|
Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
anninhk
Joined: 08 Oct 2005 Posts: 284
|
Posted: Fri Apr 20, 2007 1:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
I agree Brian.
I work in an extremely friendly school with teachers who are nothing like those described by 11.59
I often think that teachers who do face difficulties should try and look at their position from the point of view of their local colleagues. I bit of empathy would go a long way! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
briandwest
Joined: 10 Feb 2006 Posts: 98 Location: Hong Kong
|
Posted: Fri Apr 20, 2007 1:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
In response to Pieface and in_asia_bill:
It's not all a bed of roses.
- I have 34 lessons of contact time a week which is pretty high for a NET
- I arrived at my normal time of 7:30 this morning to discover no children at school. "Why are you here?" asked my SET. "Because you told me it was a normal school day today," I replied. "But the students are on holiday today and we teachers have meetings all day. Didn't anyone tell you?" came the reply. So here I am waiting for a pointless 1 hour meeting when I could have had a dayoff by speaking to the Principal nicely
Website: www.hkpnets.org and www.hkpnetsforum.com
Blog: www.cps.edu.hk/learn_teach/curriculum/sch_curricul/english_corner/index.htm |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Pieface
Joined: 18 Jun 2004 Posts: 42
|
Posted: Fri Apr 20, 2007 1:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
I am teaching (on the NET scheme) in my second local school in HK and I have to say that far from feeling 'ostrichsised' (or ostracised), both my schools were more than welcoming. In fact, I still keep in touch with some of the staff from my previous school, and often socialise staff at my current school outside of working hours. The majority of my (albeit small) circle of friends also on the NET scheme are having similarly decent experiences in their schools. Coincidence? I beg to differ.
Perhaps there are indeed some of the grieviances mentioned by 11.59 apparent in a few schools, but I think it is wholly unfair and unreasonable to tar every local school, teacher and citizen with the same brush. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Pieface
Joined: 18 Jun 2004 Posts: 42
|
Posted: Fri Apr 20, 2007 1:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
34 lessons a week is a HUGE amount!!  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
lambada
Joined: 24 Oct 2006 Posts: 50
|
Posted: Fri Apr 20, 2007 2:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oh, but when it's bad it's bad! Everyone things it's nothing until they experience it personally. There is something really nasty about being alone with the knife going in and the cultural acceptance that dishonesty and cruelty is perfectly acceptable. Just read the stuff about the Institute of Education coming out in the press. This society is riddled with elitism, hypocracy, racism and mono-culturalism and the education system has to take a lot of the blame for it. Before you all tell me to go home, my problem is not HK but the education system. I'm hanging out for equity, diversity and multi-culturalism but it will take a while and it's not very likely under the current education system. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
once again
Joined: 27 Jan 2003 Posts: 815
|
Posted: Fri Apr 20, 2007 5:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
I was on the primary NET scheme in its first year. I was in two schools. One was a joy to work in. Great staff and principal, very supportive of everything about the scheme and made me feel very welcome. The other school was a nightmare. Most of the staff were wonderful and also suffering under the principal, but the English panel head was very unsupportive and the principal a nightmare.
As has been said before, it really is a matter of luck whether a NET gets in to a good school or not. It can be wonderful, but yes, at some schools it can be terrible. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
hkteach
Joined: 29 May 2005 Posts: 202 Location: Hong Kong
|
Posted: Fri Apr 20, 2007 12:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Just to clarify my earlier comment about NETs being the only westerner in the staffroom and the isolation that this situation often/usually brings.
While it's true that some schools have 2, 3 or 4 NETs or perhaps an ELTA, I think most PNETs are on their own (some schools hire an additonal English teacher but not all).
Of course we're aware of that before we accept a NET job but perhaps we don't realise exactly what that might mean.
It's probably fair to say that before coming here, most of us were under a few illusions about English in Hong Kong and probably imagined that it was spoken more than it actually is.
