|
Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Serious_Fun

Joined: 28 Jun 2005 Posts: 1171 Location: terra incognita
|
Posted: Sun Mar 16, 2008 11:07 am Post subject: NESTA wants 39% increase |
|
|
Quote: |
NETs call for a 39pc allowance rise as costs soar
Liz Heron
Native English-speaking teachers are calling for a 39 per cent increase in their special allowance to offset spiralling living costs and keep experienced staff in Hong Kong.
Sharp rises in rents and worsening exchange rates have eroded NETs' purchasing power and wiped out the gains from a raise in benefits in 2005, according to the Native English-speaking Teachers' Association.
It has drawn up a dossier of evidence of rising living costs and a shopping list of new demands, including raising the monthly special allowance from $12HK,950 to $18HK,000.
The association also wants a new education allowance for NETs with families, and the retention bonus - 10 per cent of annual salary for teachers on second or subsequent contracts - increased to 15 per cent after the third contract and 20 per cent after the fourth.
Its leaders are due to meet Education Secretary Michael Suen Ming-yeung on Thursday to discuss English-language teaching in government and aided schools.
Perry Bayer, of the association's benefits and welfare committee, said the delegation would ask Mr Suen for an early meeting with the scheme's managers to present their case, but he could not disclose the contents of the dossier beforehand.
They would also raise concerns among NETs about an "erosion of quality" in new teachers being admitted into the scheme, with some "less-well-qualified people" being employed, especially in primary schools. "What we have really got to do now is to look at a big increase in the special allowance," he said.
"We want to retain a lot of the long-servers, people like myself who have brought up families here.
"So a lynchpin of our strategy is also the education allowance to keep families. In general terms, we are asking for 50 per cent of children's primary fees or secondary fees met through the education allowance. It should cover the fees of any international, independent or English Schools Foundation school within Hong Kong.
"We want the special allowance to be raised, mainly to cover the huge jump in rental prices over the past two years. And the value of the retention allowance was overtaken within a year of it being granted - even for NETs on the higher allowance."
Mr Bayer said the association also wanted the scheme's medical allowance - $1HK,400 for single teachers and $5HK,400 for those with families - raised to $5HK,000 and $15HK,000, respectively, and its baggage allowance of about $4HK,000 per cubic metre increased to $8HK,500.
Dave Stead, the association's secondary liaison officer, said the value of the NETs' salary had fallen by about 40 per cent in sterling terms since 1998, taking into account inflation and exchange rates.
The special allowance, which is meant to reflect the higher housing costs and other additional expenses faced by expatriates, was cut to $10HK,500 for half of all NETs in 2004 and for the other half in 2005.
But education chiefs reversed the decision after legislators warned of a "crisis of recruitment" in the scheme, as nearly half the 300 NETs due to renew their contracts in 2005 left their schools.
They restored the special allowance to $12HK,950 a month and introduced retention bonuses.
A spokeswoman for the Education Bureau said wastage rates for NETs in both primary and secondary schools had been on a decreasing trend since 2005. |
copied from http://www6.lexisnexis.com/publisher/EndUser?Action=UserDisplayFullDocument&orgId=574&topicId=100020474&docId=l:760060994&start=21 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Horizontal Hero

