Site Search:
 
Get TEFL Certified & Start Your Adventure Today!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Next best TEFL courses after Trinity TESOL/CELTA
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Newbie Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
watl1



Joined: 18 Feb 2009
Posts: 10

PostPosted: Wed Mar 11, 2009 1:30 pm    Post subject: Next best TEFL courses after Trinity TESOL/CELTA Reply with quote

Hi all

My partner would like to spend a year in China teaching English. We have chosen this country as the rules regarding degree requirements are not as strict as other countries in Asia.

We have no TEFL experience and did plan on doing the Trinity TESOL. However, my partner has not been accepted due to his lack of education beyond high school.

We are only interested in a course that is over 100 hours in length and that has an element of teaching practice.

Can anyone recommend a suitable course in the UK (London area)? At the moment, the only one that seems to fit the bill is the i-to-i 120 hour one (http://www.i-to-i.com/tefl/weekend-tefl/course.html).

Any advice would be appreciated.

Thanks

Louise
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Chancellor



Joined: 31 Oct 2005
Posts: 1337
Location: Ji'an, China - if you're willing to send me cigars, I accept donations :)

PostPosted: Thu Mar 12, 2009 1:09 pm    Post subject: Re: Next best TEFL courses after Trinity TESOL/CELTA Reply with quote

watl1 wrote:
Hi all

My partner would like to spend a year in China teaching English. We have chosen this country as the rules regarding degree requirements are not as strict as other countries in Asia.

We have no TEFL experience and did plan on doing the Trinity TESOL. However, my partner has not been accepted due to his lack of education beyond high school.

We are only interested in a course that is over 100 hours in length and that has an element of teaching practice.

Can anyone recommend a suitable course in the UK (London area)? At the moment, the only one that seems to fit the bill is the i-to-i 120 hour one (http://www.i-to-i.com/tefl/weekend-tefl/course.html).

Any advice would be appreciated.

Thanks

Louise


Louise, I suggest that you go back and take another look at that i-to-i page you linked. The 120 hours is not an on-site course but is the combination of a 20-hour on-site weekend where you do teaching "practice" on other i-to-i students. The other 100 hours is from the 40-hour basic certification and a series of add-ons such as grammar, young learners, business English, etc.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Chancellor



Joined: 31 Oct 2005
Posts: 1337
Location: Ji'an, China - if you're willing to send me cigars, I accept donations :)

PostPosted: Thu Mar 12, 2009 1:10 pm    Post subject: Re: Next best TEFL courses after Trinity TESOL/CELTA Reply with quote

watl1 wrote:
Hi all

My partner would like to spend a year in China teaching English. We have chosen this country as the rules regarding degree requirements are not as strict as other countries in Asia.

We have no TEFL experience and did plan on doing the Trinity TESOL. However, my partner has not been accepted due to his lack of education beyond high school.

We are only interested in a course that is over 100 hours in length and that has an element of teaching practice.

Can anyone recommend a suitable course in the UK (London area)? At the moment, the only one that seems to fit the bill is the i-to-i 120 hour one (http://www.i-to-i.com/tefl/weekend-tefl/course.html).

Any advice would be appreciated.

Thanks

Louise


Louise, I suggest that you go back and take another look at that i-to-i page you linked. The 120 hours is not an on-site course but is the combination of a 20-hour on-site weekend where you do teaching "practice" on other i-to-i students. The other 100 hours is from the 40-hour basic certification and a series of add-ons such as grammar, young learners, business English, etc., all of which are done online.

Since you are looking in the London area, check out websites such as the ones linked below as they provide links to informaiton about various courses:

http://www.teachenglish.co.uk/
http://www.teflcourse.net/tefl-courses-locations/england/london/
http://www.teflinstitute.com/tefl-england.php

I would also suggest that your partner bite the bullet and go get a four-year college degree (even if through various accreditied universities' distance learning programs), since more and more countries require one just to get a work visa. China, from what I hear, isn't there yet but I suspect that it will eventually.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Justin Trullinger



Joined: 28 Jan 2005
Posts: 3110
Location: Seoul, South Korea and Myanmar for a bit

PostPosted: Thu Mar 12, 2009 3:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'd also do some re-applying. Maybe the Trinity center you applied to had a full course and made an excuse? Maybe your significant other did something to give the wrong impression in an interview?

