View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
haopengyou
Joined: 02 Mar 2009 Posts: 197
|
Posted: Tue Apr 07, 2009 5:02 am Post subject: Exclusivity clauses |
|
|
I read a website for ...can't think of the name of the school now...that said that their teachers could not work at any other schools. Is this common? I was hoping to take about any job that came up and moonlight over the next year to find another position to leapfrog to after the first year is up. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Glenski

Joined: 15 Jan 2003 Posts: 12844 Location: Hokkaido, JAPAN
|
Posted: Tue Apr 07, 2009 9:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
It's a clause that comes up from time to time. Hard to say if it's truly common.
Ignore it. It is unenforceable. Just don't advertise you work elsewhere. Employers can't tell you what to do in your off-time unless it hinders the work you do with them.
Even more ridiculous is the clause that you might see which says you can't work within a certain radius of the school or even within Japan for a certain number of months or years after you leave that employer! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
starteacher
Joined: 25 Feb 2009 Posts: 237
|
Posted: Tue Apr 07, 2009 10:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
Ignore it. It is unenforceable.....
...Even more ridiculous is the clause that you might see which says you can't work within a certain radius of the school or even within Japan for a certain number of months or years after you leave that employer!
|
Do you have the legalities of these, such as website link, etc . Thanks. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Glenski

Joined: 15 Jan 2003 Posts: 12844 Location: Hokkaido, JAPAN
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
G Cthulhu
Joined: 07 Feb 2003 Posts: 1373 Location: Way, way off course.
|
Posted: Tue Apr 07, 2009 11:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Glenski wrote: |
It's a clause that comes up from time to time. Hard to say if it's truly common.
Ignore it. It is unenforceable. Just don't advertise you work elsewhere. Employers can't tell you what to do in your off-time unless it hinders the work you do with them.
Even more ridiculous is the clause that you might see which says you can't work within a certain radius of the school or even within Japan for a certain number of months or years after you leave that employer! |
Hang on.... they can have a non-competition clause effective while you are employed by them. That's perfectly legal (unless the law's changed in the last few years).
Post employment no-competes are unenforceable, as are "no-other-employment-of-any-kind-while-employed-by-us" clauses. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Glenski

Joined: 15 Jan 2003 Posts: 12844 Location: Hokkaido, JAPAN
|
Posted: Wed Apr 08, 2009 3:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
G Cthulhu wrote: |
Hang on.... they can have a non-competition clause effective while you are employed by them. That's perfectly legal (unless the law's changed in the last few years). |
Didn't say it was illegal, just unenforceable.
Do you really believe / agree with such clauses for an industry such as EFL? I can see such for pharmaceutical and IT giants, and especially for executives, but for teachers of English in Japan...?
Post employment no-competes are unenforceable, as are "no-other-employment-of-any-kind-while-employed-by-us" clauses.[/quote] |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
G Cthulhu
Joined: 07 Feb 2003 Posts: 1373 Location: Way, way off course.
|
Posted: Thu Apr 09, 2009 12:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
Glenski wrote: |
Do you really believe / agree with such clauses for an industry such as EFL? I can see such for pharmaceutical and IT giants, and especially for executives, but for teachers of English in Japan...?
|
During employment? Yes, certainly. I have no problem with the concept or practice in almost any industry.
Post employment? I generally object to them, but can see them having a place from the trade secrets point of view and one or two other aspects. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
firehorseglass
Joined: 07 Apr 2009 Posts: 8
|
Posted: Sat Apr 11, 2009 9:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi Haopengyou,
I had something similar. I think their main objective is that they don't want you teaching and making money with someone who's local when they could be making money too. If you were to give someone some private tuition in a cafe or at your apartment and asked them to keep quiet, who would know? You could do an hour-long session where you ask a student to research a BBC article, say. Obviously you shouldn't use materials belonging to your main employer, but I'm sure you wouldn't anyway.
As for not working in the vicinity after your contract ends, you're often not allowed to teach ex-students for up to one year post leaving. That makes sense though 'cos if you leave yu might take some of the students with you, and an eikawa is till a business, after all.
Keep it quiet and watch how you advertise. Avoid boards - try word-of-mouth. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Glenski

