Site Search:
 
Get TEFL Certified & Start Your Adventure Today!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Chavez Warns of War With Colombia
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> General Latin America Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
JonnyBravo



Joined: 30 Oct 2006
Posts: 80
Location: Bogota, Colombia

PostPosted: Mon Mar 03, 2008 3:49 pm    Post subject: Chavez Warns of War With Colombia Reply with quote

http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5i3-gy-m2ViT4af14BjcC-rOHaWrgD8V60E6G0

Is this all posturing or is it a legitimate threat? The line about bombing at night with precision accuracy makes me wonder if this was just a US military incursion done with Colombian approval. Thoughts?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Guy Courchesne



Joined: 10 Mar 2003
Posts: 9650
Location: Mexico City

PostPosted: Mon Mar 03, 2008 5:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

My thoughts...nothing new in a region tortured by ideology, drugs, and oil. My prediction? More people dead, cocaine still flowing north, and the same political diatribes keeping the masses buying, revolting, afraid, and alone.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
nineisone



Joined: 23 Jun 2006
Posts: 187

PostPosted: Mon Mar 03, 2008 7:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Colombia receives much of its military technology(and training) through the U.S. in the guise of fighting the cocaine trade. However, I don't read this as U.S. involvement. Possibly diplomatic pressure to act on FARC, but Uribe has rarely needed the motivation from the U.S.

As mentioned, the beat goes on in this region but any declaration of potential war by Venezuela is strictly political posturing. Sort of a Latin American variation of the old "wag the dog" trick. Rally your base around a perceived international crisis and then deflect that energy toward further pushing your domestic agenda through.

Let's also recall the recent border skirmish between Peru-Ecuador that looked like it might boil over into war, but ended with the same nasty territorial dispute between the two nations that had been going on for years.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Guy Courchesne



Joined: 10 Mar 2003
Posts: 9650
Location: Mexico City

PostPosted: Mon Mar 03, 2008 11:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well, here's a new twist, courtesy of everyone's favorite source of unbiased news, CNN.

http://www.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/americas/03/03/ecuador.colombia/index.html

Quote:
Evidence found in computers seized in a raid over the weekend suggests that Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez recently gave the leftist Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia $300 million, Colombia's national police chief said Monday.

Speaking at a news conference, Gen. Oscar Naranjo also said evidence in the computers suggests FARC had given Chavez 100 million pesos when he was a jailed rebel leader.

FARC has fought to overthrow the Colombian government for 40 years.

Chavez had no immediate response to the allegations involving him.

Naranjo said other evidence in the computers suggests FARC purchased 50 kilograms of uranium this month.


My italics.

So it seems FARC has plans to become a nuclear power. Rolling Eyes
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
JonnyBravo



Joined: 30 Oct 2006
Posts: 80
Location: Bogota, Colombia

PostPosted: Mon Mar 03, 2008 11:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I don't care how organized they are, there is no way a guerrilla group is going to enrich uranium and make a bomb...

Plus when you're fighting a domestic conflict, nuking your opponent wouldn't seem like a logical course of action (not that nuking is ever a logical course of action.) If this thing about Chavez giving FARC money doesn't go away, I could see the US getting much more involved on the Colombian side. Whether US involvement is public or not is another story entirely.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Justin Trullinger



Joined: 28 Jan 2005
Posts: 3110
Location: Seoul, South Korea and Myanmar for a bit

PostPosted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 12:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

What a lot of fun we have around here.

The terrorist use for uranium would be a "dirty" bomb, which uses conventional explosives to scatter toxic or radioactive material.

Course, it still wouldn't make any sense. Any more than Ecuador's president would benefit from involvement with the FARC. At the end of the day, if something sounds this fishy...


Justin
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
ajarnlilly



Joined: 28 Dec 2006
Posts: 35
Location: Managua Nicaragua

PostPosted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 12:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yeah, I smell US involvement. Probably not the actual bombing, but the instigation, equipment and "advice".

The US military machine is still irked that Correa won't extend the lease on the US base at Manta after next year, essentially depriving the US of a legitimate reason to be in Ecuador. American contractors will lose hundreds of millions for no longer being able to spray herbicides on indigenous people and legitimate crops, by helicopter.

This is the first time I've heard of the rebels in the jungle having computers. Have I missed something? I thought they just dropped in at some internet cafe... Laughing
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
JonnyBravo



Joined: 30 Oct 2006
Posts: 80
Location: Bogota, Colombia

PostPosted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 12:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Justin,

I'm not particularly concerned about the obscure, unverified uranium reference. My point was to dismiss it entirely. The accusation that Chavez gave a large sum money to FARC is, on the other hand, a little bit scary and entirely plausible. I'm not an expert on Latin American politics, but I sincerely doubt Correa and Ecuador had anything to do with this, with the exception of being on the receiving end of a minor military incursion. The current US administration loves to get cuddly with the Colombian government and would bite at the chance to support somebody tossing Chavez from power. I don't think I'm connecting too many dots in concluding this could be a bigger problem in the near future. Another distinct possibility is that the US could simply tug on the Colombian leash and squash this before it gets any bigger. I'm hoping for the latter.

