|
Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
funkystuff

Joined: 21 May 2008 Posts: 62
|
Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 8:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
| But Forest, your figures don't factor in the cost of living. My Taiwanese g/f is constantly complaining about how much it cost to visit me, which is why she does it less these day.(And which is why I'm thinking about moving to Taiwan.) For example, an air ticket with KLM used to be around 8K but is now around 12K. Further, I read that the Taiwan Authority is in debt to the amount of S1.4 trillion, which means more increases in coming soon. The new President there, for example, has told the public that power/utility costs will rise because the state-owned power companies are in massive debt. Costs have risen here in Thailand, but the amount is minimal. The other thing is that I don't need to fly home - or to Taiwan - frequently because taking a holiday here is fine. I've never worked in Taiwan, but I have toured the island, and quite frankly, I wasn't impressed with the beaches compared with what's on offer here in the land of a 1,000 smiles. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
forest1979

Joined: 10 Jun 2007 Posts: 507 Location: SE Asia
|
Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 9:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
Of course the figures don't factor infactor the cost of living. It's merely average wages and possible levels of savings taken from a thread at this site earlier this year. However if you take the cost of living in NY to be 100 then Taipei is 85.8 (or 48th in the world).
Rank (2007) Rank (2006) City Country
1 1 Moscow Russia
2 5 London United Kingdom
3 2 Seoul South Korea
4 3 Tokyo Japan
5 4 Hong Kong China
6 8 Copenhagen Denmark
7 7 Geneva Switzerland
8 6 Osaka Japan
9 9 Zurich Switzerland
10 10 Oslo Norway
11 13 Milan Italy
12 12 St Petersburg Russia
13 15 Paris France
14 17 Singapore Singapore
15 10 New York City USA
16 18 Dublin Ireland
17 24 Tel Aviv Israel
18 21 Rome Italy
19 21 Vienna Austria
20 14 Beijing China
21 19 Sydney Australia
22 25 Helsinki Finland
23 36 Stockholm Sweden
24 27 Douala Cameroon
25 41 Amsterdam Netherlands
=26 53 Madrid Spain
=26 20 Shanghai China
28 21 Kiev Ukraine
29 59 Athens Greece
30 52 Almaty Kazakhstan
=31 56 Barcelona Spain
=31 48 Bratislava Slovak Republic
33 45 Dakar Senegal
34 25 Dubai United Arab Emirates
35 45 Abidjan C�te d'Ivorie
36 60 Glasgow UK
37 31 Lagos Nigeria
38 15 istanbul Turkey
39 65 Munich Germany
40 61 Frankfurt Germany
41 69 Birmingham UK
42 29 Los Angeles USA
43 46 Luxembourg Luxembourg
44 70 Brussels Belgium
=45 30 Abu Dhabi United Arab Emirates
=45 72 Berlin Germany
=45 62 D�sseldorf Germany
48 - Taipei Taiwan
49 50 Prague Czech Republic
50 51 Algiers Algeria
If you take ranking for health then Taipei is 110th in the world. Bangkok 168th, or less than Rangoon in Burma. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
strangelove
Joined: 02 Jul 2003 Posts: 26 Location: Formosa
|
Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 9:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well, if you had to fly from Thailand to Taiwan then your cost of living will probably increase dramatically as well. Maybe you can get your girlfriend to pay your rent as well, and then you can tell us how housing is so much cheaper in Thailand. It is a good thing you are an English teacher and not an economist.
KLM=Royal Dutch Airline
Is Thailand blessed with an abundance of energy resources? If not then it is likely subsidizing the cost of energy (i.e. blowing loads of taxpayer $ to keep prices low)... many Asian governments have done this. I just saw that Malaysia just raised gas prices by 40% overnight since the cost of subsidizing is too costly. Taiwan had to raise the price of gas, and it is still too low considering the price of oil has risen MUCH faster than the price of gas in Taiwan.
It is hard for people to grasp, but producing energy costs money. You can set utility prices for less than cost, but it has been proven that business model doesn't work very well.
Yes, you should stay in Thailand. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
funkystuff

