| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
TedSeastrom
Joined: 20 Oct 2007 Posts: 21
|
Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2007 6:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The idea of teaching EFL and learning a new language at the same time is interesting. I'm working through the Rosetta Stone Spanish series now in preparation for going to DF in January. Seems kind of old school in a hi-tech way.
I studied French for six years before living with a family in France one summer. I could barely understand (or be understood). No English spoken anywhere. By the end of the summer I could communicate.
Later, after college, I studied French for a year in Switzerland. Got a good technical grasp of the language but never spoke it as well as I did that summer in high school. Hung out with a lot of English speakers. The irony is that the immigrant "guest workers" at the cafeteria could speak better French than the students.
Now I'm reading this book for the TEFL certificate, "Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching." Seems like for 100 years people have been coming up with new ways of teaching language. My favorite is Suggestopedia: "Students are expected to tolerate and in fact encourage their own 'infantilization.' In part this is accomplished by acknowledging the absolute authority of the teacher...."
But back to "Ugly Americans" and learning other languages. What's the point of studying another language when most American high school students can't speak or write a coherent sentence in English?  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MELEE

Joined: 22 Jan 2003 Posts: 2583 Location: The Mexican Hinterland
|
Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2007 7:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| MO39 wrote: |
| He also told me that Mexico needs a second Revolution because the first one didn't do the trick! |
You mean a third revolution? It's due in 3 years (2010).
| Quote: |
I came to wonder if I might be treated badly if people in Mexico perceived me to be someone who studied Spanish extensively but was unable to speak a word of it. I would think that someone who spent thirteen years studying a language and then couldn't form a complete sentence would be perceived to not value that language and/or be lazy.
|
No, as M0 said, in Mexico there are hundreds of thousands of people (if not more) who had had up to 6 years of English instruction and can't put two words together and certainly can't understand natural speach. Actually, I'm contanstly asked by Mexicans how I learned Spanish and what tips I could give them since I speak it well, but they can't speak English. Most of them are really pleased to learn that there are people from the US who speak Spanish. The reality is I've been studying Spanish for 20 years. But after the first 4 I could barely hold a conversation. I then spent the second 4 years studying it extensively. I then spent 11 years LIVING in Spanish speaking enviroments and including two 6 month-stretches where I hardly spoke or heard a word of English. Considering all that, as a Language teacher I really think I really ought to speak it better than I do. And I also realize that most of the students I work with haven't got a change at ever becoming "fluent" whatever that means.
Oh and most American's don't have 13 years of Spanish. Some only have two, most 4, some 6--any more than that is unusual and most have more than just Spanish to choose from. When I was in high school we got to choose between Spanish, German, French, Italian, Russian and Japanese.
I generally don't feel a lot of anti-americanism. Torward the government, yes, toward me, no. Most individuals are aware enough to realize that the government is not the people, just ask them if they think their own government is an accurate reflection of the Mexican people. There are always exception. I met a man once who tired to convience me I wasn't worthly of being called an American, because I "have European blood"---what ever that means! It was someone who was visiting an ex-landord of mine and once I left my landlord's house that day I never saw him again. It's just a weird exception to the norm. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TheLongWayHome

Joined: 07 Jun 2006 Posts: 1016 Location: San Luis Piojosi
|
Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2007 9:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| TedSeastrom wrote: |
| "Students are expected to tolerate and in fact encourage their own 'infantilization.' |
If you get to work in a uni or a high school here you'll see that students have already mastered this.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MO39

Joined: 28 Jan 2004 Posts: 1970 Location: El ombligo de la Rep�blica Mexicana
|
Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2007 10:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
[quote="MELEE"]
| MO39 wrote: |
| He also told me that Mexico needs a second Revolution because the first one didn't do the trick! |
| Quote: |
You mean a third revolution? It's due in 3 years (2010). |
As far as I know, Mexico has had only one revolution, the one that began in 1910, and one movement for independence (from Spain) that began in 1810. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MO39

Joined: 28 Jan 2004 Posts: 1970 Location: El ombligo de la Rep�blica Mexicana
|
Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2007 10:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
[quote="Guy Courchesne
| Quote: |
| Quote: |
| I knew a few smart-aleck Mexican-Americans who went south of the border acting as if they were God's gifts to Mexico, and their arrogance was quickly put down. That's an exception. |
I've come across this A LOT. . |
That's interesting and sad at the same time. Could it be put down to a reaction on the part of the Mexican-Americans who've felt prejudice against themselves in the U.S. and who then project it on to the Mexicans they meet in Mexico? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MELEE

