View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Tomasama
Joined: 18 Mar 2005 Posts: 18 Location: au
|
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 6:30 am Post subject: Please tell me why this sounds odd. |
|
|
This problem has me stumped.
" Why can't I work this out?"
" Why can not I work this out?"
The latter sentence sounds weird huh? Any folks out there who can explain why? I'll be your best friend ! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
spiral78

Joined: 05 Apr 2004 Posts: 11534 Location: On a Short Leash
|
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 6:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think it's simply the distinction between the informality of the contraction (can't) and the more formal use of the full form. I might actually say it the second way, like this "Why can I NOT WORK THIS OUT??" for emphasis.
But usually this idea would be expressed in an informal situation - I think.
But, what the hey, maybe that's the influence of living most of the year ouside an English speaking country and being married to a non-native speaker, for whom it's not natural to use contractions. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
spiral78

Joined: 05 Apr 2004 Posts: 11534 Location: On a Short Leash
|
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 6:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oh, hey, word order. Why can I not ...
Why not can I... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Tomasama
Joined: 18 Mar 2005 Posts: 18 Location: au
|
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 7:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks spiral78. I had one opinion saying that the contraction survived from middle/early-modern English while the full version did not.
There seems to be a whole string of these gems.
Why do not you have a cup of tea?
Why is not the kettle on?
Was not there some biscuits here?
Have not you got something better to do?
It's a slow day...  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
spiral78

Joined: 05 Apr 2004 Posts: 11534 Location: On a Short Leash
|
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 7:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hmm. It is an interesting little collection. One of those iggies I'll solve somewhere in the middle of the night - or never! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
GambateBingBangBOOM
Joined: 04 Nov 2003 Posts: 2021 Location: Japan
|
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 9:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
Doesn't it (does it not) go something like this:
1. Do support is used in the place of subject verb inversion for interogatives.
2. Do support requires that the 'do' comes immediately before the nominative.
3. Contractiions of negatives in the do support are treated as a single word (because they are a single word). When the negative is not in the contracted form (ie do not, instead of don't) they are seperate words and therefore treated as such (see rule number 2).
4. Modals follow the same word order rules as as Do support in some dialects of English ("Could he not...?" is not a very common structure in North America).
It's been a while and my grammar book is at home, so I'm not really sure that this is totally accurate, but I think it's the type of thing that Greenbaum and Quirk like to spout. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Zero
Joined: 08 Sep 2004 Posts: 1402
|
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 11:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
A word order thing. To me only No. 1 below sounds weird, though they're all only for formal situations or other special circumstances.
Why do you not have a cup of tea?
Why is the kettle not on?
Were there not some biscuits here?
Have you not got something better to do? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
11:59

Joined: 31 Aug 2006 Posts: 632 Location: Hong Kong: The 'Pearl of the Orient'
|
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 3:04 pm Post subject: Re: Please tell me why this sounds odd. |
|
|
Tomasama wrote: |
This problem has me stumped.
" Why can't I work this out?"
" Why can not I work this out?"
The latter sentence sounds weird huh? Any folks out there who can explain why? |
It sounds 'weird' as it is ungrammatical (six of one, half a dozen of another). Contracted negated sentences in English follow a different syntax to non-contracted negated clauses (contraction of the negation element entails an inversion of the syntactic subject and the said element). |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
VanKen
Joined: 29 Oct 2003 Posts: 139 Location: Calgary, AB Canada
|
Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2007 4:35 am Post subject: Please tell me why this sounds odd |
|
|
Zero wrote: |
A word order thing. To me only No. 1 below sounds weird, though they're all only for formal situations or other special circumstances.
Why do you not have a cup of tea?
|
Why not drop the aux verb from a WH question? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
johnnyappleseed
Joined: 26 Jun 2007 Posts: 89 Location: Vsetin Czech Republic
|
Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2007 8:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well, I think they're two different ideas...
"Why not have a cup of tea?" is a suggestion.
As is "Why don't you have a cup of tea?"
"why do you not/why don't you have a cup of tea?" Is a genuine question...though unusual without a time clause(like "on Monday mornings" (most situations would call for "Why are you not having a cup of tea", I think.) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
VanKen
Joined: 29 Oct 2003 Posts: 139 Location: Calgary, AB Canada
|
Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2007 8:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
johnnyappleseed wrote: |
"why do you not/why don't you have a cup of tea?" Is a genuine question...though unusual without a time clause(like "on Monday mornings" (most situations would call for "Why are you not having a cup of tea", I think.) |
I beg to differ. "why do you not have a cup of tea?" appears to be a WH question that uses an aux verb where none is required, so it sounds a little strange. What is a "genuine question"? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
johnnyappleseed
Joined: 26 Jun 2007 Posts: 89 Location: Vsetin Czech Republic
|
Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2007 8:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well, I meant a real question(looking for an answer that's unknown to the asker) rather than a suggestion framed as a question. Heck, I don't know. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|