|
Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
squirk
Joined: 03 Dec 2009 Posts: 33
|
Posted: Sat Jan 02, 2010 3:36 pm Post subject: QU Incidents |
|
|
As a newbie in the English department, I am very worried about a strange practice called the Faculty Incidence Report system (FIR). Basically, if you do something stupid (usually out of ignorance or not having been informed or having someone squeal on you), ou get hauled into the boss for the dumbest things. If you challenge it, he becomes very confrontational. There is a whole surveillance team watching your every move. I have never worked in such a bizarre place; some teachers are quitting, including newbies, as the monitoring, workload, agenda, and attitude are not really workplace friendly. Teachers have been told that their evaluation will be affected by this FIR thing. The FIR goes into your file forever!! The ironic thing is that teachers are supposed to be given a verbal warning about problem areas but these people don�t even follow their own guidelines. Why not? Another strange thing is waiting until Christmas to tell people if they�ve had their contracts renewed. Teachers are complaining this is a tactic to upset people. Why? What is the motive? I don't get it. Don't ask questions is what one teacher was told. The housing is really bad, we live in a state of siege in a compound full of teenage hoodies. Some people are trying to move but it ain't easy.
Has anyone else ever worked in a place with this FIR thing? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
veiledsentiments

Joined: 20 Feb 2003 Posts: 17644 Location: USA
|
Posted: Sat Jan 02, 2010 4:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Every university has its own system of reporting "incidents," but most involve something being put in writing into your files... permanently. If you feel that it was unjust or incorrect, you could request that you be able to have included in writing your side of the incident. One rarely wins these little debates with management... wherever one works (everywhere in the world)... and one always has to be very careful how one disputes it. We have only your side, so it is hard to say whether you provoked the confrontation.
Obviously if you want a clarification of your departmental rules, this board is not the place to ask. Ask your management.
As to notification of contract renewal, QU is one of the earliest notifiers. Many employers wait until late February or March... and some don't bother until just before summer leave. Most notify soon after the start of the second semester. So, you are complaining because they notify people early?
VS |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lollaerd
Joined: 03 Jul 2009 Posts: 337
|
Posted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 12:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| veiledsentiments wrote: |
As to notification of contract renewal, QU is one of the earliest notifiers. Many employers wait until late February or March... and some don't bother until just before summer leave. Most notify soon after the start of the second semester. So, you are complaining because they notify people early?
VS |
In fact, if QU lets people know the at the end of December, then this is very late notification for Qatar universities. Letting people know around Christmas seems very Scroogy. The 6 universities at Ed City ask for expressions of intent in November. Then you get your renewal after that's been processed. These universities do not have a habit of firing people like QP and QU. This is why you don't hear about any complaints, apart from ABP which has a different system. Even they ask their teachers pretty early about their intent. They treat the teachers well so people stay instead of quitting. The only place people have had complaints about has been the ABP and that is partially due to the fact that they have had a lot of directors since they opened. There seems to be some stability now although the department head is not very popular. Of course the worst offender for late notification has to be QP/Imtiaz/Griffith. Nobody can beat them! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lollaerd
Joined: 03 Jul 2009 Posts: 337
|
Posted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 12:25 pm Post subject: Re: QU Incidents |
|
|
| squirk wrote: |
| As a newbie in the English department, I am very worried about a strange practice called the Faculty Incidence Report system (FIR). |
The only incident reports I've ever heard of are either technical incident reports, equipment incident reports, or accident incident reports. A few years ago, when I was still at QP, about 4 or 5 contract teachers who had been fired from QU turned up. I got pretty friendly with one of them who said that the renewal system at QU was very unfair and discriminatory. These teachers were all very angry and very bitter as they felt they had been unfairly fired. The guy I got to know seemed pretty intelligent and used a lot of innovative ideas in teaching. He was never really told why he was fired even though he asked; he said they didn't want to tell him. He also talked about the crime/punishment mentality that was pervasive; he personally felt the head actually enjoyed watching people and making reports on them and recounted a couple of 'incidents' when he had been 'spied on' to use his expression.
It seems like this FIR system is a continuation of that way of thinking. I remember the teacher (and his friends corroborated this) telling me the man in charge was really into 'punishment' for small sins. I suppose this man thinks 'punishment' is the best way to manage his teachers. However as all good and effective teachers know, punishment doesn't work, just ike it doesn't work with students. People don't like threats or the idea of threats; it just makes everyone resentful and angry. I agree it is a very 'dumb' way to run things. The work environment and atmosphere must be very paranoid if people have to worry about these FIR documents going into their file and being used as an excuse to fire them.
