|
Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Joachim
Joined: 01 Oct 2003 Posts: 311 Location: Brighton, UK
|
Posted: Thu Apr 08, 2004 6:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
What I am saying, Scot47 is that WE, as teachers shouldn't tolerate discrimination in our profession.
Howvwer, as it is such a transient profession, few ESL teachers seem to care one way or another.
And, just our of interest - which of Articulate Inc's posts/"basic premises" do you disagree with?? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
articulate_ink

Joined: 06 Mar 2004 Posts: 55 Location: Hong Kong
|
Posted: Thu Apr 08, 2004 7:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
Joachim wrote: |
And, just our of interest - which of Articulate Inc's posts/"basic premises" do you disagree with?? |
I'm kind of curious about that, myself. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
scot47

Joined: 10 Jan 2003 Posts: 15343
|
Posted: Thu Apr 08, 2004 11:33 am Post subject: homos |
|
|
articulat_ink : "I know lots of people think homosexuality is at best a fetish and at worst a sin, and as such, us homos ought not to marry, expect civil rights, etc. I completely get that. I also wanted to be clear that I'm not interested in hearing from the idiots who think and feel that way."
You know where the lines are drawn so do not play the innocent.
Do you really expect the rest of the world to accept your interpretation of what is "right", "Good" "moral" and "desirable" ? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
shmooj

Joined: 11 Sep 2003 Posts: 1758 Location: Seoul, ROK
|
Posted: Thu Apr 08, 2004 12:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Albulbul, we've gone over being PC in the world of TESorFL before on this forum so we don't really need to go there. Life is simply not PC despite our deepest desires that it be so. Descrimination is too loaded a word for anyone to agree on when it is taking place or not. This is because it is a morally loaded word and in our post-modern society, morality has little to anchor itself on. The plus side of this is that anything goes and the negative is that anything goes.
As for what Scot47 may be taking issue to, I think it is very obvious. The OP started out by saying that he did not want to hear from anyone who held a point of view wherein he is labelled in terms he finds offensive. While we can all empathise with this dearly held wish, this appeal to dam the tide of bigotry is self-defeating because, alas, it is in itself bigoted.
IOW, by insisting on silencing others' views, no matter how despicable we may find them, we are in fact surrendering any right to demand that we are heard ourselves. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
johnslat

Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 13859 Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
|
Posted: Thu Apr 08, 2004 12:28 pm Post subject: Amen |
|
|
Dear shmooj,
Yours may well be the most rational, clear-headed message posted so far on this thread (with the possible exception of all of mine, of course).
Regards,
John |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
fat_chris
Joined: 10 Sep 2003 Posts: 3198 Location: Beijing
|
Posted: Thu Apr 08, 2004 4:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
shmooj wrote: |
IOW, by insisting on silencing others' views, no matter how despicable we may find them, we are in fact surrendering any right to demand that we are heard ourselves. |
For all the US citizens out there, Shmooj identified:
THE FIRST AMENDMENT!
Or not? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
scot47

Joined: 10 Jan 2003 Posts: 15343
|
Posted: Thu Apr 08, 2004 7:24 pm Post subject: idiots |
|
|
"I'm not interested in hearing from the idiots who think and feel that way."
You disagree with people, call them idiots and thus dispense with the need for discussion !
Who is the bigot now, Mr articulate_ink ? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
articulate_ink

