|
Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
englishgibson
Joined: 09 Mar 2005 Posts: 4345
|
Posted: Fri Feb 29, 2008 10:58 am Post subject: Moderations, Grades Adjustments by Superiors |
|
|
In China, some exams in some educational institutions are moderated, adjusted by accademic superviors or directors later and after the exams have been administered by the teachers which has been my recent issue.
I am aware of moderations and adjustments of scores that are common in British educational system as some've told me.
In Canadian and American education to my knowledge it is only common in cases where the student files a complaint regarding his/her score, or just as a random check to insure the consistancy. But I would like to hear from others that may know more about it than I do.
Cheers and beers |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
YankeeDoodleDandy
Joined: 17 Aug 2004 Posts: 428 Location: Xi'an , Shaanxi China
|
Posted: Fri Feb 29, 2008 3:21 pm Post subject: Grades |
|
|
In Anhui, I taught at a local university in Hefei for two and a half years. When school started again in the fall of 2005, I was greeted by a class of sophmore English majors who seemed depressed and down and out. Several of the students complained about their final marks the previous semester. I atold them that I would bring my grade book in the next day and I requested that they go online and tell me what there marks were. Out of approximately 25 students , 7 grades were not changed, 10 grades were lowered and 8 marks were raised. After lunch I climbed 5 flights of stairs to the Foreign Languages Department and spoke to the Dean , how an error like this could possibly happen. She didn't have a clue. To make a long story short, I told her that I felt I would have no integrity with my students and that I would resign if the grades were not changed. They were changed within a week. It seems that the person intering the grades with a family name of Chen was incompetent and his father was a professor/leader. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
The Great Wall of Whiner

Joined: 29 Jan 2003 Posts: 4946 Location: Blabbing
|
Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2008 5:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
How can grades be bumped up.
Money talks.
Someone offers a dean or teacher money to bump a grade, it is done. Student's father is some "lingdao" with "guanxi"? Frequent. Same with favours, from female students.
Dark secret, not often talked about. But not uncommon.
We as foreigners, are mostly out of the loop on these. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
englishgibson
Joined: 09 Mar 2005 Posts: 4345
|
Posted: Wed Mar 05, 2008 4:22 pm Post subject: Re: Grades |
|
|
out of the loop for sure
YankeeDoodleDandy wrote: |
It seems that the person intering the grades with a family name of Chen was incompetent and his father was a professor/leader. |
could be...i wouldn't exclude the dean out of that one ...reasons such as face saving or keeping you on would be a good motive, wouldn't it?
in my recent case, grades of my ACT students that are in a GAC program (to join a uni abroad) have been adjusted..i also have not been notified and a few months later've found out...we use cameras for our spoken assessments and our head office took that moderation initiative there..p*ssed off 'cause i feel like an idiot now and've done three more spoken assessments after...reasons for moderations not provided, so it just adds up to my anger...call it "the chinese tradition of great communication and reasoning"...ironically, these chinese kids are preparing to join western unis, but learning it the "chinese way" where no reasoning is neccessary
cheers and beers to our hard work that pays off once a month and on the end of our contracts  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
malu
Joined: 22 Apr 2007 Posts: 1344 Location: Sunny Java
|
Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2008 11:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
External moderation - or moderation by independent examiners - is a regular part of international school exam systems such as IB. The system is needed in China and it shows: I've never yet seen internal assessment grades given by a Chinese teacher raised by the moderators, though FTs' grades are sometimes moderated either way. Internal 'moderation' always makes me very suspicious, though.
At a slight tangent, it never ceases to amaze me how school 'leaders' will cheerfully sacrifice the the chances of whole cohorts of students in the pursuit of vanity or face.
I have a class of students doing Cambridge IGCSE exams. Many of them started the course late and quite a few simply don't have the English skills to get good grades. I told admin to enter about a quarter of the class for the extended paper and the rest for the core paper, where they might have a chance of getting a pass grade. Lo and behold if some pot-bellied Party slug of a unit principal didn't overturn my decision and enter virtually the whole class for the extended paper just to make the entry figures look good. As a result half a class of students will fail. Gee, thanks Mr Principal. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
arioch36
Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 3589
|
Posted: Sat Mar 08, 2008 3:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I don't believe in the seven years here I have ever had grades changed. But I have always worked at a uni. I always give a copy of my grades to my students. They can check with what is posted. i have had some mistakes, but I believe this is due to entering numbers wrongly. Where I teach, at the international college (I now refuse to work there) they had students entering many grades, certainly not a policy approved in the states.