It's very isolating to be in a staffroom where everyone sits at desks and has very little interaction with anyone for much of the day, even though they are cheek by jowl with colleagues (too busy ). This is weird to those of us who are used to staffrooms being social places (paperwork being done in our own classrooms).
It's isolating to be surrounded by others talking to each other in Canto all the time. You can't understand what's being talked about, laughed about or whispered about. You can't feel a part of the general staffroom chit-chat and that's what I mean when I say it's isolating.
I enjoy good relationships with the teachers at my school (and the cleaners and principal too) but while we might discuss work-related things, it's hard to know people... when you ask what they did on the weekend or in the holidays, you get told " I slept/played computer games/did my schoolwork/did my essay for my degree" etc. etc. Those that left Hong Kong tell you they ate a lot or went shopping. That's about it. Not a lot that we might be able to relate to.
We can't share the humour and little comments we can share in our home countries because the teachers here just wouldn't get the humour - nothing kills a joke more than actually having to explain it. We can't talk about a tv program because they usually only watch Chinese channels. We can't talk about a lot of the little things that make up our daily lives.
So yes, we may have realised that we'd be the only foreigner in the school but it's one thing to realise that, but quite another to understand the ramifications of spending a good deal of your time in a situation where you simply don't understand what's going on around you and where you can't share the little nuances of everyday occurrences.
It's not just a language barrier - it's a whole cultural chasm. It's nobody's fault - it's just the way it is.
[/img] |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
11:59

Joined: 31 Aug 2006 Posts: 632 Location: Hong Kong: The 'Pearl of the Orient'
|
Posted: Fri Apr 20, 2007 6:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Brian, it is good to see that you have been blessed with a lively sense of significance of your own thoughts and opinions:
briandwest wrote: |
I hereby resolve to not read such posts in the future and encourage potential NETs out there to do the same. |
If and when you do at some point in the future decree that such threads can again be read, please do not neglect to let people know. Make sure that you give your say-so so that they know they are again free to decide for themselves what they can peruse and what opinions and viewpoints they can thus encounter. Something along the following lines should do the trick: 'You are hereby manumitted from the need to boycott such posts.'
anninhk wrote: |
I work in an extremely friendly school with teachers who are nothing like those described by 11.59. |
I am sorry to say that this may be a touch na�ve. For unless you understand a fair bit of Cantonese you will of course not have the foggiest what they might be saying about you, (whilst of course, simultaneously looking you in the eye and smiling).
anninhk wrote: |
I often think that teachers who do face difficulties should try and look at their position from the point of view of their local colleagues. |
I was under the impression that is what I had precisely done through (briefly) examining their (wholly uncontroversial) living conditions. If you doubt what I wrote just conduct some casual research of your own. Ask around and calculate what percentage of the local teachers in your staff room have a relationship with someone (other than their parents or a ridiculous rat-like canine creature) � or ever have had. Calculate what percentage are married and what percentage of those who are married have children. Ask around and discover for yourself what percentage of the local teachers � whether married or not � still live at home with mummy and daddy, despite the fact that they are in their thirties, forties, and sometimes even fifties. If you think it is normal and healthy for a fifty-year-old woman to be without a partner and children � indeed, to have never even had a boyfriend � and to still live in a shoebox in a filing cabinet with her parents, then that is up to you. And if you think it normal for this particular brand of local female teacher to have a dog which is treated and regarded as both a husband and a child then again, that is up to you. Personally I think it is sad, and I think that it is obviously the case that these circumstances make such women bitter, twisted, and ridiculously self-centred. And may I point out that the shockingly high number (comparatively speaking) of suicides of single female teachers in Hong Kong would tend to lend at least some weight to this belief.
