|
Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
arioch36
Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 3589
|
Posted: Fri Dec 26, 2008 4:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
be aware that for 4th year students, they are often expected not to be in class. Next semester they will not be in class, they are supposed to be self studying for graduate exams or finding a job. This semester many also are working , probably many more tell the school they are working , and are not. I hate teaching 4th year classes for this reason.
Guess I've been lucky. At all my previous colleges, if I failed a student they had to pay and retake the test the next semester. If they failed 3 classes (I think that's the number) they had to take the entire semster over. So i have never had my grades changed. When the students know that the dep't is behind the foreign teacher it makes teaching a whole lot easier and more rewarding. The teaching I have always hated the most is where the dep't doesn't care |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ms Bean

Joined: 11 Oct 2008 Posts: 110 Location: Wilmington
|
Posted: Fri Dec 26, 2008 7:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| TexasHighway wrote: |
| Good for you, Ms Bean...you sound very responsible! I wish I could say the same for your administrators. Didn't they ever give you a class roster? And assigning 95 students to an oral class is absurd! |
No roster? It happens. 90+ students in a public uni for oral English is insane, but it happens too. Fifty-five students thought that they would take advantage of the fact that I had no roster. It wasn't possible.
Being tough but understanding makes the grade more valuable to the student. I had at least three students who were so terrified of speaking in front of the class that they were nervous wrecks within thirty seconds. Some were given an F for the presentation. We spoke after class.
Guess what? They weren't afraid of ME after awhile. From DAY ONE I told them that i didn't care where they started from. If they attended every class and showed improvement, their grades would improve. They could start with an F but still finish with an A average. When they began forgetting their fear and concentrating on their message, all did well.
BUT the syllabus stated that they must attend class. Those who didn't attend class couldn't pass.
Oh, the dean was furious that 50+ students failed. It must have been my fault, he said. I scared them away; my roll was faulty, etc.. My attitude was "sorry Charlie, some students who came to class every day earned a C. Convince me that the guy who came to class ONCE deserves anything except an F when another student came to class every day and struggled and made a C." I agreed to change the failures to a D if he sanctioned my changing everyone else's grade to one grade point higher."
He didn't like that. The discussion turned to the topic of sacred cows. I asked how many of those fifty five students could pull the same stunt in a math or science class taught by a Chinese teacher.
End of conversation. I have no idea what grades those 55 students received, but the ones who showed up every day were proud of their grades. I had a conversation with the class monitor about the situation so that he could express an informed opinion. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
arioch36
Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 3589
|
Posted: Sat Dec 27, 2008 4:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
BTW bigest class ... 145 students for oral english. The class was actually ok ... 3 marketing classes thrown together. Charged the school 8 overtime hours to give them their final tests. My contract that year had a separate lertter saying no classes bigger then about 35  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Hansen
Joined: 13 Oct 2008 Posts: 737 Location: central China
|
Posted: Sun Dec 28, 2008 12:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
How many of us are professionally trained teachers who are actually qualified to teach language? It's quite possible that, in our case, the failures are our fault. How many hours of class prep time do you spend to make sure you offer a lesson suitable to the students in your class?
I teach in two areas, one a professional area in which i am fully qualified, not only by many years of work in the field, but also by specialized education. Oral English is another matter. I'm no linguist. I know that in my area of specialization, the students receive training that is useful in the workplace. Oral English is another matter.
So before you start slaughtering students with your red pencil, ask yourself how many schools in your country would employ a psychology major to teach a class in language acquisition. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lhenderson

Joined: 15 Dec 2008 Posts: 135 Location: Shanghai JuLu Road
|
Posted: Sun Dec 28, 2008 12:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
Just sing my personal ditty for teaching:
"Give an A, I stay.
Give a B, they don't like me.
Give a C, they complain to Mr. Li.
