|
Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Which age group do you prefer teaching? |
Pre-K and Kindergarten |
|
8% |
[ 2 ] |
Elementary School |
|
4% |
[ 1 ] |
Middle School |
|
8% |
[ 2 ] |
High School |
|
8% |
[ 2 ] |
College/University |
|
39% |
[ 9 ] |
adults (non-college/university students) |
|
30% |
[ 7 ] |
|
Total Votes : 23 |
|
Author |
Message |
jramirez
Joined: 19 Jul 2008 Posts: 9
|
Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 6:02 pm Post subject: Which age group do you prefer teaching? |
|
|
Hi everyone,
I am currently a student teacher and I have taught so far elementary school. I find it challenging to teach middle school and high school because some students are not motivated at times. I was wondering if anyone here has worked more with adults. What has your experience been like?
Last edited by jramirez on Tue Jan 04, 2011 12:33 am; edited 3 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
spiral78

Joined: 05 Apr 2004 Posts: 11534 Location: On a Short Leash
|
Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 6:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I prefer university and adult students.
Both have stronger motivation than children, and I prefer to relate on an equal basis with other responsible adults.
But I'm not a big fan of children as a species in any case...though there are a few individual kids in the world whom I happen to totally enjoy, as specific humans whom I really like. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Madame J
Joined: 15 Feb 2007 Posts: 239 Location: Oxford, United Kingdom
|
Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 7:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I prefer young children to adults, but I would take either of these over high school. From what I've heard, teenagers are by far the most difficult group to motivate.
My only experience with adults has been on my CELTA, but I enjoyed it far more than I'd anticipated. However, I still prefer kids. I'm naturally quite an energetic person with a strong sense of the ridiculous, so being in a play oriented teaching environment suits me down to the ground.
I have to say, I'm not entirely sure I know what middle school is? When I say I prefer elementary, I'm thinking of ages 4-11ish, and I think of "high school" as being 11-18ish. I might enjoy teaching middle school if I lived in a country in which such a system exists, but at present it's pretty alien to me. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
fluffyhamster
Joined: 13 Mar 2005 Posts: 3292 Location: UK > China > Japan > UK again
|
Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 8:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I don't really mind who I teach, as long as I'm given plenty of freedom to choose or create more interesting or appropriate materials and methods (set textbooks can be handy, but...), and the students are reasonably polite/not too rude (rude students should be shown the door by not only teachers but bosses too). That being said, kids IMHO really need a few years of elementary schooling in their L1 before they are capable of much in L1 let alone L2, and languages shouldn't be compulsory at middle/junior/secondary level (or if they are, they should be better/more imaginatively and engagingly taught - is it any wonder otherwise that student motivation can be low!). The most motivated students are generally going to be those who have elected (rather than been forced) to study a language, but unfortunately it isn't uncommon to find language school or university students who show little interest in, and therefore little apparent aptitude for, the language they are meant to be studying. (It is debatable if this is due to perceived deficiencies in teacher and/or method and consequent lack of respect, but one thing I do believe is that truly motivated students should be able to reach a reasonable level in a foreign language by themselves, simply by studying self-study/bilingual courses, and referring to dictionaries and grammars - conversing with a native speaker is the icing on the cake, with the proof of that pudding in the eating).
Bear in mind that I have mainly taught EFL in Japan, and China.
I imagine that MFL teaching in state schools in one's home country (for me, the UK) could be rewarding, but one would be much more aware (or made aware!) of the politics and politicking involved, which could get tiring. But the better pay (relative to TES(O)L and certainly TEFL) might make up for that. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
naturegirl321

Joined: 04 May 2003 Posts: 9041 Location: home sweet home
|
Posted: Thu Mar 05, 2009 1:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
I prefer either little ones, or bigger ones. But it depends on the culture. Middle school ASian kids are nothing like middle school Peruvians.
As far as motivation, I've seen it lacking here in Peru. Personally, teaching little kids, like 3 to 5 is easier in a way, they pick up the language SO fast. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
naturegirl321