Joined: 26 Mar 2004 Posts: 2492 Location: The civilised little bit of China.
|
Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2008 12:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I thought the last increase was supposed to be a one-claim-meets-all-demands. I thought it was supposed to be fixed - we chose that option over a flexible living allowance that would be indexed according to the cost of living. Could be seen as going back on our word, and as being greedy. Then again, all the other claims that have ever been made by NESTA could also have been seen as greedy.
Good luck to them, and hopefully the EDB/Legco won't just get sick of our requests and go and and employ Philippinas, Indonesians and Thais more cheaply. They are already doing half the language work here anyway, for way less than us.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ChrisRose
Joined: 19 Apr 2003 Posts: 427 Location: Hong Kong
|
Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 2:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Greedy? It appears so.
I myself have been unable to find any suitable positions here in HK.
As a non degree holder; (I do posses, a Dip.Ed (HKU), Dip.TESK (CUHK, Cert. ELT (Secondary) HKU SPACE, LPAT-(E), FTBE and many more, but no completed first degree). Hence, I am ready to give up on Hong Kong.
Let's just consider the situation outside of the the EDB- NET scheme.
Many government schools will try to offer entry level local terms or less. Usually a 10 month contract. No paid summer holidays, no gratuity!
The private sector are even worse. Contract based positions, usually without MPF let alone paid holidays.
On the whole the NET package whilst not comparable to local terms would appear equivalent to a GM with 10 years plus experience in the one school.
Just where do these individuals expect to find better terms than they already have? China, hmm 7 - 10k RMB a month Japan? The Middle East or back to the inner city schools of their home countries?
Whilst I can fully understand any unions attempts to look after their members interest, there is always a grey border between reasonable and ridiculous. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
hkteach
Joined: 29 May 2005 Posts: 202 Location: Hong Kong
|
Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 7:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yes, some countries in the Middle East (Kuwait, Dubai) offer more than HK PNETs' top of range salary package.
Although the base salary in M.E. might be less, there's no tax to factor in, utilities are usually paid and accomm (or allowance) is also provided, so teachers there actually take home more per month than HK NETs.
Good international schools here have better salary packages than NET scheme (they offer 20% gratuity, bigger base salary and lower housing ... which works out better).
And certainly, salaries in NETs' home countries (usually Australia, UK, NZ) offer much higher salaries but higher tax. If I returned to my home country, I'd be on about the same (higher base salary, higher tax yes, but no exchange rate difficulties).
Being a NET here is not all it's cracked up to be.......Hong Kong is not an easy place to live for many from other cultures and many NETs are very unhappy with their working conditions and their general deployment.
Salaries have been eroded over time and what seemed good a few years ago makes HK less attractive now. Add to that the deployment difficulties faced by many and an education system in a time warp (a la 1940s in our home countries) and you can see why many are dissatisfied overall.
It isn't just the $$ - but an increase in benefits would no doubt mean some would stay on but if not, they will go to some place where the job satisfaction is higher.
And, degree holders with teaching qualifications and experience would be earning a lot more than 7-10 yuan a month. They'd be teaching in those swanky international schools in the big cities and earning a very good salary. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ChrisRose
Joined: 19 Apr 2003 Posts: 427 Location: Hong Kong
|
Posted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 8:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
You said some countries in the Middle East, I am afraid there aren't that many, nor that many positions listed.
International schools in Hong Kong. Again only a few have similar or superior terms.
With regards to the desired raise in the special allowance. I should have been a little clearer. The allowance itself is meant as a buffer towards start up and the continued living cost. It is not per say the basic salary. Even if it is interpreted that way.
So you have a small number of teachers in H.K., whom want a 39% increase in a particular benefit. When you consider that the benefit alone is higher than the entry salary for teachers on local terms, it does seem excess and greedy. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
11:59

Joined: 31 Aug 2006 Posts: 632 Location: Hong Kong: The 'Pearl of the Orient'
|
Posted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 10:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
I say good luck to them! Whilst I take the point made by HH and Chris that this request/demand may appear excessive and greedy, I think we do have to remind ourselves that we are after all in the go-getter of all go-getter societies, Hong Kong. This is the frontier town of capitalism where the siege mentality is commonplace and most if not all unerringly subscribe to the ethico-economic principle that 'more is better'. Given this context, I do not think it is too unreasonable to seek more remuneration, especially since as noted in the article costs do appear to be rising (rent certainly is) and current exchange rates may make HK less attractive (i.e., for those with a mortgage, education fees, and other bills 'back home'). Also, the government has been boosting of its end-of-year surplus and the healthy state of the economy, and many in the both the civil service and the private sector have recently been awarded fairly substantial salary increases and/or bonuses.
HK Teach is right I think to point out that HK does indeed have some serious competition when it comes to attracting and retaining teachers. Kuwait and Dubai are too destinations in the ME already cited, but you can also add Bahrain and, if you don't mind a restrictive life-style, the KSA. More locally, Singapore and Brunei can also offer attractive packages to the sort of teacher who would be eligible for the higher-end of the EMB/EDB pay scale, and Japan too can offer some high salaries and decent overall packages for experienced and qualified teachers. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Muscateer
Joined: 09 Oct 2006 Posts: 5
|
Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2008 12:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Japan has no high paying jobs outside of a very small handful of international schools. I spent six years there.
Brunei is is for sleep walkers and employment conditions are subject to extremely arbitrary management and a very un-supportive CfBT (not to mention being unprofessional and rife with corruption and nepotism.) I spent a few years there too.
Hong Kong is a mixed bag but big enough that you could transfer to another school if you find yourself in a bad school. I now own an apartment here and live here, needless to say I like it here. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
11:59

Joined: 31 Aug 2006 Posts: 632 Location: Hong Kong: The 'Pearl of the Orient'
|
Posted: Tue Apr 01, 2008 5:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
I beg to differ on Japan. University language instructor posts there pay very well indeed. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling. Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|