View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
roywebcafe
Joined: 13 Jan 2006 Posts: 259
|
Posted: Fri Jun 26, 2009 6:33 pm Post subject: Re: Taking the P i s s Re: clearance requirments |
|
|
If you want to know about taking the piss read my post on Police clearance checks regarding overseas work in this forum. This is about a demand made by teaching agencies which also provide Adult ESOL work
SueH wrote: |
I've just seen an advertisement for a post in London offering �9 an hour.
Taking into account prep and general hanging around time that works out at about minimum wage...
Sorry about the language in the title, but really it sums the situation up.
Any comments, anybody? |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
kserasera
Joined: 04 Dec 2008 Posts: 16
|
Posted: Sat Jul 11, 2009 7:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I make 9 pounds an hour, and to be honest when i factor in the cost of living in this city etc - I made more money and enjoyed my quality of life in Istanbul a lot more. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sharter
Joined: 25 Jun 2008 Posts: 878 Location: All over the place
|
Posted: Fri Sep 25, 2009 3:31 pm Post subject: erm |
|
|
LSI Portsmouth about 17 quid and hour.
BEET Bournemouth about 16 quid and hour.
I couldn't care less as I work on a 6 and 3 rotation in the oil field teaching adults on a good salary with all expenses paid.
From what I've seen of UK language schools, they're full of women whose husbands have better jobs....oh and summer school backpackers who couldn't care less cos they're at it with all the students for a couple of months before heading off somewhere else. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Will.
Joined: 02 May 2003 Posts: 783 Location: London Uk
|
Posted: Fri Sep 25, 2009 7:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Here is something you might like to cut and paste and send back to the colleges you think pay too little.
Well I think it about time we started to expose the language schools we all so love to deride to the other side of the coin to those institutions flouting the tightwaddedness of the cheapskates by making an offer simply expecting us to work for much more than they do.
For this money I might apply myself
From jobs.ac.uk.
Those offering a decent wage this day...
LSBU
English Language Development Support Classes
Centre for Learning Support & Development
http://www.jobs.ac.uk/jobs/JZ068/Hourly_Paid_Lecturers/
�42.63 per hour
Cover teacher
Now weep. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Persuasion
Joined: 16 Sep 2009 Posts: 11 Location: East of Acton
|
Posted: Sat Sep 26, 2009 10:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
I found this the other day - a real slagging off for the private EFL schools in the UK, which compares teaching EFL in the UK to playing football in the third division.
http://tefltradesman.blogspot.com/2009/09/play-tefl-and-enjoy-life-in-3rd.html
Plenty of food for thought, anyway. I must say I just might follow the advice given - become a 'real' teacher and work in a state school, and thus make a proper living instead of the 11 quid an hour (330 a week!) my current boss thinks I'm worth. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
SueH
Joined: 01 Feb 2003 Posts: 1022 Location: Northern Italy
|
Posted: Sat Sep 26, 2009 2:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Slightly inaccurate only insofar as the fact that 3rd division football in the UK is sometimes watched by crowds of above 20000, and players are on thousands a week. I'd have said it's more like the women's football league I used to play in where we bought our own kit and paid match subs. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sharter
Joined: 25 Jun 2008 Posts: 878 Location: All over the place
|
Posted: Sun Sep 27, 2009 10:41 am Post subject: harrumph |
|
|
Women's football? What's that? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
SueH
Joined: 01 Feb 2003 Posts: 1022 Location: Northern Italy
|
Posted: Sun Sep 27, 2009 5:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I do hope you aren't a teacher. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mozzar
Joined: 16 May 2009 Posts: 339 Location: France
|
Posted: Sun Sep 27, 2009 7:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
For those teaching in the UK: do you have a CELTA or a masters? I'd agree that if you have a masters you should be able to earn as much as a state school teacher but if you only have a CELTA there's no reason you should be paid as much as you haven't had to do half the work that state school teachers have required.
