|
Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Is PSU a credible institution, even after this scandal? |
| YES |
|
25% |
[ 2 ] |
| NO |
|
75% |
[ 6 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 8 |
|
| Author |
Message |
Queen of Sheba
Joined: 07 May 2006 Posts: 397
|
Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2006 5:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I am not a fan of the American educational system; I never faced so much drama, racism, or sports as a way of life attitude before or since high school in the USA. My education came more from observing and being scrutinized by the prejudiced teachers, backwards administration and hours I ditched their idiotic classes reading Shakespeare and Blake in the library. Somehow I don�t think their intent was to educate me by playing the jerk and supporting the jocks, that would imply a "tough love" sort of intelligence, and we all know their is a lack of intelligence emanating from America. Those that are mildly intelligent, have traveled and read 3 books on Eastern religions, and eat mung beans, are ex-hippies that can't get a grip on the modern world so they fling themselves into jobs abroad based on their "diversity training" and piss off the rest of us. Belly dancing and natural fibers don't equate cultural awareness. Actually they may be still stoned from the 70s purple haze to see thru the smoke into the cultural realities that we face in the workplace.
Higher education in the US is another story, and a good college education can be attained, if you can afford to go to college, in the US, although I can't respect the average American�s education entirely unless they have a college degree and some study abroad, or work abroad experiences. Not that this can fix the societal propaganda they grow up with, but it may be a start to thinking outside of their box. Too often Americans live insular lives and thus have insular minds.
Last edited by Queen of Sheba on Sat Dec 02, 2006 2:51 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
007

Joined: 30 Oct 2006 Posts: 2684 Location: UK/Veteran of the Magic Kingdom
|
Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2006 5:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Queen of Sheba wrote: |
| ... Too often Americans live insular lives and thus have insular minds. |
Can we say that the above reflect the 'Cowboy" culture??
I rebember once an American writer, wrote the following, I quote:
"American people are physically fat, mentally ill, and they walk the walk".
How true is it? Any comments V.S ??? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
veiledsentiments

Joined: 20 Feb 2003 Posts: 17644 Location: USA
|
Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2006 11:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| 007 wrote: |
Do you consider schools of today are safe for students and teachers, compared, for examples with schools in 10-20 years ago??
Do you think today's students are getting a better education than you got? |
I'd say that the answers to both those question is that it depends on where you are...
I couldn't speak of the schools of 10-20 years ago since I was last in them as a student over 40 years ago. Now those were truly different times...
VS |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
veiledsentiments

Joined: 20 Feb 2003 Posts: 17644 Location: USA
|
Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2006 11:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
QoS... well the US is a great big country with a huge variance in the knowledge of its citizens and the standards of its HS systems. Since there is no central control of education in the country, there can be huge differences in style, management and the ability of their teachers.
One can spend all day making stereotypical generalizations about Americans (or Arabs or citizens of the sub-continent or the UK) and sometimes one is right and sometimes one is dead wrong...
Are many of us fat? Yup... and so are many Egyptians. Are many of us mentally ill? Unlikely many more than in the rest of the world...
What I have found is that the average untraveled American knows about as much about the world and different cultures as the average untraveled Gulf Arab knows about America. Both of them have learned what they know from movies and TV news propaganda...
Our comments about the "other" usually tell us more about ourselves than them...
VS |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Queen of Sheba
Joined: 07 May 2006 Posts: 397
|
Posted: Sat Dec 02, 2006 2:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| veiledsentiments wrote: |
| What I have found is that the average un- traveled American knows about as much about the world and different cultures as the average untraveled Gulf Arab knows about America. Both of them have learned what they know from movies and TV news propaganda...VS |
That�s not saying very much is it? When comparing Americans to the underdeveloped, under educated Gulf Arab? They are also years behind Egyptian, Syrian, Jordanian, Iraqi and others in the region when it comes to their educational systems and educational values.
This is an interesting debate, maybe we should make a poll of it to see what others think? I will do that in another post. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Cleopatra

