Site Search:
 
Get TEFL Certified & Start Your Adventure Today!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

A Question for Canadians!
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Japan
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
fromCanada



Joined: 20 Sep 2003
Posts: 48
Location: Ontario

PostPosted: Sat Nov 01, 2003 5:00 pm    Post subject: A Question for Canadians! Reply with quote

Dear fellow Canucks, Very Happy

Recently, I came across a website of a school in Japan that hired a Canadian college graduate. I may be interested in working for this school, which requires a Bachelor's degree for consideration. I don't know why they hired a college graduate since we all know that "college" and "university" are totally different things in Canada.

My question: Are college graduates from Canada going around in Japan stating they have a degree?

I'm from Ontario and I am pretty sure that colleges do not grant degrees in Ontario....but I would like to hear your thoughts.

Just curious....

Thanks! Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Capergirl



Joined: 02 Feb 2003
Posts: 1232
Location: Nova Scotia, Canada

PostPosted: Sat Nov 01, 2003 5:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

All of the "colleges" that I am familiar with in Canada offer diplomas and certificates, not degrees. It would seem that this particular school you are talking about is assuming that "college" and "university" mean the same thing, just as it does in the U.S. (which is not the case, obviously).

I've always wondered why Americans don't make a distinction between the two. Would any Americans here care to enlighten us? Wink
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
J-Pop



Joined: 07 Oct 2003
Posts: 215
Location: USA

PostPosted: Sat Nov 01, 2003 6:16 pm    Post subject: maybe Reply with quote

Capergirl wrote:
. . .
I've always wondered why Americans don't make a distinction between the two. Would any Americans here care to enlighten us? Wink

Good question. A friend of mine, from Hungary, is having a very difficult time comparing the Hungarian terms & levels of education, to American ones (me too Confused ).

Usually I don't like it when someone answers a question with a question: that is not the intent of this post. However, in order to more accurately respond to the question, it would be helpful to know this:

Idea Why do Canadians distinguish between the two: college & university? What are the differences? Is one, a college perhaps, designed for training (education) in more "practical" vocations? Thus, less theory (for example)? Less time (# of years) required for a "diploma" (or certificate) versus a "degree"? If so, this sounds more in keeping with a European oriented system, compared to the American model.

[Off-hand, it sounds like what Canucks refer to as "colleges," we might refer to as "trade" or "technical" schools. Earlier, in the twentieth-century, institutions in the various states of the USA especially designed for training teachers were referred to as "normal" schools, or "teacher colleges." The course of study was typically roughly half (or less) of colleges or universities offering bachelor (& higher) degrees.]

Maybe others, who are familiar with all the differences between the two educational systems, have more of a ready-made reply Question
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
fromCanada



Joined: 20 Sep 2003
Posts: 48
Location: Ontario

PostPosted: Sat Nov 01, 2003 11:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

J-Pop,

You are generally right about Canadian colleges. They are usually vocational schools that place more emphasis on practical experience and less on theory. (Unlike universities). But it gets more complicated.

I currently study at an affiliated college of a Canadian university. This again changes the meaning of "college." Basically, I attend a separate institution within a bigger insititution (the main university). The "college" I attend is no way vocational in nature, it's just an extension of the university, like another campus, but with smaller classes. Admission requirements to my college are actually higher than the main university. I even pay tuition directly to the college and not to my university; yet when I graduate from this affiliated college, I will be a university graduate. Make sense? So in a nutshell, I am going to college and university......

In regards to my original posting, I'd figure that most employers in Japan would just assume that the word "college" means "university." (like Capergirl said). But they are dead wrong.....and some Canucks will likely end up benefitting without the required Bachelors degree.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
J-Pop



Joined: 07 Oct 2003
Posts: 215
Location: USA

PostPosted: Sat Nov 01, 2003 11:49 pm    Post subject: yes, OR? Reply with quote

fromCanada wrote:
J-Pop,

Make sense? So in a nutshell, I am going to college and university......

Thanks! Yes, your explanation is clear. Smile

fromCanada wrote:

In regards to my original posting, I'd figure that most employers in Japan would just assume that the word "college" means "university." (like Capergirl said). But they are dead wrong.....and some Canucks will likely end up benefitting without the required Bachelors degree.

I thought this was your main point. Yes could be. Or, another possibility is, this:

The employer (or the Japanese governmental agency in charge of these matters) may figure out college & university are not the same in Canada (as they are, more or less, in the USA). If that were to happen, I wonder, will a work visa be denied, or revoked?