Joined: 06 Mar 2004 Posts: 55 Location: Hong Kong
|
Posted: Fri Apr 09, 2004 4:32 am Post subject: Re: homos |
|
|
scot47 wrote: |
articulat_ink : "I know lots of people think homosexuality is at best a fetish and at worst a sin, and as such, us homos ought not to marry, expect civil rights, etc. I completely get that. I also wanted to be clear that I'm not interested in hearing from the idiots who think and feel that way."
You know where the lines are drawn so do not play the innocent.
Do you really expect the rest of the world to accept your interpretation of what is "right", "Good" "moral" and "desirable" ? |
I've been thinking about the direction this debate has taking. The irony is that my own comments seem to have sent it into the very direction I wanted to avoid.
If I made any mistake up front, it was taking a slightly proprietary view of this thread. I was looking for specific information, either from other gay folks who have experienced ESL teaching in these countries firsthand, or from people who have... well, who have a clue. After reading some of the appalling comments in the "Gay or a stud" thread in the Korea general discussion forum, I thought I might pre-empt some of that here. And it has backfired.
Calling people who do not understand basic information about sexual orientation, but think they do (whether it's out of sheer ignorance, or for religious reasons, or both), "idiots" was using too strong a term. I'll admit that. Part of being a minority (of whatever sort) entails constantly finding oneself in a position of having to educate others, whether one wants to or not. Sometimes one has to be gracious even while grinding one's teeth. I'm sure that's something everyone out there in ESL-land can relate to.
On the other hand, the issue is being blown way out of proportion, the inferences various people have made about me are bizarre, and this thread will devolve into a pis$ing contest if it keeps going like this. Somebody jumped to the conclusion that I'm trying to squelch debate, stifle free speech, and god knows what else. The First Amendment of the US Constitution was invoked. It has been suggested that I might not fare well in other cultures. Calm down, folks. I went a little overboard in thinking I could avoid the sort of cl*sterf*ck the "Gay or a stud" thread turned into, but I think the point is that once the posts are out there, they're out there, and people are free to react to them as they will. I can't control that and shouldn't have tried. Mea culpa.
And here's the part where I will not back down. Arguing about sexual orientation is about as useful as arguing about handedness, eye color, or race. It's that simple. But what's this about my interpretation of what's right, wrong, etc? What's there to interpret? Anyone who's presumably not gay and trying to argue the point with someone who is, as if the former might possibly know more on the subject than the latter, is out of their league. It's presumptuous. It's asinine. It happens often enough, but that doesn't mean the arguer knows what (s)he is talking about. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
scot47

Joined: 10 Jan 2003 Posts: 15343
|
Posted: Fri Apr 09, 2004 4:44 am Post subject: asinine ? |
|
|
"It's presumptuous. It's asinine. It happens often enough, but that doesn't mean the arguer knows what (s)he is talking about." (articulte_ink)
You are at it again, just after retracting the "idiot" label. If you wish to engage in dialogue, dispense with the insults. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
articulate_ink

Joined: 06 Mar 2004 Posts: 55 Location: Hong Kong
|
Posted: Fri Apr 09, 2004 7:15 am Post subject: Re: asinine ? |
|
|
scot47 wrote: |
"It's presumptuous. It's asinine. It happens often enough, but that doesn't mean the arguer knows what (s)he is talking about." (articulte_ink)
You are at it again, just after retracting the "idiot" label. If you wish to engage in dialogue, dispense with the insults. |
I believe I've said everything I have to say on the subject. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
yaramaz

Joined: 05 Mar 2003 Posts: 2384 Location: Not where I was before
|
Posted: Fri Apr 09, 2004 8:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
Can we re-start this thread under the assumption that no slight was intended and that the OP merely wanted relevant, informed advice rather than unnecessary negative comments about his sexuality?
Please shake hands now, boys, and go back to your corners. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
shmooj