Chinese teachers can enter their grades directly. You can also insist on doing this. If you enter the grades directly, it becomes extremely difficult for anyone to change the grades, and would be a huge violation, even in Chinese standards.
In America I almost never heard of a grade being changed. You would have to have evidence of a definite professor mistake. The only exception ... I took a semester of Chinese. Supposd to be for students with NO knowledge of Chinese. Of the 120 students only 20 were Americans. Most were Chinese sundergrads trying to boost their GPA. It wasa 5 credit course. There was a MA from Taiwan teaching the lecture portion, she was the head teacher. I was in the East Asian Office talking to the history prof (american) Chinese students, especially girls, were going to the Taiwan lady's office crying, how if they didn't get a higher grade in this class, they might not be able to stay at the college. The Taiwan lady prof would lecture them ... and agree to give them a higher grade. I was not amused (nor was the prof I was talking to)
ENG GIBBY
Quote: |
in my recent case, grades of my ACT students that are in a GAC program (to join a uni abroad) have been adjusted |
This I can believe. I was teaching Math in this situation, and they (the nice Chinese lady who was the true leader despite the laowai DOS face)did everything possible to keep students in the program. No student was allowed to fail ... one way or another
That's why, despite a nice offer (I think, for Zhengzou, 13,000) I could not be a DOS in the system for an EF or GAC or any of this. I have to believe the Aussies "running" this know the score |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
malu
Joined: 22 Apr 2007 Posts: 1344 Location: Sunny Java
|
Posted: Sun Mar 09, 2008 1:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
arioch36 wrote: |
I have to believe the Aussies "running" this know the score |
Right on the nail. Same goes for 2nd division UK universities running dubious 'foundation' partnerships here. So long as it is Mr Chen doing it in Guangzhou while Dr Cholmondeley-Warner back in England can deny all knowledge of it, money goes into the bank and life goes on. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
englishgibson
Joined: 09 Mar 2005 Posts: 4345
|
Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2008 10:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
glad i've found others on forums that've had the same thoughts and experiences
coincidentally there's some ms chen in shanghai that helps with ACT moderations and she insists that the australian head office supervises her...that ms chen could be a wife of this mr above, but there're plenty of chens around
Quote: |
Chinese teachers can enter their grades directly. You can also insist on doing this. If you enter the grades directly, it becomes extremely difficult for anyone to change the grades, and would be a huge violation, even in Chinese standards. |
this is something that no foreign teacher's been allowed in ACT (here in china)
Quote: |
In America I almost never heard of a grade being changed. You would have to have evidence of a definite professor mistake. |
exactly...and, i've asked the ACT head office leader and her ms chen coworker for that evidence which i've never got...ironically, i prepare students for american unis (with chinese standards)
Quote: |
Quote:
in my recent case, grades of my ACT students that are in a GAC program (to join a uni abroad) have been adjusted
Reply:
This I can believe. I was teaching Math in this situation, and they (the nice Chinese lady who was the true leader despite the laowai DOS face)did everything possible to keep students in the program. No student was allowed to fail ... one way or another |
no, it was a freaking ROLE-PLAY in a language class..i mean english language with ms chen and her office assistant emily that's a regional operations manager of ACT...can't speak english well, but apparently can moderate anything...her evidence was a low quality video replay
Quote: |
That's why, despite a nice offer (I think, for Zhengzou, 13,000) I could not be a DOS in the system for an EF or GAC or any of this. I have to believe the Aussies "running" this know the score |
man, this really bugs me..i feel the american ACT company began a "monkey head office" in australia ... something about "keepin' your hands clean"
cheers and beers |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Brian Caulfield
Joined: 14 Sep 2004 Posts: 1247 Location: China
|
Posted: Fri Mar 21, 2008 6:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
The problem is also in the exam system here. The three universities that I have worked in in China only require a final exam. I test my students three times. I do an assessment at the start a mid term and a final. I always inform the students of their grade before I hand the grades in. I think many of the problems are a result of people trying to do many things at the same time ( Chinese tradition going back 5,ooo years) as a result errors are made in entering the grades. I too have run into the sour faces of students disgrunted over the last foreing teachers marks. This is because in China an average mark is 80% plus and in the west 60 is an average mark. So foreigners mark low and cause problems. To reiterate my previous stance DON'T FAIL YOUR STUDENTS. They are only studying English. 60% is a pass in China and an embarassment. If you know who they are pass them. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
lf_aristotle69
Joined: 06 May 2006 Posts: 546 Location: HangZhou, China
|
Posted: Fri Mar 21, 2008 7:11 am Post subject: Educational standards... |
|
|
Brian Caulfield wrote: |
The problem is also in the exam system here. The three universities that I have worked in in China only require a final exam. I test my students three times. I do an assessment at the start a mid term and a final. I always inform the students of their grade before I hand the grades in. I think many of the problems are a result of people trying to do many things at the same time ( Chinese tradition going back 5,ooo years) as a result errors are made in entering the grades. I too have run into the sour faces of students disgrunted over the last foreing teachers marks. This is because in China an average mark is 80% plus and in the west 60 is an average mark. So foreigners mark low and cause problems. To reiterate my previous stance DON'T FAIL YOUR STUDENTS. They are only studying English. 60% is a pass in China and an embarassment. If you know who they are pass them. |
Well, passing everyone "If you know who they are" might be reasonable for conversational ESL teaching in schools and universities. In fact, the assessments and the resulting grades for these FT classes are (usually) not really used in calculating students' grades in any case.
