View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Olivia Shanks
Joined: 14 Dec 2007 Posts: 2
|
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 2:51 am Post subject: Visas and Onsight Training |
|
|
Reading through the posts, I see that many people recommend on sight training for new ESL teachers. Well, I plan to do a CELTA in Beijing in October and then find a job in China, but I have a few questions.
First, if I enter on a tourist visa for my training and then find a job through the training center, will I have to make a visa run and reenter on a Z visa to teach?
Second, what are my chances or finding temporary employment until March and then transferring to a University, or starting at a University in late October, early November (I have a BS)
Third, does anyone know about Language Link? Are their CELTA programs and placement services good?
Finally (this is somewhat off topic) can anyone suggest a City in which the local dialect is close to Standard Mandarin? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Dedicated
Joined: 18 May 2007 Posts: 972 Location: UK
|
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 3:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
You have mentioned twice " onsight training". Do you possibly mean " on-site training"? I question your intended employability at university level with such a basic error, particularly in Beijing.
If you intend to teach legally, then you will need the appropriate Z visa and a Foreign Expert's Certificate.
Most employers will expect you to work for a year's contract if they are going to provide accommodation etc.
I cannot comment on Language Link as I have never heard of anyone who has used their CELTA or placement services.
Avoid Shanghai and Suzhou where they have very distinct dialects, almost incomprehensible to other Chinese, let alone foreigners. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
eslstudies

Joined: 17 Dec 2006 Posts: 1061 Location: East of Aden
|
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 4:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
You're talking of university teaching, in which case I assume you've got a degree.
Most of China speaks regional dialects on a day to day basis. Some of these are, as pointed out, mutually incomprehensible. Shanghai and Guangdong are two prime examples. Fortunately, most people with a modicum of education can also speak Putonghua [aka Mandarin], which is dominant in the NE, including Beijing. I had few problems anywhere in the country with basic, but by all accounts reasonably clear, Putonghua. This included several years in Shanghai, even though there are still people who only speak Shanghaihua.
As for site/sight
principal/principle
complement/compliment
and so on, live and learn. Especially, learn. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Shan-Shan

Joined: 28 Aug 2003 Posts: 1074 Location: electric pastures
|
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 4:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
I question your intended employability at university level |
Private training centers' students (adult students) are far more discerning than anything at a university. Grammar competence for most university positions is hardly of any consequence, though it should be. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
lostinasia
Joined: 11 Apr 2007 Posts: 466
|
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 4:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
Dedicated wrote: |
You have mentioned twice " onsight training". Do you possibly mean " on-site training"? I question your intended employability at university level with such a basic error, particularly in Beijing.
If you intend to teach legally, then you will need the appropriate Z visa and a Foreign Expert's Certificate.
Most employers will expect you to work for a year's contract if they are going to provide accommodation etc.
I cannot comment on Language Link as I have never heard of anyone who has used their CELTA or placement services.
Avoid Shanghai and Suzhou where they have very distinct dialects, almost incomprehensible to other Chinese, let alone foreigners. |
-- twice mentioned is more appropriate than "mentioned twice"
-- "onsight training" and not " onsight training"
-- "on-site training" and not " on-site training" - such a basic mistake - TWICE
-- "appropriate Z visa"? Is there an inappropriate Z visa?
-- a "basic" check of the front of your FEC will reveal the name is "Foreign Experts Certificate" and not "Foreign Expert's Certificate" as you have indicated. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
eslstudies

Joined: 17 Dec 2006 Posts: 1061 Location: East of Aden
|
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 5:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
lostinasia wrote: |
Dedicated wrote: |
You have mentioned twice " onsight training". Do you possibly mean " on-site training"? I question your intended employability at university level with such a basic error, particularly in Beijing.
If you intend to teach legally, then you will need the appropriate Z visa and a Foreign Expert's Certificate.
Most employers will expect you to work for a year's contract if they are going to provide accommodation etc.
I cannot comment on Language Link as I have never heard of anyone who has used their CELTA or placement services.
Avoid Shanghai and Suzhou where they have very distinct dialects, almost incomprehensible to other Chinese, let alone foreigners. |
-- twice mentioned is more appropriate than "mentioned twice"
-- "onsight training" and not " onsight training"
-- "on-site training" and not " on-site training" - such a basic mistake - TWICE
-- "appropriate Z visa"? Is there an inappropriate Z visa?
-- a "basic" check of the front of your FEC will reveal the name is "Foreign Experts Certificate" and not "Foreign Expert's Certificate" as you have indicated. |
Someone's bored today. Did I get that right? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
11:59

