|
Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Rooster_2006
Joined: 24 Sep 2007 Posts: 984
|
Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2008 5:02 am Post subject: Three Questions |
|
|
Hello. I'm in Korea right now, but plan to move to Japan late next year (starting off teaching English). I would like to learn Japanese while I'm there. I'm aware it's a monumental task, because I have done over 1,000 hours at Yonsei University for Korean, which is a similar language, and it's been tough. Still, it doesn't deter me from trying to tackle Japanese. So here are my questions:
1. Which regions of Japan (NOT Tokyo, too expensive) speak pretty standard Japanese, and which regions should I avoid? If someone asked me where NOT to study in Korea, I'd say "Jeollanam" because in that province, they speak a really incomprehensible dialect. What is the Jeolla of Japan (the area to avoid)? Where do they speak pretty standard Japanese?
2. In that area, are there any good language schools? If so, which ones? I'm looking for an emphasis on listening comprehension, because that's always been my weak point with Korean, and I expect it to be that way with Japanese, too.
3. I have a little bit of flexibility in when I move. When does the Japanese school year begin, and when does it end? When is the best time to look for jobs?
Any help people can provide would be great. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Glenski

Joined: 15 Jan 2003 Posts: 12844 Location: Hokkaido, JAPAN
|
Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2008 11:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
1. Hokkaido
2. Yes
3. The academic year begins in April. This is often when most conversation schools begin, too. International schools start in the fall (Aug or Sept). Figure 12 months from starting date if you want to calculate finish. (Can't believe I had to write that!) Best time to look for work is Feb/March, although some mainstream schools will advertise 6 months in advance. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Rooster_2006
Joined: 24 Sep 2007 Posts: 984
|
Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2008 10:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
Glenski wrote: |
1. Hokkaido
2. Yes
3. The academic year begins in April. This is often when most conversation schools begin, too. International schools start in the fall (Aug or Sept). Figure 12 months from starting date if you want to calculate finish. (Can't believe I had to write that!) Best time to look for work is Feb/March, although some mainstream schools will advertise 6 months in advance. |
Thanks for the reply, Glenski. Now that Glenski has enlightened me on some things, I have some additional questions:
1. Is it legal to study in Japan on a tourist visa if the study doesn't exceed 90 days?
2. If the answer to #1 is "no," is there a special language study visa that doesn't require a 3,000,000 yen bank balance?
3. Can you attend a regular university on an English teacher's visa? Like, let's say I get an English teaching job and then quit, and attend Temple University while still on my English teacher's visa. Is that legal?
4. What are the most reputable Japanese language schools in Hokkaido? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gypsy Rose Kim
Joined: 08 Dec 2006 Posts: 151
|
Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2008 4:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I lived in Korea and have studied both languages. Korean is much, much harder than Japanese for any number of reasons (most notably, the writing system and pronunciation--or should I say, reading and listening). You'll also find you'll make faster progress here because people won't crack up laughing every time you try to speak Japanese.
I feel nauseas when I think about how I tried to learn Korean. I feel happy when I speak Japanese, even though I make tons of mistakes. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
chinagirl

Joined: 27 May 2003 Posts: 235 Location: United States
|
Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2008 7:43 pm Post subject: really? |
|
|
GRK...Sorry, I don't have any experience learning Korean, but that was the first time I have ever heard anyone say that Korean is harder to learn to read than Japanese. Isn't Hangul a phonetic written alphabet? Excuse my ignorance if i am wrong, but can you explain what you mean? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Apsara
Joined: 20 Sep 2005 Posts: 2142 Location: Tokyo, Japan
|
Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2008 12:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
I do have some experience learning to write and read Korean, and for me at least Japanese has taken far more time- when kanji can have so many different readings and there are thousands of them I don't see how memorising hangul compares. I'd be interested to know what aspect of the Korean writing system GRK found more difficult as well. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
G Cthulhu
Joined: 07 Feb 2003 Posts: 1373 Location: Way, way off course.
|
Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2008 3:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
Rooster_2006 wrote: |
Thanks for the reply, Glenski. Now that Glenski has enlightened me on some things, I have some additional questions:
1. Is it legal to study in Japan on a tourist visa if the study doesn't exceed 90 days?
|
Completely. Almost everyone who comes to Japan on a tourist visa either studies or works ful time. After all, Japan is too expensive to be a tourist in. The government knows it and accepts it. If you're ever asked about it just slip the officer 3000 yen and they'll ignore the "error".
Quote: |
2. If the answer to #1 is "no," is there a special language study visa that doesn't require a 3,000,000 yen bank balance?
3. Can you attend a regular university on an English teacher's visa? Like, let's say I get an English teaching job and then quit, and attend Temple University while still on my English teacher's visa. Is that legal?
|
Yes that's legal. Like the student visa thing, no one expects anyone to follow their visa rules. This happened a lot after Nova collapsed too, so it's okay. Lots of Nova teachers were working for Tanuki Delivery Services. Remember, we won the war so it's always legal.