Joined: 21 May 2008 Posts: 62
|
Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 10:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
| forest1979 wrote: |
| Of course the figures don't factor infactor the cost of living. It's merely average wages and possible levels of savings taken from a thread at this site earlier this year. However if you take the cost of living in NY to be 100 then Taipei is 85.8 (or 48th in the world). |
These figures don't show distribution across the various classes either. What % of wealth is owned by the likes of plastics tycoon, Y.C. Wang. Actually, according to a recent article in Forbes magazine: "The combined net worth of the island's 40 richest is $77 billion, more than their counterparts in South Korea or any Southeast Asian nation. They lag Hong Kong's top 40 by $102 billion and China's by $43 billion, but considering Taiwan's political isolation and relative size, the group holds its own."
The figures you quote mean nothing! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
forest1979

Joined: 10 Jun 2007 Posts: 507 Location: SE Asia
|
Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 1:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Funkystuff...
Well let you provide us with the statistics. If you criticise everything relating to average salaries, and talk subjectively all the time, then stand up and be counted yourself with cold hard data for all social classes, groups, and regions of nations. We await in anticipation. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
funkystuff

Joined: 21 May 2008 Posts: 62
|
Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 4:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| strangelove wrote: |
| Yes, you should stay in Thailand. |
I'm certainly gonna do that. The only person who seems to know what he's talking about and has some modicum of objective advice is Miyazaki. Hats off to him. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Miyazaki
Joined: 12 Jul 2005 Posts: 635 Location: My Father's Yacht
|
Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 8:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks, Funky. The salaries and deductions I've posted and quoted a few times on this thread are straight from someone teaching at a university in Taiwan and she has given me a lot of information about teaching at universities there. A number of other people have given me info on university teaching in Taiwan also. so even though there are a few posters here who have actually taught in universities in taiwan, the info they're presenting on this thread doesn't quite jive with what I'm hearing.
| forest1979 wrote: |
| As I have stated before as has become apparent in the past couple of years or so what MAs that are being recruited are local people on staff, not faculty contracts. Can you prove though that they are putting PhD holders cvs straight into the bin? I think you'll find it's quite the opposite, as BJ has said. |
at university language centers, ph.d applicants are getting rejected because they're seen as "over qualified" and possibly even difficult to manage (and definitely more expensive!) by directors and chairs. they're hiring master's degree holders only for these psoitions. also, they aren't being hired as "staff" but as "instructors" for MoE stipulated positions and hold MoE cert. of lectureship licenses. it's a myth that all universities in taiwan require a ph.d to teach in a language center. in fact, it's the opposite - all of the new hires in many college and university Engl. Depts. and language centres only have an master's.
also, universities in Taiwan are said to be notoriously cheap and will try to avoid paying higher salaries for ph.d holders.
| forest1979 wrote: |
| Ah, so you've trawled through MCU's ELC staff website? Well if so, the person in question left in early 2007, and was assistant to the President as she is fluent in Chinese - a translator for APEC - and was a go-between for the local and the large numbers of foreign staff. Hence her position. Personally I think such a person in such a position was forwarding thinking - it resolved a lot of issues foreign staff might normally encounter elsewhere in Taiwan. And she was a MA holder. |
leanne i'm told is a a religious, autocratic, unintelligent, underqualified nuttter! this coming from several sources. again, i've never worked there and am not speaking from personal experience. i cannot speak from the perspective of having actually worked at this school. however, i've met and exchanged e-mails with several people during my research who have commented on this particulare person and onother person mentioned on this thread. a few years ago, when i was looking, i was told that this leanne person did not hold a master's degree or even a background in sla or tesol; however, weilded quit a bit of power. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JZer
Joined: 16 Jan 2005 Posts: 3898 Location: Pittsburgh
|
Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 10:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
JZer: "If one is smart enough and motivate enough to earn an M.A. then they are intelligent enough to learn that information on their own. Furthermore one can attend conferences and learn about different teaching methods."
Too damn right!!! However how many people attend conference and are motivated to learn imperative things to increase their chances of university employment? Few! |
I guess I am in the minority but when I lived in Korea I attended many KTESOL events. I am looking to attend some in Taiwan.
Not to mention that I actually read books about language development for fun. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
forest1979

