View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Julieanne
Joined: 18 Mar 2004 Posts: 120
|
Posted: Tue May 12, 2009 4:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yes Justin but as the internet grows and technology improves you have to be more open minded to online certification. As a matter of fact many more schools accept it than they did a few years ago even. It is like saying people should not have web meetings or teach online via Skype because in person is better. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Justin Trullinger

Joined: 28 Jan 2005 Posts: 3110 Location: Seoul, South Korea and Myanmar for a bit
|
Posted: Tue May 12, 2009 4:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
I think though that in general nobody can comment about any TEFL company unless they have taken the course. We have lost the focus of whether the course is good or not. |
Not entirely true; many of us are capable of forming opinions from secondary as well as primary sources.
The fact that any given course (and I agree with you that some are very similar) makes misleading claims is clearly something we can form opinions about.
Best,
Justin |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
spiral78

Joined: 05 Apr 2004 Posts: 11534 Location: On a Short Leash
|
Posted: Tue May 12, 2009 4:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It's not just the hours- it's the lack of supervised classroom practice. Substandard in the region where I have worked the past 12 years.
Sorry. Fact. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Julieanne
Joined: 18 Mar 2004 Posts: 120
|
Posted: Tue May 12, 2009 4:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Where is that spiral?
Justin we will have to agree to disagree as to what constitutes an opinion about a course. You have to take it and also see if said course provides you with a job before really being able to critique. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
naturegirl321

Joined: 04 May 2003 Posts: 9041 Location: home sweet home
|
Posted: Tue May 12, 2009 4:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Julieanne wrote: |
spiral I agree but as I said at the beginning of the post SeriousTEFL is adding a 120 hour course by the end of the month. I inquired about this a few weeks ago and I wrote [email protected] if you want to write her and verify this |
Will that include 6 hours of teaching practice? If not, than it's not very legit. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
spiral78

Joined: 05 Apr 2004 Posts: 11534 Location: On a Short Leash
|
Posted: Tue May 12, 2009 4:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Western/Central Europe, Julianne. It's a lot of territory. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Julieanne
Joined: 18 Mar 2004 Posts: 120
|
Posted: Tue May 12, 2009 4:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Not certain about that naturegirl, I suppose you could write them and ask them if you do not see it on the site itself which I don't. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Julieanne
Joined: 18 Mar 2004 Posts: 120
|
Posted: Tue May 12, 2009 4:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
spiral I have heard there are some good courses in that region, not true? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
spiral78

Joined: 05 Apr 2004 Posts: 11534 Location: On a Short Leash
|
Posted: Tue May 12, 2009 5:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yes, the standard is 120 hours on site and including the teaching practice. Some generic courses do meet the standard - some are a bit dodgy. But employers in general here don't look favorably on on-line certs - you can read up on this on the country-specific forums. I recall one specific thread on the Poland forum about a guy with an online cert and his job search (which was ultimately successful, but he ended up with a dodgy employer after a very long discouraging search). |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
spiral78

Joined: 05 Apr 2004 Posts: 11534 Location: On a Short Leash
|
Posted: Tue May 12, 2009 5:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ultimately, my own (relatively educated on the subject) opinion about Serious Teachers is that it's not (serious). I would never recommend such a course to a newbie, or inflict a teacher with this kind of 'training' on paying students. My opinion as a career teacher with 12+ years of experience, and having worked on three different training courses, and being involved currently with both training and hiring. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Justin Trullinger

Joined: 28 Jan 2005 Posts: 3110 Location: Seoul, South Korea and Myanmar for a bit
|
Posted: Tue May 12, 2009 5:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
Justin we will have to agree to disagree |
We did that long ago. But as long as we both represent our opinions here, we'll also have to continue to defend them.
Can I ask you some questions?
Here goes:
Is it okay to use another organisation's logo without permission?
My answer is that it isn't. Even if the organisation doing it is advertising a good product, it isn't okay.
Is it okay to do something wrong just because others also do it?
Again, I'd say no.
Is it okay to offer bad products, just because you also offer good products?
Because this seems to be what you're arguing- by saying "they're going to get a 120 hour course!" you seem to be saying that this makes their fallacious advertising of other course okay. It doesn't.
LAst question- have you, yourself, taken the SeriousTEFL course? When did you take it? I ask, because if it's like most courses, content and methodology change from time to time. Frankly, unless you've taken it very recently, you may not know as much about the current course as you think.
Best,
Justin. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Justin Trullinger

Joined: 28 Jan 2005 Posts: 3110 Location: Seoul, South Korea and Myanmar for a bit
|
Posted: Tue May 12, 2009 5:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
Yes Justin but as the internet grows and technology improves you have to be more open minded to online certification. |
I've been fairly clear- on this thread, I'm addressing misleading publicity on the part of online course providers.
I am not opposed to distance learning. I am not opposed to technology. I regularly use the internet for a wide range of communication, and am currently enrolled in a distance post-graduate degree program.
My question is about the validity of certain courses and the claims they make, not about the potential validity of distance learning.
In my previous post, I asked some questions...
Best,
Justin |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
BenE

Joined: 11 Oct 2008 Posts: 321
|
Posted: Tue May 12, 2009 6:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Julianne what is the world of TEFL course sales like?
I looked at what you have posted and it seems like you have quite a history of posting for some small websites probably run from the same location offering small time courses for new 'TEFL seeking' people.
I will jump straight to some questions:
Can you tell me if a course with seriousTEFL is comparable or better than the three main courses I mentioned beforehand (CELTA, Trinity TESOL and SIT) and why?
How does an online cert sucessfully teach the techniques required to teach in a class? How does it also substitute the the more practical approach of a student actually teaching a class?
I am eager to hear your reply. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
naturegirl321

Joined: 04 May 2003 Posts: 9041 Location: home sweet home
|
Posted: Wed May 13, 2009 3:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
For me, the simple fact that they use "serious" in their name, means that they shouldn't keep taken serously. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Justin Trullinger

Joined: 28 Jan 2005 Posts: 3110 Location: Seoul, South Korea and Myanmar for a bit
|
Posted: Thu May 14, 2009 8:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Further thoughts on SeriousTEFL.
Since I first posted on this thread, the NAFSA logo has gone, and stayed gone, from the ST website. THere is, however, a link to NAFSA's website in the space where the logo used to be. Sort of implying the same thing, but without the logo. (Which is wouldn't be legal to use.)
THe IATEFL logo, I swear, disappeared off the website for a few days, then re-appeared. I don't know what's up with that.
Another poster also implied that perhaps ST, and others, had permission to use these logos, and I wanted to clarify.
I didn't just guess that they don't. The IATEFL and NAFSA websites make completely clear that they do not "recognise" courses.
But to be double-sure, I wrote to both organisations; both responded that they would be writing to ST and asking for their logos to be taken down.
I wonder if they did. And I wonder why it hasn't yet worked, at least not entirely.
Best,
Justin |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|