Joined: 28 Jun 2003 Posts: 3657 Location: Tuamago Archipelago
|
Posted: Sat Dec 02, 2006 2:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
What I have found is that the average untraveled American knows about as much about the world and different cultures as the average untraveled Gulf Arab knows about America. |
I definately disagree with this.
The average Saudi who has finished secondary school and who has not travelled outside of KSA (or at least outside the ME) could point to the US on a map, name its capital city and, um, head of state, as well as several other famous Americans. They are also likely to be able to speak at least a little English. By contrast, the average American high school graduate could not point to KSA (or many other major countries) on a map, and probably does not even know the name of the head of state of Britain or France, let alone KSA. It is unlikely that he or she can speak anything other than English.
I also agree with Q of S: to compare the educational achievements of Americans to those of a developing region like the Gulf, where many if not most people were illitarate barely two generations ago, is really to set one's sights very low indeed. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
veiledsentiments

Joined: 20 Feb 2003 Posts: 17644 Location: USA
|
Posted: Sat Dec 02, 2006 3:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
But how much of the knowledge of the 'average' Gulf Arab is due to the fact that they are in an area that has been colonized to one extent or another, has significant numbers of the populace are wealthy enough to have traveled, and their economy and future are strongly affected by outside counties.
None of those factors would affect the 'average' American. The US has never been colonized or invaded. There has been little or no use for learning a foreign language as there is little or no chance to use it. (outside of Spanish) For the average American - whatever that is - is not different from the average citizen of anywhere. They care about and learn about what interests them and what affects their daily life.
We, as educators, naturally look down our noses at the deficiencies of the American system of education (and I could write volumes on it and how bad I consider it and what I think should change). But, I have about as much chance of changing the American system as I did to change that of any Gulf country I worked in. We tend to be very quick to generalize and criticize, but I can also see how and why both parts of the world have ended up where they are in their education systems.
As an interesting sidenote to the liberals versus conservative situation in education and societal debate on this... I have been in a running email debate with a fellow American who claims that the reason that the US system is bad because those darned 'liberals' have taken over the system here. I pointed out that the best European systems seem to be in countries with a liberal political system. He wasn't convinced.
I am often amused by the parallel arguments in such different countries and cultures.
VS |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
007

Joined: 30 Oct 2006 Posts: 2684 Location: UK/Veteran of the Magic Kingdom
|
Posted: Sat Dec 02, 2006 4:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Cleopatra wrote: |
| .... By contrast, the average American high school graduate could not point to KSA (or many other major countries) on a map, and probably does not even know the name of the head of state of Britain or France, let alone KSA. |
Remembering the fact that 78% of Americans are unable to locate the country of Iraq on a map of the world, according to the National Geographic Society.
Many "certified" teachers aren't qualified to teach either. Nor can they find Iraq on a map. They can, however, find the local anti-war protest about a war they know nothing about.
A comment on Bush II by his friend Richard Perle:
By the way the great majority of G. W. Bush tutors, including his National Security Advisor, are geographically illiterate too. Now, we must imagine the type of foreign policy practiced in the USA by the Bush administration.
In this statement, Mr. Bush confuses the two countries of Slovenia and Slovakia. Or, Slovenia became Slovakia.
How many Americans know anything about Slovenia? We have to remember that this was Mr. Bush, a candidate for the most powerful office in the world talking to the prime minister of another country and calling his country by a wrong name.
Quote from Bush: "I was raised in the West. The west of Texas. It's pretty close to California. In more ways than Washington, D.C., is close to California." |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
007

Joined: 30 Oct 2006 Posts: 2684 Location: UK/Veteran of the Magic Kingdom
|
Posted: Sat Dec 02, 2006 4:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| veiledsentiments wrote: |
| .. The US has never been colonized or invaded. |
French colonization of the Americas
French colonization of the Americas began in the 16th century, and continued as France established a colonial empire in the 17th century. Major French colonies were located in Canada and the Mississippi River Valley, along the Gulf coast in what is today Alabama, Mississippi and Louisiana, on the Caribbean islands of Hispaniola, Guadeloupe, Martinique, and St. Lucie, and at French Guiana in South America. Most colonies were developed to export products such as fish, sugar, and furs.
As they colonized the New World, the French founded cities such as Quebec and Montreal in Canada, and Detroit, Michigan, St. Louis, Missouri, Mobile, Alabama, Biloxi, Mississippi, Baton Rouge, Louisiana and New Orleans, Louisiana in the United States.
Source: Wikipedia |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Cleopatra