Quote: |
4. What are the most reputable Japanese language schools in Hokkaido?
|
You should look into the Jomon School. They're tops double A+.
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Rooster_2006
Joined: 24 Sep 2007 Posts: 984
|
Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2008 4:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks, G Cthulhu. Actually, I completely agree with Gypsy Rose Kim. Based on the Japanese I've studied, it seems like it's a lot easier than Korean. There are no ending consonants which change sounds when placed next to other consonants. This makes it a much cleaner languge that's a lot easier to understand. Japanese has more loanwords then Korean (I'm pretty sure), and is a lot more regular. In my country, a (very smart) soldier who wants to go to DLI and take Japanese needs a DLAB score of 100, but Korean requires a 110. Still, I understand that Japanese is hard, and maybe the reason why I've had little trouble learning it so far is that I learned a very similar language first.
By the way, I'm no insulting the intellects of people who learn Japanese. It's still one of the four hardest languages on earth for non-native speakers! So no flames! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
japanman
Joined: 24 Nov 2005 Posts: 281 Location: England
|
Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2008 5:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
One of the rop four then. What do you think are the other three? Mandarin Chinese, Korean and then what's the other one? Arabic? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gypsy Rose Kim
Joined: 08 Dec 2006 Posts: 151
|
Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2008 7:36 am Post subject: Re: really? |
|
|
chinagirl wrote: |
GRK...Sorry, I don't have any experience learning Korean, but that was the first time I have ever heard anyone say that Korean is harder to learn to read than Japanese. Isn't Hangul a phonetic written alphabet? Excuse my ignorance if i am wrong, but can you explain what you mean? |
The phonetic alphabet makes it much harder, especially when you are just starting out. It gets to just look like a bunch of sounds on a page, and very difficult to attach any meaning to them. That is compounded by the fact that some of the sounds are hard to hear or differentiate between.
Remember when you started studying Japanese and some of the passages would be all in hiragana? I always found those very difficult. Where does one word end and another begin? That kind of stuff.
Kanji are tough, very much so when you get to higher levels. I found getting to a level 3 was fun and interesting, and confusing but not horribly so. I can't seem to push my way up to level 2, but haven't really been trying very hard. Please don't think I am trying to pass myself off as an expert.
On the other hand, I do think having kanji to rely on is invaluable for learners. Patterns become clear and they reveal so much about the language. I didn't have that in Korean. Like I said, just sounds on a page. Sounds I couldn't even pronounce in my head.
Almost every foreigner I know in Japan is semi-self-sufficient. They can order in restaurants, communicate with the NHK man, get a haircut, make small talk. Of course most of make a lot of mistakes, but the fact is that the sounds of Japanese make it almost impossible not to pick up a bit of the language if you live here any amount of time.
On the other hand, the majority of teachers I worked with in Korea couldn't do anything at all. I studied Korean (at a language center) for only six months, but on more than one occasion I burst into tears in a shop or restaurant because even simple sentences like, "What time do you close?" were so hard to pronounce that nobody could understand me.
The fact that Koreans look at foreigners like aliens and laugh out loud when people make mistakes also doesn't help. But I digress...
Or, maybe I don't. There's a lot to be said for being able to practice the language every day, in real life, without being laughed at.
I gave up on Korean, even though I lived there for two years. I tried hard in the beginning, but I didn't feel like it was a language one could learn part-time, ie., I couldn't hold down my job and learn Korean at the same time. In Japan, even home study is relatively effective and an hour or two a day will lead to real progress.
I still hate reading in Japanese. It gives me a headache and I need a dictionary and it is, frankly, tedious. But it doesn't feel impossible like Korean did. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Glenski

Joined: 15 Jan 2003 Posts: 12844 Location: Hokkaido, JAPAN
|
Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2008 8:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
Almost everyone who comes to Japan on a tourist visa either studies or works ful time. |
Where do you get such an outrageous idea? I call you on this one. Tourists cannot work here legally.
Quote: |
After all, Japan is too expensive to be a tourist in. |
If that were true, there would be no tourists here.
Quote: |
The government knows it and accepts it. If you're ever asked about it just slip the officer 3000 yen and they'll ignore the "error". |
Are you actually suggesting bribing an immigration officer (and with a mere 3000 yen)?
Quote: |
Like the student visa thing, no one expects anyone to follow their visa rules. |
Nobody except immigration.
Quote: |
Lots of Nova teachers were working for Tanuki Delivery Services. |
Perhaps. Who really knows? The point here is that perhaps the Humanities Specialist/International Relations work visa they had might just be good enough for delivery jobs.
