapable of understanding is that of force. |
Ahad Ha'Am, the leading Eastern European Jewish essayist, wrote after his three months visit to Palestine in 1891:
" ....[the Zionists pioneers believed that] the only language the Arabs understand is that of force ..... [They] behave towards the Arabs with hostility and cruelty, trespass unjustly upon their boundaries, beat them shamefully without reason and even brag about it, and nobody stands to check this contemptible and dangerous tendency." (Expulsion Of The Palestinians, p.7)
If the question was slightly changed, but instead of saying Arabs, let us use Israelis or Jews instead, the statement would become:
"Why Israelis or Jews do not understand but the language of force?"
If any person dares to publish such a racist statement, he or she will be automatically Black Listed and tagged for being an anti-Semite.
The hard truth is that all people, regardless of their colour or religious backgrounds, understand the language of force. It's true that Arabs, like many others in the past, submitted to the language of force. On the other hand, many other people submitted to the Arabs force as well, i.e. the Crusaders, Persian, Byzantium, and Mongols to name a few. Similarly, the French, Russian, Greek, Polish Jews during the famous Warsaw uprising or Intifada, ... etc. submitted to the Nazi might during WW II. In other words, force does not and will not discriminate between an Arab nor a Jew. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling. Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|