View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
razorhideki
Joined: 19 Jan 2010 Posts: 78
|
Posted: Wed Jun 16, 2010 10:32 am Post subject: Two years and out! Standard practice? |
|
|
A long time Dave's poster recently claimed that it was "fairly standard" practice for Japanese employers to stipulate that after a time period "you're outta here!" Even by Japanese standards this seems like cruelty/ madness-any truth to this? If you're doing a good job, why do this? Or is it terror at the thought of actually paying someone 300,000 K/mo. and enrolling them in shakai hoken(gasp! horror!).
I'm NOT talking about JET-I'm well aware of its age/time limit restrictions. I'm wondering about non-JET gigs. Last time I was in Japan, I knew of eikaiwa types(poor souls!) who'd been w/the same outfit for a decade. Universities/colleges? Don't know. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
flyer
Joined: 16 May 2003 Posts: 539 Location: Sapporo Japan
|
Posted: Wed Jun 16, 2010 1:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
well I am not JET and I have been at my place for 6 going on 7 years and they want me to stay longer!
I would say its case by case |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Glenski

Joined: 15 Jan 2003 Posts: 12844 Location: Hokkaido, JAPAN
|
Posted: Wed Jun 16, 2010 10:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It's pretty standard for FT uni teachers to be on a 3-year contract. It might get renewed once. Can't say what the norm is for uni PTers.
Other jobs, though, I don't see that employers get rid of teachers in 1 or 2 years. I'm sure it happens, but I don't think it's the norm.
Westgate has 3-month contracts and until recently, I thought those were non-renewable, but I think they are changing a bit. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Sweetsee

Joined: 11 Jun 2004 Posts: 2302 Location: ) is everything
|
Posted: Wed Jun 16, 2010 10:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Flyer got it right: case by case. If they want to they can keep you and if not they tell you it's two and out. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
fujisan
Joined: 24 Jun 2010 Posts: 42
|
Posted: Sat Jun 26, 2010 9:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think that that policy is kind of stupid. After working there for two years you'd be pretty good at teaching according to whatever style they wanted. If they bring in teachers every year or two they'd take a few months to get up to speed, don't you think?
Just my opinion anyway. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
razorhideki
Joined: 19 Jan 2010 Posts: 78
|
Posted: Sat Jun 26, 2010 6:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
fujisan: "that policy is kind of stupid."
You are a neophyte then, mate? No shame in that-we all were once.
Here's a little primer as to how the Japanese(non-JET) EFL employer mentality works:
School manager #1(Mr. Nakamura): Well, luckily their contracts are almost up. Sure, they were cheap-no airfare, high rents for our crap apartments, 200K/mo., no registration in NHI, etc., but...
School manager #2(Mr. Yamamoto): Quite right Nakamura-san. [But] those 20-something barbarians were useless...no teaching credentials, experience and they seemed to be more interested in travelling & partying than teaching our students.
#1: Hmmm...let's look at the new applicants' resumes. Hmmmm...he's 45, has a teaching certificate, a TEFL & 10 years EFL experience...hmmmm...he wants(gasp!)275/mo., paid airfare and enrollment in NHI!
#2: Gasp! We can't afford that! I know! Let's hire more frat boys/girls at the starvation levels! They must be handsumu/pletttyyy!
#1: Mr. Yamamoto, how could I run this outfit without you!? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Glenski