lambada wrote: |
Just read the stuff about the Institute of Education coming out in the press. This society is riddled with elitism, hypocrisy, racism and mono-culturalism and the education system has to take a lot of the blame for it. |
This is very true. Indeed, I doubt whether truer words have ever been spoken in the context of this particular issue. Around three months ago, I, for the monograph I am currently penning (with the working title of 'Where do the Children Play? Education and Socialisation in Hong Kong') feigned naivety and attempted to ascertain information pertaining to the number of senior-ranking EMB officials who have children and who have their offspring enrolled at a school here in Hong Kong. I doubt if it will come as all too much of a surprise to anyone with even just so much as a fleeting acquaintance with the EMB and the education system in Hong Kong that the information I sought was not exactly forthcoming. Although I wrote at some length in a formal and polite way to in excess of some two hundred high-ranking employees, and although I did not attempt in any way to obtain information which would or could be considered as confidential (or which could translate into a possible security risk), not a single person replied � not one. This is particularly striking given that any information offered would have been wholly anonymous.
What I did ascertain from the EMB (in a generic form of Chinglish-writing) and from a few EMB renegades (in conversation) though was that because of the nature of their posts (so-called 'civil servants') and their rank (middle management and above, right up to senior section heads), the people I wrote to enjoy certain privileges. One such privilege is an educational allowance � of quite a hefty sum � payable for up to a maximum of three or four children (how many normal people can afford to have three or four children in Hong Kong?). Furthermore, they actually get encouraged to send their children abroad for, in addition to this already generous allowance, the government will actually pay half of the tuition fees of the foreign institution (with a cap of a quite high amount, circa $10,000 HK per month per child). But there is more to the story, and this is the real kicker: the government will even pay for two return airfares for the children in question to return to HK during the major holidays and then go back to their foreign school to continue their studies. In other words, the parents are encouraged to not enrol their children in a school in Hong Kong and are actually financially rewarded for not doing so. Now, from one point of view this is simply a very real (and innocent) perk and one which senior executives would demand and enjoy in the private industrial sector, but from another (and equally as cogent) point of view, this is a somewhat damming assessment of the education system currently in place in the SAR of HK. That none other than the government itself should pay high-ranking staff within the education sector to farm their kids out to institutions overseas � and to blatantly have this as some form of perk to which one becomes entitled at a certain point on the pay scale � is nothing short of a damming indictment of the local system. This policy smacks of elitism at its most mediaeval, feudalistic, and hideous. The message flashing above the entrance gates to the EMB stronghold/redoubt seems to be 'Work hard, climb the corporate-style ladder, and thereby get your kid out of the HK system!' In other words, it has the same level of inherent cynicism as 'Arbeit macht frei'.
Should we really be all too overly surprised then if we are to discover that there is not a single child of a high-ranking EMB official currently in a school in Hong Kong, not even a (so-called elite, Band 1) school, or even an International or ESF school?
I also attempted to conduct some research into the number of extant EMB employees who themselves were educated within the HK system but alas, information was not forthcoming from the relevant department. What I did establish from a brief survey of relevant documents though was that few if any of those who have Bachelor Degrees had obtained them from local HK universities (this was a simple matter to document as they seem quite fond of placing letters after their names at each and every opportunity, even if they only have the one degree). As it is a far from simple task to get into a foreign university if you have been educated in the local HK school system (for both educational and financial reasons) we can assume that not a great deal of them went through primary or secondary schools here in Hong Kong. I think that is quite telling, if not downright disturbing.
So, you see, it does not really matter a fig what I personally think of the local system and/or the local teachers. All I need to do to cement my case against this sorry excuse for a local school/education system is to point to the fact that none of those in the upper echelons of the EMB seem to think much of it, as evinced quite candidly by the fact that they most certainly do not place their children in it, and indeed seem to strive to keep their offspring as far away from it as is humanly possible. These are the people who ultimately have the reins on the system, yet they have no vested interest in that very system. Now, just by applying fairly uncontroversial free-market principles, we have to ask ourselves what sort of situation we would expect to come out of such a state of affairs. Well, the answer to that question is arguably there for all and sundry to see and experience in each and every classroom and staff room of every local school in Hong Kong. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
hkteach
Joined: 29 May 2005 Posts: 202 Location: Hong Kong
|
Posted: Sat Apr 21, 2007 6:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
I agree totally with your observations of the local education system here and the EMB officials who send their kids o/s with hefty allowances paid.