Joined: 28 Jun 2003 Posts: 3657 Location: Tuamago Archipelago
|
Posted: Sat Dec 02, 2006 5:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| The US has never been colonized or invaded. |
As ABBA has pointed out, this is debatable. In any case, whole swathes of Saudi Arabia have never really come under the sway of foreign rulers either. Foreign interest was limited to the Hejaz and the coastal regions of the gulf.I accept your point about how there are valid reasons why citizens of relatively small (at least in population terms) and relatively weak countries like those of the Gulf would have more of an interest in the wider world than the citizens of an (albeit fading) superpower. But none of that changes my original point: which is that it is just not true to say that the world knowledge of the average American is as good as that of the average Gulfie.
| Quote: |
| significant numbers of the populace are wealthy enough to have traveled, |
Of course, the average income in the US is higher than in every single Gulf state. Even proportionately, far more Americans could afford to travel abroad than Saudis, it's just that they don't often choose to. In any case, we were both referring to untravelled types.
| Quote: |
| We tend to be very quick to generalize and criticize, but I can also see how and why both parts of the world have ended up where they are in their education systems. |
But this is to miss the point. As I've said, the US is the wealthiest and most powerful country on earth, whereas the Gulf is a region which would be considered third world in every respect were it not for the relatively recent discovery of oil. Even primary education as we know it barely existed here 50 years ago, so to compare the systems of education in the US to that of the Gulf really is an apples and oranges comparison.
| Quote: |
| I pointed out that the best European systems seem to be in countries with a liberal political system. |
Which countries were you thinking of? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Queen of Sheba
Joined: 07 May 2006 Posts: 397
|
Posted: Sat Dec 02, 2006 5:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The post I had up with a poll on this US education topic has been zapped by the mods, so before this gets zapped as well, let me just say that I do agree that much of the education in the Middle East has been from years of conquest, and the more recent colonizing by the French, British, and American �globalization,� if we cant call it colonization.
None the less, teachers are underpaid, SAT scores are on the decline, and America's colleges aren�t subsidized by the state, save for in California, thus have less enrollment and are very expensive. Furthermore, students aren�t required to learn a second language and general knowledge on foreign policy, geography and cultures and countries outside the US is next to nothing. The West and East coasts provide some exceptions to these rules, but given the size of the US, that�s a possible 1/16 of the population that may know what the average Arab or European knows about the latter, and this may be related to their own ancestral links. So, yes, there are educational and historic explanations that state why, arguably, Arabs and Europeans, to take things on a balanced level with America, have a better, wider, and more globally aware knowledge base. However, I remain firmly planted in the depressing fact that the US hasn�t exported much more than the franchised democracy and McDonald�s chains. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
veiledsentiments

Joined: 20 Feb 2003 Posts: 17644 Location: USA
|
Posted: Sun Dec 03, 2006 1:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
I wouldn't disagree and have used most of the criticisms, but the fact is that the average American can't identify Slovenia or Slovakia or Kuwait on a map because they are all totally irrelevant to their lives and they just plain don't care. They have absolutely no use for a foreign language as they would never have a reason to use it. And I'm not really sure why anyone in any other country should care about that one way or another. The average Gulf Arab can use English... or Urdu... and it is worth his or her time to learn it.
And I stand by my point that the US has never been colonized nor invaded beyond small border skirmishes in the early years of settling the borders. The North American continent was colonized by England, France, and Spain prior to the formation of the US, but there has never been any colonization since the US threw out the British and formed the country.
But I would definitely call the situation in the Gulf after WW1 by Europe and the US as colonization. Not in the same use of the word as when we think of India say. But 'globalization' is a modern word of the last 10-15 years and what I would consider the colonialization period was from the 1930s to 1970s. Note that I am always speaking of the Gulf in general, not Saudi in particular.
I hope the mods don't snatch this one, but it is on the subject of the Gulf too. I suspect that your new thread was considered too far off topic. Perhaps a thread devoted to bashing the US educational system is more appropriate in the North America section.
VS |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
globalnomad2