Joined: 22 Jan 2003 Posts: 2583 Location: The Mexican Hinterland
|
Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2007 10:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| When people go to war against there exsisting government (no matter where that government is based) it's a revolution. In US history we study the Revolutionary War, in which the US won it's independance, not the Idependance War. In Mexico there has been two revolutions. They are commonly known as the Guerra de Independencia and the Revolucion de 1910 so that people will know which revolution you are talking about. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guy Courchesne

Joined: 10 Mar 2003 Posts: 9650 Location: Mexico City
|
Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2007 11:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| It's due in 3 years (2010). |
Trying to figure out the date...Oaxaca state elections? Or is it an every-100-year-upheaval thing you think is coming?
Last edited by Guy Courchesne on Mon Nov 12, 2007 11:21 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MO39

Joined: 28 Jan 2004 Posts: 1970 Location: El ombligo de la Rep�blica Mexicana
|
Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2007 11:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| MELEE wrote: |
| When people go to war against there exsisting government (no matter where that government is based) it's a revolution. In US history we study the Revolutionary War, in which the US won it's independance, not the Idependance War. In Mexico there has been two revolutions. They are commonly known as the Guerra de Independencia and the Revolucion de 1910 so that people will know which revolution you are talking about. |
Here in Mexico, people speak of "La Independencia" (of 1810) and "La Revoluci�n Mexicana" (of 1910). That's what I was thinking of when I said Mexico had had only one revolution, and I believe that most Mexicans would express it this way also. But when I next see my student, I'll ask him how he would refer to these two wars. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MELEE

Joined: 22 Jan 2003 Posts: 2583 Location: The Mexican Hinterland
|
Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2007 11:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
My daughters refer to their soy milk as "Juice" but it's soy milk. People refer to it, so you know that they are talking about--that doesn't make it any less of a revolution.
Guy, haven't you noticed, in this country revolutions happen every 100 years (every other fuego nuevo). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jfurgers

Joined: 18 Sep 2005 Posts: 442 Location: Mexico City
|
Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2007 11:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Every class I teach I have students from all over the world and we sometimes get into discussions about Bush, Iraq, a possible air stike against Iran and world governments in general. All of my students agree that the problems isn't with the people but with the governments.
The governments create the problems. We got into this discussion last week and I have students in my class from Mexico, Iraq, Iran, Columbia, South Korea, China, India and a couple of other countries and all agree that people seem to get along, it's the governments that create the problems and the wars.
All of the students I have get along great and love doing presentations because they learn a lot about other cultures and viewpoints. They also tell me that they love the American people...it's the government and Bush that they don't like, the foreign policies.
I was in Mexico City last December and everyone was nice with me like always. My wife says it's because I have beautiful blonde hair and white skin. The Mexicans in my classes always tell me I'll have no problems with anti American attitudes in DF. I don't live in DF (yet, but I'm trying) but I don't think anyone has to worry about people hating you because you're from the States.
Speaking of speaking Spanish, I've been married to a chilanga for 10 years and still my Spanish is very broken. That's because my wife only wants to speak English with me. She only speaks in Spanish to me when she's mad at me.
Same with my students who are from Mexico. They never want to help me with Spanish, they always tell me, Teacher! you have to speak only in English to us! They always tell me that when they try to practice English in the stores a lot of the North Americans say no, help me with my Spanish.
I love the Mexicans! They're always warm and very helpful. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
notamiss