The current Under-Secretary, ( who is Australian and was recruited from there ) has his children here with him here in Hong Kong. Like all other expats' kids, they must attend ESF or international schools. For some time, NETs have been suggesting/requesting some assistance in the way of an education allowance (these school fees seriously dent NET salaries).
In the past couple of days, NETs have received notes of submissions to EMB for same and a comment attributed to this person...."we hire the NET, not the family'" or something along those lines! Indeed.
I wonder if school fees are paid for his kids or are we to believe he has to foot the bill himself?
What's good for the goose............. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Lao Wai
Joined: 25 Mar 2006 Posts: 20
|
Posted: Sat Apr 21, 2007 12:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
hkteach wrote: |
Just to clarify my earlier comment about NETs being the only westerner in the staffroom and the isolation that this situation often/usually brings.
While it's true that some schools have 2, 3 or 4 NETs or perhaps an ELTA, I think most PNETs are on their own (some schools hire an additonal English teacher but not all).
Of course we're aware of that before we accept a NET job but perhaps we don't realise exactly what that might mean.
It's probably fair to say that before coming here, most of us were under a few illusions about English in Hong Kong and probably imagined that it was spoken more than it actually is.
It's very isolating to be in a staffroom where everyone sits at desks and has very little interaction with anyone for much of the day, even though they are cheek by jowl with colleagues (too busy ). This is weird to those of us who are used to staffrooms being social places (paperwork being done in our own classrooms).
It's isolating to be surrounded by others talking to each other in Canto all the time. You can't understand what's being talked about, laughed about or whispered about. You can't feel a part of the general staffroom chit-chat and that's what I mean when I say it's isolating.
I enjoy good relationships with the teachers at my school (and the cleaners and principal too) but while we might discuss work-related things, it's hard to know people... when you ask what they did on the weekend or in the holidays, you get told " I slept/played computer games/did my schoolwork/did my essay for my degree" etc. etc. Those that left Hong Kong tell you they ate a lot or went shopping. That's about it. Not a lot that we might be able to relate to.
We can't share the humour and little comments we can share in our home countries because the teachers here just wouldn't get the humour - nothing kills a joke more than actually having to explain it. We can't talk about a tv program because they usually only watch Chinese channels. We can't talk about a lot of the little things that make up our daily lives.
So yes, we may have realised that we'd be the only foreigner in the school but it's one thing to realise that, but quite another to understand the ramifications of spending a good deal of your time in a situation where you simply don't understand what's going on around you and where you can't share the little nuances of everyday occurrences.
It's not just a language barrier - it's a whole cultural chasm. It's nobody's fault - it's just the way it is.
[/img] |
I agree with everything you've said here. I had a feeling, even before I came to be a PNET, that I was making a mistake. My main reason for thinking this was due to being the only foreigner in the school. However, I pushed aside this fear because I thought that the level of English at the school would be much greater than it is.
I absolutely HATED my job when I first came. The staff were hardly welcoming and I was somewhat disturbed by the 'old school' approach to education. Many of the teachers were single females who fit the description painted by 11:59. Luckily, they all quit at the end of the year and new teachers came to the school. These new teachers were MUCH friendlier and 'normal'.
I get along quite well with the staff. I'm let in on much of the 'dirt' by the English Panel Chair. Other teachers, besides English teachers, will sometimes talk to me as well. I can laugh and joke with them but it's all quite surface, really. So, the staff I can handle. The students on the other hand...Let's just say they're some of the worst students I've ever taught in terms of motivation and behaviour. However, the classes are streamlined, so a few of them are decent but the lower level classes are quite terrible. I've had to become 'quite the disciplinarian' and I don't like being that kind of teacher.
So, unless I have a sudden change of heart, I will not be renewing my contract when it ends this summer. I'd rather go home and substitute teach until I get a position.