Give an F, I'm F'd." |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
arioch36
Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 3589
|
Posted: Sun Dec 28, 2008 5:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| ask yourself how many schools in your country would employ a psychology major to teach a class in language acquisition |
Language aquisition is a graduate level course, Oral English is not. Langauge aquistion is well within the realm of psychology ... studied it in my upper level psych classes. I would not want a linguist teaching oral english, on the whole. Took two linguistic classes at my uni ... none of them would help in the least in teaching oral english. College students in China do take one course in "linguistics" in some schools ... a memory course with no practical application. A chart showing tongue positions can be helpful to some students ... though rarely have I found pronunciation to be a problem in CHina. being able to glibly spout terms like uncoiced labial fricative, or whatever is of no importantce in 99.9% of english classes;can't remember the terms anymore because I haven't had an occassion to use them since I have been in CHina.
W W W W W W H are far more useful
True, CHinese administrators don't take Oral English importantly enough, but then they don't take most courses very importantly. The average laowai teacher knows a lot more about learning theory then the average Chinese teacher. What a newbie lacks is experience. What the schools lack, many of them, is any regard for experience or ability. How many schools care about experience? Not enough. Evryone sucks their first year, then they get better with time |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ms Bean

Joined: 11 Oct 2008 Posts: 110 Location: Wilmington
|
Posted: Sun Dec 28, 2008 6:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Hansen wrote: |
How many of us are professionally trained teachers who are actually qualified to teach language? It's quite possible that, in our case, the failures are our fault. How many hours of class prep time do you spend to make sure you offer a lesson suitable to the students in your class?
I teach in two areas, one a professional area in which i am fully qualified, not only by many years of work in the field, but also by specialized education. Oral English is another matter. I'm no linguist. I know that in my area of specialization, the students receive training that is useful in the workplace. Oral English is another matter.
So before you start slaughtering students with your red pencil, ask yourself how many schools in your country would employ a psychology major to teach a class in language acquisition. |
I wonder about your qualifications, Hanson. The red pencil (and the color red in general when used in conjunction with correcting papers) has been red lined from western education for over twenty-five years. It was deemed to have "traumatizing and stigmatizing" effects sometime in the late seventies.
Kindly address your comment to an individual, not to the forum readership.
Please regard this not as a confrontation, but rather as a reminder of effective group dynamics. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ms Bean

Joined: 11 Oct 2008 Posts: 110 Location: Wilmington
|
Posted: Sun Dec 28, 2008 7:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
| arioch36 wrote: |
| Quote: |
| ask yourself how many schools in your country would employ a psychology major to teach a class in language acquisition |
Language aquisition is a graduate level course, Oral English is not. Langauge aquistion is well within the realm of psychology ... studied it in my upper level psych classes. I would not want a linguist teaching oral english, on the whole. Took two linguistic classes at my uni ... none of them would help in the least in teaching oral english. College students in China do take one course in "linguistics" in some schools ... a memory course with no practical application. A chart showing tongue positions can be helpful to some students ... though rarely have I found pronunciation to be a problem in CHina. being able to glibly spout terms like uncoiced labial fricative, or whatever is of no importantce in 99.9% of english classes;can't remember the terms anymore because I haven't had an occassion to use them since I have been in CHina.
W W W W W W H are far more useful
True, CHinese administrators don't take Oral English importantly enough, but then they don't take most courses very importantly. The average laowai teacher knows a lot more about learning theory then the average Chinese teacher. What a newbie lacks is experience. What the schools lack, many of them, is any regard for experience or ability. How many schools care about experience? Not enough. Evryone sucks their first year, then they get better with time |
Arioch36,
I must chide you in your lapse in basic linguistics! How could you possibly forget labio-dental fricatives, sibilant, lateral, and pseudofricatives? Not to mention voiceless bilabial fricative, and the voiced linguolabial, and the voiceless palatal fricatives !!
You're a frickin' mess!
But now let us speak of psycholinguistics: If you've read Carnap, Chomsky, and Piaget, and can actually understand some of the nuttiness of it , you are eminently qualified to teach in China. In fact, if you have a handle on psycholinguistics AND have a sense of humor, then you are perfect for China. Please know, however, that the west misses you.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Hansen
Joined: 13 Oct 2008 Posts: 737 Location: central China
|
Posted: Sun Dec 28, 2008 3:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ms Bean,
What's to wonder about? I'm qualified to teach in a specialized area of technical English. I have many years of experience in that field. Additionally, besides the general training I received, I studied electives specifically related to the language of the field.