Jon
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Justin Trullinger



Joined: 28 Jan 2005
Posts: 3110
Location: Seoul, South Korea and Myanmar for a bit

PostPosted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 1:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

YOu're very right about potential scariness. As for the poster who smells US involvement...how could it be otherwise? The US gives more "military aid" to Colombia than anyone else in the hemisphere. And "quien paga, manda."

It's looking a bit ugly, but I imagine that it will fizzle on its own, after some diplomatic chest beating. You can say that it doesn't have much to do with Ecuador...but we got invaded. In any case, though- Colombia will go on posturing, but wouldn't risk war with Venezuela, at least not while the US is so embroiled in other areas that forthcoming aid will be financial only. Or so we're all hoping.

Best,

Justin
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
naturegirl321



Joined: 04 May 2003
Posts: 9041
Location: home sweet home

PostPosted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 1:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Seems like everyone wants to start a war with someone these days, just look at Bush.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Guy Courchesne



Joined: 10 Mar 2003
Posts: 9650
Location: Mexico City

PostPosted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 1:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
but we got invaded


Hardly. An invasion entails taking land, or uprooting the governance. Colombia chased some of their own citizens a mere 2 clicks over the border and dragged a single body across. Not a nice to do by any stretch, but invasion isn't the word for it.

You wouldn't see the same thing happening across the Canada-US border, or the US-Mexico border, but then again, we're talking pretty remote jungle here between Ecuador and Colombia.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
ajarnlilly



Joined: 28 Dec 2006
Posts: 35
Location: Managua Nicaragua

PostPosted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 2:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

naturegirl321 wrote:
Seems like everyone wants to start a war with someone these days, just look at Bush.


Yeah, talk about someone who wags the dog! I wonder what Bush's response would have been if Mexico had conducted a nighttime commando raid into Texas, then sent troops across the border and took a couple of bodies, leaving behind a dozen dead bodies and several wounded, with no notification before, during or after. His trivialization of the violation of national sovereignty is an indication of his level of respect for LA countries in general.

If this had been above board, Columbia would have been in communication with Ecuador no later than the commencement of the raid. But then there might have been witnesses to the 'finding' of the laptop oomputer (oh, wait, now there are 3 laptop computers and the US is going to 'help' assess the 'information' on them).

The US gave Colombia $5 BILLION in military aid last year, plus "advisors" (remember Vietnam - only advisors), yet Colombia can't take care of the refugees their 'war on drugs' creates. Ecuador is taking care of at least 60,000 Colombians who have entered the country to escape the trouble.

No, I don't think there will necessarily be a war. The countries involved don't really want one. But the alleged uranium factor has got the media calling it an international concern. Sounds to me like the beginning to a build up of one of the games the big dogs play: let's you and him fight. (So we'll have to step in and settle it.)

I sure hope I'm wrong. I'm headed for Ecuador in a few months and I think LA has suffered enough US intervention. I think it's also interesting that the media begins every story with handwringing over the 'leftist guerrillas' in Colombia but there is no mention of the right wing vigilante death squads that Uribe has apparantly made peace with. Of course, they don't have to traffic in drugs and kidnappings to make their money - they are wealthy land owners who profit from the right wing dictatorships the US loves to support.
-Lilly
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
lozwich



Joined: 25 May 2003
Posts: 1536

PostPosted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 2:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm not sure what to make of it, there are lots of differing opinions on the ground here, but there's something stinky going on methinks, especially since some of the stories just don't add up.

And yes FARC has computers. They even have their own website, or should I say had, because I haven't been able to get onto it since this all happened.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ajarnlilly



Joined: 28 Dec 2006
Posts: 35
Location: Managua Nicaragua

PostPosted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 2:28 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

[quote="Guy Courchesne"]
Quote:
but we got invaded


Hardly. An invasion entails taking land, or uprooting the governance. Colombia chased some of their own citizens a mere 2 clicks over the border and dragged a single body across. Not a nice to do by any stretch, but invasion isn't the word for it....."

I beg to differ, by way of definitions 1 & 4 below. I don't want to be argumentative, but the unilateral decision to do this makes it a hostile act.

"Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1)
in�va�sion noun
1. an act or instance of invading or entering as an enemy, esp. by an army.
2. the entrance or advent of anything troublesome or harmful, as disease.
3. entrance as if to take possession or overrun: the annual invasion of the resort by tourists.
4. infringement by intrusion. "
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Guy Courchesne



Joined: 10 Mar 2003
Posts: 9650
Location: Mexico City

PostPosted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 4:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ok, the dictionary wins.

But come on now, let's use some common sense. Colombian forces chasing other Colombians over a jungle border probably at best marked out by a local basil or mangrove. Sure Ecuador has the right to complain, but is it really cause for war? It takes one hell of a right-wing nut to complain that your neighbour peed a few inches over your property line and if not a right-wing nut, then a far left nut. Either way, nobody's home in the rational middle and everyone's left distracted from real issues.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> General Latin America Forum All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Teaching Jobs in China
Teaching Jobs in China