Joined: 04 May 2003 Posts: 9041 Location: home sweet home
|
Posted: Thu Mar 05, 2009 1:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
fluffyhamster wrote: |
(It is debatable if this is due to perceived deficiencies in teacher and/or method and consequent lack of respect, but one thing I do believe is that truly motivated students should be able to reach a reasonable level in a foreign language by themselves, simply by studying self-study/bilingual courses, and referring to dictionaries and grammars - conversing with a native speaker is the icing on the cake, with the proof of that pudding in the eating). |
really? Have you seen people just learn a language from self study? Have you been able to achieve that? Thank goodness most of my students can't, or I'd be out of a job. Actually, it couldn't happen, most of my kids can't even read. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Shonai Ben
Joined: 15 Feb 2003 Posts: 617
|
Posted: Thu Mar 05, 2009 9:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
adults........more motivated and no discipline problems.......they also buy me beer.......  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
fluffyhamster
Joined: 13 Mar 2005 Posts: 3292 Location: UK > China > Japan > UK again
|
Posted: Thu Mar 05, 2009 1:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
naturegirl321 wrote: |
fluffyhamster wrote: |
(It is debatable if this is due to perceived deficiencies in teacher and/or method and consequent lack of respect, but one thing I do believe is that truly motivated students should be able to reach a reasonable level in a foreign language by themselves, simply by studying self-study/bilingual courses, and referring to dictionaries and grammars - conversing with a native speaker is the icing on the cake, with the proof of that pudding in the eating). |
really? Have you seen people just learn a language from self study? Have you been able to achieve that? Thank goodness most of my students can't, or I'd be out of a job. Actually, it couldn't happen, most of my kids can't even read. |
Well, like I said, kids in compulsory education generally aren't motivated, and even if they were, the input is usually insufficient in terms of quantity for a start.
I am actually beginning to wonder if there are any jobs which are strictly necessary and not just so much leeching off the taxpayer (I'm from the UK, remember - what a bloated public sector, 1 in 5 jobs now or something silly like that). People go to the doctor asking for magic bullets. Same thing like I implied above with more than a few so-called motivated students "actively" enrolling for "lessons" (i.e. to be told things they could often have found out for themselves). It doesn't help of course that not all native teachers have studied or will ever study (really look at) the language to even the extent that the lazier students do(n't). (Sorry, "rant" over).
As for my own language learning, I guess that the main chapter involved learning Chinese. I was nominally enrolled on a "postgrad" Mandarin course, but didn't attend much, other than to take progress tests and obviously any exams. Part of the reason for not attending was that I continued to buy plenty of reference materials and courses, so I had more than enough to be getting on with already, but another factor was surely that there were more than a few students who just couldn't seem to get to grips with even looking up (how to look up) Chinese characters, let alone the thought of actually reading and writing them to any level of proficiency - one student dropped out early on (ironically the guy who'd been awarded the only bursary!), whilst another continually fretted the whole way through and finally decided to not take the final exam. (So, whilst the practical "intricacies" of Chinese characters are seldom clearly or comprehensively explained, I think in this instance it was more a case of some people making mountains out of molehills than due to any absolute deficiency in the teaching. I just know that tempers were clearly fraying among the regular attendees when on one day I did attend, I simply observed and remarked, 'Oh, you've already studied such and such a point' - 'Yes, and we're not covering it again for your benefit!' immediately snarled someone whose patience had obviously already been exhausted by anyone and everyone but me! (Unsurprisingly, I really did drift back to my books after that, and took consolation in the fact that the one thing in the final exam that had really stumped everyone else including Mr Snarly there, hadn't stumped me - I mean, if you're studying Chinese, there really isn't any excuse to not be familiar with the characters for 'Confucius'!)).
Anyway, when I progressed onto TEFL in Shanghai, I somehow managed to at least find my way from the airport to the school unaided; more specifically, I could generally converse, get out and about, read and sing karaoke reasonably well, deal/argue with Immigration officials when they messed up (they lost my registration of address slip whilst renewing my visa) but wanted to blame me etc. Not to blow my own trumpet, but some level of proficiency can be attained largely under one's own steam - native speakers can't so much teach you what to say, but rather, just give the nod to what you yourself have learnt and said (learnt to say?). That is not to say however that a genuinely high level in a foreign language can be achieved without immersion, significant relationships etc. I guess I've had those too, but I still don't feel my Chinese is really "good enough" (for any and every practical everyday purpose) yet!
How do your own attempts at language learning compare, Naturegirl (or whoever else might like to reply)? 
Last edited by fluffyhamster on Mon Aug 31, 2009 9:35 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
MELEE

Joined: 22 Jan 2003 Posts: 2583 Location: The Mexican Hinterland
|
Posted: Fri Mar 06, 2009 12:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
I voted preschool, because I found that experience both fun and rewarding, but I've worked most of my professional life teaching university because it's more finacially rewarding.
Fluffy, your questions will lead this thread off topic, but WTH!
I started learning Spanish in highschool. I had teachers who made it fun and low pressure. I enjoyed it and did well, got to what I'd call a B1 (PET) level. And because I enjoyed it, majored in it in University. Learned some more formally, but then studied abroad. Learned TONS informally immersed in the language. Eventually married a Spanish speaker and learn WAY more, now would be at a Cambridge Proficency level in the language and sometimes have trouble using English. Certainly the places I really learned the language was without formal instruction. But the early formal instruction is what got me to the place both in language skills and in motivation to allow me to fly into it on my own.
I also studied Portuguese formally, and now can read a bit thanks to it's close realtionship to Spanish, can't speak it worth a hoot, haven't had the cause to try in over a decade. (Since leaving Japan, I actually used my Portuguese in Japan).
I learned some Japanese informally, but lacked the motivation to go beyond ordering in a restaurant, asking for directions and polite small talk. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
naturegirl321

Joined: 04 May 2003 Posts: 9041 Location: home sweet home
|
Posted: Fri Mar 06, 2009 1:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
fluffyhamster wrote: |
How do your own attempts at language learning compare, Naturegirl (or whoever else might like to reply)?  |
Started Spanish at age 12, studied all the way through uni, never really HEARD spanish until uni, all my other teachers taught spanish in english, go figure.
Went abroad to Spain, then went to live in China.
Forgot Spanish, learnt Chinese through immersion, the little kids don't understnad that you don't speak it.
Went to Peru, forgot Chinese, releanrt Spanish. Married a Peruvian. Became Peruvian, but I only speak Spanish on the street. All my students are Korean, so I speak English with their familes. And Spanish with my husband. I'll never be fluent. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
rmcdougall
Joined: 28 Feb 2009 Posts: 71
|
Posted: Fri Mar 06, 2009 4:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
Late teens to young adults has been, by far, my most rewarding teaching experience. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
coledavis
Joined: 21 Jun 2003 Posts: 1838
|
Posted: Sun Mar 29, 2009 4:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Adults. It's easier to start discussions when you can use current affairs, etc. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling. Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|