|
Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Guy Courchesne

Joined: 10 Mar 2003 Posts: 9650 Location: Mexico City
|
Posted: Fri Jan 19, 2007 4:19 pm Post subject: Adios, Venezuelan Democracy |
|
|
It was nice knowing you.
Chavez is now going to be running the show 'by decree', legally able to bypass Congress. This is a good history lesson, happening now, for future students. Watch how a Latin American country descends into a dictatorship.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/6277379.stm |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
matttheboy

Joined: 01 Jul 2003 Posts: 854 Location: Valparaiso, Chile
|
Posted: Fri Jan 19, 2007 6:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
shame moonraven's not around to see this thread, or possibly not around at all to see what's become of her beloved democratic revolutionary leader.
it's just a way of ensuring he keeps control of the country when he's spent all the money made during the oil price boom. if you can simply bypass pretty much any law on the books you don't have to bribe the people with social schemes which are economically unviable in the long-term (that doesn't mean the schemes are without merit, of course). |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Aramas
Joined: 13 Feb 2004 Posts: 874 Location: Slightly left of Centre
|
Posted: Sun Jan 21, 2007 9:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
Give them a few years and they'll be just like the USA  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Justin Trullinger

Joined: 28 Jan 2005 Posts: 3110 Location: Seoul, South Korea and Myanmar for a bit
|
Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2007 2:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
It is interesting, isn't it. Passing a law democratically to modify presidential powers is somehow undemocratic?
Meanwhile, in that beacon of democracy, the old US of A, they got a president who believes in, and practices, the idea that the president has the right to modify laws passed by the congress through signing statements without any democratic process whatsoever. It's just a case of extending executive power through practice, not through process. ANd don't get me started on wiretapping...
Anyway, a similar resolution was passed some time ago in Venezuela, for a fixed term, like this one. Chavez didn't go nuts, and didn't set up 1984- he just used the changed powers to nationalize some resources that weren't working for the good of the nation. If this is so dangerous, where were the negative consequences then?
It's interesting to me that in the first world, where mostly the economic situation is good, people tend to see democracy as automatically good. But third world citizens, who have often been fucked by the democratic process, often in favour of foreign interests, are less convinced.
It's been said that democracy is the worst system there is, except for all the others. What do you think?
Best,
Justin |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
John Hall

Joined: 16 Mar 2004 Posts: 452 Location: San Jose, Costa Rica
|
Posted: Tue Jan 23, 2007 5:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think most Nicaraguans would agree with that. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling. Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|