I think if you're a social person it's hard when you don't have that regular banter with your colleagues. I really miss it. I also feel like teaching here is doing nothing for me, professionally. I know that teaching in western countries has its issues, but I still think at the end of the day it will be a lot more rewarding. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
lambada
Joined: 24 Oct 2006 Posts: 50
|
Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2007 6:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
Interesting posts. It's not really the money. No one can keep going just for bucks or we would get a new job. Basically most of us have our day to day and luxury costs covered and look for something, anything that gives us a purpose or gets the superego charged. For me it's social life and study.
Education can be different here if enough teachers and principals decide they want to change it. I work with one local teacher who is far from perfect, but it a great and devoted teacher, is very strict with the kids, is loved by the kids, has their total attention and minimal disruptions even including kids with serious emotional and socio economic problems. We do have small classes and work on the PLPR programme including phonics etc. These kids are communicative, love English and love to read etc. It's only one subject and two small classes, but for me it's sufficient light. I should point out that I had nothing to do with it. The credit goes to the local teacher. I have just had the privilege of assisting and watching the beneficial aspects unfold over a couple of years. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
guangho

Joined: 16 Oct 2004 Posts: 476 Location: in transit
|
Posted: Sun May 06, 2007 6:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
11:59 wrote: |
Remember that there are a few Band 1 elite schools that do have two EMB NETs on their staff. But, leaving this aside, for the rest I do not think that there could be anyone who was not fully aware that they were to be the only foreigner in their school, but I do not think that this is what the chap meant when he referred to this point. There is after all an immense gulf between being the only foreigner in a school (something I think everyone is fully aware of, well prepared for, and wholly comfortable with) and being totally and entirely isolated, often to the point of actually being openly ostrichsised. I have never been on either of the NET schemes, but I do currently meet a number of NETs as part and parcel of my present job (and my, albeit limited, social life) and I was on the precursor to the NET scheme, the ET scheme, when I was here the first time. Believe me, the term ET was highly accurate as most if not all of us were certainly regarded and treated as extra-terrestrials. From what I gather from today's NETs little has changed.
Most NETs I speak to tell me that it is a rare event for a local teacher to ever talk to them, or even to offer them a greeting such as 'Good morning'. Many complain of at best just being blanked, and at worse having to endure endless dirty looks, scowls, and other assorted glares. There can be a number of reasons for this isolation and hostile treatment. To begin with the former, one is that many local teachers are absolutely petrified of making mistakes in English (or indeed in any area in life). They encourage students to put aside any fear they may have of attempting to speak a foreign language such as Mandarin or English (the two other 'official' languages in HK), and will often publicly scold them for not doing so, but they themselves will often simply freeze at the prospect of having to actually engage someone in either of these languages themselves. (As with so many of aspects of education and socialisation in HK it is a question of 'do as I say, not as I do'.) As regards the latter, one reason is that local teachers are of course local people and thus are typically exceedingly introverted, mind-numbingly inward-looking, self-centred to an extent which is difficult for a westerner to comprehend, selfish to an extreme, arrogant beyond words, provokingly obnoxious, survivalistic to a degree unheard of outside of HK, and cynical with a capital 'C'. In short, they have been rendered twisted and embittered by both the 'education' system in HK and the underlying societal structure and resulting 'life' conditions (remember, it is life, just not as we know it). Very few are married (or ever will be), and it is rare for any of them to have a boyfriend or girlfriend (dating is not big in Hong Kong as it is considered inappropriate, promiscuous, or downright immoral), and even fewer have any interests, hobbies, or pastimes outside of the workplace. The vast majority still live at home with their parents, and even the slim minority that are married will, more often than not, be childless and will still live at home with one or the other set of parents. This 'saves money' (both the ultimate meaning and measure of life in HK) and of course has the somewhat favourable and desirable knock-on effect of furnishing them with just the excuse they require to avoid engaging in normal, intimate (i.e., sexual) relationships. Many thirty-something-year-old teachers will often still sleep in bunk beds above or below their forty-something-year-old brother or sister. Such conditions have a very real effect on their outward behaviour, and indeed on their very inner psyche, that is, their id. After all, having five or six people (as there is invariably also at least one grandparent living with them in addition to the ever-present 'domestic helper') cooped up in a flat (which incidentally would be termed a shoebox or rabbit hutch in the west) is not exactly conducive to normal, healthy, intimate, meaningful relationships. Add to this the fact that most are perpetually exhausted from ridiculously long hours at work (note I do not say working hours � I choose my words carefully), are exposed to incessant noise of an eardrum-shattering volume and repetitive nature, rarely if ever exercise, rarely if ever read anything (books in HK are all but non-existent and intellectual activity is not exactly encouraged), never release energy or pent up frustrations through sexual contact/behaviour, conduct and maintain relationships with friends through mobile phones, seem to have very little to live for save for far off (pipe) dreams of retiring to Canada or Australia, and we soon see why so many HK teachers can be considered to be at best emotionally hardened city-dwellers, and at worse resentful and hostile � if not downright vicious � boors.