Joined: 10 Jun 2007 Posts: 507 Location: SE Asia
|
Posted: Sun Jun 08, 2008 2:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
Funkystuff...
If your view is that the majority of people responding on this thread to your initial posting don't know what they're talking about then you're doing nothing but insult them. Personally I won't ever respond to any of your comments again.
Miyazaki...
You raise some seriously good points. Firstly, you're spot on when you say PhD holders are difficult to handle. Personally from what I have found is they require a different management dynamic as they have different academic priorities to instructors, and the Taiwanese uni system doesnt cater for this.
They cost more money....true...can't criticise that as it is 100% correct. So, yes, in some instances where budgets are tight MA holders will be given preference. However, as I have said before, there is MoE pressure now for departments/ELCs to have a more balanced ratio of MA to PhD holders. This is why, for instance, MCU has been advertising for research degree holders in TESOL, Education, Linguistics, etc. Problem is though that if you're a PhD holder from the US, Canada, UK, etc., would you would with this kind of degree in a ELC? No way! Complete waste of time, hence whether ELCs want PhDs or not they often have no choice to fall back on locals with PhDs or foreigners with MAs.
On the subject of staff vs instructor contracts this is becoming common in private unis. What is the issue is not whether the new teacher is called an instructor or not, irrespective of contract by being a MA holder you're an instructor, the contract form depends on the uni in question. MCU, which has cropped up no end of times in this thread, has a number of instructors on staff contracts. They teach more, earn less, have less holidays, do much more admin. Staff contracts are to be curt, an instructor contract for locals.
On the subject of MCU I can categorically say that maybe your sources have one or two erroneous views of LeAnn. Did your source once work at MCU but is now at the Chinese Uni in Yangmingshan? Damn right she is known to be religious - she came to Taiwan as a missionary - but is she unintelligent, autocratic....?....far from it. She certainly is not stupid, and her management style is anything but autocratic. Her problem was controlling people!
Underqualified? Maybe. Certainly she's lacking formal qualifications in TEFL but she's got a huge number of years of classroom practice, and does have a MA (albeit in a different subject).
Did she wield power? Yes, in admin terms she was MCU's ELC boss. Now there is technically no formal boss in the ELC, just an administrative secretary with a bit more power than most. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Miyazaki
Joined: 12 Jul 2005 Posts: 635 Location: My Father's Yacht
|
Posted: Sun Jun 08, 2008 2:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Forest,
I agree with all that you've written.
I think there are people who can work in the same place and have different experiences or competing interpretations of events. I've met or exchanged e-mail with several (like maybe 6 or 7 people) over the years who have taught at this school and, although I cannot speak from personal experience, did not like working there. leanne was mentioned by some of these people.
frankly, while I think JZer raises some great points in this thread, I cannot agree that universities should open their doors to teachers with only B.A. degrees - and non-TESOL degrees at that! it's crazy. I'll never accept that this is good practice - to bring amateurs and hacks into the univ. english depts. head back to korea where this is the norm. however, in taiwan you get these old-timers who have been here for decades and have no professional or relevant training or education in tesol or applied linguistics - yet they're often the ones in management or supervisor positions, supervising doctorates! i'ts mental.
speaking of ming chuan university, do they still have to travel out to taoyuan to teach once a week? can they tell admin that they refuse to go travel out that way - or is is compulsory? some of the poeple i've talked really didn't like this aspect of their contract / program. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
forest1979