Joined: 15 Jan 2003 Posts: 12844 Location: Hokkaido, JAPAN
|
Posted: Sat Apr 11, 2009 11:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
G Cthulhu wrote: |
Glenski wrote: |
Do you really believe / agree with such clauses for an industry such as EFL? I can see such for pharmaceutical and IT giants, and especially for executives, but for teachers of English in Japan...?
|
During employment? Yes, certainly. I have no problem with the concept or practice in almost any industry. |
Then how are you on the simple concept of part-time work? The majority of uni teachers here are PTers, and if they are told they can't work for another school at the same time, they would be out of business. The same holds for lots of other places.
Quote: |
Post employment? I generally object to them, but can see them having a place from the trade secrets point of view and one or two other aspects. |
And what trade secrets does the EFL industry have? None. Schools that tell you you can't work in the same area (including city!) for 1-3 years are crazy. (and yes, I've heard reports of all those) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mr_Monkey
Joined: 11 Mar 2009 Posts: 661 Location: Kyuuuuuushuuuuuuu
|
Posted: Sun Apr 12, 2009 12:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
firehorseglass wrote: |
As for not working in the vicinity after your contract ends, you're often not allowed to teach ex-students for up to one year post leaving. That makes sense though 'cos if you leave yu might take some of the students with you, and an eikawa is till a business, after all. |
This is misleading - a clause like that in a contract is simply not enforceable in any way. If anything, it's there in order to fool the signatory in to a position where they won't compete with the school after they leave. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
cornishmuppet
Joined: 27 Mar 2004 Posts: 642 Location: Nagano, Japan
|
Posted: Sun Apr 12, 2009 3:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
They do it everywhere. My contract at the bank I worked at in England said no other employment. I assumed it was because they didn't want me turning up tired from being up half the night serving in a bar or something.
It's a stupid clause but like others have said, unenforceable and ignorable. Practically everyone I know, ALTs at least - with the evenings free - do private classes regardless of what it says in their contract. If you're getting taxed elsewhere it might be a problem but if its cash in hand on the quiet your employer are unlikely to find out unless someone snitches on you. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
wayne432
Joined: 05 Jun 2008 Posts: 255
|
Posted: Mon Apr 13, 2009 2:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think a lot of places do it because they don't want you stealing students away. If good teachers change to a different school that's close by, a good amount of students could follow.
Same with private lessons... some students might quit if they like what they're getting on the side. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
kojimoji
Joined: 15 Jan 2009 Posts: 13
|
Posted: Wed Apr 15, 2009 11:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yep, mine has the exclusivity clause as well... I don't know how strict Japan is about enforcing it because I haven't left the states yet, but if you make Japanese friends in the city who are willing to pay cash... what's the harm in a few lessons on the side?
I think it's kind of silly to forbid private lessons, but I understand why they need to say that in the contract. I know a woman who taught in Tokyo and made $50 a lesson (one hour)--- it's the best job, she just sat and chatted with people in coffee shops. I think many Japanese people need practice talking to English speakers because they are mainly taught to read and write but not speak it as much. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Glenski

Joined: 15 Jan 2003 Posts: 12844 Location: Hokkaido, JAPAN
|
Posted: Thu Apr 16, 2009 4:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
Just chatting is not a lesson IMO. It's paid chatting.
A lesson is when someone actually tries teaching something. Want to chat and learn? The teacher should point out vocabulary, pronunciation, grammar, etc. as the student speaks (or asks questions).
Just chatting is IMO the worst kind of "lesson". Seen too many "teachers" do this, and they monopolize the "conversation" so that the student is just gaping and listening. Are they actually learning? Nobody knows if you don't somehow test them, and having a real 2-way conversation does exactly that, but just chatting itself is pretty thin. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Apsara
Joined: 20 Sep 2005 Posts: 2142 Location: Tokyo, Japan
|
Posted: Fri Apr 17, 2009 1:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
kojimoji wrote: |
I know a woman who taught in Tokyo and made $50 a lesson (one hour)--- it's the best job, she just sat and chatted with people in coffee shops. I think many Japanese people need practice talking to English speakers because they are mainly taught to read and write but not speak it as much. |
Kojimoji, probably just about everyone on this forum who is/has been in Japan has done this at some point or is still doing it. I used to, but I got tired of it after a few years and also started to feel embarrassed about "teaching" in coffee shops, plus the students can be very fickle as far as cancelling and "forgetting" to pay. It can be useful for some extra change, but I wouldn't call it "the best job" at all.
Also, the whole eikaiwa industry here is based on the idea that Japanese people need practice talking to English speakers because they don't learn communicative skills at school. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|