Many students know that, and act accordingly in your classes. It's also one reason a lot of the less professional school managers/principals and the Chinese administrative staff couldn't care less when you complain. Your class is not a "real" class.
However, for more formal EAP and Prep programs low performing students (according to preset criteria, or external moderation if possible) should be failed. Of course, due to the reasons highlighted by others here, it doesn't always happen.
I haven't taught on IB programs yet. How do they perform in that regard?
China is currently working (not very hard or fast...) on getting rid of the "I paid, therefore I get the certificate" idea. They're still trying to improve academic standards in the Chinese top tier 'Ivy League' Universities, so I guess it will be 50 years before it filters down through their whole education system... if ever.
65% is a Credit grade (a 5 on a 1 to 7 scale, 7 is High distinction, 4 is a Pass) in Australia. When I was first here no-one told me that students weren't being marked on a 50% passing grade... Ooops.
LFA |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Brian Caulfield
Joined: 14 Sep 2004 Posts: 1247 Location: China
|
Posted: Fri Mar 21, 2008 9:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
My reasoning in giving my students high marks is that I need my students to take chances. Chance taking is a characteristic of a good language learner. If my students are only concerned about doing well on their grades they don't perform for me in the class. They clam up and don't say anything or don't write anything of their own. So I find after I give them a mid term and am generous with my marking I get more from them during class time. If my students don't make mistakes how can I teach them. What difference does it make if I give the top student 99 or 70? You tell me about these ever important exams to get into Ivy League schools, but I have yet to see any exam system in English that is equal. Some TOEFl exams are easy some are hard. The IELT test is the same . I refuse to look at the Chinese exams now when a Chinese teacher presents me with one. There are usually too many mistakes in them.
There will never be an exam to measure English fairly because it is an art. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
lf_aristotle69
Joined: 06 May 2006 Posts: 546 Location: HangZhou, China
|
Posted: Fri Mar 21, 2008 10:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
Brian Caulfield wrote: |
My reasoning in giving my students high marks is that I need my students to take chances. Chance taking is a characteristic of a good language learner. If my students are only concerned about doing well on their grades they don't perform for me in the class. They clam up and don't say anything or don't write anything of their own. So I find after I give them a mid term and am generous with my marking I get more from them during class time. If my students don't make mistakes how can I teach them. What difference does it make if I give the top student 99 or 70? You tell me about these ever important exams to get into Ivy League schools, but I have yet to see any exam system in English that is equal. Some TOEFl exams are easy some are hard. The IELT test is the same . I refuse to look at the Chinese exams now when a Chinese teacher presents me with one. There are usually too many mistakes in them.
There will never be an exam to measure English fairly because it is an art. |
I agree that encouragement is very important in motivating learners.
But, I think we should be cautious with false praise.
As I said, for conversational ESL (which I only taught for a little while a few years ago) I also agree that encouragement and even lenient marking (or rather, awarding high scores) are not a problem as those courses are not generally accountable to outside academic structures. They are just seeking to give the students the opportunity to improve from their starting level up to a higher level. Which almost any student making some effort should accomplish. If encouragement of various types helps, I'm all for it.
What I really meant was that courses that are part of a larger structure e.g. EAP pre-academic program (academic subjects given in English) courses (generally) have to ensure that students have attained certain competencies by the time they complete the course.