Joined: 20 Jun 2007 Posts: 908 Location: El 5o pino del la CDMX
|
Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2007 1:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
I've been following this thread while trying to put my opinion into words. It's more or less like this:
On a variety of forums, I've seen time and again people who haven't visited Mexico express apprehension about how they might be treated, or whether they might be more prone to be crime victims because they don't "look Mexican" or because they don't speak (much) Spanish. I think Mexico doesn't work that way. First, being foreign per se doesn't in particular attract rudeness or crime. When these things do happen, fellow Mexicans themselves are just as likely to be targets. Also, language aside, looking foreign isn't only a question of being taller and paler (or blacker), it's how one dresses and acts.
Something to get used to is that Mexicans are more free about remarking on people's appearance (colour, weight, etc.) and it is not derogatory. So a remark on your colour (like being addressed as g�ero/a) might be taken as offensive by someone not used to this, but it isn't. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
thelmadatter
Joined: 31 Mar 2003 Posts: 1212 Location: in el Distrito Federal x fin!
|
Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2007 2:35 pm Post subject: odd conservative |
|
|
Ive been here 4.5 years and found that the overwhelming majority of people treat me as a person, not a "gringo". Oh sure there are the usual gringo jokes, but all in fun and 1/2 the time Im the one making them!
Maybe 3 times have I had anyone rant at me about my county, however, I AM careful not to discuss my political views because I happen to believe the Iraq war was inevitable and do not believe that we should withdraw. I know expressing those views would cause friction between me and most people in this county (not to mention many people on this board). So I could conclude that there is no hostility toward Americans as long as they disavow their own country (or its government) to some extent or just shut up.
BTW, this thing about distinguishing between the people and the government holds water for those from non-elected governments (kingdoms, dictatorships etc) but its the PEOPLE who elect the US government so the people are responsible for what it does. This idea that somehow the government works completely separate from the people's wishes is a cop-out. After all, Harriet Myers did not get to the Supreme Court and the newest round of amnesty did not pass despite the fact that George Bush wanted both and Congress along with Bush sorely wanted the second. The Iraq War has not been stopped because the protestors and Hollywood do not represent the majority of American voters (or consumers, seeing how Lions for Lambs is bombing terribly). The government may work contrary to YOUR wishes but that is because not enough of your fellow citizens share your wishes.
<putting on my flame retardant undies now> |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
john_n_carolina

Joined: 26 Feb 2006 Posts: 700 Location: n. carolina
|
Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2007 4:28 pm Post subject: Re: odd conservative |
|
|
| thelmadatter wrote: |
I happen to believe the Iraq war was inevitable and do not believe that we should withdraw. I know expressing those views would cause friction between me and most people in this county (not to mention many people on this board). So I could conclude that there is no hostility toward Americans as long as they disavow their own country (or its government) to some extent or just shut up.
|
don't worry madatter, everyone is surely allowed to their opinion, right or wrong. i actually happen to agree with you about the Invasion of Iraq was inevitable. everyone forgets Great Britain was just as big a part.
i'm no military expert, but from my study of military history, we made a big mistake by trying to go after Baghdad. we should've stayed on the borders, awaiting more UN resolutions. so, of course now i'm for a 80% withdrawal, and the rest sit on the borders. the other 80% bring them home to the US, this violence will never end.
i'm sure i also will receive a lot of negative replies, but you know what i'm not even sure of my own opinions. maybe, we should just bring them all home, i'm not really sure. i don't have a TV, no newspapers, or information so i really don't know. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guy Courchesne

Joined: 10 Mar 2003 Posts: 9650 Location: Mexico City
|
Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2007 4:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| i'm not really sure. |
Well, you're not alone in that. That's why the word quagmire is so readily used by those on both sides of the debate. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MELEE

Joined: 22 Jan 2003 Posts: 2583 Location: The Mexican Hinterland
|
Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2007 5:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It's never been proven that the people elected the current US president.
But it whatever the history of it, we are in the Iraq war and unfortunately you can just stop a war when you hear your mother calling you home for dinner.
I'm a bit of an anomaly myself, A leftist-northern-confederate. In a country the size of the US we cannot expect the federal government to be responsive to the people in a timely fashion. Public opinion can not trickle up to them fast enough. There are many cities that have come out as opposing the current federal government's policies on everything from the war to the environment to health care. I believe there should be more power at the state and local (city and county) levels because that's where people can really take an active part, meeting personally with their elected officials.
Keeping your mouth shut is a very good policy for foreigners. That's my approach to religion. When Mexicans I barely know start to ask me about my religious beliefs I try to be a vague and evasive as possible without being rude. I respect their religion and would never try to change their beliefs, unfortunately most non-catholic faiths represented in Mexico spend most of their time actively trying to convert people. And I've found that while many Mexicans are open to a wide gama of political ideologies when it comes to religion, its "my way or the highway". |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|