As for oral English, I have a certification; however, I do not believe that I am nearly as effective teaching Oral English as technical English in my field of expertise.
My question regarding the qualifications of teachers here was addressed to the entire board, not any one individual. I was recently told by an FAO that only a few FTs were not professionally trained teachers. I find that hard to believe. "Professionally trained" indicates at least a bachelor's degree and a teaching credential, if not a master's degree.
Do most FTs hold those kind of credentials?
If a teacher in the U.S. failed half the class, that would usually be a commentary on the teacher, not the class. There are a multitude of issues facing these students as well as FTs.
Most of their language training has been from non native speakers; consequently, they have an obviously lower level than we might expect.
The style of teaching is often quite different. I spend a lot of time teaching my students how to study and challenging them to figure out solutions, rather than simply giving them information.
Supposedly, successful language learners are highly motivated and involved in the tasks designed by the teacher. That is often not the case in China. Few students even care about learning English. How much sense does it makes for an FT to develop sophisticated teaching plans for a class of students in which only 10-15% even participate?
In the future,I plan to start meeting with a professionally trained Chinese English teacher to develop more effective classroom strategies.
As for failing students, due to various factors, I don't see the wisdom of so doing. Those who I have failed continue along their path. They are not held back. They are not compelled to achieve a certain level of English proficiency to advance, so they receive no practical benefit from a failing mark.
I remain unconvinced that, regarding Oral English, the fault is not mine, nor that of the system, rather than the fault of the individual student. If I had a class of 10 students who could all receive the help they deserve, possibly not a one would fail. Blood running in the streets is not a sign of good teaching, as far as I'm concerned. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kev7161
Joined: 06 Feb 2004 Posts: 5880 Location: Suzhou, China
|
Posted: Sun Dec 28, 2008 11:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I don't teach college level so I guess my opinions are just that. But the way I see it, college (and high school) are preparing the young men and women for life. In life, they can't laze about and do their jobs in a half-assed manner. Well, they CAN obviously and some can actually get away with it. But most cannot do this and keep that job for very long. Failing a student is sending a clear message to them that they didn't do their job as a student in your class. If the school wants to ignore your grade and/or not put much stock in it, so be it. You've done your job by assessing the student fairly based on class attendance, classroom participation, and ability to pass examinations in a reasonable manner. If the school passes a failed student anyway and it really burns your butt, then you either need to raise a stink about it or move on to another school that may take you seriously in the job you are paid to do.
But as stated in previous posts, not all FTs here are professional teachers. They are teaching to get by so they can enjoy other pleasures that China has to offer. They may not care one way or the other about whether or not students came to class and so they play the game and just pass all students and don't lose a night's sleep over it. To each their own. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ms Bean

Joined: 11 Oct 2008 Posts: 110 Location: Wilmington
|
Posted: Mon Dec 29, 2008 5:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
| kev7161 wrote: |
I don't teach college level so I guess my opinions are just that. But the way I see it, college (and high school) are preparing the young men and women for life. In life, they can't laze about and do their jobs in a half-assed manner. Well, they CAN obviously and some can actually get away with it. But most cannot do this and keep that job for very long. Failing a student is sending a clear message to them that they didn't do their job as a student in your class. If the school wants to ignore your grade and/or not put much stock in it, so be it. You've done your job by assessing the student fairly based on class attendance, classroom participation, and ability to pass examinations in a reasonable manner. If the school passes a failed student anyway and it really burns your butt, then you either need to raise a stink about it or move on to another school that may take you seriously in the job you are paid to do.