Others, as nice as they otherwise may be, simply resent the housing allowance that NETs receive and/or their placement on the master pay scale. I have actually heard local teachers (in Cantonese) say things such as 'Why should he/she get $13,000 a month housing allowance just for having fair hair/blue eyes/white skin/etc.?' and 'Why should he/she come straight in at X thousand a month when I had to work ten years to reach that level on the pay scale?' Such statements are produced aloud in the staff room for all (Cantonese speakers) to hear. Another frequent cause of complaint is that NETs 'arrive at school late' (which, translated from local school-speak, means something along the lines of 'later than they, that is, the local teachers, get there'), do 'less work', and 'leave early'. I have commented on this attitude and discussed these points at some length on another thread (see the PGDE discussion) and so won't repeat myself here, suffice to say that in many schools unless you go in at 7am and do not leave until 9pm you will be considered to be, and earmarked as (sometimes in actual writing), a bad teacher and a lazy so-and-so (or a degenerate layabout) who is only in it for the money. The fact that NETs tend not to have a cooked breakfast at work, somehow resist the temptation to have an hour-long lunchtime kip at their desk, somewhat amazingly manage to survive without having afternoon tea in the staff room, and prefer to have a cooked evening meal at home rather than at work alone in silence at their desk (among the numerous other essential daily 'activities' performed by your average, diligent, conscientious local teacher) does not count for anything. What is important in their eyes is the sheer number of hours spent at work, not the attitude you evince, work you do, qualifications you have, rapport you build up with the kids, or the results you otherwise achieve. |
Wow, South Korea under a deceptive Western sheen. Allow me to contribute, having worked in Guangzhou and visited for extended periods in HK.
1. You are a FOREIGNER. Got that? You will never, ever, ever be anything more. Assuming that my HK=shinier SK equation is correct, and I have no reason to think otherwise, this means you will be invisible. In SK I was routinely hit by scooters (and once by a car) simply because to a Korean I literally did not exist. When I existed, it was as a 'foreigner', such as 'I am looking for a foreigner teacher.' This also means that one foreigner is the same as another. There is no difference between an alcoholic with seventeen illegitimate children in Kansas and a teaching professional. Both are foreigners.
2. You will be resented. When in HK, my massive 'work' load allowed me to watch copious amounts of television. If I recall, many commercials were for skin whitening creams and of course that wonderous product, "the amazing breast cream." Being white in appearance is a huge goal in both SK and HK. In SK, women walk about with umbrellas so that their skin won't darken. They apply creams, injections and according to one memorable lore urine to their faces to achieve this. They will never succeed (obviously) which makes them hate you even more.
3. You will be resented II. You get paid more, work (or rather, be at work) less and are free from the stifling social conditions, which was extensively elaborated upon by 11:59 which your HK or SK teaching partners must endure. Thus, they will hate you.