A months training for a job doesn't really qualify you for any exceptional wage, especially not when you're in a market such as the British ESL one. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Persuasion
Joined: 16 Sep 2009 Posts: 11 Location: East of Acton
|
Posted: Mon Sep 28, 2009 5:49 am Post subject: Celtas and Deltas |
|
|
I agree with you, Mozzar. But I think you'll find that many EFL teachers with Diplomas, Masters and even PGCEs are currently working for less than 15 quid an hour - which is actually LESS than I earned in London around 12 YEARS AGO!! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sharter
Joined: 25 Jun 2008 Posts: 878 Location: All over the place
|
Posted: Mon Sep 28, 2009 10:22 am Post subject: harrumph |
|
|
The key things are ability and experience. The point about EFL is that you don't get paid any more for having tonnes of either.
I don't agree that a PGCE qualified teacher should necessarily earn more...it should be based on competency and experience.
I didn't do an MA because I looked at various courses and found that many where simply a load of 'normative' tosh.
PGCEs require lots of practical input which is nothing more than experience.
I've taught in state schools, EFL schools, universities and companies and the most creative teachers I've ever seen have been EFL teachers.
Let's face it; most of the paperwork you have in state schools is a load of tosh and guiding students through exams which get easier every year is hardly something worth shouting about. Let's not even mention the holidays state school teachers get or the pension schemes.
I have no complaints as I work in an oil company training centre and earn quite a lot, but I've heard that 'when are you going to become a real teacher' bull for 15 years and no-one has yet explained to me why a French teacher in the UK should be treated differently to an English language teacher in the UK.
Then again...teachers can be a snotty bunch of Guardian reading know-it-alls can't they? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mozzar
Joined: 16 May 2009 Posts: 339 Location: France
|
Posted: Mon Sep 28, 2009 11:23 am Post subject: Re: harrumph |
|
|
sharter wrote: |
The key things are ability and experience. The point about EFL is that you don't get paid any more for having tonnes of either.
I don't agree that a PGCE qualified teacher should necessarily earn more...it should be based on competency and experience.
|
A PGCE is a bigger investment, it means an extra year spent studying (and getting into debt) followed by a year of observed teaching. The teachers that come out of this are likely to be a lot more qualified from the get go than a CELTA qualified person (such as myself).
Quote: |
PGCEs require lots of practical input which is nothing more than experience.
|
But it's observed input by experienced teachers, thus helping those being observed become better teachers. Everyone goes on about how important observed teaching is in the month long TEFL course because by having your teaching observed you can become a better teacher.
Also, i would say that many of the teachers do have a greater understanding of learning within the state school system - they haven't been studying teaching for a year to be left with the same knowledge as someone who has 'experience'. No doubt experience is important, but an early education in teaching methods plus experience is vastly better.
Quote: |
I've taught in state schools, EFL schools, universities and companies and the most creative teachers I've ever seen have been EFL teachers. |
Most creative, but most effective? And arguably state school teaching is different to language teaching so takes a different approach.
Quote: |
Let's face it; most of the paperwork you have in state schools is a load of tosh and guiding students through exams which get easier every year is hardly something worth shouting about. Let's not even mention the holidays state school teachers get or the pension schemes. |
Try taking this to a PGCE's teacher's forum and see the responses. I can't imagine they'll be good.
Quote: |
I have no complaints as I work in an oil company training centre and earn quite a lot, but I've heard that 'when are you going to become a real teacher' bull for 15 years and no-one has yet explained to me why a French teacher in the UK should be treated differently to an English language teacher in the UK.
|
They get paid more because they've invested more in their education and have stricter course guidelines than lanuage teachers (normally). They're job is also more than just teaching, for example they're a support for the kids and deal with their problems.
Likewise, when i gain my masters i will expect a pay increase because i will have spent two years learning how to teach more effectively. Rather than having to try out new methods repeatedly to find the best, i will learn what are some of the best teaching methods and be able to apply them straight away. A better education should mean better pay and more opportunities. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sharter
Joined: 25 Jun 2008 Posts: 878 Location: All over the place
|
Posted: Mon Sep 28, 2009 3:38 pm Post subject: Couldn't disagree more. |
|
|
Competency and experience are worth so much more than having a piece of paper.