There isn't a degree requirement for the Trinity cert that I know of. I did the same cert some years ago, and not everyone in our group had been to college.

Keep looking and get a decent qualification. THere will be a way.


I'll also seconf Chancellor's comment- start looking for ways to get a degree. Sooner or later, not having it will be a barrier to getting where you want to be.


Best,
Justin
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
watl1



Joined: 18 Feb 2009
Posts: 10

PostPosted: Sun Mar 15, 2009 12:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks all for your replies Smile

Yes, I knew the i-to-i course was part online but, as it inolved more than 100 hours of study, albeit online, I thought this would be acceptable to some organisations as it does have teaching practice. However, if I'm completely wrong with regard employers' requirements, please let me know!

Also, thanks for the links - I'm researching the courses one by one now Smile

I think a degree is definitely the way forward, so I've registered to start a distance psychology course in October and my partner is now looking at a few courses as well. He's going to call Trinity direct and speak to them regarding his chances before he applies for the same course with different colleges.

Fingers crossed!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
BenE



Joined: 11 Oct 2008
Posts: 321

PostPosted: Sun Mar 15, 2009 1:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi I've just done the CELTA and I'm just starting work now after finishing it. (I'll give more info about that once I've finished my first few weeks)

Can you compare a 100 hr course with 60 hours done online to the CELTA? No I really don't think you can.

The amount of time I had to put in OUTSIDE the 120 hours of teacher time on the course to make sure I was prepared and I studied the material and did research to compliement what I was doing face-to-face with the teacher would make the CELTA a lot longer if you included that element as well.

I personally am a strong supporter of the CELTA (ok! having done one) because the 120 hours IS 120 hours of being taught and getting feedback on what you are doing. Self study is an assumed part of it and you can't avoid doing the extra 3-4 hours a night self study required in order to get through the course.

i to i might well be a good introduction to the EFL world but I don't really see it as a comparable qualification.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
spiral78



Joined: 05 Apr 2004
Posts: 11534
Location: On a Short Leash

PostPosted: Sun Mar 15, 2009 1:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

watl1, just to clarify the 'teaching practice' i-to-i includes is not on actual students - it's really an insufficient approach to basic training.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Chancellor



Joined: 31 Oct 2005
Posts: 1337
Location: Ji'an, China - if you're willing to send me cigars, I accept donations :)

PostPosted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 2:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

watl1 wrote:
Thanks all for your replies Smile

Yes, I knew the i-to-i course was part online but, as it inolved more than 100 hours of study, albeit online, I thought this would be acceptable to some organisations as it does have teaching practice. However, if I'm completely wrong with regard employers' requirements, please let me know!

Also, thanks for the links - I'm researching the courses one by one now Smile

I think a degree is definitely the way forward, so I've registered to start a distance psychology course in October and my partner is now looking at a few courses as well. He's going to call Trinity direct and speak to them regarding his chances before he applies for the same course with different colleges.

Fingers crossed!
The problem with i-to-i is that the teaching practice is practice on other i-to-i students and not real ESL/EFL learners. Also, while i-to-i claims to be accredited, the so-called accrediting bodies are organizations that are pretty-much unknown and there is serious doubt about their qualifications to accredit courses. What exactly are the Open and Distance Learning Quality Council (ODLQC) and the Scottish Quality Management System (SQMS)? Are they really "highly respected and widely recognized" as i-to-i claims? And if so, by whom? Is ODLQC really "the British government's guardian of quality in open and distance learning" (implying that the British government is accrediting the i-to-i course)?

I don't have the objection to online learning that some others seem to have - particularly since more and more government-accredited universities are offering entire degree programs through online learning and the coursework in these university online degree programs is sometimes more rigorous than the same on-site courses in that the coursework is done on a compressed schedule (e.g. eight weeks instead of a full semester, though the course content is identical) - there is no substitute for teaching practice with real ESL/EFL students. There's a reason why getting a teaching license requires doing some student teaching: to make sure you can really teach. Apply the same principle to obtaining TESL/TEFL certification.