Joined: 23 Jul 2005 Posts: 562
|
Posted: Sun Dec 03, 2006 10:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hhhmmm...a lot of simplistic disparaging of Americans here. We are not all George Dubya. That's why the recent congressional elections were essentially a national vote against the Bush-man.
As for high schools, quality varies among the public ones, and certainly, the kids value conformity above all else. That disappears pretty much at the university level, however. I went to a regional state university (a "state college,") and found absolutely all kinds of students, and all were free to be themselves and we all found friends with similar interests--and friends with dissimilar interests.
As for the US university system as a whole, one need only look at the international rankings. The Times Higher Education Supplement and another one out of China puts 7 or 8 US universities in the top 10, with Oxford and Cambridge near the middle. As early as 1975 I remember seeing polls of worldwide CEOs and politicians ranking Harvard as the most prestigious (or best) university. Today, the latter has literally 10 times more financial resources than Oxford. This kind of endowment buys top professors, far, far better research facilities, etc. So Oxford is not "the world's most prestigous university," as one poster here claims. It used to be, but those days are long gone.
A couple of years ago two British higher-education specialists, one an Oxford don and the other from the University of London (sorry, I didn't save their names) proposed that Britain start emulating the US university system. The Oxford don said the U.S. system "combines elite excellence with mass access to higher education." I do remember that quote. He meant that while there are Harvard, MIT, and 130 other world-class institutions that are difficult to get into, there are also less selective colleges that nevertheless can offer an outstanding education if the student takes advantage of it.
While we're on the subject of stupid Americans and their inferior education system (I agree, the public high schools don't measure up), this year the Nobel prizes in chemistry, physics, medicine and economics all went to Americans. In previous years, as you may recall, Nobels in those fields have been awarded to U.S.-based scholars disproportionately more than the rest of the world.. Some recipients have been American, and some have been foreign immigrants, but the point is, it is the U.S. university system that has enabled people to excel to the level of Nobel prizes.
In all, if I am supposed to believe I am dimwitted and inferior to others because I'm American--and that's precisely what some of you are syaing...well...I'm not very impressed with such logic. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
globalnomad2

Joined: 23 Jul 2005 Posts: 562
|
Posted: Sun Dec 03, 2006 10:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
And by the way, what is Queen of Sheba talking about when s/he claims only California subsidizes the state universities? That is absurdly inaccurate. All 50 states subsidize their state universities and colleges to varying degrees. In some, like Texas, Florida, Missouri, Louisiana and others, tuition rates are similar to or cheaper than in California.
And...the U.S. doesn't export much more than McDonalds?? Uhm...so high-end technology such as passenger jets and computers don't count? Did you know General Electric powers Tokyo with its generators?
In the late 1980s everybody said the US was finished, it's all over; Japan will take over the world, etc....but the US is a work-based society, like Japan and Hong Kong and China and Korea. People value work, and the university system is outstanding. You cannot say this about the Middle East OR Europe (where universities have become rather bad, overall).
These things come in cycles. George Dubya wastes all our treasury on his stupid wars, and things look like the 1980s now again...but there will be upturns...and downturns. Never pooh-pooh and dimiss a large country that is based on work and a good higher-education system. Especially if you're in the Middle East or Europe, taking 3-hour lunches and 5 or 6 coffee breaks during the few hours you actually work.
Last edited by globalnomad2 on Sun Dec 03, 2006 10:45 am; edited 2 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Cleopatra

Joined: 28 Jun 2003 Posts: 3657 Location: Tuamago Archipelago
|
Posted: Sun Dec 03, 2006 10:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| the average American can't identify Slovenia or Slovakia or Kuwait on a map because they are all totally irrelevant to their lives |
Or France or Britain or.... Canada come to think of it.
And considering America fought a war to 'liberate' Kuwait, is it really so irrellevant? Given America's power in the world, couldn't we say that the 'average American' has a duty to know about the world in a way which the average Qatari or Bahraini does not?
| Quote: |
| they just plain don't care. |
But this in and of itself is rather depressing, no? Surely they should care, given that the US has some military presence in over 200 countries and has such huge influence just about everywhere? Maybe, just maybe if more than a small % of Americans could have pointed to Iraq on a map in 2002, and had even an elementary understanding of socio-political realities in that country and in the ME in general, the US (and Iraq) would not be in the awful, bloody quagmire it is today. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling. Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|