Learning about Chomsky, Krashen and Prahbu will not make you a more effective teacher. Reading about debates between Cognitivists and Behaviouralists is interesting, but again won't make you more competent in the classroom. Some teachers can get as many pieces of paper as you can possibly accumulate, but they are still 'poor' educators. Spending tonnes of money on your education doesn't mean you deserve a higher salary; by that rationale just about anyone who went to private school isn't earning enough! Teachers who perform well should be paid more. The question is;what criteria do you use to measure performance?
GCEs (old A-levels) are without a doubt easier than they were. I left school in 1988 and the cleverest chap at our school, currently an Oxford Professor, only took four A-levels. Now people take 5 and 6 and get A grades in everything. In my day that was rare indeed and I went to a major league UK public school. Therefore teachers should be judged on something more than exam results and that's where experience comes in and the state school pay spine.
No doubt it's a complex issue worth the debate, but why should someone teaching French get paid more than someone teaching English? Answer that. Let's face it;teaching in state school you just follow a curriculum and the course books are there on lists, so you won't have much of a say in the approach you use as that will be largely determined by the coursebooks and syllabus.
I wish all teachers got paid more. Amen. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Phil_b
Joined: 14 Oct 2003 Posts: 239 Location: Back in London
|
Posted: Mon Sep 28, 2009 5:54 pm Post subject: Re: Couldn't disagree more. |
|
|
sharter wrote: |
Competency and experience are worth so much more than having a piece of paper.
Learning about Chomsky, Krashen and Prahbu will not make you a more effective teacher. Reading about debates between Cognitivists and Behaviouralists is interesting, but again won't make you more competent in the classroom. Some teachers can get as many pieces of paper as you can possibly accumulate, but they are still 'poor' educators. Spending tonnes of money on your education doesn't mean you deserve a higher salary; by that rationale just about anyone who went to private school isn't earning enough! Teachers who perform well should be paid more. The question is;what criteria do you use to measure performance?
|
I would suggest that is more of a problem with some Masters courses, A PGCE is not perfect, but it does cover both the theory and the practical application of those theories in the classroom. As regards investment, I don't think it's about finance - it's about how much work you put into it, and how much you learn from it. A PGCE is doubtlessly a greater commitment that a CELTA.
Whether or not exams are easier does not change the fact that the results are far more important than in the past. Lifewise, paperwork probably is a load of tosh, but that doesn't reduce it's effect on workload.
However, you are certainly right when you suggest that all things being equal, there is no reason why a French teacher should earn more than an English teacher.... We just need a bigger market for PGCE level English teachers! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mozzar
Joined: 16 May 2009 Posts: 339 Location: France
|
Posted: Mon Sep 28, 2009 6:43 pm Post subject: Re: Couldn't disagree more. |
|
|
sharter wrote: |
Competency and experience are worth so much more than having a piece of paper. |
Certainly. But if you have a bit of paper and the competency due to the fact that you've trained for a year rather than four weeks, i know who i'd rather employ/pay more.
Quote: |
No doubt it's a complex issue worth the debate, but why should someone teaching French get paid more than someone teaching English? Answer that.
|
Are we talking ESL teachers or public school English teachers? I imagine for the former it's about training and for the second it would be about demand. It's why maths and science teachers get paid more - their skills are rarer.
Quote: |
Let's face it;teaching in state school you just follow a curriculum and the course books are there on lists, so you won't have much of a say in the approach you use as that will be largely determined by the coursebooks and syllabus.
|
I'd disagree. You could have a huge difference in how two teachers decide to teach a book or concept. It's the same in ESL; you're given a course book but you don't just read from it, you bring in other materials or exercises to help the students learn.
Quote: |
I wish all teachers got paid more. Amen. |
We can definately agree on that. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|