It seem reasonable that this very issue must have surely come up previously. If not at this school (maybe it's a new one?), then at the level of the central government. I'm almost certain it's an issue that must have come up previously. I would think there are clear guidelines for this & related matters? (maybe not) Confused

Is this person currently employed, & in place, with a work visa in Japan? Just curious.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kestrel



Joined: 15 May 2003
Posts: 31
Location: Kyoto, Japan

PostPosted: Sun Nov 02, 2003 5:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

So here's my 2 cents about the college/university thing: In the UK, it's my impression that it's used as FromCanada mentioned, that is a college is an institution within a larger institution. In the States, a college will get you generally a bachelor's degree, though sometimes only an associate's degree (generally these are community colleges). At a University, on the other hand, you have classes all the way up to PhD level. And that's the difference for us.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cangel



Joined: 12 May 2003
Posts: 74
Location: Jeonju, South Korea

PostPosted: Mon Nov 03, 2003 6:37 am    Post subject: Colleges & Universities Reply with quote

Is a Canadian diploma held in the same regard as a Canadian degree? In America, colleges and universities, nowadays, are the same thing. Both will usually offer degrees up to the PhD but it usually has to do with the size of the institution and not whether it's a college or a university. In general, all degrees, presuming it's a BA, take 4 years in the states. Community colleges offer 2-year degrees (AA) and usually a lot of vo-tech diplomas and certifications. How long are the diploma and degree programs in Canada?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
hagakuri



Joined: 03 Mar 2003
Posts: 84
Location: Nishi-Shinjuku JAPAN

PostPosted: Mon Nov 03, 2003 8:59 am    Post subject: Interesting Reply with quote

Hello,

It may be interesting to note, that the University system in England is far different than the States. I believe, that thier degrees are obtained within a 2 year period, more inline with the community college system of America, as opposed to a typical 4 year degree in the States.

If you look at an English `University` transcript and one from the States... they are far different. To me, it seemed like I was looking at a community college transcript. Actually, they dont have transcripts. More like a summary on a letterhead. But all the courses were very generalized with seemingly no upper division courses (ie 300-400-500).

The difference here is that these comparison is from a University in England not a college. But upon reading this thread it seems like the English `degree` is more inline with a Canadian `diploma`.

I used to be under the impression that a Degree was generally 4 years around the world. But, obviously, that is not the case. There is a VAST difference in under-graduate programs.

What if employers start stipulating that teachers should have a `4 year` degree.. and the government inacts this as policy. How many teachers would this impact do you think? hmmmmm.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Sherri



Joined: 23 Jan 2003
Posts: 749
Location: The Big Island, Hawaii

PostPosted: Mon Nov 03, 2003 10:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I am an American but got both a BA and an MSc from British universities. It took me 3 years to get the BA as it does for most/all BAs in the UK. When I applied I was lucky to be accepted even though I already had 2 years from an American university. I had to start all over from scratch and it was bloody hard work--much more rigorous than in the States.

You have to look at the system as a whole, not just how many years it takes. At that time (I know it has changed recently) in a British "high school"(they are not called high schools there) the students took exams called O and A levels. O levels were taken around age 16 (? not sure about this since I didn't attend school there) and some people after taking their O levels leave school and go on to find work. I think this more or less equivalent to a US high school graduation.

Some stay on and take A levels at age 17 or 18. These exams are very difficult as any British person can tell you. I did an A level in Russian and I can say this was far more difficult than the coursework I was doing at university level in the States. With A levels, many people just go on to find a job. It is at this point that I think we could compare with a US community college grad or 2 years at a regular university.

The proportion of people in the UK who do go on to university is far smaller than in the US--going to university means more in the UK. And I believe the overall standard is much higher than in the US. Of course this is in general--there are some great schools in the States.

I don't know what transcripts you were looking at, but there are divisions just like in the States (a "first" probably is the same as a 4.0, 2.1 is like a B average, 2.2 is like a C etc)

After going through the system I have a lot of respect for the UK university system. please excuse any typos or bad English, I am typing this with one hand and feeding a baby at the same time!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
othius



Joined: 28 Oct 2003
Posts: 2
Location: Rochester, NY

PostPosted: Mon Nov 03, 2003 4:03 pm    Post subject: College/University difference Reply with quote

From my understanding the designation of "college" or "university" has to do with the degrees offered. Originally, a "college" offered Baccalaureate degrees where as a "university" offered Masters level or Doctorate level degrees. Now, I don't think there's much of a difference, you can't assume by the name that it does or does not offer graduate or terminal degrees. Some choose to keep the "college" part of their name.