The course I completed was 250 hours that is recognized by the government of Canada (which may come in handy when the American economy finally collapses and China decides to collect on all those loans it keeps giving us). I'm trying to arrange to do the teaching practice (10 hours of observation followed by 10 hours of teaching real ESL students) through Buffalo Public Schools adult education because as I was on my way to Toronto to do the teaching practice, Customs Canada decided (wrongly) that I needed a work permit to do the teaching practice.

The TEFL industry is becoming a much more professional one. Gone are the days when a native-speaker with no teaching experience could just backpack his way across a continent and pay his way by teaching English. Countries and private schools are (rightly) starting to demand that teachers actually be qualified to teach. I suspect that the time will come when the qualifications for TEFL will be the same as the qualifications for TESOL in American, Canadian or British public schools.

By the way, why did you choose to start a psychology degree instead of, say, an education degree?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Justin Trullinger



Joined: 28 Jan 2005
Posts: 3110
Location: Seoul, South Korea and Myanmar for a bit

PostPosted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 3:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'll second what others have said. Even if you found a good i to i course, and I'm not sure that you have, that organisation is so well known for their short, distance, not-good courses, that the name "i to i" on your resume would hurt you.


Best,
Justn
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Chancellor



Joined: 31 Oct 2005
Posts: 1337
Location: Ji'an, China - if you're willing to send me cigars, I accept donations :)

PostPosted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 3:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

spiral78 wrote:
watl1, just to clarify the 'teaching practice' i-to-i includes is not on actual students - it's really an insufficient approach to basic training.
Yes, i-to-i's teaching practice is on fellow i-to-i students and not on real ESL/EFL students. Thus, it doesn't really cut it as "real" teaching practice. Imagine if you were pursuing a public school teaching license in, say, New York and your student teaching was done on other people pursuing a teaching license instead of on the kinds of students you are being licensed to teach. How much confidence would a prospective public school district or private school have in your ability to teach? Probably not much.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
liv



Joined: 10 Mar 2009
Posts: 8
Location: London

PostPosted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 5:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Just thought I'd add my two cents...
I'm a newbie looking to get my CELTA/TESOL qualification and teach abroad. I went along to an i-to-i seminar at the weekend (it was free so I thought I'd check it out).
When I asked about observed teaching practice at the weekend course (the only practical, non "distant" component of the I-to-I course, I was told that over the weekend you actually only get to teach your peers for ten minutes! This is regardless of how many of the online hours you do. Ten minutes to me seemed like a ridiculous amount of time and personally for me would in no way prepare me for a classroom of education-hungry students.
I personally would rather spend the extra money and get a TESOL/CELTA or other generic teaching course which will give me the confidence to know that I have had my teaching abilities critiqued. At the end of the day, it seems that the i-to-i course will just cost more in the long run. I also am of the belief that not just anyone should teach, as much as I want to teach, I also believe that the students I am teaching should benefit from the best possible teachers, therefore the assessment in the longer courses for me seems like the best way to ensure that you're actually helping rather than hindering the people you go on to teach.
Just my opinion...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Chancellor



Joined: 31 Oct 2005
Posts: 1337
Location: Ji'an, China - if you're willing to send me cigars, I accept donations :)

PostPosted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 7:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

liv wrote:
Just thought I'd add my two cents...
I'm a newbie looking to get my CELTA/TESOL qualification and teach abroad. I went along to an i-to-i seminar at the weekend (it was free so I thought I'd check it out).
When I asked about observed teaching practice at the weekend course (the only practical, non "distant" component of the I-to-I course, I was told that over the weekend you actually only get to teach your peers for ten minutes! This is regardless of how many of the online hours you do. Ten minutes to me seemed like a ridiculous amount of time and personally for me would in no way prepare me for a classroom of education-hungry students.
I personally would rather spend the extra money and get a TESOL/CELTA or other generic teaching course which will give me the confidence to know that I have had my teaching abilities critiqued. At the end of the day, it seems that the i-to-i course will just cost more in the long run. I also am of the belief that not just anyone should teach, as much as I want to teach, I also believe that the students I am teaching should benefit from the best possible teachers, therefore the assessment in the longer courses for me seems like the best way to ensure that you're actually helping rather than hindering the people you go on to teach.
Just my opinion...
Yes, certification really needs to include at least six hours of teaching practice with real ESL/EFL students. But beyond looking at whether a course meets/exceeds the "industry standard" (100-120 course hours and six hours of supervised teaching practice with real ESL/EFL students), one should really look at the qualifications of the course instructors and look at the accrediting bodies (and whether they're qualified to accredit courses).