I hope the "rolling eyes" emoticon at the bottom of your post was a sign that the whole post was tongue in cheek. I for one cannot see that, though. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
markle
Joined: 17 Jan 2003 Posts: 1316 Location: Out of Japan
|
Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2008 4:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Rooster_2006 wrote: |
It's still one of the four hardest languages on earth for non-native speakers! |
How do you figure that? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Rooster_2006
Joined: 24 Sep 2007 Posts: 984
|
Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2008 5:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
markle wrote: |
Rooster_2006 wrote: |
It's still one of the four hardest languages on earth for non-native speakers! |
How do you figure that? |
Sorry, I meant "English speakers," not non-native speakers.
The four hardest languages on earth for ENGLISH speakers are Chinese, Japanese, Korean, and Arabic. Or you could divide that into more than four if you count dialects of those languages, like Cantonese, obscure Japonic languages, Jeju-do dialect, and the various vernacular Arabics spoken all across the Arab world.
They are classified in their own special category by the US military when it trains interpreters, etc. You need a DLAB (Defense Language Aptitude Battery) score of 100 to study any of those languages, supposedly. Otherwise it's not considered worth the hundreds of thousands of dollars they spend to train you.
I'm sure other organizations in other English-speaking countries agree with this assessment, although sometimes you hear Finnish in there, and sometimes a couple of others. However, when all is said and done, Korean being phonetic (mostly, not 100%) does not really make it significantly easier. Memorizing 1,800 characters ain't that hard when you consider that those 1,800 characters help you decipher 40,000 or more words in common use with ease. Remove the characters, and it makes the learning curve level at first, but then very, very steep as you hit a wall where you know 5,000 words and can only read the easy newspaper and understand it very, very roughly! The Japanese kanji may be daunting at first, but it is specific. In Korean, if you see "sa" (사), it can mean 16 different things, according to Naver (very good Korean dictionary). |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Rooster_2006
Joined: 24 Sep 2007 Posts: 984
|
Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2008 5:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
What Gypsy Rose Kim says is absolutely correct about most English teachers in Korea simply being incapable of speaking any Korean whatsoever past "annyeonghaseyo?" It is really, really pitiful. It's like they're actually proud of how bad they are, like it's this unique thing that sets them apart from everyone else and makes them special. Wow, look at me, I'm so bad, it's funny!
It's true this has something to do with the difficulty of speaking Korean (10 simple vowels, and probably 20 or more vowels when you count dipthongs), batchims and batchim changes, etc. However, I think an element of this is also that Korea has traditionally been so incredibly closed (visas so restrictive, you can't even volunteer legally), it is not a fun place to live for most, and foreigners almost never become long-term residents like some foreigners in Japan do. Pretty much the only thing the EFL scene in Korea has going for it is the money and benefits, which must be very, very good to attract teachers who would otherwise pick a more welcoming place like Japan, China, or any other country on earth.
I work at a guest house for foreigners in Korea, and whenever we get teachers staying at our guest house on visa runs from Japan, it's astounding. They're normal people. They don't have weird mental problems, and they often speak Japanese quite well. Which is completely unlike the teachers that Korea attracts. So I think it's a combination of Japanese being slightly easier AND far more worthwhile to learn. That's a synergy which has resulted in better instructional materials, and more foreigners who speak it well. If you look at just about any Korean textbook, it'll probably be 100% in Korean. Not very helpful if you don't know Korean already! That's because Korean language learning is pretty much designed strictly for ethnic Koreans who have already learned some Korean from their parents. Japanese, on the other hand, has a wide support base from foreigners (and I mean true foreigners, not ethnic Japanese abroad) who have already accomplished it! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
markle
Joined: 17 Jan 2003 Posts: 1316 Location: Out of Japan
|
Posted: Thu Feb 21, 2008 1:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Rooster_2006 wrote: |
markle wrote: |
Rooster_2006 wrote: |
It's still one of the four hardest languages on earth for non-native speakers! |
How do you figure that? |
Sorry, I meant "English speakers," not non-native speakers.
The four hardest languages on earth for ENGLISH speakers are Chinese, Japanese, Korean, and Arabic. Or you could divide that into more than four if you count dialects of those languages, like Cantonese, obscure Japonic languages, Jeju-do dialect, and the various vernacular Arabics spoken all across the Arab world.
They are classified in their own special category by the US military when it trains interpreters, etc. You need a DLAB (Defense Language Aptitude Battery) score of 100 to study any of those languages, supposedly. Otherwise it's not considered worth the hundreds of thousands of dollars they spend to train you.
|
The flaw with that thinking is that the US military sets those levels partly on a needs basis not totally by a qualitative value of how difficult a particular language is. Take for instance the language of the Kalahari Bushmen- the one with the unusual clicks in it and I challenge you to find anything more difficult to master. However militarily, competence in this language is pretty much worthless and as you stated not "worth the hundreds of thousands of dollars they spend to train you" |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling. Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|