4. A goodly number of so-called teachers of Western extraction are Britishers/Americans/Canadians high to the nth degree. Many are appalling to the extreme. From the New Zealander who walked up drunkenly while shouting at random women "do you shave your *beep*?" to the British narcoleptic who vomited in public more times than I can count, we have surely earned the resentment of the locals. Put another way, would you fork over U.S. $2000 per month to employ the aforementioned gentlemen?
4a. So you say that YOU are not a druggie layabout. In that case, refer to #1. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
anninhk
Joined: 08 Oct 2005 Posts: 284
|
Posted: Sun May 06, 2007 7:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
That's the problem with a lot of expats - they forget that they are foreigners in a foreign land.
I wonder if they ever consider how foreigners are treated in their own countries? and how they treat them themselves?
A lot still have this sense of superiority and expect to be treated differently. Others behave in a way they would never behave at home - or perhaps they do, and it is condoned in their own country but does not conform to the norms of the country they are in. I expect these are the very same people who want all immigrants in their own countries to follow their customs and ways of behaving.
Talk to any black, brown or Asian person and ask them how they were treated in the West and you'll find that living in Hong Kong as an expat is paradise compared to what they had to put up with. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
lambada
Joined: 24 Oct 2006 Posts: 50
|
Posted: Tue May 08, 2007 1:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
Annie in HK, I have to disagree although I don't wish to minimise the issue of blatently racist people and the serious issues of racism worldwide. I also accept that there are issues of post colonialist attitudes in countries such as the UK and France and the extreme right often combined with an ingrained class system. But this is not an accurate representation of life in places such as Australia unless you happen to be Aboriginal. Sure there is blatent racism by some, and a fear of the 'yellow peril' among a few, but in day to day life, such as schools and the workplace, there is legislation to minimise the kind of racist activities that are randomly executed in HK and other Asian countries.
I have 2 grown Filipino children in Australia who have rarely experienced any kind of serious racism - one is even a builder in Queensland! There school was almost half of Asian descent. I am not aware of their Vietnamese or Chinese friends experiencing much in the way of problems. Yes racism exists everywhere, but these countries are light years ahead when it comes to promoting and developing multicultural communities. Westerners, particularly Australians, carry this huge and unnecessary guilt complex. In Australian education now, they don't even talk about racism in a format that you would recognise but rather, racism is now being defined as the promotion of being Australian or having an Australian identity � 'culturalism' I think it's called. I call it assimilation, and as a 'Pom', I accept (all jokes aside) my Australianism and acknowledge Oz as one of the best countries in the world to live in, as do my sons.
Here, issues are somewhat more mundane. Last week my Filipino G/F was not allowed to put her stroller in the front of the minibus even though she was holding a baby. She was also refused her receipt when she was overcharged in a 7/11 (until they saw me arrive). The minibuses routinely don't stop for Filipinos but always stop for locals if there is a space. I still get to be the last person sat next to etc. Sometimes people won't even get on! The same thing happens to my Western friends. The scary thing is that nobody even acknowledges that it is racism. Ok, it's not violent, but it is racism and needs to be acknowledged and addressed.
How many Asians, of non Chinese descent, who suffer from local racism the worst, would swap their daily HK experiences for Oz experiences? I still remember the man at Immigration in China screaming at his domestic as she waited for a visa. We generally don't have servants (slaves) in Oz either. The point is that in most Western countries we have legislation to curb the worse excesses � here they seem to legislate the worst excesses into law! Just think about recent decisions in relation to non Cantonese speaking students and schooling. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
anninhk
Joined: 08 Oct 2005 Posts: 284
|
Posted: Tue May 08, 2007 3:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
While I agree that racism here exists, and is very blatant, towards most non-Hong Kongers - I can'ts ay Chinese because of the attitude to Mainlanders, I was actually looking at it from the point of view of the person who posted before me i.e. white expats in Korea.
When things get me down in school I sometimes consider what would happen in an English staffroom if some foreigner turned up telling the school how to change it's teaching, especially if that foreigner was black or Asian. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling. Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|