Also, Uni. Prep courses require that students achieve certain skill levels equivalent when compared to externally moderated samples. The expectation of students being able to do things at a foreign high-school level is reasonable in most cases for Chinese students expecting to enter a Bachelor degree course. Remember, degrees are not 'easy' for native speakers, it's just setting Chinese (and other nationalities) students up for failure if they can barely read and write in English. Let alone that they need to be able handle western Uni assessment methods etc.
Often the two types of situations (EAP and Uni Prep) I mention here are an intermediate step up to another/3rd party program. The 3rd parties could be foreign universities etc.
I.e. legal agreements have been made that the students who are permitted to enter the next stage have attained the required skills/competencies or appropriate standard.
Of course, this is an ideal. And, in China it seems very, very difficult to maintain the required standards.
1. students enter the programs at too low a level
2. the students are the "Mummy and Daddy have already paid, so, I don't have to really do any serious study" type
3. management (usually on the Chinese side, but not always just them) interfere with the teachers' and the DoS's efforts to assign students' true results
While I think that teachers should be trusted to exercise subjectively to some extent. I also, don't think caving into the whole system of reducing quality really does the students any favour. Neither in the short, nor the long term.
In the short term they won't have the skills to do the work at the next higher stage. And, in the long term the whole program will become discredited and devalued and students won't have a worthwhile qualification at the end of it all...
The high failure rates of Chinese students, in particular, in foreign Universities over the last 10 years shows they cut every corner possible to get over to a foreign Uni.
If the Chinese way of rubber-stamping every student was any good, then foreign Unis would just accept Chinese students directly without the need for all these International programs. But, they just like to have their cake and eat it too! Sometimes I just can't believe how they try to cheat and cut corners...
I think IELTS is still a very good test. Maybe the best in it's category? It's pretty accurate IMO. My students' results are what I would expect in just about every case. Especially after they fixed the regions problem a few years ago.
Have you seen real IELTS tests, or just some of the training textbooks that write their own tests? I haven't tried to take the real IELTS test myself yet. I always get a 9 when I do them while my students are doing them, but they're just practice tests. I doubt they are as rigorously produced and balanced as the authentic IELTS tests.
BTW, I'm not sure those "Cambridge IELTS test" Books 1 - 5 are real. They seem to have a lot of printing (spelling) errors in them.
LFA |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
malu
Joined: 22 Apr 2007 Posts: 1344 Location: Sunny Java
|
Posted: Fri Mar 21, 2008 1:51 pm Post subject: Re: Educational standards... |
|
|
lf_aristotle69 wrote: |
I haven't taught on IB programs yet. How do they perform in that regard?
|
There is some scope for teacher-assisted cheating in the internal assessments and extended essay assignments, though if it's too obvious the external moderators will get heavy with the school.
The final exams are extremely well policed, however, and those foreign universities that actually care about entry standards know how to read between the lines in the results - a student from China with top marks for IA and crappy finals scores won't get into Cambridge or Yale.
Integrity is the top selling point for IB (and IELTS and IGCSE for that matter) so the IBO has a strong interest in preventing and detecting foul play. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Brian Caulfield
Joined: 14 Sep 2004 Posts: 1247 Location: China
|
Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 12:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
All great universities work the same way. I met a person who was a regent at Harvard . He told me that the bright get scholarships and the rich pay. It is the formula. The rich will always be accepted, but it doesn't mean that they graduate. McGill my old alma worked the same . If your parents were rich benevolent alumni , you were given special treatment. And it is not that they get to one of these schools and they are dropped on the pavement to die. Most schools offer ESL classes to students who are coming from foreign countries. I was very fortunate starting out as an English teacher to know many of these teachers teaching at these programs. They let me come into their classrooms and watch them work.
What I learned from them was not to cover the students writing with red ink but to be supportive and encourage them by focusing on the positive aspects of their work. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
11:59

Joined: 31 Aug 2006 Posts: 632 Location: Hong Kong: The 'Pearl of the Orient'
|
Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 3:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
Brian Caulfield wrote: |
There will never be an exam to measure English fairly because it is an art. |
But, as pointed out by Wittgenstein, language is a precise art. Therefore, it can certainly be measured. Indeed, we subconsciously gauge and measure the language competence of others every day when we engage in discourse.
Last edited by 11:59 on Sat Mar 22, 2008 4:58 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling. Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|