Joined: 31 Aug 2006 Posts: 632 Location: Hong Kong: The 'Pearl of the Orient'
|
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 7:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
lostinasia wrote: |
Dedicated wrote: |
If you intend to teach legally, then you will need the appropriate Z visa and a Foreign Expert's Certificate. |
"appropriate Z visa"? Is there an inappropriate Z visa? |
It is just me that is confused by this? I guess Lost is suggesting that in the above 'appropriate' is 'redundant' (a term that has much currency with laymen). But I for one often say and write things such as 'a little baby'. Does that mean you would retort with 'Is there such a thing as a 6 foot 10 inch, 20 stone baby?' |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
lostinasia
Joined: 11 Apr 2007 Posts: 466
|
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 7:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'd disagree with that baby retort. Little baby versus big baby are common expressions. There could be different degrees of baby size; where one is abnormally undersized, one is normal, and another is oversize. In fact, medicine has the baby growth charts which define such things.
Whereas, a Z visa is just that - there aren't different types of Z visas. There are no degrees or dynamic state.
An equivalent phrase with the word in question would be that you must obtain "an appropriate visa" which would of course be the Z visa.
I'm the only one who does see the grammatical issue?
As for having too much time and being bored today - yes, that's true actually. But, this was the third post today where someone decided to be the grammar police. It does get old very quickly and is so hilarious when the corrector himself makes mistakes in his correcting. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
eslstudies

Joined: 17 Dec 2006 Posts: 1061 Location: East of Aden
|
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 8:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
lostinasia wrote: |
But, this was the third post today where someone decided to be the grammar police. It does get old very quickly and is so hilarious when the corrector himself makes mistakes in his correcting. |
Do you mean like this?
lostinasia wrote: |
Many people with fully capitalize a word |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
11:59

Joined: 31 Aug 2006 Posts: 632 Location: Hong Kong: The 'Pearl of the Orient'
|
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 8:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
lostinasia wrote: |
Whereas, a Z visa is just that - there aren't different types of Z visas. There are no degrees or dynamic state. |
Actually, I was under the distinct impression that everything in China had various 'degrees', 'states' and 'shades' (as well as interpretations) � even the 'law'.
lostinasia wrote: |
I'm the only one who does see the grammatical issue?. |
Leaving aside your echoic (and presumably, rhetorical, question), yes, I think you may well be. But maybe you could enlighten us all as to the area of grammar to which this 'issue' belongs. Is it part of phonetics, phonology, morphology, morphosyntax, syntax, semantics, or pragmatics? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
arioch36
Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 3589
|
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 9:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
Okay, 11:59, lost is right, you could say "the appropriate z-visa", but not appropriate visa. And well, yeah you can say little or big, fat or skinny baby. doesn't mean the baby is 6 ft.
Are we the most pathetic group of losers or what!
Oh, someone posted something. if you come in a a tourist visa, you must leave the country to come back in on a z (work) visa, that's the law, though some claim they have escaped doing this
Standard Mandarin is everywhere and nowhere. Doesn't much matter which city. For esample, SHanghai. Business people, schools use standard mandarin. At home, in a small shop is a different story. Same everywhere
Work, anything is possible. Depends on now hard you want to look and how desparate you are, what you are willing to accept
Last edited by arioch36 on Tue Dec 18, 2007 9:55 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
danielb

Joined: 08 Aug 2003 Posts: 490
|
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 9:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
Wouldn't the 'appropriate Z visa' be the one issued upon the invitation of the legal entity in which you intend to work? I'm with 11:59, where is the grammar issue? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Shan-Shan

Joined: 28 Aug 2003 Posts: 1074 Location: electric pastures
|
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 9:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
There's a bit of e.e. cummings us in all... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
arioch36
Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 3589
|
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 10:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
Wouldn't the 'appropriate Z visa' be the one issued upon the invitation of the legal entity in which you intend to work? |
for teaching legally, there is no "innapropiate z-visa"
"appropriate z-visa" would mean that there is more then one kind of z-visa (untrue),
the appropriate visa means that there is more then one kind of visa (true)
isn't it great that my computer game is taking so long between turns, thus I can help y'all with such weighty members
Oh, sorry mistake ... isn't it noble that i'm taking a break from my grading of papers just to help you all? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Olivia Shanks
Joined: 14 Dec 2007 Posts: 2
|
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 12:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thank you for the help, but next time I will ask people who are less catty and pretentious |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|