Joined: 15 Jan 2003 Posts: 12844 Location: Hokkaido, JAPAN
|
Posted: Sat Jun 26, 2010 11:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
This article is less of a tongue-in-cheek answer, too.
http://www.eltnews.com/features/special/2004/01/the_power_of_perceptions_a_loo.html
In its beginning, pay attention to this section:
In the book, Teach English in Japan, (Wordell and Gorsuch, 1992), Des Aulier lists ten grievances he feels underscore problems teachers face within the private ELT industry in Japan (p. . The following is an abbreviated list illustrating some of these grievances:
1. Don't ask what the company can do for you, but what you can do for the company.
2. Don't exercise any creative teaching initiative without authorization from the business management.
3. Don't worry too much about teaching (no one is concerned that you were a physical education major); just be popular with the students.
4. Remember: Your Japanese bosses know best about English teaching-and almost everything else. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
saloc
Joined: 04 Jul 2003 Posts: 102
|
Posted: Sun Jun 27, 2010 1:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If you are doing an okay job, the vast majority of schools will want to hang on to you. One of the biggest complaints about eikaiwas is turnover of staff. It can be expensive to recruit teachers, it takes time for them to settle in and the last thing most school want is for them to up and leave just when they are getting good at their job. Many schools might not want to pay you as much as you would like, but I think there are very few that actually want their teachers to leave after a few years. Not sure about the reasoning behind the three-year university positions, but certainly in eikaiwa, most schools want to hang on to competent teachers. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
steki47
Joined: 20 Apr 2008 Posts: 1029 Location: BFE Inaka
|
Posted: Mon Jun 28, 2010 4:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
saloc wrote: |
One of the biggest complaints about eikaiwas is turnover of staff. It can be expensive to recruit teachers, it takes time for them to settle in and the last thing most school want is for them to up and leave just when they are getting good at their job. |
When I worked PT at a small eikaiwa, some students complained about the high turnover of the teachers. In some ways it reflected poorly on foreigners in general, but some students started to realize that maybe the school wasn't so good at encouraging people to stay.
From my own experience as a trainer/manager at Nova, I found it tough to manage a group of 3-4 teachers who were constantly quitting/transferring. We spent months training a teacher and giving them more responsibility in the branch just to have 80% of them quit after one contract. The river of employees made it virtually impossible to build any sense of professionalism or teamwork.
Now I work at a very small juku/eikaiwa with just one teacher: me. The owner teaches the juku side and I handle the eikaiwa division. We talk directly about testing, curriculum, etc. Night and day. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Okonomiyaki
Joined: 17 Aug 2010 Posts: 28 Location: Thailand at the moment
|
Posted: Thu Sep 09, 2010 10:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'm surprised that everyone's overlooking the obvious.
YES, eikaiwas (small private English conversations schools) will likely want to hold onto you for years, if you're a decent teacher.
NO, that's not the only kind of job in Japan. A recent big trend in Japanese employment is that only the core 10% of a company's employees will actually be full time permanent staff of that company. The remainder are "paato taimu / arubaito".
The words "paato taimu" and "arubaito" are both misleading. It's not part time work-- it's classic "temp" work, but for years rather than quick fill-in work while some regular employee is off being sick or having a baby. "Arubaito" comes from the German word "Arbeit", meaning "work"-- and again, in its native language it's not an accurate description of this class of work.
In paato taimu / arubaito, you're not employed directly by the office in which you work. Let's say you work in Toyota's head office: you're a trusted accountant, and roughly 5% of the people who come to work in that office are Toyota company members. You, and most of the other workers, however, are employed by a TEMP AGENCY that sends you to Toyota's office every day for years. You're permanent staff, but you're not an employee of Toyota. Toyota has no pension or firing or HR burden to maintain for you-- all that responsibility, Toyota has offloaded to the "temp agency". And after that number of years have passed, even if you're a good worker you get dumped.
Naturally, the government says "Hey, if a guy is working for you for yeeears, stop calling him a 'temp' at some point. Start treating him like a regular, full-time, permanent employee." And...that's the cutoff date for every worker that goes to Toyota to work, but is getting paid by that temp agency.
Gone are the sweeeet days when Japanese companies asked for and delivered loyalty, to the point where the job was likely "yours for life".
In the New Japan, almost all the jobs are anxiety-riddled temp jobs, with low salary and zero to inspire long-term economic confidence.
So...yeah, English teacher jobs too are on the "arubaito / paato taimu" plan, and it sucks. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
starteacher
Joined: 25 Feb 2009 Posts: 237
|
Posted: Thu Sep 09, 2010 4:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Glenski wrote: |
1. Don't ask what the company can do for you, but what you can do for the company. |
I'm sure I must have heard this quote from some well known US President, except the company bit was for something slightly larger.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Never Ceased To Be Amazed

Joined: 22 Oct 2004 Posts: 3500 Location: Shhh...don't talk to me...I'm playin' dead...
|
Posted: Thu Sep 09, 2010 4:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Oh! And DON'T marry the women folk!!!
NCTBA |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
rxk22
Joined: 19 May 2010 Posts: 1629
|
Posted: Fri Sep 10, 2010 2:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
saloc wrote: |
If you are doing an okay job, the vast majority of schools will want to hang on to you. One of the biggest complaints about eikaiwas is turnover of staff. It can be expensive to recruit teachers, it takes time for them to settle in and the last thing most school want is for them to up and leave just when they are getting good at their job. Many schools might not want to pay you as much as you would like, but I think there are very few that actually want their teachers to leave after a few years. Not sure about the reasoning behind the three-year university positions, but certainly in eikaiwa, most schools want to hang on to competent teachers. |
Well what if anything do these companies do to keep people? My co doesn't have raises or anything nice like that. I don't see any reason to stay. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
rxk22
Joined: 19 May 2010 Posts: 1629
|
Posted: Fri Sep 10, 2010 3:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Okonomiyaki wrote: |
I'm surprised that everyone's overlooking the obvious.
YES
Gone are the sweeeet days when Japanese companies asked for and delivered loyalty, to the point where the job was likely "yours for life".
In the New Japan, almost all the jobs are anxiety-riddled temp jobs, with low salary and zero to inspire long-term economic confidence.
So...yeah, English teacher jobs too are on the "arubaito / paato taimu" plan, and it sucks. |
I have thought about this a lot too. Seems Japanese companies still demand the loyalty from their workers, but they are no longer fulfilling their half, ie stability. Wonder how long the workers will do a full @$$ed job in this situation?
I'd hate to be a recent grad in Japan. Just scary. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Hoser

Joined: 19 Mar 2005 Posts: 694 Location: Toronto, Canada
|
Posted: Thu Sep 16, 2010 9:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
rxk22 wrote: |
saloc wrote: |
If you are doing an okay job, the vast majority of schools will want to hang on to you. One of the biggest complaints about eikaiwas is turnover of staff. It can be expensive to recruit teachers, it takes time for them to settle in and the last thing most school want is for them to up and leave just when they are getting good at their job. Many schools might not want to pay you as much as you would like, but I think there are very few that actually want their teachers to leave after a few years. Not sure about the reasoning behind the three-year university positions, but certainly in eikaiwa, most schools want to hang on to competent teachers. |
Well what if anything do these companies do to keep people? My co doesn't have raises or anything nice like that. I don't see any reason to stay. |
Normally I would agree with you-pay raises are great. But with these deflationary times I would say that most people (well Japanese anyways) are facing pay CUTS for next year-not pay RAISES. Now bear in mind that the previous statement is purely anecdotal. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|