At least, we didn't have anything quite like this at QP and I have never worked in a place that did. If the system says it has a verbal warning stage, then it seems strange that they don't bother to use it. If you want to solve a problem, first you tell someone there is a problem. If it doesn't get solved then maybe you take it a step further. None of the former QU teachers had anything good to say about the place although they did claim it was way better under some Sudanese guy. A lot of QP people laughed when they heard that because at QP the Sudanese are not known as the best administrators. But then again, it's likely that the QP system broke them down too.
It seems like this FRI business is just another example of pen-pushing, form-filling, document-filing management style that so many people seem to use and even enjoy. (What a way to get your thrills!!) In my opinion, this type of thing is nothing more than a feeble excuse for lack of real management skills. These types of people just love to file documents because it makes them look like they are busy. But are they really? And busy doing what? I have a management position now and I certainly deal with my people on a one-to-one basis, we iron out our problems and try to resolve issues and problems like civil responsible adults; I don't treat my staff as children and they aren't afraid of me. The system is called MR - mutal respect. I don't write reports and file them away to use them as a threat or as punishment. This kind of approach is counter-productive as any management trainer will tell you. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
veiledsentiments

Joined: 20 Feb 2003 Posts: 17644 Location: USA
|
Posted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 6:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Written reports of problems like this is standard in US universities, so I expect that most of those establishments out in University City have a similar type of thing. Whether there is an official form with a special name is rather moot - it could be a mere memo. As an employee, if my employer has a problem with me or something I did, I want to see it in writing and be able to write my side of the story... and I want it in my file, so that a new manager isn't depending on the departmental grapevine for the story a couple years later when contract renewal is coming up.
We are all familiar with the fellow(s) and all their various screen names who got 'not renewed' or whatever 5 or so years ago. They really do need to get over it. We've all known and worked with teachers who got the ax who could never understand why... but all the rest of us knew. Sometimes it is just a personality clash with a supervisor or a class, but that is why written reports are such a good idea. You can't then say that you didn't understand what you were doing that management didn't approve of...
I still stand by my opinion that December is more than fair for notification of renewal or non-renewal. At universities in Oman, the UAE and Kuwait, I got mine in January or February at best. It is rather unfair to compare notification time at QU with its EFL staff of well over 100 teachers to most of the small places out in university city which have a handful of EFL teachers. And those that whinged that it wasn't nice to tell you near Christmas would have whinged at how late it was if they had waited until after the first of the year.
Here I was thinking that you were Wilbur... but you are starting to sound like the socks...
VS |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lollaerd
Joined: 03 Jul 2009 Posts: 337
|
Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2010 5:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| veiledsentiments wrote: |
| Written reports of problems like this is standard in US universities, so I expect that most of those establishments out in University City have a similar type of thing. Whether there is an official form with a special name is rather moot - it could be a mere memo. As an employee, if my employer has a problem with me or something I did, I want to see it in writing and be able to write my side of the story... and I want it in my file, so that a new manager isn't depending on the departmental grapevine for the story a couple years later when contract renewal is coming up. VS |
You've raised some good points. My point is whether filing one of these FIR things is necessary for a trivial incident. I still think that there should be a one-to-one talk before anything gets put in writing. If the system calls for a verbal warning first, then the system should be followed. If the incident is more serious, then just maybe a report is warranted. The poster didn't mention what the incident was about but it seems as though he thinks it is trivial and is ticked off about it. I've never met the person he refered to but anyone who has worked at QP knows those former QU teachers who joined IMTIAZ a few years ago were steaming about what had happened to them. You can kind of dismiss one person's comments - but four teachers??? And they all said the same thing. Another QU guy turned up later after I'd left. He likes his tipple and has said some pretty dark remarks about the department and its system. The one guy I personally knew left the country years ago, long before these issues arose. He used to feel sorry for us QP sloggers. I feel sorry for the QP sloggers. Nobody has been as badly treated as they have been.
If you are referring to Education City, all of the universities there follow standard administration practices used in their parent university in the US. All staff are treated the same, there are no special rules for English teachers. The ABP is an exception to this and have their own system as they do not have a parent institution sponsoring them.
On another note, Wilber is busily doing his MA in Linguistics in California and is still sore about what happened last summer at QP. It will take him some time to get over it. I sort of took over his byline (having been a freelancer for one of the local rags until they stopped using freelancers -budget constraints they said). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
millie18
Joined: 23 Oct 2007 Posts: 185
|
Posted: Tue Jan 05, 2010 5:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
But aren't most of the teaching faculty at the US universities from the home campus? So it's not really a matter of a contract renewal, especially if these people have tenure.
They also have recourse to a grievance procedure (and labour laws) in the US should they have a dispute, or am I misinformed on that?
Very different from being employed on a 2 or 3 year contract subject to the whim and whimsey of sometimes unpredictable management (not necessarily at QU - but I've seen it happen in Oman and UAE)
As for notification - I was surprised when I was told I was renewed before December - I've always been told in late January/early February in the past as have friends working at other tertiary institutions in the GCC. |
|
| Back to top |
| |