Anyhow, that's my two-cents.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
oich



Joined: 19 Jul 2003
Posts: 25

PostPosted: Mon Nov 03, 2003 8:33 pm    Post subject: Re: Interesting Reply with quote

hagakuri wrote:

If you look at an English `University` transcript and one from the States... they are far different. To me, it seemed like I was looking at a community college transcript. Actually, they dont have transcripts. More like a summary on a letterhead. But all the courses were very generalized with seemingly no upper division courses (ie 300-400-500).


As noted above, degrees at English universities are obtained in three years.

In fact, "But all the courses were very generalized with seemingly no upper division courses (ie 300-400-500)" is almost exactly opposite to what actually happens. At an English university, you apply for a degree in a specific subject - there aren't really such things as 'minors' or 'majors' (I'm not entirely sure what they are, anyway). For example, if you apply to a university for a history degree, you learn history for three years, and no other subjects. You will learn history 5 days a week for three years, then get a degree in history.

I believe this is different to America/Canada, where Americans I've known have said they did courses in lots of subjects during their degree (i.e. 'I did a Spanish class and a math class while studying for a theatre degree'), which strikes me as bizarre - if you're going to university to learn theatre stuff, why would you have to learn subjects that have nothing to do with it? There are essentially ZERO 'generalised' courses while studying for a degree in England. No idea what "upper division courses (ie 300-400-500)" means - is it related to the bizarre '101' designation for courses? There is no equivelent of that in England - in America do you start with a 101 course, then go up to a 200 then higher?

You're right that essentially there isn't such a thing as a transcript for English graduates, merely a piece of paper saying 'This person has passed this degree with this mark'. This is just my (probably ill-informed) belief, but I think I'm right in saying that obtaining your degree in America (and graduating high school) is done by studying a whole bunch of disperate subjects (initially in a '101' course, then getting progressively higher), and being given a grade at the end of each course. Then if the average grade you got in all of your different courses is above a certain total, you've passed. Is this anything like correct?

In the English educational system there are no such designations as 'Math[s] 101' - you just study Maths from the day you start going to school until you're 16, at which point you have to sit an exam in it, for which you get a grade of A-U. This is the same for every other subject. These are the GCSE exams.

At age 16, probably with a clutch of around 8 or so GCSEs, you can choose to continue full-time education and work towards the next set of exams, A levels. These are far harder than GCSEs and most people only do 3 subjects, again, as I said before, you then study the 3 subjects you choose, and NOTHING else (no 'minors', no nothing).

Then, if you pass your A-levels with sufficient grades, you can choose to apply for a degree at a university. Entry to university courses is dictated by your A-level results - the best universities demand results like A's in all three of your A-level subjects for the best courses (e.g. medicine), and specific subjects (you won't be able to apply for a medical degree unless you chose at age 16 to study Physics and Chemistry as two of your A-level subjects, for example...). Other degree courses will have other requirements as to your A-level subjects and results.

There is no such thing as a 'grade average', only individual A-U grades from each specific subject you study (up to age 1Cool, then a single mark for your degree (obtained through exams at the end of your third year of study).

Well, that turned out to be a lot longer than I thought it would be, and probably incoherent. I would love to hear from some North Americans about their system, which is as confusing to me as ours is to you. Am I right in my definition of 'minors' and 'majors'? '101's? Just why would someone studying for a theatre degree have to study Spanish?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
canuck



Joined: 11 May 2003
Posts: 1921
Location: Japan

PostPosted: Mon Nov 03, 2003 9:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

In Canada, university degrees also vary. In B.C. a degree will take your four years. In Ontario, a degree will take you either 3 years or 4 years. The 3 year degree is a degree, and the 4 year degree is with Honours. In Ontario and maybe parts of Eastern Canada, they have or had grade 13. In Western Canada, they have up to grade 12.

The words college and university are use interchangeably, except as someone has mentioned that at most colleges now offer 2 year diplomas, or what other countries might call associate degrees and 4 year degrees, however 3 year degrees in Eastern Canada (or at least in Ottawa).

To obtain a work visa, it is usually required to have a degree, not a diploma. However, I know 2 people who have successfully obtained work visa with 2 year diplomas.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mark



Joined: 23 Jan 2003
Posts: 500
Location: Tokyo, Japan

PostPosted: Tue Nov 04, 2003 4:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Okay, so first the difference btwn Cda and the US

In Canada, there are 3 kinds of colleges:

1) colleges that are affiliated with a university and grant degrees within that university's system. So, a university might consist of a number of colleges

2) University colleges - these are colleges that are authorized to offer BAs

3) community colleges that cannot offer BAs

The main difference between Cda and the US is that most Canadian provinces don't have 2-year Associate degrees. British Columbia has them, but I think it might be the only one.