Joined: 11 Sep 2003 Posts: 1758 Location: Seoul, ROK
|
Posted: Fri Apr 09, 2004 9:06 am Post subject: Re: homos |
|
|
articulate_ink wrote: |
I've been thinking about the direction this debate has taking. The irony is that my own comments seem to have sent it into the very direction I wanted to avoid. |
Funny that
Quote: |
Part of being a minority (of whatever sort) entails constantly finding oneself in a position of having to educate others....Anyone who's presumably not gay and trying to argue the point with someone who is, as if the former might possibly know more on the subject than the latter, is out of their league. |
No argument has taken place here... but I have sure been educated. Thanks articulate...
To take yaramaz's cue, Korea is definitely not the place for you. Far too many "idiots" here who are into "arguing"
Sure, there are "idiots" in Japan, but they don't tend to "argue"
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Brooks
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Posts: 1369 Location: Sagamihara
|
Posted: Sat Apr 10, 2004 1:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
as far as I know, the gay scene in Tokyo is in Shinjuku.
From what I have heard, gays are becoming accepted in Japan. It is probably easier to be gay in Osaka, Tokyo, or Kyoto, than out in the country.
I know of one woman from Tokyo who is a lesbian and her mother wanted her to marry a man. So she had to meet men picked by her mother. But of course she wasn`t interested. The mother would cry and wish her daughter was straight.
I work with some gays.
I think it is easier for them to fit in to the Japanese work culture, since they are not married and don`t have children. So, they can devote themselves to their jobs.
I would probably say that my employer is gay friendly. But I wonder if they have a don`t ask, don`t tell policy. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
SueH
Joined: 01 Feb 2003 Posts: 1022 Location: Northern Italy
|
Posted: Sat Apr 10, 2004 7:31 pm Post subject: Re: asinine ? |
|
|
scot47 wrote: |
"You are at it again, just after retracting the "idiot" label. If you wish to engage in dialogue, dispense with the insults. |
I am sure art_I would have no problems in engaging in dialogue, but I suspect that he has found that attempting to engage in dialogue with bigots is a counter-productive and pointless exercise, and that his initial statement was merely reflecting that. (I stand to be corrected).
I don't think Scot quite appreciates that minorities are vulnerable and not a threat, even when their behaviour is overt. Most of us learn that there is far too much grief around to be completely open in our behaviour, and it leads to the sort of practical questions that intigated this thread.
I think I'm probably bisexual, but mainly with a lesbian orientation. I can assure you that as I'm a loyal, romantic monogamist , in practice that means I'm asexual, or at least for the last 8 years. The reaction and behaviour of many men does nothing to encourage me towards heterosexual behaviour. The opportunity given to others by the original post to express such sheer hostility, under the guise of balance and 'anti-PC' opinions tends to confirm me in my views. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
shmooj

Joined: 11 Sep 2003 Posts: 1758 Location: Seoul, ROK
|
Posted: Sun Apr 11, 2004 2:13 am Post subject: Re: asinine ? |
|
|
SueH wrote: |
I don't think Scot quite appreciates that minorities are vulnerable and not a threat, even when their behaviour is overt. |
ETA, IRA, Al-Qaida etc are hardly harmless. I think you forget SueH that everyone starts out as a minority. History often bears out that it is often by being overt that they become majorities.
...but I'll come clean. I too am part of a minority group - I'm what others label as a "born-again Christian" I'm constantly misunderstood, prejudiced against, ignored, side-lined, laughed at and taunted. I have been ever since I decided to follow Christ at the age of 14 or so. I got it at school, I get it at work. It is part of the deal. The decision to follow Christ has alienated family members against me, drawn invective and ridicule from them and been exceptionally painful at times. But I wouldn't trade it for the world.
Why? Because I counted the cost when I made my decision and I live with that cost every day. It is my joy and delight and I accept it gladly because that is part of being a follower of Christ - in fact it confirms my identity and reassures me. "Rejoice when you are persecuted for My sake..."
I am labelled a bigot constantly because I have non-negotiable beliefs which, while not ramming them down anyone's throat, I refuse to abandon because they are an essential part of my identity in Christ. The label "bigot" is a post-modern one. Those who make claims to Truth have to, by definition, be narrow-minded. The post-modern culture that most of us on this board have grown up in has no room for this and so has no time for us. Ironically, I do not find myself labelled in this way when I dialogue even with the most vehement believer in Islam.
My beliefs are far more open to the label bigot than what a homosexual believes because I claim that what I believe is what everyone should believe. I don't know any homosexual who would claim that. I'd like to know if the OP believes I am therefore bigotted. If so, he will find we share membership of the same club.
So, I encounter "dialogue" similar to the OP. I expect this but I cannot under any circumstances tell people who differ from me that their opinion is worthless. I cannot, as the OP did, stop it dead in its tracks at the outset of our exchange. If I claim to love the person, I will therefore value and hear out their opinion even if it is poles apart from what I believe. I am free then, having heard them, to comment on it and either support or disagree with it. But I cannot close them down simply because they are offensive to me. If I did, there would be extremely few people I could ever talk to and I would contradict the very belief to love others that is part of my identity.
The problem that most misunderstood minorities have I believe is that they refuse to accept the hostility of others with love and understanding and instead react with hostility themselves as the OP demonstrated. By doing so, they alienate themselves from the very people they would wish to see support them.
As the man I love and follow said, "Take the plank out of your own eye before you deal with the speck in your brother's."
Happy Easter everyone - and NO, I'm not talking bunnies and eggs! New life available to all... PM for details  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling. Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|