Joined: 10 Jun 2007 Posts: 507 Location: SE Asia
|
Posted: Sun Jun 08, 2008 2:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Miyazaki....
Did you know that one of Taiwan's TEFL experts, according at least to his blog, is written by someone without any formal qualification in language teaching. Still regards himself as an expert though!
MCU...yep, people still have to go out to their campus in Taoyuan County. Some do it three times a week from what I gather, in part due to the classrooms being larger (and so easier to teach in - the Taipei campus is like a chicken coop!). Also the Department of English is based there so for specialist classes, e.g. composition, drama, etc., then the teacher would have to go out to Taoyuan. For remedial teaching, i.e. to all non-English majors, this is done in Taipei and Taoyaun through the ELC's self-designed books (not very good - I have seen some).
As for saying whether people refuse to travel I am not 100% sure on this. I think it depends on the contract, which probably means teaching staff have no choice, but also the lady who does the timetabling. I know she gets leaned upon by some staff members, and as a result she modifies their schedule. I suppose therefore with good quanxi or telling her to stick it you might be able to get out of travelling. On the whole I think it's compulsory. I think most teachers are resigned to travel as part of their working week but I have heard on the grapevine that what has got a lot of people's beef is not so much the journey but that the MCU bus at certain times has not been large enough to accommodate everyone. So people have been asked to take taxis, and then claim the money back. As you know admin office work at snails pace so this is hardly a pragmatic long-term solution to the problem! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JZer
Joined: 16 Jan 2005 Posts: 3898 Location: Pittsburgh
|
Posted: Sun Jun 08, 2008 2:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| frankly, while I think JZer raises some great points in this thread, I cannot agree that universities should open their doors to teachers with only B.A. degrees - and non-TESOL degrees at that! it's crazy. |
I don't think it matters if one has an M.A. or B.A.
Furthermore if Taiwan universities hire people with M.A.'s in other fields I don't see how these people are any better than a B.A. Having an M.A. in Chemistry, Political Science, or anything else is as untrained as having a B.A.
Another point is someone with an M.A. who gets their M.A. in TESOL and sits on their butt for 10 years. Are they any better than someone with a B.A.? Using outdated teaching methods is not really helpful.
The real problem is like anywhere people don't have the time or are too lazy to check out what someone knows. I have not worked at a Taiwanese university but I do know that Korean university interviewers rarely ask any questions about teaching or what you know about grammar. It is anyone's guess whether the teacher being hired can explain grammar or has the knowledge to use different techniques in class.
It is like what I recently read in "Why Gender Matters: What Parents and Teachers Need to Know about the Emerging Science of Sex Differences".
This books talks about how teachers use the techniques they learned in the 70s, 80s, and 90s. Some of the techniques are outdated.
One example was how many elementary teachers expect boys to draw like girls and use many colors and be more expressive. That is what they were taught in their education programs even though research shows that the average first grader boy does not do this. Due to their misguided expectations many boys start to think of art as a girls thing since their teacher does not seem to approve of their more violent and less colorful drawings. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JZer
Joined: 16 Jan 2005 Posts: 3898 Location: Pittsburgh
|
Posted: Sun Jun 08, 2008 3:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| frankly, while I think JZer raises some great points in this thread, I cannot agree that universities should open their doors to teachers with only B.A. degrees - and non-TESOL degrees at that! it's crazy. |
I know this may anger some people but I think what is even crazier is that people just blindly accent M.A. degrees. Some universities do teach outdated methods and information. Sometimes certain ideas are taught and others are not is because they are political correct. Not to mention that some university departments have vested themselves so deeply in a theory that they cannot get out. It would be like admitting that they just wasted the last 20 years on research that has been proven inferior or just plain not true. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BJ
Joined: 03 Dec 2003 Posts: 173
|
Posted: Sun Jun 08, 2008 4:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
"modicum of objective advice is Myiazaki" - erm thanks Flunky, very kind of you to say taht Forest and I have no objective posiitons. Some times I wonder why I bother. I have no ulterior motivation to give advice other than trying to help.
Regarding masters for langauyage centre. I called both the advertised locations about the jobs on offer, all full time posts were for PHds only, Langauage centre masters were for part time staff only. - Not objective? call them yourself and ask. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mr. Kalgukshi Mod Team


Joined: 18 Jan 2003 Posts: 6613 Location: Need to know basis only.
|
Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2008 7:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Way too many personal attacks and so this thread is now closed. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling. Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|