Also, I think that in the US it's more to common to have PhD programs that don't require a Master's degree.

It's also important to note that Quebec has a completely different educational system that I won't go into.

As for the difference between NA and Britain, yeah, it's quite different.

100-level courses are 1st year courses, 200-level are 2nd year and so on. 500-level courses are 1st year MA courses. So, History 112 might be a prerequisite for History 212, which might be a prerequisite for History 312, and so on.

100 and 200-level courses are called lower-level courses and 300 and 400-level are called upper level. 2 years of lower-level courses would constitute an Associate degree.

The idea is that students should take a wide variety of lower-level courses. Most universities require you to take a wide variety of courses. At my university each academic year was 30 credits, so you'd do 60 credits in your first two years. Most departments only offerent maybe 12 or so lower-level credits so that'd be the maximum you could take from that department.

A BA degree is 4 years and, at my uni, 120 credits. The requirements at my university for a major were at least 42 credits but no more than 60 credits in a subject with at least 30 of those credits being upper level. A minor was at least 30 credits but not more than 42 credits in a subject with at least 18 of those credits being upper level.

The Faculty of Arts had other requirements like 12 language credits, mandatory literature credits and science requirements and so on.

The system varies a bit from school to school but that's generally how it works.

Hope that helps,

Mark
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
J-Pop



Joined: 07 Oct 2003
Posts: 215
Location: USA

PostPosted: Tue Nov 04, 2003 1:33 pm    Post subject: interesting Reply with quote

Sherri wrote:
I am an American but got both a BA and an MSc from British universities. It took me 3 years to get the BA as it does for most/all BAs in the UK. When I applied I was lucky to be accepted even though I already had 2 years from an American university. I had to start all over from scratch and it was bloody hard work--much more rigorous than in the States.

. . . .

After going through the system I have a lot of respect for the UK university system. please excuse any typos or bad English, I am typing this with one hand and feeding a baby at the same time!

Sherri,
your explanation is very helpful. It does make a difference, I think, when a fellow "Yank" explains the British, or another, system of schooling.

Over the past 5 years or so, it's been an eye-opener to learn of the substantial differences between systems of education in Mexico, Canada, & the USA. Though we are more or less, neighbors, our schooling varies a lot I've learned. So, it only makes sense that the British, European & other systems are also, in certain ways, quite unique.

What you write seems very similar to my impression of the educational system in the Netherlands (other countries too). That is, when a student there finishes (their equivalent of) American high school, they are functioning more on the level of someone with a 2-year AA Associated Arts degree (like, from a community college) in the USA. Or, as you note, they are on the level (or further along) than many Junior (3d year students) in most--not all--American universities & colleges!

P.S. I didn't note ANY typos or "bad" English in your post. Good job, considering you were feeding the little one at the same time. Don't know how to properly credit that one--to your baby, to your ability to "multi-task," or to your British education (a combination?) Laughing
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
J-Pop



Joined: 07 Oct 2003
Posts: 215
Location: USA

PostPosted: Tue Nov 04, 2003 1:57 pm    Post subject: nice summary Reply with quote

Mark wrote:
Okay, so first the difference btwn Cda and the US

In Canada, there are 3 kinds of colleges:

Also, I think that in the US it's more to common to have PhD programs that don't require a Master's degree.


Mark,
A very nice overview.

In certain instances, what you say about some PhD programs not requiring a Master's degree--in order to enter the program--is correct. However, in most (nearly all?) of these particular programs, what typically happens is that, after 2 or 3 years into the PhD program you are--in fact--awarded an MA.
One of the reasons (maybe not the only one?) they do this is so people won't come into the program to ONLY earn an MA, then leave.

But, I know one guy (after earning a BA) who was in a "PhD alone" program, in "Latin." After being awarded (on his transcripts) an MA, starting into his doctoral program, finishing his doctoral comprehensive exams--then meeting a certain attractive female Cool ! -- he dropped out of the PhD progam, but he still had his MA.

Mark wrote:

As for the difference between NA and Britain, yeah, it's quite different.

. . .

Mark

This part was good too. Though, I wasn't clear sometimes whether you were presenting the differences from a British, or from a North American, perspective?

Interesting stuff!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Japan All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Teaching Jobs in China
Teaching Jobs in China