In the alternative, one could pursue a degree in TESL/TEFL (usually a master's) and teacher certification, or one can pursue one of those certificate programs from various universities like the ones below:

http://www.ce.columbia.edu/tesol/
http://www.american.edu/tesol/certific.html
http://www.lin.ufl.edu/tesl/gradtesol.html
http://www.wal.org/tesl/programs/certificate.html
http://www.abu.nb.ca/TESL/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
KoreaLifer



Joined: 19 Mar 2009
Posts: 8

PostPosted: Fri Mar 20, 2009 3:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Just to play devil's advocate,

I can see taking a CELTA if you plan to teach adults in a Europe, a CELTA training center, or nation that follows the British system, but in all honesty, there are few places around the world I know of where it helps you earn more than jobs without it. In fact, most nations that are willing to accept a CELTA and pay you more money for having it don't pay well anyway (or are restrictive places where most wouldn't want to teach -- like Saudi).

The CELTA is an excellent course for hands-on training, but it's very expensive, and in my opinion, over-marketed. If you plan on teaching in the EU, then it's a good feather in your cap, but it will not secure you a true job in a state school (nothing noteworthy I'm aware of, anyway). In the USA, your resume will meet the rubbish bin with just a CELTA and no proper state certifications.

If I were you, and cared about becoming a true licensed educator, I would consider completing a full 2 to 4 year teaching degree program from a proper university. In Canada, you can complete a teachers college program in a year or so. At the very least, an MA/TESOL will be worth far more and pay dividends in the future.

If you have no confidence in your teaching ability, and need the help, then a CELTA can be a quick/intensive way to learn. It's very expensive, however, and the (don't take this too negatively) inbred trainers can be somewhat stuck on themselves and their methods.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Justin Trullinger



Joined: 28 Jan 2005
Posts: 3110
Location: Seoul, South Korea and Myanmar for a bit

PostPosted: Fri Mar 20, 2009 5:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
there are few places around the world I know of where it helps you earn more than jobs without it.


True enough. But there are lots of places where it's easier to get jobs with a certificate qualification than without.

I'm not a CELTA disciple. I have a Trinity cert and have for several years been a cert level teacher trainer. Nobody is more aware than I am of the limitations of certificate qualifications. But it's a place to start.

And I guess it's a pretty important place to start. Most people won't invest in a Masters in a field they've never tried.

And while you're "trying," your students will get better value out of a cert qualified teacher than an unqualified teacher.



Best,
Justin
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Chancellor



Joined: 31 Oct 2005
Posts: 1337
Location: Ji'an, China - if you're willing to send me cigars, I accept donations :)

PostPosted: Fri Mar 20, 2009 5:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Justin Trullinger wrote:
Quote:
there are few places around the world I know of where it helps you earn more than jobs without it.


True enough. But there are lots of places where it's easier to get jobs with a certificate qualification than without.

I'm not a CELTA disciple. I have a Trinity cert and have for several years been a cert level teacher trainer. Nobody is more aware than I am of the limitations of certificate qualifications. But it's a place to start.

And I guess it's a pretty important place to start. Most people won't invest in a Masters in a field they've never tried.

And while you're "trying," your students will get better value out of a cert qualified teacher than an unqualified teacher.



Best,
Justin
What I think some people (not you) miss is that this certification (CELTA, Trinity, whatever) is really entry level training. It should be looked at as a foundation on which to build further training and experience (experience is still one of the best teachers).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Newbie Forum All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Teaching Jobs in China
Teaching Jobs in China