But as stated in previous posts, not all FTs here are professional teachers. They are teaching to get by so they can enjoy other pleasures that China has to offer. They may not care one way or the other about whether or not students came to class and so they play the game and just pass all students and don't lose a night's sleep over it. To each their own. |
I'm with you all the way. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
arioch36
Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 3589
|
Posted: Mon Dec 29, 2008 6:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
Kev
But
| Quote: |
| as stated in previous posts, not all FTs here are professional teachers. They are teaching to get by so they can enjoy other pleasures that China has to offer. They may not care one way or the other about whether or not students came to class and so they play the game and just pass all students and don't lose a night's sleep over it. To each their own |
Actually you have just described the CHinese teachers. Overall I have found the FTs to take their classes more seriously. Yes I know a laowai who taught writing for two semesters and only taught the students how do you an e-mail. When the CHinese Dean found out, he was not amused.
But when pause by the door of the Chinese uni clasroo, and peek in on a CHinese teacher's class, you will notice students openly sleeping, texting, etc
Most Ft's I know .. even most "backpackers" I have known, tke pride in doing a good job, though the younger teachers I have noticed, are more likely to not be able to handle the classroom.
| Quote: |
| If you've read Carnap, Chomsky, and Piaget, and can actually understand some of the nuttiness of it |
As I gow older, Chomsky becomes less useful. Unfortunately Skinner was right in many areas .. win it comes to teaching in the classroom.
V G O T S K Y ... can you use that in scrabble" I really think he put down on paper things that help a teacher reflect and improve their teaching. The more I use the old outdated uninspiring New Concept English series, the more I appreciate Alaexander's brilliance. The series almost never discusses grammar, and students who use the series have great grammar .. and if the teacher uses the book correctly ..the students develop excellent all around ENglish
My grad school teachers on the whole were less paper qualified then my BS teachers, and not sometimes not as good. A good teacher ... don't think the degree makes a whit of difference, just like many jobs. Other factors are more important. Anyone who graduated with a half way decent GPA should have the ability to do the job ... honestly most jobs are like that. So many jobs don't need a specif degree, just need the ability to write speak, think logicaly, and work productively. You learn your job on the job |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Hansen
Joined: 13 Oct 2008 Posts: 737 Location: central China
|
Posted: Mon Dec 29, 2008 10:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
"In life, they can't laze about and do their jobs in a half-assed manner. Well, they CAN obviously and some can actually get away with it. But most cannot do this and keep that job for very long."
Totaly wrong. They will keep that job even though they may never learn how to, or even care about doing it right. Take a walk around your school offices. How many of the workers are sitting there playing computer games. Often, they will not even stop to do for you what they are supposedly being paid to do.
In my school, the classes I teach are not part of the core curriculum. I give my own tests prior to the real tests given by the school. It is that way in other top quality high schools as well. These folks are not going to let a foreigner impact a Chinese student's life in a meaningful way. Failing them is a joke because the classes don't even count. I suppose there are exceptions to this but I'm generalizing.
A high school in my area is one of the top high schools in all of China. It has an arrangement with the best universities in China. A certain % of the top students are admitted to those universities automatically. Do you think that any parent or school administrator would allow an FT to impact a students admission to one of those schools? Do you think that a sociology major should be allowed to fail or give a low grade to a student in Oral English if that grade could prevent the student from getting into a top university?
FTs, let's not take ourselves too seriously. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
smitten13
Joined: 08 May 2006 Posts: 293 Location: Philippines
|
Posted: Mon Dec 29, 2008 12:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lhenderson.
There should be more FTs like you working in China.
I can't stand your attitude, but you are exactly what the Chinese deserve...
Am I being harsh??  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TexasHighway
Joined: 03 Dec 2005 Posts: 779
|
Posted: Mon Dec 29, 2008 4:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| If you are working in a language mill or other kind of "head, shoulders, knees and toes" type of "white monkey" job, it probably serves no useful purpose in failing students. But in a respectable university position, we all bear some responsibility in maintaining some integrity in the grading system. i know if I gave everyone an A, I would be called into my dean's office and probably would not have a job very long. As with most foreign teachers, I am probably a bit generous in the grades I give out. In order to fail my class, a student almost has to try to fail; so the failures are few and far between. But I certainly would never pass a student who never comes to class, doesn't show up for the final exam, or otherwise just doesn't give a sh*t. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling. Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|